Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?

Objective Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart. Methods Thirty...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of orthopaedics 2020-12, Vol.54 (Suppl 2), p.260-269
Hauptverfasser: Sinha, Shivam, Sarkar, Swarup, Singh, Ajit, Saraf, Shyam K., Rastogi, Amit, Singh, Tejbali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 260
container_title Indian journal of orthopaedics
container_volume 54
creator Sinha, Shivam
Sarkar, Swarup
Singh, Ajit
Saraf, Shyam K.
Rastogi, Amit
Singh, Tejbali
description Objective Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart. Methods Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture–dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture–dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability. Results The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis. Conclusion Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion–extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s43465-020-00136-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7609614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461006114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e18fb228d6a5501631fd612448a16c7533862fb6e9c303aef07eac010a1384013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1ERdPCC7BAXrJgqP_GM8MCFIWUIlUqQiDEynI8dxJXjh1sDzS7ilfoG_ZJMEmpYMPKku85n6_PQegpJS8pIc1JElzIuiKMVIRQLivyAE1o17UVb1jzEE3KbVfVgvJDdJTSJSE1a5h8hA45p50ojAn6-VH3Vjt8BrrH05hXMWycTnn7As-vjE02eKx9jy9ShpC2Pq8g2YStx7Ow3ji4wnO3CD_wadQmjxFur2_e2uSC0blYd8KvYfRLPO1Hl9Mr_GWlMy6EDxEGiBH6N4_RwaBdgid35zH6fDr_NDurzi_evZ9NzysjhMwV0HZYMNb2Utc1oZLToZeUCdFqKk1Tc95KNiwkdIYTrmEgDWhDKNGUt6Lkc4xe77mbcbGG3oDPUTu1iXat41YFbdW_E29Xahm-q0aSTlJRAM_vADF8GyFltbbJgHPaQxiTYkKWTCXdSdleamJIqXz1_hlK1O_y1L48VcpTu_IUKaZnfy94b_nTVhHwvSCVkV9CVJdhjL6E9j_sL5zZp8Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461006114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sinha, Shivam ; Sarkar, Swarup ; Singh, Ajit ; Saraf, Shyam K. ; Rastogi, Amit ; Singh, Tejbali</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Shivam ; Sarkar, Swarup ; Singh, Ajit ; Saraf, Shyam K. ; Rastogi, Amit ; Singh, Tejbali</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart. Methods Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture–dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture–dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability. Results The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis. Conclusion Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion–extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00136-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33194100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Conservative Orthopedics ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020-12, Vol.54 (Suppl 2), p.260-269</ispartof><rights>Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020</rights><rights>Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e18fb228d6a5501631fd612448a16c7533862fb6e9c303aef07eac010a1384013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e18fb228d6a5501631fd612448a16c7533862fb6e9c303aef07eac010a1384013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1781-5340</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609614/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609614/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Shivam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Swarup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraf, Shyam K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rastogi, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Tejbali</creatorcontrib><title>Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?</title><title>Indian journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>JOIO</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><description>Objective Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart. Methods Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture–dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture–dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability. Results The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis. Conclusion Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion–extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment.</description><subject>Conservative Orthopedics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0019-5413</issn><issn>1998-3727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1ERdPCC7BAXrJgqP_GM8MCFIWUIlUqQiDEynI8dxJXjh1sDzS7ilfoG_ZJMEmpYMPKku85n6_PQegpJS8pIc1JElzIuiKMVIRQLivyAE1o17UVb1jzEE3KbVfVgvJDdJTSJSE1a5h8hA45p50ojAn6-VH3Vjt8BrrH05hXMWycTnn7As-vjE02eKx9jy9ShpC2Pq8g2YStx7Ow3ji4wnO3CD_wadQmjxFur2_e2uSC0blYd8KvYfRLPO1Hl9Mr_GWlMy6EDxEGiBH6N4_RwaBdgid35zH6fDr_NDurzi_evZ9NzysjhMwV0HZYMNb2Utc1oZLToZeUCdFqKk1Tc95KNiwkdIYTrmEgDWhDKNGUt6Lkc4xe77mbcbGG3oDPUTu1iXat41YFbdW_E29Xahm-q0aSTlJRAM_vADF8GyFltbbJgHPaQxiTYkKWTCXdSdleamJIqXz1_hlK1O_y1L48VcpTu_IUKaZnfy94b_nTVhHwvSCVkV9CVJdhjL6E9j_sL5zZp8Y</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Sinha, Shivam</creator><creator>Sarkar, Swarup</creator><creator>Singh, Ajit</creator><creator>Saraf, Shyam K.</creator><creator>Rastogi, Amit</creator><creator>Singh, Tejbali</creator><general>Springer India</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-5340</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?</title><author>Sinha, Shivam ; Sarkar, Swarup ; Singh, Ajit ; Saraf, Shyam K. ; Rastogi, Amit ; Singh, Tejbali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-e18fb228d6a5501631fd612448a16c7533862fb6e9c303aef07eac010a1384013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Conservative Orthopedics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Shivam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Swarup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ajit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraf, Shyam K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rastogi, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Tejbali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinha, Shivam</au><au>Sarkar, Swarup</au><au>Singh, Ajit</au><au>Saraf, Shyam K.</au><au>Rastogi, Amit</au><au>Singh, Tejbali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>JOIO</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>260-269</pages><issn>0019-5413</issn><eissn>1998-3727</eissn><abstract>Objective Complex elbow fractures are common injuries in young adults. Results in recent studies with various operative treatment protocols are equivocal. We compared the results of radial head arthroplasty, excision with osteosynthesis in such injuries at two follow-ups 1 year apart. Methods Thirty-five patients of complex elbow fracture–dislocations including, posterior/anterior olecranon dislocation of elbow, terrible triad injury, anteromedial facet of coronoid fracture, Type IV Monteggia fracture–dislocation and unclassified elbow dislocation were enrolled. They were managed operatively by standardized protocol similar to McKee et al. radial head reconstruction with miniplates, lag screws or non-operative treatment for undisplaced fractures. Arthroplasty of radial head with cemented prosthesis + LCL repair with suture anchor/transosseous tunnel was done. Coronoid and olecranon fixation was always performed. Patients were evaluated as follows: Q-DASH score, MEPI, pain according to VAS, range of motion, complications and radiographic findings and fracture union, and elbow instability. Results The mean length of follow-up among the patients was 18 months. There were statistically significant differences between the DASH score/MEPS between radial head excision and replacement/reconstruction. Instability was significantly reduced in those with LCL reconstruction. Excising the comminuted radial head without replacement had the worst outcome. Best PROM was reported in patients with osteosynthesis. Conclusion Provided a standard protocol is applied, radial head osteosynthesis has preferable outcomes in terms of patient-related outcomes as compared to arthroplasty, although not statistically significant. Radial head excision though has acceptable outcomes but there is a restriction of movements especially flexion–extension. Acceptable rate of complications major or minor warrants need of secondary surgical procedures or a staged treatment.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>33194100</pmid><doi>10.1007/s43465-020-00136-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-5340</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5413
ispartof Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020-12, Vol.54 (Suppl 2), p.260-269
issn 0019-5413
1998-3727
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7609614
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Conservative Orthopedics
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original
Original Article
Orthopedics
Surgical Orthopedics
title Radial Head Arthroplasty, Excision and Osteosynthesis in Complex Elbow Fracture–Dislocations in Young Adults: What is Preferred?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radial%20Head%20Arthroplasty,%20Excision%20and%20Osteosynthesis%20in%20Complex%20Elbow%20Fracture%E2%80%93Dislocations%20in%20Young%20Adults:%20What%20is%20Preferred?&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Sinha,%20Shivam&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=260-269&rft.issn=0019-5413&rft.eissn=1998-3727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43465-020-00136-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2461006114%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461006114&rft_id=info:pmid/33194100&rfr_iscdi=true