Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19

Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults with multiple comorbidities experience high rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Changes in care utilization by persons in advanced illness management (AIM) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic are not w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Gerontologist 2021-02, Vol.61 (1), p.78-85
Hauptverfasser: Abrashkin, Karen A, Zhang, Jenny, Poku, Asantewaa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title The Gerontologist
container_volume 61
creator Abrashkin, Karen A
Zhang, Jenny
Poku, Asantewaa
description Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults with multiple comorbidities experience high rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Changes in care utilization by persons in advanced illness management (AIM) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well known. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in care utilization by homebound AIM patients in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic before and during the pandemic. Research Design and Methods Descriptive statistics and tests of differences were used to compare care utilization rates, including emergency department (ED) and inpatient admissions, acute and subacute rehabilitation, and AIM program utilization during the pandemic with rates 1 year prior. Results Acute and post-acute utilization for enrollees (n = 1,468) decreased March–May 2020 compared to 1 year prior (n = 1,452), while utilization of AIM program resources remained high. Comparing 2019 and 2020, ED visits/1,000 enrollees were 109 versus 44 (p < .001), inpatient admissions 213 versus 113 (p < .001), and rehabilitation facility admissions 56 versus 31 (p = .014); AIM program home visits were 1,935 versus 276 (p < .001), remote visits (telehealth/telephonic) 0 versus 1,079 (p < .001), and all other phone touches 3,032 versus 5,062 (p < .001). Home hospice admissions/1,000 increased: 16–31 (p = .011). Discussion and Implications Our results demonstrate decreased acute and post-acute utilization, while maintaining high levels of connectedness to the AIM program, among a cohort of homebound older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 1 year prior. While further study is needed, our results suggest that AIM programs can provide support to this population in the home setting during a pandemic.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geront/gnaa158
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7665495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/geront/gnaa158</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2450649365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-6e465284aa68821fcec91756e62cdabc42cd491d57b8312cf1b87402d04ca1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS3UqmyXXjlWlnopUrPYie04F6RlKQUJiT2UXq2J402NEnuxk0rw62uUBQEXTjPWfH6aNw-hQ0oWlFTFcWuCd8Nx6wAol3toRksuM14w-gHNCKEiqwgt9tHnGG9Jeud5-QntFwVhnHA2Q81Sj4P5gdc-DhlMPbgGr4PtIdzjFQSDbwbb2QcYrHfYOgz4wvcmO4Vo3oDr4NsAPT4bg3UtXl3_uTzLaHWAPm6gi-bLrs7RzfnP36uL7Or61-VqeZVpzsSQCcMEzyUDEFLmdKONrpIdYUSuG6g1S4VVtOFlLQua6w2tZclI3hCmgdammKOTSXc71r1ptHFDgE5tpxWVB6teT5z9q1r_T5VCcFbxJPB9JxD83WjioHobtek6cMaPUeXpaoJVhXhEv71Bb_0YXLKXKCloxRiRiVpMlA4-xmA2z8tQoh4DVFOAahdg-vD1pYVn_CmxBBxNgB-374n9B5ooplM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486194408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Abrashkin, Karen A ; Zhang, Jenny ; Poku, Asantewaa</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrashkin, Karen A ; Zhang, Jenny ; Poku, Asantewaa</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults with multiple comorbidities experience high rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Changes in care utilization by persons in advanced illness management (AIM) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well known. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in care utilization by homebound AIM patients in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic before and during the pandemic. Research Design and Methods Descriptive statistics and tests of differences were used to compare care utilization rates, including emergency department (ED) and inpatient admissions, acute and subacute rehabilitation, and AIM program utilization during the pandemic with rates 1 year prior. Results Acute and post-acute utilization for enrollees (n = 1,468) decreased March–May 2020 compared to 1 year prior (n = 1,452), while utilization of AIM program resources remained high. Comparing 2019 and 2020, ED visits/1,000 enrollees were 109 versus 44 (p &lt; .001), inpatient admissions 213 versus 113 (p &lt; .001), and rehabilitation facility admissions 56 versus 31 (p = .014); AIM program home visits were 1,935 versus 276 (p &lt; .001), remote visits (telehealth/telephonic) 0 versus 1,079 (p &lt; .001), and all other phone touches 3,032 versus 5,062 (p &lt; .001). Home hospice admissions/1,000 increased: 16–31 (p = .011). Discussion and Implications Our results demonstrate decreased acute and post-acute utilization, while maintaining high levels of connectedness to the AIM program, among a cohort of homebound older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 1 year prior. While further study is needed, our results suggest that AIM programs can provide support to this population in the home setting during a pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa158</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33045054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Comorbidity ; COVID-19 ; Emergency services ; Home Care Services ; Hospice care ; Humans ; Older people ; Pandemics ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Rehabilitation ; Research design ; SARS-CoV-2</subject><ispartof>The Gerontologist, 2021-02, Vol.61 (1), p.78-85</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-6e465284aa68821fcec91756e62cdabc42cd491d57b8312cf1b87402d04ca1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-6e465284aa68821fcec91756e62cdabc42cd491d57b8312cf1b87402d04ca1be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrashkin, Karen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poku, Asantewaa</creatorcontrib><title>Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19</title><title>The Gerontologist</title><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults with multiple comorbidities experience high rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Changes in care utilization by persons in advanced illness management (AIM) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well known. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in care utilization by homebound AIM patients in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic before and during the pandemic. Research Design and Methods Descriptive statistics and tests of differences were used to compare care utilization rates, including emergency department (ED) and inpatient admissions, acute and subacute rehabilitation, and AIM program utilization during the pandemic with rates 1 year prior. Results Acute and post-acute utilization for enrollees (n = 1,468) decreased March–May 2020 compared to 1 year prior (n = 1,452), while utilization of AIM program resources remained high. Comparing 2019 and 2020, ED visits/1,000 enrollees were 109 versus 44 (p &lt; .001), inpatient admissions 213 versus 113 (p &lt; .001), and rehabilitation facility admissions 56 versus 31 (p = .014); AIM program home visits were 1,935 versus 276 (p &lt; .001), remote visits (telehealth/telephonic) 0 versus 1,079 (p &lt; .001), and all other phone touches 3,032 versus 5,062 (p &lt; .001). Home hospice admissions/1,000 increased: 16–31 (p = .011). Discussion and Implications Our results demonstrate decreased acute and post-acute utilization, while maintaining high levels of connectedness to the AIM program, among a cohort of homebound older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 1 year prior. While further study is needed, our results suggest that AIM programs can provide support to this population in the home setting during a pandemic.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFP3DAQhS3UqmyXXjlWlnopUrPYie04F6RlKQUJiT2UXq2J402NEnuxk0rw62uUBQEXTjPWfH6aNw-hQ0oWlFTFcWuCd8Nx6wAol3toRksuM14w-gHNCKEiqwgt9tHnGG9Jeud5-QntFwVhnHA2Q81Sj4P5gdc-DhlMPbgGr4PtIdzjFQSDbwbb2QcYrHfYOgz4wvcmO4Vo3oDr4NsAPT4bg3UtXl3_uTzLaHWAPm6gi-bLrs7RzfnP36uL7Or61-VqeZVpzsSQCcMEzyUDEFLmdKONrpIdYUSuG6g1S4VVtOFlLQua6w2tZclI3hCmgdammKOTSXc71r1ptHFDgE5tpxWVB6teT5z9q1r_T5VCcFbxJPB9JxD83WjioHobtek6cMaPUeXpaoJVhXhEv71Bb_0YXLKXKCloxRiRiVpMlA4-xmA2z8tQoh4DVFOAahdg-vD1pYVn_CmxBBxNgB-374n9B5ooplM</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Abrashkin, Karen A</creator><creator>Zhang, Jenny</creator><creator>Poku, Asantewaa</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19</title><author>Abrashkin, Karen A ; Zhang, Jenny ; Poku, Asantewaa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c546t-6e465284aa68821fcec91756e62cdabc42cd491d57b8312cf1b87402d04ca1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrashkin, Karen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poku, Asantewaa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrashkin, Karen A</au><au>Zhang, Jenny</au><au>Poku, Asantewaa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>0016-9013</issn><eissn>1758-5341</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and Objectives Older adults with multiple comorbidities experience high rates of hospitalization and poor outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Changes in care utilization by persons in advanced illness management (AIM) programs during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well known. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in care utilization by homebound AIM patients in an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic before and during the pandemic. Research Design and Methods Descriptive statistics and tests of differences were used to compare care utilization rates, including emergency department (ED) and inpatient admissions, acute and subacute rehabilitation, and AIM program utilization during the pandemic with rates 1 year prior. Results Acute and post-acute utilization for enrollees (n = 1,468) decreased March–May 2020 compared to 1 year prior (n = 1,452), while utilization of AIM program resources remained high. Comparing 2019 and 2020, ED visits/1,000 enrollees were 109 versus 44 (p &lt; .001), inpatient admissions 213 versus 113 (p &lt; .001), and rehabilitation facility admissions 56 versus 31 (p = .014); AIM program home visits were 1,935 versus 276 (p &lt; .001), remote visits (telehealth/telephonic) 0 versus 1,079 (p &lt; .001), and all other phone touches 3,032 versus 5,062 (p &lt; .001). Home hospice admissions/1,000 increased: 16–31 (p = .011). Discussion and Implications Our results demonstrate decreased acute and post-acute utilization, while maintaining high levels of connectedness to the AIM program, among a cohort of homebound older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with 1 year prior. While further study is needed, our results suggest that AIM programs can provide support to this population in the home setting during a pandemic.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33045054</pmid><doi>10.1093/geront/gnaa158</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-9013
ispartof The Gerontologist, 2021-02, Vol.61 (1), p.78-85
issn 0016-9013
1758-5341
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7665495
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Aged
Comorbidity
COVID-19
Emergency services
Home Care Services
Hospice care
Humans
Older people
Pandemics
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Rehabilitation
Research design
SARS-CoV-2
title Acute, Post-acute, and Primary Care Utilization in a Home-Based Primary Care Program During COVID-19
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute,%20Post-acute,%20and%20Primary%20Care%20Utilization%20in%20a%20Home-Based%20Primary%20Care%20Program%20During%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=The%20Gerontologist&rft.au=Abrashkin,%20Karen%20A&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=0016-9013&rft.eissn=1758-5341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geront/gnaa158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2450649365%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486194408&rft_id=info:pmid/33045054&rft_oup_id=10.1093/geront/gnaa158&rfr_iscdi=true