Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function
Tissue flossing aims to improve range of motion (ROM), reduce pain, and enhance injury prevention. However, evidence is lacking regarding its effects. Therefore, this study examined the effects of flossing on hamstring muscles function in comparison to dynamic stretching (DS). Seventeen healthy youn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of sports science & medicine 2020-12, Vol.19 (4), p.681-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | Journal of sports science & medicine |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Kaneda, Hiroaki Takahira, Naonobu Tsuda, Kouji Tozaki, Kiyoshi Kudo, Sho Takahashi, Yoshiki Sasaki, Shuichi Kenmoku, Tomonori |
description | Tissue flossing aims to improve range of motion (ROM), reduce pain, and enhance injury prevention. However, evidence is lacking regarding its effects. Therefore, this study examined the effects of flossing on hamstring muscles function in comparison to dynamic stretching (DS). Seventeen healthy young men ([mean ± SD] age, 23.2 ± 1.1 years; height, 1.72 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 63.5 ± 9.3 kg) volunteered as subjects in this randomized crossover trial. The subjects received flossing, DS, and control interventions in random order at least 1 week apart to eliminate the influence of the previous intervention. Flossing involved passive twisting and active movement using a floss band (Sanctband COMPRE Floss Blueberry, Sanct Japan Co., Ltd.). DS was performed for 4 minutes in 30-second sets consisting of 15 repetitions of 2 seconds stretching. The following were measured before and after each intervention: straight leg raise (SLR) test, passive knee extension (KE) test, passive torque, passive stiffness, fascicle length in the biceps femoris long head as an indication of hamstring muscles flexibility, and maximal isometric knee flexion contraction, maximal eccentric knee extension/flexion contraction, rate of force development, and muscle activity. Flossing yielded significant improvements in the SLR test (mean difference in post-intervention changes between interventions: 5.4°, percentage change from pre- to post-value: 13.4%, p = 0.004), passive KE test (6.2°, 4.5%, p < 0.001), passive torque at end-ROM (3.8 Nm, 4.7%, p = 0.03), and maximal eccentric knee flexion contraction (14.9% body weight, 8.2%, p = 0.03) than control. Moreover, flossing yielded 2.1-fold greater improvements in the passive KE test (3.8°, 4.5%, p = 0.03) and yielded significant improvements in the maximal eccentric knee extension contraction (29.9% body weight, 13.8%, p = 0.02) than DS. Therefore, flossing on hamstring muscles is more beneficial than DS with respect to increasing ROM and muscle exertion. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7675630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A649131425</galeid><sourcerecordid>A649131425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g498t-48f655d7930de722ed530192533f5a37ca35514a0124c06c1a364d94ba4961a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CX0CRkBAcUsWfiS9I1dJtKy3dQ8vZcp1J1pVjl9hG9N_jVQvdoB4qH-wZP_NaM69fFYeI1KTCgrev984HxVEIt3WNGcPt2-KAEEyEoOiw2Jz2PegYSt-X1yaEBOXK-hCMG0rluvLbvVOj0eVVnCDq7S7tXXmuxhCnXfA9BW0hlKvkdDTevSve9MoGeP-4L4ofq9Pr5Xm13pxdLE_W1UBFGyva9pyxrhGk7qDBGDpGaiQwI6RnijRaEcYQVTXCVNdcI0U47QS9UVRwpBBZFF8fdO_SzQidBhcnZeXdZEY13UuvjJzfOLOVg_8lG94wnueyKD4_Ckz-Z4IQ5WiCBmuVA5-CxJRTXnPS8Ix-_A-99WlyuT2JWYNFk2cpnqhBWZDG9T6_q3ei8oRTgQiiub1FcfwMlVcHeczeQW9yflbwZVaQmQi_46BSCPLi6vLFbHu2nrPVc6z21sIAMpu13Mz5T3v8FpSN2-Bt2pke5uCHfWf-WfL3z5E_N4jNMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572973999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kaneda, Hiroaki ; Takahira, Naonobu ; Tsuda, Kouji ; Tozaki, Kiyoshi ; Kudo, Sho ; Takahashi, Yoshiki ; Sasaki, Shuichi ; Kenmoku, Tomonori</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaneda, Hiroaki ; Takahira, Naonobu ; Tsuda, Kouji ; Tozaki, Kiyoshi ; Kudo, Sho ; Takahashi, Yoshiki ; Sasaki, Shuichi ; Kenmoku, Tomonori</creatorcontrib><description>Tissue flossing aims to improve range of motion (ROM), reduce pain, and enhance injury prevention. However, evidence is lacking regarding its effects. Therefore, this study examined the effects of flossing on hamstring muscles function in comparison to dynamic stretching (DS). Seventeen healthy young men ([mean ± SD] age, 23.2 ± 1.1 years; height, 1.72 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 63.5 ± 9.3 kg) volunteered as subjects in this randomized crossover trial. The subjects received flossing, DS, and control interventions in random order at least 1 week apart to eliminate the influence of the previous intervention. Flossing involved passive twisting and active movement using a floss band (Sanctband COMPRE Floss Blueberry, Sanct Japan Co., Ltd.). DS was performed for 4 minutes in 30-second sets consisting of 15 repetitions of 2 seconds stretching. The following were measured before and after each intervention: straight leg raise (SLR) test, passive knee extension (KE) test, passive torque, passive stiffness, fascicle length in the biceps femoris long head as an indication of hamstring muscles flexibility, and maximal isometric knee flexion contraction, maximal eccentric knee extension/flexion contraction, rate of force development, and muscle activity. Flossing yielded significant improvements in the SLR test (mean difference in post-intervention changes between interventions: 5.4°, percentage change from pre- to post-value: 13.4%, p = 0.004), passive KE test (6.2°, 4.5%, p < 0.001), passive torque at end-ROM (3.8 Nm, 4.7%, p = 0.03), and maximal eccentric knee flexion contraction (14.9% body weight, 8.2%, p = 0.03) than control. Moreover, flossing yielded 2.1-fold greater improvements in the passive KE test (3.8°, 4.5%, p = 0.03) and yielded significant improvements in the maximal eccentric knee extension contraction (29.9% body weight, 13.8%, p = 0.02) than DS. Therefore, flossing on hamstring muscles is more beneficial than DS with respect to increasing ROM and muscle exertion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1303-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1303-2968</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33239941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ankle ; Blood pressure ; Cross-Over Studies ; Disease prevention ; Exercise ; Exercise equipment ; Hamstring muscles ; Hamstring Muscles - physiology ; Humans ; Injury prevention ; Intervention ; Joints ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Male ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Pain ; Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation ; Physiological aspects ; Physiological research ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Sports training ; Stretching exercises ; Torque ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of sports science & medicine, 2020-12, Vol.19 (4), p.681-689</ispartof><rights>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675630/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675630/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaneda, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahira, Naonobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuda, Kouji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozaki, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Shuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenmoku, Tomonori</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function</title><title>Journal of sports science & medicine</title><addtitle>J Sports Sci Med</addtitle><description>Tissue flossing aims to improve range of motion (ROM), reduce pain, and enhance injury prevention. However, evidence is lacking regarding its effects. Therefore, this study examined the effects of flossing on hamstring muscles function in comparison to dynamic stretching (DS). Seventeen healthy young men ([mean ± SD] age, 23.2 ± 1.1 years; height, 1.72 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 63.5 ± 9.3 kg) volunteered as subjects in this randomized crossover trial. The subjects received flossing, DS, and control interventions in random order at least 1 week apart to eliminate the influence of the previous intervention. Flossing involved passive twisting and active movement using a floss band (Sanctband COMPRE Floss Blueberry, Sanct Japan Co., Ltd.). DS was performed for 4 minutes in 30-second sets consisting of 15 repetitions of 2 seconds stretching. The following were measured before and after each intervention: straight leg raise (SLR) test, passive knee extension (KE) test, passive torque, passive stiffness, fascicle length in the biceps femoris long head as an indication of hamstring muscles flexibility, and maximal isometric knee flexion contraction, maximal eccentric knee extension/flexion contraction, rate of force development, and muscle activity. Flossing yielded significant improvements in the SLR test (mean difference in post-intervention changes between interventions: 5.4°, percentage change from pre- to post-value: 13.4%, p = 0.004), passive KE test (6.2°, 4.5%, p < 0.001), passive torque at end-ROM (3.8 Nm, 4.7%, p = 0.03), and maximal eccentric knee flexion contraction (14.9% body weight, 8.2%, p = 0.03) than control. Moreover, flossing yielded 2.1-fold greater improvements in the passive KE test (3.8°, 4.5%, p = 0.03) and yielded significant improvements in the maximal eccentric knee extension contraction (29.9% body weight, 13.8%, p = 0.02) than DS. Therefore, flossing on hamstring muscles is more beneficial than DS with respect to increasing ROM and muscle exertion.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise equipment</subject><subject>Hamstring muscles</subject><subject>Hamstring Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscle Stretching Exercises</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiological research</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Stretching exercises</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1303-2968</issn><issn>1303-2968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CX0CRkBAcUsWfiS9I1dJtKy3dQ8vZcp1J1pVjl9hG9N_jVQvdoB4qH-wZP_NaM69fFYeI1KTCgrev984HxVEIt3WNGcPt2-KAEEyEoOiw2Jz2PegYSt-X1yaEBOXK-hCMG0rluvLbvVOj0eVVnCDq7S7tXXmuxhCnXfA9BW0hlKvkdDTevSve9MoGeP-4L4ofq9Pr5Xm13pxdLE_W1UBFGyva9pyxrhGk7qDBGDpGaiQwI6RnijRaEcYQVTXCVNdcI0U47QS9UVRwpBBZFF8fdO_SzQidBhcnZeXdZEY13UuvjJzfOLOVg_8lG94wnueyKD4_Ckz-Z4IQ5WiCBmuVA5-CxJRTXnPS8Ix-_A-99WlyuT2JWYNFk2cpnqhBWZDG9T6_q3ei8oRTgQiiub1FcfwMlVcHeczeQW9yflbwZVaQmQi_46BSCPLi6vLFbHu2nrPVc6z21sIAMpu13Mz5T3v8FpSN2-Bt2pke5uCHfWf-WfL3z5E_N4jNMw</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Kaneda, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Takahira, Naonobu</creator><creator>Tsuda, Kouji</creator><creator>Tozaki, Kiyoshi</creator><creator>Kudo, Sho</creator><creator>Takahashi, Yoshiki</creator><creator>Sasaki, Shuichi</creator><creator>Kenmoku, Tomonori</creator><general>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</general><general>Uludag University</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function</title><author>Kaneda, Hiroaki ; Takahira, Naonobu ; Tsuda, Kouji ; Tozaki, Kiyoshi ; Kudo, Sho ; Takahashi, Yoshiki ; Sasaki, Shuichi ; Kenmoku, Tomonori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g498t-48f655d7930de722ed530192533f5a37ca35514a0124c06c1a364d94ba4961a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise equipment</topic><topic>Hamstring muscles</topic><topic>Hamstring Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscle Stretching Exercises</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiological research</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Stretching exercises</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaneda, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahira, Naonobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuda, Kouji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tozaki, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Shuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenmoku, Tomonori</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sports science & medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaneda, Hiroaki</au><au>Takahira, Naonobu</au><au>Tsuda, Kouji</au><au>Tozaki, Kiyoshi</au><au>Kudo, Sho</au><au>Takahashi, Yoshiki</au><au>Sasaki, Shuichi</au><au>Kenmoku, Tomonori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sports science & medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sports Sci Med</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>681-689</pages><issn>1303-2968</issn><eissn>1303-2968</eissn><abstract>Tissue flossing aims to improve range of motion (ROM), reduce pain, and enhance injury prevention. However, evidence is lacking regarding its effects. Therefore, this study examined the effects of flossing on hamstring muscles function in comparison to dynamic stretching (DS). Seventeen healthy young men ([mean ± SD] age, 23.2 ± 1.1 years; height, 1.72 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 63.5 ± 9.3 kg) volunteered as subjects in this randomized crossover trial. The subjects received flossing, DS, and control interventions in random order at least 1 week apart to eliminate the influence of the previous intervention. Flossing involved passive twisting and active movement using a floss band (Sanctband COMPRE Floss Blueberry, Sanct Japan Co., Ltd.). DS was performed for 4 minutes in 30-second sets consisting of 15 repetitions of 2 seconds stretching. The following were measured before and after each intervention: straight leg raise (SLR) test, passive knee extension (KE) test, passive torque, passive stiffness, fascicle length in the biceps femoris long head as an indication of hamstring muscles flexibility, and maximal isometric knee flexion contraction, maximal eccentric knee extension/flexion contraction, rate of force development, and muscle activity. Flossing yielded significant improvements in the SLR test (mean difference in post-intervention changes between interventions: 5.4°, percentage change from pre- to post-value: 13.4%, p = 0.004), passive KE test (6.2°, 4.5%, p < 0.001), passive torque at end-ROM (3.8 Nm, 4.7%, p = 0.03), and maximal eccentric knee flexion contraction (14.9% body weight, 8.2%, p = 0.03) than control. Moreover, flossing yielded 2.1-fold greater improvements in the passive KE test (3.8°, 4.5%, p = 0.03) and yielded significant improvements in the maximal eccentric knee extension contraction (29.9% body weight, 13.8%, p = 0.02) than DS. Therefore, flossing on hamstring muscles is more beneficial than DS with respect to increasing ROM and muscle exertion.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</pub><pmid>33239941</pmid><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1303-2968 |
ispartof | Journal of sports science & medicine, 2020-12, Vol.19 (4), p.681-689 |
issn | 1303-2968 1303-2968 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7675630 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Ankle Blood pressure Cross-Over Studies Disease prevention Exercise Exercise equipment Hamstring muscles Hamstring Muscles - physiology Humans Injury prevention Intervention Joints Knee Knee Joint - physiology Male Muscle Contraction Muscle Stretching Exercises Pain Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation Physiological aspects Physiological research Range of motion Range of Motion, Articular Sports training Stretching exercises Torque Young Adult |
title | Effects of Tissue Flossing and Dynamic Stretching on Hamstring Muscles Function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A36%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Tissue%20Flossing%20and%20Dynamic%20Stretching%20on%20Hamstring%20Muscles%20Function&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sports%20science%20&%20medicine&rft.au=Kaneda,%20Hiroaki&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=681-689&rft.issn=1303-2968&rft.eissn=1303-2968&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA649131425%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572973999&rft_id=info:pmid/33239941&rft_galeid=A649131425&rfr_iscdi=true |