Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adhere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.5916-5924
Hauptverfasser: Seastedt, Kenneth P, Luca, Michael J, Antevil, Jared L, Browning, Robert F, Mullenix, Philip S, Reoma, Junewai L, McKay, Sean A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5924
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5916
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 12
creator Seastedt, Kenneth P
Luca, Michael J
Antevil, Jared L
Browning, Robert F
Mullenix, Philip S
Reoma, Junewai L
McKay, Sean A
description Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013-2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)-a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-20-1841
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7656399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2462413530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e14acf1368f563df8da38c68721ccbb1c315485c70313c940d8334f8213d60063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctKAzEUDaLYUrtzLVm6cDTJTWcyG0GKLyjoQnEZ0kymTZlJajJT8O-NbS16N_d1OPdxEDqn5JpRAsXNqqsyRjIqOD1CQ0aKIstzxo-3Mcsoh3KAxjGuSLKcMFYUp2gAwEjJGR-ij1fVWeM63PrOblLsXcS1D9h5l6lqaYJx2uDO46Z3C6xVygKOOhjjbCpYhxVubWM7Fb7w2q_7Zktyhk5q1UQz3vsRen-4f5s-ZbOXx-fp3SzTIHiXGcqVrinkop7kUNWiUiB0LgpGtZ7PqQY64WKiCwIUdMlJJQB4LRiFKk8HwQjd7njX_bw1lU6nBNXIdbBtWkh6ZeX_jrNLufAbWeRpYFkmgss9QfCfvYmdbG3UpmmUM76PkvH0TgoTIAl6tYPq4GMMpj6MoURu5ZBJDsmI_JEjwS_-rnYA_z4fvgGddIbt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2462413530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Seastedt, Kenneth P ; Luca, Michael J ; Antevil, Jared L ; Browning, Robert F ; Mullenix, Philip S ; Reoma, Junewai L ; McKay, Sean A</creator><creatorcontrib>Seastedt, Kenneth P ; Luca, Michael J ; Antevil, Jared L ; Browning, Robert F ; Mullenix, Philip S ; Reoma, Junewai L ; McKay, Sean A</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013-2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)-a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1841</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33209424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.5916-5924</ispartof><rights>2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e14acf1368f563df8da38c68721ccbb1c315485c70313c940d8334f8213d60063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656399/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7656399/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33209424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seastedt, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luca, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antevil, Jared L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullenix, Philip S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reoma, Junewai L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Sean A</creatorcontrib><title>Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013-2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)-a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctKAzEUDaLYUrtzLVm6cDTJTWcyG0GKLyjoQnEZ0kymTZlJajJT8O-NbS16N_d1OPdxEDqn5JpRAsXNqqsyRjIqOD1CQ0aKIstzxo-3Mcsoh3KAxjGuSLKcMFYUp2gAwEjJGR-ij1fVWeM63PrOblLsXcS1D9h5l6lqaYJx2uDO46Z3C6xVygKOOhjjbCpYhxVubWM7Fb7w2q_7Zktyhk5q1UQz3vsRen-4f5s-ZbOXx-fp3SzTIHiXGcqVrinkop7kUNWiUiB0LgpGtZ7PqQY64WKiCwIUdMlJJQB4LRiFKk8HwQjd7njX_bw1lU6nBNXIdbBtWkh6ZeX_jrNLufAbWeRpYFkmgss9QfCfvYmdbG3UpmmUM76PkvH0TgoTIAl6tYPq4GMMpj6MoURu5ZBJDsmI_JEjwS_-rnYA_z4fvgGddIbt</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Seastedt, Kenneth P</creator><creator>Luca, Michael J</creator><creator>Antevil, Jared L</creator><creator>Browning, Robert F</creator><creator>Mullenix, Philip S</creator><creator>Reoma, Junewai L</creator><creator>McKay, Sean A</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population</title><author>Seastedt, Kenneth P ; Luca, Michael J ; Antevil, Jared L ; Browning, Robert F ; Mullenix, Philip S ; Reoma, Junewai L ; McKay, Sean A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e14acf1368f563df8da38c68721ccbb1c315485c70313c940d8334f8213d60063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seastedt, Kenneth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luca, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antevil, Jared L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullenix, Philip S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reoma, Junewai L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, Sean A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seastedt, Kenneth P</au><au>Luca, Michael J</au><au>Antevil, Jared L</au><au>Browning, Robert F</au><au>Mullenix, Philip S</au><au>Reoma, Junewai L</au><au>McKay, Sean A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5916</spage><epage>5924</epage><pages>5916-5924</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, and lung cancer screening has been shown to decrease this mortality. Adherence to lung cancer screening is paramount to realize the mortality benefit, and reported adherence rates vary widely. Few reports address non-adherence to screening, and our study sought to understand the non-compliant patients in our military population. This Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients enrolled in our screening program from 2013-2019 identified patients who failed to obtain a subsequent Low Dose CT scan (LDCT) within 15 months of their prior scan. Attempts were made to contact these patients and elucidate motivations for non-adherence via telephone. Of the 242 patients enrolled, 183 (76%) patients were adherent to the protocol. Significant predictors of non-adherence versus adherence were younger age (P=0.008), female sex (P=0.005), and enlisted officer rank (P=0.03). There was no difference with regards to race, smoking status, pack-years, negative screens, lung-RADS level, or nodule size. 31 (52%) non-adherent patients were contacted, and 24 (77%) reported their reason for non-adherence was lack of follow-up for a LDCT. Twenty (64%) were interested in re-enrollment. Of the total screening cohort, 15 interventions were performed, with lung cancer identified in 5 (2%)-a 67% false positive rate. One stage IV lung cancer was found in a non-adherent patient who re-enrolled. Lack of perceived contact for follow-up was expressed as the primary reason for non-compliance in our screening program. Compliance is critical to the efficacy of any screening modality, and adherence rates to lung cancer screening may be increased through improved contact with patients via multiple avenues (i.e., phone, email, and letter). There is benefit in contacting non-adherent patients as high rates of re-enrollment are possible.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>33209424</pmid><doi>10.21037/jtd-20-1841</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.5916-5924
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7656399
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Patient motivations for non-adherence to lung cancer screening in a military population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20motivations%20for%20non-adherence%20to%20lung%20cancer%20screening%20in%20a%20military%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Seastedt,%20Kenneth%20P&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5916&rft.epage=5924&rft.pages=5916-5924&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-20-1841&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2462413530%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2462413530&rft_id=info:pmid/33209424&rfr_iscdi=true