Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems
Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2020-11, Vol.13 (11), p.947-958 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 958 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 947 |
container_title | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ghai, Nirupa R Jensen, Christopher D Merchant, Sophie A Schottinger, Joanne E Lee, Jeffrey K Chubak, Jessica Kamineni, Aruna Halm, Ethan A Skinner, Celette Sugg Haas, Jennifer S Green, Beverly B Cannizzaro, Nancy T Schneider, Jennifer L Corley, Douglas A |
description | Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (
= 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017-2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50-74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40-49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424444341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-2f1656d8f679a60dca0d7322d86fd5814b714cc47b4b7b43c1b16df62255c08c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMorqdXkFx6U03SNG1vhLV4ggUXD9chTaZupE3WpBV8e1t2XXRuZmDm_2eGD6FzSi4pzYorWnKSCEbyy2q-fE4YSQgl5R462jZotr-rST5DxzF-ECJYwdJDNEuZEGVKiyPklsF2KnzjSgXAy-C_rIGAb6C10ESsnMHPoH3XgTOqt95FPK_90OPKtz6A7lU7Sp0eNS86ADjr3rF1-M4PAT-AavuVnpxfvmMPXTxFB41qI5xt8wl6u7t9rR6SxdP9YzVfJJpT3iesoSITpmhEXipBjFbE5CljphCNyQrK65xyrXlej1XNU01rKkwjGMsyTQqdnqDrje96qDswGlwfVCvXm2elV1b-7zi7ku_-S-aC07IsRoOLrUHwnwPEXnY2amhb5cAPUTLO-Bgpp-Oo2Izq4GMM0OzWUCInWHLiICcOcoIlGZETrFF4_vfIneyXTvoD7RWSgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424444341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems</title><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ghai, Nirupa R ; Jensen, Christopher D ; Merchant, Sophie A ; Schottinger, Joanne E ; Lee, Jeffrey K ; Chubak, Jessica ; Kamineni, Aruna ; Halm, Ethan A ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Haas, Jennifer S ; Green, Beverly B ; Cannizzaro, Nancy T ; Schneider, Jennifer L ; Corley, Douglas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghai, Nirupa R ; Jensen, Christopher D ; Merchant, Sophie A ; Schottinger, Joanne E ; Lee, Jeffrey K ; Chubak, Jessica ; Kamineni, Aruna ; Halm, Ethan A ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Haas, Jennifer S ; Green, Beverly B ; Cannizzaro, Nancy T ; Schneider, Jennifer L ; Corley, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><description>Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (
= 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017-2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50-74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40-49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., <50 and ≥75 years). Evidence addressing these beliefs may be relevant if cancer screening recommendations are modified to include older and/or younger patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-6207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32669318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020-11, Vol.13 (11), p.947-958</ispartof><rights>2020 American Association for Cancer Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-2f1656d8f679a60dca0d7322d86fd5814b714cc47b4b7b43c1b16df62255c08c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-2f1656d8f679a60dca0d7322d86fd5814b714cc47b4b7b43c1b16df62255c08c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0479-9887 ; 0000-0002-0763-989X ; 0000-0002-6095-7942 ; 0000-0003-1630-9021 ; 0000-0002-2535-4476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3356,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghai, Nirupa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchant, Sophie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schottinger, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeffrey K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubak, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamineni, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halm, Ethan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Celette Sugg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Beverly B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannizzaro, Nancy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corley, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><title>Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems</title><title>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><description>Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (
= 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017-2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50-74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40-49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., <50 and ≥75 years). Evidence addressing these beliefs may be relevant if cancer screening recommendations are modified to include older and/or younger patients.</description><issn>1940-6207</issn><issn>1940-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkdtKxDAQhoMorqdXkFx6U03SNG1vhLV4ggUXD9chTaZupE3WpBV8e1t2XXRuZmDm_2eGD6FzSi4pzYorWnKSCEbyy2q-fE4YSQgl5R462jZotr-rST5DxzF-ECJYwdJDNEuZEGVKiyPklsF2KnzjSgXAy-C_rIGAb6C10ESsnMHPoH3XgTOqt95FPK_90OPKtz6A7lU7Sp0eNS86ADjr3rF1-M4PAT-AavuVnpxfvmMPXTxFB41qI5xt8wl6u7t9rR6SxdP9YzVfJJpT3iesoSITpmhEXipBjFbE5CljphCNyQrK65xyrXlej1XNU01rKkwjGMsyTQqdnqDrje96qDswGlwfVCvXm2elV1b-7zi7ku_-S-aC07IsRoOLrUHwnwPEXnY2amhb5cAPUTLO-Bgpp-Oo2Izq4GMM0OzWUCInWHLiICcOcoIlGZETrFF4_vfIneyXTvoD7RWSgw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Ghai, Nirupa R</creator><creator>Jensen, Christopher D</creator><creator>Merchant, Sophie A</creator><creator>Schottinger, Joanne E</creator><creator>Lee, Jeffrey K</creator><creator>Chubak, Jessica</creator><creator>Kamineni, Aruna</creator><creator>Halm, Ethan A</creator><creator>Skinner, Celette Sugg</creator><creator>Haas, Jennifer S</creator><creator>Green, Beverly B</creator><creator>Cannizzaro, Nancy T</creator><creator>Schneider, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Corley, Douglas A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-9887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-989X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-7942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-9021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2535-4476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems</title><author>Ghai, Nirupa R ; Jensen, Christopher D ; Merchant, Sophie A ; Schottinger, Joanne E ; Lee, Jeffrey K ; Chubak, Jessica ; Kamineni, Aruna ; Halm, Ethan A ; Skinner, Celette Sugg ; Haas, Jennifer S ; Green, Beverly B ; Cannizzaro, Nancy T ; Schneider, Jennifer L ; Corley, Douglas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-2f1656d8f679a60dca0d7322d86fd5814b714cc47b4b7b43c1b16df62255c08c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghai, Nirupa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Christopher D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchant, Sophie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schottinger, Joanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeffrey K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chubak, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamineni, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halm, Ethan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Celette Sugg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Beverly B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannizzaro, Nancy T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corley, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghai, Nirupa R</au><au>Jensen, Christopher D</au><au>Merchant, Sophie A</au><au>Schottinger, Joanne E</au><au>Lee, Jeffrey K</au><au>Chubak, Jessica</au><au>Kamineni, Aruna</au><au>Halm, Ethan A</au><au>Skinner, Celette Sugg</au><au>Haas, Jennifer S</au><au>Green, Beverly B</au><au>Cannizzaro, Nancy T</au><au>Schneider, Jennifer L</au><au>Corley, Douglas A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems</atitle><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>958</epage><pages>947-958</pages><issn>1940-6207</issn><eissn>1940-6215</eissn><abstract>Primary care provider's (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers' perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (
= 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017-2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40-49, 50-74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50-74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40-49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., <50 and ≥75 years). Evidence addressing these beliefs may be relevant if cancer screening recommendations are modified to include older and/or younger patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32669318</pmid><doi>10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-9887</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-989X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-7942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-9021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2535-4476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-6207 |
ispartof | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020-11, Vol.13 (11), p.947-958 |
issn | 1940-6207 1940-6215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641998 |
source | American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A27%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20Care%20Provider%20Beliefs%20and%20Recommendations%20About%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening%20in%20Four%20Healthcare%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20prevention%20research%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Ghai,%20Nirupa%20R&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=958&rft.pages=947-958&rft.issn=1940-6207&rft.eissn=1940-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2424444341%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424444341&rft_id=info:pmid/32669318&rfr_iscdi=true |