Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Qin, Mu, Ming-chun, He, Yan, Cai, Zhao-lun, Li, Zheng-chi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e21462
container_issue 32
container_start_page e21462
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 99
creator Zhang, Qin
Mu, Ming-chun
He, Yan
Cai, Zhao-lun
Li, Zheng-chi
description Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians. We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity. A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA. This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7593073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32769876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIXIKH8QIofSRxzQCotL6lVL3C2HGfTBBKnstNW-XsM5b2XXc3OzK4GoXOCxwQLfrmYjfFPURIl9AANScySMBZJdIiGHo1DLng0QCfOvWBMGKfRMRowyhOR8mSIljcba9pNF1QmgAbsCozugwbySlcGgnXZOz8p466CiYc7FSqjag-6QJk8cL3roFFdpQML2wp2p-ioULWDs88-Qs93t0_Th3C-vH-cTuahZnHMwzTlPEqpgoxplnAQhBQRUyKNkizHOdaeUKSKFAp4BljEmmKRFhklOisoJGyErve-603mv9VgOqtqubZVo2wvW1XJvxtTlXLVbiWPBcOceQO2N9C2dc5C8a0lWL7nKxcz-T9fr7r4ffZb8xWoJ0R7wq6tO7Dutd7swMoSVN2VH34xFzSkmGKcYo5DjxDO3gD7NIeJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><description>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians. We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity. A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA. This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32769876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology ; Emergency Medicine ; Humans ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevalence ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462</ispartof><rights>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593073/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593073/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Ming-chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Zhao-lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians. We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity. A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA. This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</description><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIXIKH8QIofSRxzQCotL6lVL3C2HGfTBBKnstNW-XsM5b2XXc3OzK4GoXOCxwQLfrmYjfFPURIl9AANScySMBZJdIiGHo1DLng0QCfOvWBMGKfRMRowyhOR8mSIljcba9pNF1QmgAbsCozugwbySlcGgnXZOz8p466CiYc7FSqjag-6QJk8cL3roFFdpQML2wp2p-ioULWDs88-Qs93t0_Th3C-vH-cTuahZnHMwzTlPEqpgoxplnAQhBQRUyKNkizHOdaeUKSKFAp4BljEmmKRFhklOisoJGyErve-603mv9VgOqtqubZVo2wvW1XJvxtTlXLVbiWPBcOceQO2N9C2dc5C8a0lWL7nKxcz-T9fr7r4ffZb8xWoJ0R7wq6tO7Dutd7swMoSVN2VH34xFzSkmGKcYo5DjxDO3gD7NIeJ</recordid><startdate>20200807</startdate><enddate>20200807</enddate><creator>Zhang, Qin</creator><creator>Mu, Ming-chun</creator><creator>He, Yan</creator><creator>Cai, Zhao-lun</creator><creator>Li, Zheng-chi</creator><general>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200807</creationdate><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><author>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Ming-chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Zhao-lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Qin</au><au>Mu, Ming-chun</au><au>He, Yan</au><au>Cai, Zhao-lun</au><au>Li, Zheng-chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2020-08-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>e21462</spage><epage>e21462</epage><pages>e21462-e21462</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians. We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity. A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA. This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>32769876</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000021462</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7593073
source MEDLINE; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Burnout, Professional - epidemiology
Emergency Medicine
Humans
Physicians - psychology
Physicians - statistics & numerical data
Prevalence
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T09%3A05%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Burnout%20in%20emergency%20medicine%20physicians:%20A%20meta-analysis%20and%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Qin&rft.date=2020-08-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=e21462&rft.epage=e21462&rft.pages=e21462-e21462&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000021462&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32769876%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32769876&rfr_iscdi=true