Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e21462 |
---|---|
container_issue | 32 |
container_start_page | e21462 |
container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Zhang, Qin Mu, Ming-chun He, Yan Cai, Zhao-lun Li, Zheng-chi |
description | Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians.
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity.
A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA.
This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7593073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32769876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIXIKH8QIofSRxzQCotL6lVL3C2HGfTBBKnstNW-XsM5b2XXc3OzK4GoXOCxwQLfrmYjfFPURIl9AANScySMBZJdIiGHo1DLng0QCfOvWBMGKfRMRowyhOR8mSIljcba9pNF1QmgAbsCozugwbySlcGgnXZOz8p466CiYc7FSqjag-6QJk8cL3roFFdpQML2wp2p-ioULWDs88-Qs93t0_Th3C-vH-cTuahZnHMwzTlPEqpgoxplnAQhBQRUyKNkizHOdaeUKSKFAp4BljEmmKRFhklOisoJGyErve-603mv9VgOqtqubZVo2wvW1XJvxtTlXLVbiWPBcOceQO2N9C2dc5C8a0lWL7nKxcz-T9fr7r4ffZb8xWoJ0R7wq6tO7Dutd7swMoSVN2VH34xFzSkmGKcYo5DjxDO3gD7NIeJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><description>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians.
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity.
A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA.
This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021462</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32769876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology ; Emergency Medicine ; Humans ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics & numerical data ; Prevalence ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462</ispartof><rights>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593073/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7593073/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Ming-chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Zhao-lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians.
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity.
A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA.
This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</description><subject>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIXIKH8QIofSRxzQCotL6lVL3C2HGfTBBKnstNW-XsM5b2XXc3OzK4GoXOCxwQLfrmYjfFPURIl9AANScySMBZJdIiGHo1DLng0QCfOvWBMGKfRMRowyhOR8mSIljcba9pNF1QmgAbsCozugwbySlcGgnXZOz8p466CiYc7FSqjag-6QJk8cL3roFFdpQML2wp2p-ioULWDs88-Qs93t0_Th3C-vH-cTuahZnHMwzTlPEqpgoxplnAQhBQRUyKNkizHOdaeUKSKFAp4BljEmmKRFhklOisoJGyErve-603mv9VgOqtqubZVo2wvW1XJvxtTlXLVbiWPBcOceQO2N9C2dc5C8a0lWL7nKxcz-T9fr7r4ffZb8xWoJ0R7wq6tO7Dutd7swMoSVN2VH34xFzSkmGKcYo5DjxDO3gD7NIeJ</recordid><startdate>20200807</startdate><enddate>20200807</enddate><creator>Zhang, Qin</creator><creator>Mu, Ming-chun</creator><creator>He, Yan</creator><creator>Cai, Zhao-lun</creator><creator>Li, Zheng-chi</creator><general>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200807</creationdate><title>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</title><author>Zhang, Qin ; Mu, Ming-chun ; He, Yan ; Cai, Zhao-lun ; Li, Zheng-chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-8877482aeb3c367e911f43a9846bd0d0c887f8a1fae7be095c2098fb21cbf2e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Burnout, Professional - epidemiology</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mu, Ming-chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Zhao-lun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng-chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Qin</au><au>Mu, Ming-chun</au><au>He, Yan</au><au>Cai, Zhao-lun</au><au>Li, Zheng-chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2020-08-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>e21462</spage><epage>e21462</epage><pages>e21462-e21462</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Physician burnout has been a global problem that affects severely the mental status among doctors, especially in emergency medicine (EM). However, few studies have focused on emergency medicine physicians, and the published data are inconsistent. Thus, this meta-analysis is performed to systematically evaluate the prevalence of burnout among emergency medicine physicians.
We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library from inception to September, 2019 for English-language articles. We selected all the original articles those used Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess the prevalence of burnout and its 3 dimensions emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and personal accomplishment (PA) in emergency medicine physicians. After literature screening, quality evaluation was performed for eligible studies by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data; then, Begg test and Egger test was used to assess publication bias. Pooled prevalence rates were assessed by conducting a meta-analysis using random effects models. Then sensitivity analysis followed to test the stability of the result and detected the source of heterogeneity.
A total of 1943 EM physicians provided burnout data. The pooled prevalence rates of high levels of emotional exhaustion, high levels of depersonalization and low levels of PA were 40% (95% CI: 26%-55%; I = 97.4%), 41% (95% CI: 30%-52%; I = 94.5%) and 35% (95% CI: 19%-52%; I = 99.0%), respectively. The mean burnout scores were 23.95 (SD = 11.88) for emotional exhaustion, 11.63 (SD = 6.85) for depersonalization, and 34.69 (SD = 7.71) for PA.
This meta-analysis demonstrate a high level of burnout prevalent in EM physicians that approximately 40% experience high levels of EE and depersonalization. Our findings also suggest that EM physicians are more susceptible to burnout compared with physicians in other departments and other medical staffs in EM. More attention should be payed to mental status of EM physicians and further investigation concerning how to reduce burnout would be beneficial for EM physicians.Registration: INPLASY202060060 in inplasy.com (doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.6.0060).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>32769876</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000021462</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2020-08, Vol.99 (32), p.e21462-e21462 |
issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7593073 |
source | MEDLINE; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Burnout, Professional - epidemiology Emergency Medicine Humans Physicians - psychology Physicians - statistics & numerical data Prevalence Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Burnout in emergency medicine physicians: A meta-analysis and systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T09%3A05%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Burnout%20in%20emergency%20medicine%20physicians:%20A%20meta-analysis%20and%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Qin&rft.date=2020-08-07&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=e21462&rft.epage=e21462&rft.pages=e21462-e21462&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000021462&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32769876%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32769876&rfr_iscdi=true |