The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor

Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Masatoshi, Konrad, Andreas, Kasahara, Kazuki, Yoshida, Riku, Murakami, Yuta, Sato, Shigeru, Aizawa, Kodai, Koizumi, Ryoma, Wilke, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 327
container_issue 2
container_start_page 322
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 37
creator Nakamura, Masatoshi
Konrad, Andreas
Kasahara, Kazuki
Yoshida, Riku
Murakami, Yuta
Sato, Shigeru
Aizawa, Kodai
Koizumi, Ryoma
Wilke, Jan
description Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7614110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769214595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwBghZ4rYp_o2TGyS02lKgVVG7wKXldcablMRubYfCG_Ux6_SPgmXpWGOfb8Y6RfGa4D0iSPPu8-liDz9anFbsSbFNBGMlp7V8ms-44mWNCdkqXsR4hjEVQrDnxRYTgnMmyHZxteoALfy47h20aGktmIS8RadJp95kCZBM17sN0q5F-16P6MQPw1z40acO-XCjfkroe78O2eQdyjtl7Il2G5hhR34u76KjKZoB0FcI1odROwO7N9hVH-ME6ECH1kGMs2X2f3EAaPk7gYs-vCyeWT1EeHWnO8W3_eVqcVAeHn_8tPhwWBpeV03JQYsWSwaSAiONEKapaG3a_PO2NZZUUgK3xmLDiLGWryUjjJlK2wpTQwXbKd7fcs-n9QitAZeCHtR56Ecd_iive_Xvjes7tfG_lKwIJwRnwNs7QPAXE8SkzvwUXJ5ZUVk1lHDRzG347SsTfIwB7EMHgtWcr8r5qv_zzbY3j6d7MN0H-pd76YcEIf4cpksIqgM9pC7zCOVU1iXFlGGaqeWMbtg1tKOyOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769214595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p &lt; 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35544351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Over Studies ; Hardness ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; Muscle contraction ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pain ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Vibration ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Riku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizawa, Kodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Ryoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p &lt; 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscle Stretching Exercises</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwBghZ4rYp_o2TGyS02lKgVVG7wKXldcablMRubYfCG_Ux6_SPgmXpWGOfb8Y6RfGa4D0iSPPu8-liDz9anFbsSbFNBGMlp7V8ms-44mWNCdkqXsR4hjEVQrDnxRYTgnMmyHZxteoALfy47h20aGktmIS8RadJp95kCZBM17sN0q5F-16P6MQPw1z40acO-XCjfkroe78O2eQdyjtl7Il2G5hhR34u76KjKZoB0FcI1odROwO7N9hVH-ME6ECH1kGMs2X2f3EAaPk7gYs-vCyeWT1EeHWnO8W3_eVqcVAeHn_8tPhwWBpeV03JQYsWSwaSAiONEKapaG3a_PO2NZZUUgK3xmLDiLGWryUjjJlK2wpTQwXbKd7fcs-n9QitAZeCHtR56Ecd_iive_Xvjes7tfG_lKwIJwRnwNs7QPAXE8SkzvwUXJ5ZUVk1lHDRzG347SsTfIwB7EMHgtWcr8r5qv_zzbY3j6d7MN0H-pd76YcEIf4cpksIqgM9pC7zCOVU1iXFlGGaqeWMbtg1tKOyOg</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Konrad, Andreas</creator><creator>Kasahara, Kazuki</creator><creator>Yoshida, Riku</creator><creator>Murakami, Yuta</creator><creator>Sato, Shigeru</creator><creator>Aizawa, Kodai</creator><creator>Koizumi, Ryoma</creator><creator>Wilke, Jan</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><author>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscle Stretching Exercises</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Riku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizawa, Kodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Ryoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Masatoshi</au><au>Konrad, Andreas</au><au>Kasahara, Kazuki</au><au>Yoshida, Riku</au><au>Murakami, Yuta</au><au>Sato, Shigeru</au><au>Aizawa, Kodai</au><au>Koizumi, Ryoma</au><au>Wilke, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>322-327</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p &lt; 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>35544351</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7614110
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Cross-Over Studies
Hardness
Humans
Knee
Male
Muscle contraction
Muscle Stretching Exercises
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Pain
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Vibration
Young Adult
title The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Combined%20Effect%20of%20Static%20Stretching%20and%20Foam%20Rolling%20With%20or%20Without%20Vibration%20on%20the%20Range%20of%20Motion,%20Muscle%20Performance,%20and%20Tissue%20Hardness%20of%20the%20Knee%20Extensor&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Masatoshi&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=322-327&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2769214595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769214595&rft_id=info:pmid/35544351&rfr_iscdi=true