The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes

This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578
Hauptverfasser: Garbowski, Tomasz, Gajewski, Tomasz, Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 4578
container_title Materials
container_volume 13
creator Garbowski, Tomasz
Gajewski, Tomasz
Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof
description This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ma13204578
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7602429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2451848470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUdtKAzEQDaJo0b74BQu-iFDNbdPkRbClXkAQvLwJIdmdbVd3NzXJFv17UyreZmBmOHM4nGEQOiT4lDGFz1pDGMU8H8stNCBKiRFRnG__mvfQMIQXnIIxIqnaRXuMYSEEIwP0_LiA7N41kLkqm_TFa1N386zuspjwWYh1a2LtuvV26tqlhxDqFWQP0UM3j4sN7n0_NxHKbGp8aV0q2cS9QzhAO5VpAgy_-j56upw9Tq9Ht3dXN9OL21HBJIsjZSsucrCQV5zI3IJlXIpkn_PS2oKPaUVYKSiQnChhQCmZV0JZUkqLU7J9dL7RXfa2hbKALnrT6KVP7v2HdqbWfzddvdBzt9JjgSmnKgkcfwl499ZDiLqtQwFNYzpwfdCU50Ryycc4UY_-UV9c77t0nqY5l5JJQmVinWxYhXcheKi-zRCs13_TP39jn33-iP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548838128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creator><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma13204578</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33066631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Boxes ; Buckling ; Cardboard ; Compressive strength ; Error analysis ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Packaging design ; Packaging industry ; Popularity ; Quality control ; Shear stiffness</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4292-0417 ; 0000-0002-0553-1084 ; 0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602429/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602429/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><title>Materials</title><description>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</description><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Cardboard</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Packaging design</subject><subject>Packaging industry</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Shear stiffness</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUdtKAzEQDaJo0b74BQu-iFDNbdPkRbClXkAQvLwJIdmdbVd3NzXJFv17UyreZmBmOHM4nGEQOiT4lDGFz1pDGMU8H8stNCBKiRFRnG__mvfQMIQXnIIxIqnaRXuMYSEEIwP0_LiA7N41kLkqm_TFa1N386zuspjwWYh1a2LtuvV26tqlhxDqFWQP0UM3j4sN7n0_NxHKbGp8aV0q2cS9QzhAO5VpAgy_-j56upw9Tq9Ht3dXN9OL21HBJIsjZSsucrCQV5zI3IJlXIpkn_PS2oKPaUVYKSiQnChhQCmZV0JZUkqLU7J9dL7RXfa2hbKALnrT6KVP7v2HdqbWfzddvdBzt9JjgSmnKgkcfwl499ZDiLqtQwFNYzpwfdCU50Ryycc4UY_-UV9c77t0nqY5l5JJQmVinWxYhXcheKi-zRCs13_TP39jn33-iP0</recordid><startdate>20201014</startdate><enddate>20201014</enddate><creator>Garbowski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Gajewski, Tomasz</creator><creator>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201014</creationdate><title>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</title><author>Garbowski, Tomasz ; Gajewski, Tomasz ; Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9bf465ebe5f4185beb348699644dbbc472f13d62e15196ae9985f69b1d8b0b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Cardboard</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Packaging design</topic><topic>Packaging industry</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Shear stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garbowski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajewski, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garbowski, Tomasz</au><au>Gajewski, Tomasz</au><au>Grabski, Jakub Krzysztof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><date>2020-10-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4578</spage><pages>4578-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>This paper presents analytical methods for estimating the static top-to-bottom compressive strength of simple corrugated packaging, in which the torsional and shear stiffness of corrugated cardboard as well as the panel depth-to-width ratio are included. The methods are compared herein with a basic and more detailed buckling description with the successful McKee formula, which is over fifty years old but still widely used among packaging designers and quality control departments. Additionally, the assumptions and applied simplifications used in the literature are analyzed, and the limits of applicability of different versions of the selected methods are checked. Finally, all approaches are verified with the experiment results of various packaging designs made of corrugated cardboard. The results show that, for certain proportions of dimensions of simple flap boxes, simplified methods give an even two times larger estimation error than the analytical approach proposed in the paper. Furthermore, it is evidenced that including all flexural, torsional and shear stiffnesses in the buckling force estimation gives a very precise prediction of the box compressive strength for the full range of package dimensions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33066631</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma13204578</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-1084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-2514</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1944
ispartof Materials, 2020-10, Vol.13 (20), p.4578
issn 1996-1944
1996-1944
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7602429
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Boxes
Buckling
Cardboard
Compressive strength
Error analysis
Laboratories
Methods
Packaging design
Packaging industry
Popularity
Quality control
Shear stiffness
title The Role of Buckling in the Estimation of Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Buckling%20in%20the%20Estimation%20of%20Compressive%20Strength%20of%20Corrugated%20Cardboard%20Boxes&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Garbowski,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2020-10-14&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4578&rft.pages=4578-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma13204578&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2451848470%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548838128&rft_id=info:pmid/33066631&rfr_iscdi=true