Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds
Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-10, Vol.17 (21), p.7777 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 21 |
| container_start_page | 7777 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel Albaladejo-Saura, Mario Luna-Badachi, Ana E Esparza-Ros, Francisco |
| description | Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relationship with the body mass index and sums of skinfolds measurement in kinanthropometry. A total of 2458 active adults participated in the study. Body mass index (BMI) and skinfolds were measured, and the Kerr, Durnin-Womersley, Faulkner and Carter equations were used to assess fat mass. Significant differences were found between all the formulas for the percentage of fat mass, ranging from 10.70 ± 2.48 to 28.43 ± 5.99% (
< 0.001) and fat mass from 7.56 ± 2.13 to 19.89 ± 4.24 kg (
< 0.001). The correlations among sums of skinfolds and the different equations were positive, high and significant in all the cases (
from 0.705 to 0.926
< 0.001), unlike in the case of BMI, were the correlation was lower and both positive or negative (
from -0.271 to 0.719;
< 0.001). In conclusion, there were differences between all the formulas used to estimate fat mass; thus, for the evaluation of fat mass with kinanthropometry of an active adult, the use of the same formula is recommended on all occasions when the results are going to be compared or when an athlete is compared with a reference. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph17217777 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7660690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2630515603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ce1d73f8a638fcb35ded84da1f58ef9dc320ed056338daa5ff8c122517588a773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFPHCEUxknTplrba48NSS-9rMIwMOylycaqbWKjqe2ZIDw6bJlhBMZm_3vRVaNyAd778eV9fAh9pGSfsSU58GtIU0-7hnZ1vUK7VAiyaAWhr5-cd9C7nNeEMNmK5Vu0wxilbSPILtp8885BgtFAxn7Ex7rgnzpnfJSLH3TxsdZiGuag7_rn_SZ7o0PY4JUp_hrwys6h4PM4VeQO16PFv2B7yb2f8H9fenwxDxlHhy_--dHFYPN79MbpkOHD_b6H_hwf_T78vjg9O_lxuDpdmFawsjBAbcec1IJJZy4Zt2BlazV1XIJbWsMaApZwwZi0WnPnpKFNw2nHpdRdx_bQ163uNF8OYA2MJemgplTtpY2K2qvnndH36m-8Vl39PbEkVeDLvUCKVzPkogafDYSgR4hzVk3LuWyZ4Lfo5xfoOs5prPZUIxjhlAvCKrW_pUyKOSdwj8NQom5TVc9TrQ8-PbXwiD_EyG4Ao7ShQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630515603</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel ; Albaladejo-Saura, Mario ; Luna-Badachi, Ana E ; Esparza-Ros, Francisco</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel ; Albaladejo-Saura, Mario ; Luna-Badachi, Ana E ; Esparza-Ros, Francisco</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relationship with the body mass index and sums of skinfolds measurement in kinanthropometry. A total of 2458 active adults participated in the study. Body mass index (BMI) and skinfolds were measured, and the Kerr, Durnin-Womersley, Faulkner and Carter equations were used to assess fat mass. Significant differences were found between all the formulas for the percentage of fat mass, ranging from 10.70 ± 2.48 to 28.43 ± 5.99% (
< 0.001) and fat mass from 7.56 ± 2.13 to 19.89 ± 4.24 kg (
< 0.001). The correlations among sums of skinfolds and the different equations were positive, high and significant in all the cases (
from 0.705 to 0.926
< 0.001), unlike in the case of BMI, were the correlation was lower and both positive or negative (
from -0.271 to 0.719;
< 0.001). In conclusion, there were differences between all the formulas used to estimate fat mass; thus, for the evaluation of fat mass with kinanthropometry of an active adult, the use of the same formula is recommended on all occasions when the results are going to be compared or when an athlete is compared with a reference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217777</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33114260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adipose Tissue ; Adult ; Athletes ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Body size ; Exercise ; Humans ; Methods ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Status ; Physical fitness ; Population ; Reference Values ; Skinfold Thickness ; Sums ; Weight control</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-10, Vol.17 (21), p.7777</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ce1d73f8a638fcb35ded84da1f58ef9dc320ed056338daa5ff8c122517588a773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ce1d73f8a638fcb35ded84da1f58ef9dc320ed056338daa5ff8c122517588a773</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2708-4817 ; 0000-0003-0234-7756 ; 0000-0002-4519-1635 ; 0000-0002-0876-6890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660690/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7660690/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33114260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo-Saura, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna-Badachi, Ana E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esparza-Ros, Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relationship with the body mass index and sums of skinfolds measurement in kinanthropometry. A total of 2458 active adults participated in the study. Body mass index (BMI) and skinfolds were measured, and the Kerr, Durnin-Womersley, Faulkner and Carter equations were used to assess fat mass. Significant differences were found between all the formulas for the percentage of fat mass, ranging from 10.70 ± 2.48 to 28.43 ± 5.99% (
< 0.001) and fat mass from 7.56 ± 2.13 to 19.89 ± 4.24 kg (
< 0.001). The correlations among sums of skinfolds and the different equations were positive, high and significant in all the cases (
from 0.705 to 0.926
< 0.001), unlike in the case of BMI, were the correlation was lower and both positive or negative (
from -0.271 to 0.719;
< 0.001). In conclusion, there were differences between all the formulas used to estimate fat mass; thus, for the evaluation of fat mass with kinanthropometry of an active adult, the use of the same formula is recommended on all occasions when the results are going to be compared or when an athlete is compared with a reference.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><subject>Sums</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFPHCEUxknTplrba48NSS-9rMIwMOylycaqbWKjqe2ZIDw6bJlhBMZm_3vRVaNyAd778eV9fAh9pGSfsSU58GtIU0-7hnZ1vUK7VAiyaAWhr5-cd9C7nNeEMNmK5Vu0wxilbSPILtp8885BgtFAxn7Ex7rgnzpnfJSLH3TxsdZiGuag7_rn_SZ7o0PY4JUp_hrwys6h4PM4VeQO16PFv2B7yb2f8H9fenwxDxlHhy_--dHFYPN79MbpkOHD_b6H_hwf_T78vjg9O_lxuDpdmFawsjBAbcec1IJJZy4Zt2BlazV1XIJbWsMaApZwwZi0WnPnpKFNw2nHpdRdx_bQ163uNF8OYA2MJemgplTtpY2K2qvnndH36m-8Vl39PbEkVeDLvUCKVzPkogafDYSgR4hzVk3LuWyZ4Lfo5xfoOs5prPZUIxjhlAvCKrW_pUyKOSdwj8NQom5TVc9TrQ8-PbXwiD_EyG4Ao7ShQw</recordid><startdate>20201023</startdate><enddate>20201023</enddate><creator>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel</creator><creator>Albaladejo-Saura, Mario</creator><creator>Luna-Badachi, Ana E</creator><creator>Esparza-Ros, Francisco</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-4817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0234-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-6890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201023</creationdate><title>Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds</title><author>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel ; Albaladejo-Saura, Mario ; Luna-Badachi, Ana E ; Esparza-Ros, Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-ce1d73f8a638fcb35ded84da1f58ef9dc320ed056338daa5ff8c122517588a773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><topic>Sums</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaladejo-Saura, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna-Badachi, Ana E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esparza-Ros, Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel</au><au>Albaladejo-Saura, Mario</au><au>Luna-Badachi, Ana E</au><au>Esparza-Ros, Francisco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-10-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>7777</spage><pages>7777-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Changes in body composition and specifically fat mass, has traditionally been used as a way to monitor the changes produced by nutrition and training. The objective of the present study was to analyse the differences between the formulas used to estimate fat mass and to establish the existing relationship with the body mass index and sums of skinfolds measurement in kinanthropometry. A total of 2458 active adults participated in the study. Body mass index (BMI) and skinfolds were measured, and the Kerr, Durnin-Womersley, Faulkner and Carter equations were used to assess fat mass. Significant differences were found between all the formulas for the percentage of fat mass, ranging from 10.70 ± 2.48 to 28.43 ± 5.99% (
< 0.001) and fat mass from 7.56 ± 2.13 to 19.89 ± 4.24 kg (
< 0.001). The correlations among sums of skinfolds and the different equations were positive, high and significant in all the cases (
from 0.705 to 0.926
< 0.001), unlike in the case of BMI, were the correlation was lower and both positive or negative (
from -0.271 to 0.719;
< 0.001). In conclusion, there were differences between all the formulas used to estimate fat mass; thus, for the evaluation of fat mass with kinanthropometry of an active adult, the use of the same formula is recommended on all occasions when the results are going to be compared or when an athlete is compared with a reference.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33114260</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph17217777</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-4817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0234-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-6890</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-10, Vol.17 (21), p.7777 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7660690 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Abdomen Adipose Tissue Adult Athletes Body Composition Body fat Body mass Body Mass Index Body size Exercise Humans Methods Nutrition Nutritional Status Physical fitness Population Reference Values Skinfold Thickness Sums Weight control |
| title | Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Fat%20Mass%20Estimation%20Formulas%20in%20Physically%20Active%20Adult%20Population%20and%20Relationship%20with%20Sums%20of%20Skinfolds&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Vaquero-Crist%C3%B3bal,%20Raquel&rft.date=2020-10-23&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=7777&rft.pages=7777-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph17217777&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2630515603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630515603&rft_id=info:pmid/33114260&rfr_iscdi=true |