The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes
This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 4578 |
container_title | Materials |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Garbowski, Tomasz Gajewski, Tomasz Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof |
description | This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma13204578 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7602429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451848470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUdtKAzEQDaJo0b74BQu-iFDNbdPkRbClXkAQvLwJIdmdbVd3NzXJFv17UyreZmBmOHM4nGEQOiT4lDGFz1pDGMU8H8stNCBKiRFRnG__mvfQMIQXnIIxIqnaRXuMYSEEIwP0_LiA7N41kLkqm_TFa1N386zuspjwWYh1a2LtuvV26tqlhxDqFWQP0UM3j4sN7n0_NxHKbGp8aV0q2cS9QzhAO5VpAgy_-j56upw9Tq9Ht3dXN9OL21HBJIsjZSsucrCQV5zI3IJlXIpkn_PS2oKPaUVYKSiQnChhQCmZV0JZUkqLU7J9dL7RXfa2hbKALnrT6KVP7v2HdqbWfzddvdBzt9JjgSmnKgkcfwl499ZDiLqtQwFNYzpwfdCU50Ryycc4UY_-UV9c77t0nqY5l5JJQmVinWxYhXcheKi-zRCs13_TP39jn33-iP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548838128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creator><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma13204578</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33066631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Boxes ; Buckling ; Cardboard ; Compressive strength ; Error analysis ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Packaging design ; Packaging industry ; Popularity ; Quality control ; Shear stiffness</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4292-0417 ; 0000-0002-0553-1084 ; 0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602429/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602429/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><title>Materials</title><description>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</description><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Cardboard</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Packaging design</subject><subject>Packaging industry</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Shear stiffness</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUdtKAzEQDaJo0b74BQu-iFDNbdPkRbClXkAQvLwJIdmdbVd3NzXJFv17UyreZmBmOHM4nGEQOiT4lDGFz1pDGMU8H8stNCBKiRFRnG__mvfQMIQXnIIxIqnaRXuMYSEEIwP0_LiA7N41kLkqm_TFa1N386zuspjwWYh1a2LtuvV26tqlhxDqFWQP0UM3j4sN7n0_NxHKbGp8aV0q2cS9QzhAO5VpAgy_-j56upw9Tq9Ht3dXN9OL21HBJIsjZSsucrCQV5zI3IJlXIpkn_PS2oKPaUVYKSiQnChhQCmZV0JZUkqLU7J9dL7RXfa2hbKALnrT6KVP7v2HdqbWfzddvdBzt9JjgSmnKgkcfwl499ZDiLqtQwFNYzpwfdCU50Ryycc4UY_-UV9c77t0nqY5l5JJQmVinWxYhXcheKi-zRCs13_TP39jn33-iP0</recordid><startdate>20201014</startdate><enddate>20201014</enddate><creator>Garbowski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Gajewski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201014</creationdate><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><author>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Cardboard</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Packaging design</topic><topic>Packaging industry</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Shear stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garbowski, Tomasz</au><au>Gajewski, Tomasz</au><au>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><date>2020-10-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4578</spage><pages>4578-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33066631</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma13204578</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
ispartof | Materials, 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578 |
issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7602429 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Boxes Buckling Cardboard Compressive strength Error analysis Laboratories Methods Packaging design Packaging industry Popularity Quality control Shear stiffness |
title | The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Buckling%20in%20the%20Estimation%20of%20Compressive%20Strength%20of%20Corrugated%20Cardboard%20Boxes&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Garbowski,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2020-10-14&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4578&rft.pages=4578-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma13204578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2451848470%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548838128&rft_id=info:pmid/33066631&rfr_iscdi=true |