Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Abstract Background The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020-12, Vol.75 (12), p.2404-2411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2411 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2404 |
container_title | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Coyle, Peter C Perera, Subashan Shuman, Valerie VanSwearingen, Jessie Brach, Jennifer S |
description | Abstract
Background
The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.
Methods
A secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.
Results
F8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%–59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%–56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%–50% lower.
Conclusions
Clinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/gerona/glaa035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7662178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/gerona/glaa035</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2350095608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-38811d1fc2192dce78b9a6e819d3a94128f9cbd9f51abd81dea609495aedf2ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkklv1TAUhSMEoqWwZYkssYGFWw8Z7A1SlVJAKmoXZdhZTnyTujj2q50U9Qfwv3H0HhWwAG883O8e-dinKJ5TckiJ5EcjxOD10ei0Jrx6UOzTphK44tXXh3lNGokrQuq94klK12QdFXtc7HGWDwlj-8WPE7gFFzYT-Blpb9Bn7azRsw0ehQFdQEzB4zZXIYJB7TLji2D9nNAQIpqvAJ3acYmAw4AF_qLdN3QJaV57P4bOOjvfIetRG6Zp8XmDT76Dc9aP6NwZiOjYLG5OT4tHg3YJnu3mg-LT6dvL9j0-O3_3oT0-w30pyIy5EJQaOvSMSmZ6aEQndQ2CSsO1LCkTg-w7I4eK6s4IakDXRJay0mAGBpofFG-2upulmyAr-DlqpzbRTjreqaCt-rPi7ZUaw61q6prRRmSBVzuBGG6WbFRNNvXZkfYQlqQYz88tq5qs6Mu_0OuwRJ_tKVYKXpeMNPTfVEMJz-yqdbil-hhSijDcX5kSteZAbXOgdjnIDS9-N3qP__r4DLzeAmHZ_E_sJxKVwE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471032488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Coyle, Peter C ; Perera, Subashan ; Shuman, Valerie ; VanSwearingen, Jessie ; Brach, Jennifer S</creator><creatorcontrib>Coyle, Peter C ; Perera, Subashan ; Shuman, Valerie ; VanSwearingen, Jessie ; Brach, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.
Methods
A secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.
Results
F8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%–59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%–56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%–50% lower.
Conclusions
Clinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-535X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32006022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Balance ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Emergency medical care ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Humans ; Independent Living ; Male ; Mobility ; Motor ability ; Motor skill ; Motor Skills ; Motor task performance ; Older people ; Patient-centered care ; Psychometrics ; Studies ; THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Medical Sciences ; Walk Test - standards ; Walking</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020-12, Vol.75 (12), p.2404-2411</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-38811d1fc2192dce78b9a6e819d3a94128f9cbd9f51abd81dea609495aedf2ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-38811d1fc2192dce78b9a6e819d3a94128f9cbd9f51abd81dea609495aedf2ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3954-2563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32006022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coyle, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Subashan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanSwearingen, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brach, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.
Methods
A secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.
Results
F8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%–59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%–56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%–50% lower.
Conclusions
Clinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent Living</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Motor ability</subject><subject>Motor skill</subject><subject>Motor Skills</subject><subject>Motor task performance</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Walk Test - standards</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1079-5006</issn><issn>1758-535X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkklv1TAUhSMEoqWwZYkssYGFWw8Z7A1SlVJAKmoXZdhZTnyTujj2q50U9Qfwv3H0HhWwAG883O8e-dinKJ5TckiJ5EcjxOD10ei0Jrx6UOzTphK44tXXh3lNGokrQuq94klK12QdFXtc7HGWDwlj-8WPE7gFFzYT-Blpb9Bn7azRsw0ehQFdQEzB4zZXIYJB7TLji2D9nNAQIpqvAJ3acYmAw4AF_qLdN3QJaV57P4bOOjvfIetRG6Zp8XmDT76Dc9aP6NwZiOjYLG5OT4tHg3YJnu3mg-LT6dvL9j0-O3_3oT0-w30pyIy5EJQaOvSMSmZ6aEQndQ2CSsO1LCkTg-w7I4eK6s4IakDXRJay0mAGBpofFG-2upulmyAr-DlqpzbRTjreqaCt-rPi7ZUaw61q6prRRmSBVzuBGG6WbFRNNvXZkfYQlqQYz88tq5qs6Mu_0OuwRJ_tKVYKXpeMNPTfVEMJz-yqdbil-hhSijDcX5kSteZAbXOgdjnIDS9-N3qP__r4DLzeAmHZ_E_sJxKVwE8</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Coyle, Peter C</creator><creator>Perera, Subashan</creator><creator>Shuman, Valerie</creator><creator>VanSwearingen, Jessie</creator><creator>Brach, Jennifer S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-2563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults</title><author>Coyle, Peter C ; Perera, Subashan ; Shuman, Valerie ; VanSwearingen, Jessie ; Brach, Jennifer S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-38811d1fc2192dce78b9a6e819d3a94128f9cbd9f51abd81dea609495aedf2ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent Living</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Motor ability</topic><topic>Motor skill</topic><topic>Motor Skills</topic><topic>Motor task performance</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Walk Test - standards</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coyle, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Subashan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuman, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanSwearingen, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brach, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coyle, Peter C</au><au>Perera, Subashan</au><au>Shuman, Valerie</au><au>VanSwearingen, Jessie</au><au>Brach, Jennifer S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2404</spage><epage>2411</epage><pages>2404-2411</pages><issn>1079-5006</issn><eissn>1758-535X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
The Figure-of-8-Walk test (F8WT) is a performance measure of the motor skill of walking. Unlike walking speed over a straight path, it captures curved path walking, which is essential to real-world activity, but meaningful cut-points have yet to be developed for the F8WT.
Methods
A secondary analysis of 421 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 80.7 ± 7.8), who participated in a community-based exercise clinical trial, was performed. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCC) were calculated using baseline data, with F8WT performance discriminating different self-reported global mobility and balance dichotomies. Cut-points for the F8WT were chosen to optimize sensitivity and specificity. For validation, F8WT cut-points were applied to postintervention F8WT data. Participants were called monthly for 12 months after intervention completion to record self-reported incident falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations; risks of the outcomes were compared between those who performed well and poorly on the F8WT.
Results
F8WT performance times of ≤9.09 seconds and ≤9.27 seconds can discriminate those with excellent (sensitivity = 0.647; specificity = 0.654) and excellent/very good global mobility (sensitivity = 0.649; specificity = 0.648), respectively. A total number of steps ≤17 on the F8WT can discriminate those with excellent/very good/good global balance (sensitivity = 0.646; specificity = 0.608). Compared to those who performed poorly, those who performed well had a lower incidence of negative outcomes: F8WT time ≤9.09 seconds = 46%–59% lower; F8WT time ≤9.27 seconds = 46%–56% lower; F8WT steps ≤17 = 44%–50% lower.
Conclusions
Clinicians may consider these preliminary cut-points to aid in their clinical decision making, but further study is needed for definitive recommendations.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32006022</pmid><doi>10.1093/gerona/glaa035</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-2563</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-5006 |
ispartof | The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020-12, Vol.75 (12), p.2404-2411 |
issn | 1079-5006 1758-535X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7662178 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Balance Clinical decision making Decision making Emergency medical care Female Geriatric Assessment - methods Humans Independent Living Male Mobility Motor ability Motor skill Motor Skills Motor task performance Older people Patient-centered care Psychometrics Studies THE JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY: Medical Sciences Walk Test - standards Walking |
title | Development and Validation of Person-Centered Cut-Points for the Figure-of-8-Walk Test of Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20Person-Centered%20Cut-Points%20for%20the%20Figure-of-8-Walk%20Test%20of%20Mobility%20in%20Community-Dwelling%20Older%20Adults&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20A,%20Biological%20sciences%20and%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Coyle,%20Peter%20C&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2404&rft.epage=2411&rft.pages=2404-2411&rft.issn=1079-5006&rft.eissn=1758-535X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/gerona/glaa035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2350095608%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471032488&rft_id=info:pmid/32006022&rft_oup_id=10.1093/gerona/glaa035&rfr_iscdi=true |