A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening

To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JMA journal 2020-04, Vol.3 (2), p.125-130
Hauptverfasser: Saito, Miho, Hirai, Chihiro, Makino, Shintaro, Takeda, Jun, Nojiri, Shuko, Takeda, Satoru, Itakura, Atsuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 130
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title JMA journal
container_volume 3
creator Saito, Miho
Hirai, Chihiro
Makino, Shintaro
Takeda, Jun
Nojiri, Shuko
Takeda, Satoru
Itakura, Atsuo
description To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 -percentile infants. The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90 percentile. GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 percentile, as compared with RBG.
doi_str_mv 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7590393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457968631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-81c0fe216468b3af987de87b392932a7b5fbdd20989d6f5eee479177996a78913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EolXpmRuaI5e0_kj8cUGqFliQWiHRVuJmOclk1yuvvcROpR747yS0rOA0I83MO_POQ8hbRi8Ek5Jf7vZud8EpMxWlir8gp7wWohLc6JfHXP84Iec57yil3HCuNXtNToRgDeV1fUp-XcF3LGPKB-yKf0C4mULxHcaCI9yWqX-EFKFsEe4zDlOImDOkARoKG1iHqUsZYbV1IWDcINxhLuAjrOfoik_RBfjoXYsFM9xgCL5MGW67ETH6uHlDXg0uZDx_jmfk_vOnu9WX6vrb-uvq6rrqaiF5pVlHB-RM1lK3wg1Gqx61aoXhRnCn2mZo-55To00vhwYRa2WYUsZIp7Rh4ox8eNI9TO0e-8Xe6II9jH7vxkebnLf_V6Lf2k16sKoxVBgxC7x_FhjTz2k2Z_c-d7MfFzFN2fK6UUZqKZZdl0-t3fzVPOJwXMOo_cPNLtzsws0u3OaJd_9ed-z_S0n8BpYOlcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457968631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Saito, Miho ; Hirai, Chihiro ; Makino, Shintaro ; Takeda, Jun ; Nojiri, Shuko ; Takeda, Satoru ; Itakura, Atsuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Saito, Miho ; Hirai, Chihiro ; Makino, Shintaro ; Takeda, Jun ; Nojiri, Shuko ; Takeda, Satoru ; Itakura, Atsuo</creatorcontrib><description>To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 -percentile infants. The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90 percentile. GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 percentile, as compared with RBG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2433-328X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2433-3298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33150244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Japan Medical Association</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>JMA journal, 2020-04, Vol.3 (2), p.125-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Japan Medical Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © Japan Medical Association</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590393/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33150244$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saito, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makino, Shintaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nojiri, Shuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itakura, Atsuo</creatorcontrib><title>A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening</title><title>JMA journal</title><addtitle>JMA J</addtitle><description>To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 -percentile infants. The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90 percentile. GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 percentile, as compared with RBG.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2433-328X</issn><issn>2433-3298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EolXpmRuaI5e0_kj8cUGqFliQWiHRVuJmOclk1yuvvcROpR747yS0rOA0I83MO_POQ8hbRi8Ek5Jf7vZud8EpMxWlir8gp7wWohLc6JfHXP84Iec57yil3HCuNXtNToRgDeV1fUp-XcF3LGPKB-yKf0C4mULxHcaCI9yWqX-EFKFsEe4zDlOImDOkARoKG1iHqUsZYbV1IWDcINxhLuAjrOfoik_RBfjoXYsFM9xgCL5MGW67ETH6uHlDXg0uZDx_jmfk_vOnu9WX6vrb-uvq6rrqaiF5pVlHB-RM1lK3wg1Gqx61aoXhRnCn2mZo-55To00vhwYRa2WYUsZIp7Rh4ox8eNI9TO0e-8Xe6II9jH7vxkebnLf_V6Lf2k16sKoxVBgxC7x_FhjTz2k2Z_c-d7MfFzFN2fK6UUZqKZZdl0-t3fzVPOJwXMOo_cPNLtzsws0u3OaJd_9ed-z_S0n8BpYOlcQ</recordid><startdate>20200415</startdate><enddate>20200415</enddate><creator>Saito, Miho</creator><creator>Hirai, Chihiro</creator><creator>Makino, Shintaro</creator><creator>Takeda, Jun</creator><creator>Nojiri, Shuko</creator><creator>Takeda, Satoru</creator><creator>Itakura, Atsuo</creator><general>Japan Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200415</creationdate><title>A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening</title><author>Saito, Miho ; Hirai, Chihiro ; Makino, Shintaro ; Takeda, Jun ; Nojiri, Shuko ; Takeda, Satoru ; Itakura, Atsuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4362-81c0fe216468b3af987de87b392932a7b5fbdd20989d6f5eee479177996a78913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saito, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Chihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makino, Shintaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nojiri, Shuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Itakura, Atsuo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JMA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saito, Miho</au><au>Hirai, Chihiro</au><au>Makino, Shintaro</au><au>Takeda, Jun</au><au>Nojiri, Shuko</au><au>Takeda, Satoru</au><au>Itakura, Atsuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening</atitle><jtitle>JMA journal</jtitle><addtitle>JMA J</addtitle><date>2020-04-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>125-130</pages><issn>2433-328X</issn><eissn>2433-3298</eissn><abstract>To clarify the usefulness of glucose challenge test (GCT), the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) detection and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups of random blood glucose level (RBG) and 50 g GCT in this study. The first survey was conducted at 255 institutions registered by the Kanto Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and clinical training institutions in the Kanto Area, followed by a second survey. The included women were broadly classified into the RBG and GCT groups, according to the mid-trimester blood glucose screening method, and the perinatal outcomes of the two groups were retrospectively compared. The primary outcomes were the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 -percentile infants. The rate of GDM diagnosis was significantly higher in the GCT group (7.6%) than that in the RBG group (4.8%). However, no significant differences were observed in perinatal outcomes, i.e., the proportion of infants weighing 3,500 g or more or birth weight ≥90 percentile. GCT is not superior for predicting infants weighing 3,500 g or more and birth weight ≥90 percentile, as compared with RBG.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japan Medical Association</pub><pmid>33150244</pmid><doi>10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2433-328X
ispartof JMA journal, 2020-04, Vol.3 (2), p.125-130
issn 2433-328X
2433-3298
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7590393
source PubMed Central Open Access; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title A Retrospective Multicenter Study on the Usefulness of 50 g Glucose Challenge Test in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Retrospective%20Multicenter%20Study%20on%20the%20Usefulness%20of%2050%20g%20Glucose%20Challenge%20Test%20in%20Gestational%20Diabetes%20Mellitus%20Screening&rft.jtitle=JMA%20journal&rft.au=Saito,%20Miho&rft.date=2020-04-15&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=125-130&rft.issn=2433-328X&rft.eissn=2433-3298&rft_id=info:doi/10.31662/jmaj.2019-0072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2457968631%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457968631&rft_id=info:pmid/33150244&rfr_iscdi=true