The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor
Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 327 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 322 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Nakamura, Masatoshi Konrad, Andreas Kasahara, Kazuki Yoshida, Riku Murakami, Yuta Sato, Shigeru Aizawa, Kodai Koizumi, Ryoma Wilke, Jan |
description | Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7614110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769214595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwBghZ4rYp_o2TGyS02lKgVVG7wKXldcablMRubYfCG_Ux6_SPgmXpWGOfb8Y6RfGa4D0iSPPu8-liDz9anFbsSbFNBGMlp7V8ms-44mWNCdkqXsR4hjEVQrDnxRYTgnMmyHZxteoALfy47h20aGktmIS8RadJp95kCZBM17sN0q5F-16P6MQPw1z40acO-XCjfkroe78O2eQdyjtl7Il2G5hhR34u76KjKZoB0FcI1odROwO7N9hVH-ME6ECH1kGMs2X2f3EAaPk7gYs-vCyeWT1EeHWnO8W3_eVqcVAeHn_8tPhwWBpeV03JQYsWSwaSAiONEKapaG3a_PO2NZZUUgK3xmLDiLGWryUjjJlK2wpTQwXbKd7fcs-n9QitAZeCHtR56Ecd_iive_Xvjes7tfG_lKwIJwRnwNs7QPAXE8SkzvwUXJ5ZUVk1lHDRzG347SsTfIwB7EMHgtWcr8r5qv_zzbY3j6d7MN0H-pd76YcEIf4cpksIqgM9pC7zCOVU1iXFlGGaqeWMbtg1tKOyOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769214595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35544351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Over Studies ; Hardness ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; Muscle contraction ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pain ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Vibration ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Riku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizawa, Kodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Ryoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscle Stretching Exercises</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoqXwBghZ4rYp_o2TGyS02lKgVVG7wKXldcablMRubYfCG_Ux6_SPgmXpWGOfb8Y6RfGa4D0iSPPu8-liDz9anFbsSbFNBGMlp7V8ms-44mWNCdkqXsR4hjEVQrDnxRYTgnMmyHZxteoALfy47h20aGktmIS8RadJp95kCZBM17sN0q5F-16P6MQPw1z40acO-XCjfkroe78O2eQdyjtl7Il2G5hhR34u76KjKZoB0FcI1odROwO7N9hVH-ME6ECH1kGMs2X2f3EAaPk7gYs-vCyeWT1EeHWnO8W3_eVqcVAeHn_8tPhwWBpeV03JQYsWSwaSAiONEKapaG3a_PO2NZZUUgK3xmLDiLGWryUjjJlK2wpTQwXbKd7fcs-n9QitAZeCHtR56Ecd_iive_Xvjes7tfG_lKwIJwRnwNs7QPAXE8SkzvwUXJ5ZUVk1lHDRzG347SsTfIwB7EMHgtWcr8r5qv_zzbY3j6d7MN0H-pd76YcEIf4cpksIqgM9pC7zCOVU1iXFlGGaqeWMbtg1tKOyOg</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Konrad, Andreas</creator><creator>Kasahara, Kazuki</creator><creator>Yoshida, Riku</creator><creator>Murakami, Yuta</creator><creator>Sato, Shigeru</creator><creator>Aizawa, Kodai</creator><creator>Koizumi, Ryoma</creator><creator>Wilke, Jan</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</title><author>Nakamura, Masatoshi ; Konrad, Andreas ; Kasahara, Kazuki ; Yoshida, Riku ; Murakami, Yuta ; Sato, Shigeru ; Aizawa, Kodai ; Koizumi, Ryoma ; Wilke, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4869-4ea5d073e72e31955c9628cd255ddcf1677e4fcf0c31cff4b73133c6af602c253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscle Stretching Exercises</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konrad, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Riku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aizawa, Kodai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koizumi, Ryoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilke, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Masatoshi</au><au>Konrad, Andreas</au><au>Kasahara, Kazuki</au><au>Yoshida, Riku</au><au>Murakami, Yuta</au><au>Sato, Shigeru</au><au>Aizawa, Kodai</au><au>Koizumi, Ryoma</au><au>Wilke, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>322-327</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Nakamura, M, Konrad, A, Kasahara, K, Yoshida, R, Murakami, Y, Sato, S, Aizawa, K, Koizumi, R, and Wilke, J. The combined effect of static stretching and foam rolling with or without vibration on the range of motion, muscle performance, and tissue hardness of the knee extensor. J Strength Cond Res 37(2): 322-327, 2023-Although the combination of static stretching (SS) and foam rolling (FR) is frequently used for warm-up in sports, the effect of the intervention order is unclear. This study compared mechanical tissue properties, pain sensitivity, and motor function after SS and FR (with and without vibration) performed in different orders. Our randomized, controlled, crossover experiment included 15 healthy male subjects (22.5 ± 3.3 years) who visited the laboratory 5 times (inactive control condition, FR + SS, FR vibration + SS, SS + FR, and SS + FR vibration ) with an interval of ≥48 hours. In each session, subjects completed three 60-second bouts of FR and SS, targeting the anterior thigh. Pressure pain threshold, tissue hardness, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric (MVC-ISO), and concentric (MVC-CON) torque, as well as countermovement jump height, were determined before and after the intervention. All interventions significantly ( p < 0.01) increased knee flexion ROM ( d = 0.78, d = 0.87, d = 1.39, and d = 0.87, respectively) while decreasing tissue hardness ( d = -1.25, d = -1.09, d = -1.18, and d = -1.24, respectively). However, MVC-ISO torque was significantly reduced only after FR + SS ( p = 0.05, d = -0.59). Our results suggest that SS should be followed by FR when aiming to increase ROM and reduce tissue hardness without concomitant stretch-induced force deficits (MVC-ISO, MVC-CON, and countermovement jump height). Additionally, adding vibration to FR does not seem to affect the magnitude of changes observed in the examined outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>35544351</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8184-1121</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2023-02, Vol.37 (2), p.322-327 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7614110 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Cross-Over Studies Hardness Humans Knee Male Muscle contraction Muscle Stretching Exercises Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Pain Range of motion Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Vibration Young Adult |
title | The Combined Effect of Static Stretching and Foam Rolling With or Without Vibration on the Range of Motion, Muscle Performance, and Tissue Hardness of the Knee Extensor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T15%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Combined%20Effect%20of%20Static%20Stretching%20and%20Foam%20Rolling%20With%20or%20Without%20Vibration%20on%20the%20Range%20of%20Motion,%20Muscle%20Performance,%20and%20Tissue%20Hardness%20of%20the%20Knee%20Extensor&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Masatoshi&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=322-327&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2769214595%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769214595&rft_id=info:pmid/35544351&rfr_iscdi=true |