PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor

Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2020-09, Vol.108 (3), p.616-624
Hauptverfasser: Smart, Kevin, Bröske, Ann‐Marie, Rüttinger, Dominik, Mueller, Claudia, Phipps, Alex, Walz, Antje‐Christine, Ries, Carola, Baehner, Monika, Cannarile, Michael, Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 3
container_start_page 616
container_title Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
container_volume 108
creator Smart, Kevin
Bröske, Ann‐Marie
Rüttinger, Dominik
Mueller, Claudia
Phipps, Alex
Walz, Antje‐Christine
Ries, Carola
Baehner, Monika
Cannarile, Michael
Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina
description Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activation of the cell surface colony‐stimulating factor‐1 receptor. Here, we show how modeling target‐mediated drug disposition coupled with pharmacodynamic end points was used to optimize the dose of emactuzumab without defining an MTD. The model could be used to recommend doses across different disease indications. The approach recommended an optimal biological dose of emactuzumab for dosing every 2 weeks (q2w) ≥ 900 mg, approximately three‐fold lower than the highest dose tested clinically. The model predicted that emactuzumab doses ≥ 900 mg q2w would achieve target saturation in excess of 90% over the entire dosing cycle. Subsequently, a dose of 1,000 mg q2w was used in the extension phase of a phase I study of emactuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumors or diffuse‐type tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Clinical data from this study were consistent with model predictions. The model was also used to predict the optimum dose of emactuzumab for use with dosing every 3 weeks, enabling dosing flexibility with respect to comedications. In summary, this work demonstrates the value of quantitative clinical pharmacology approaches to dose selection in oncology as opposed to traditional MTD methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpt.1964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7589268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416943919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-9d935f293b7f55525e466e1c44e0327b64954ad03423bbb083ec11b6beb5dcfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAYRSMEokNB4gmQlyya1v8Tb5Cq9IeKoo5oEEvLdhzGKLFD7AyarngE9rwdT4LLlAILVp-s7_jYV7coniN4iCDER2ZMh0hw-qBYIEZwyRlhD4sFhFCUAhO-VzyJ8VM-UlFVj4s9gtmSIQ4XxffVm6PVCXhrW6eSbcFJiBZcjckN7kYlFzwIHTgdlEnzzTwofQAUqK_P0Dtw4ddOuxSmA-A8WGXY-hTBB5fW4LjdKG-y7jr0rgXNPIQpAuWz33XdHO2Pr9-a7WhBY32IWx82TvXg3CmfQG37fnfjafGoU320z-7mfvH-7LSpX5eXV-cX9fFlaWgFaSlaQViHBdHLjjGGmaWcW2QotZDgpeZUMKpaSCgmWmtYEWsQ0lxbzVrTKbJfvNp5x1kPtjU5x6R6OU5uUNNWBuXkvxvv1vJj2MglqwTmVRa8vBNM4fNsY5KDiybnUN6GOUpMEReUCCT-oGYKMU62u38GQXnbpcxdytsuM_ri72_dg7_Ly0C5A7643m7_K5L1qvkl_AnpKar7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416943919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Smart, Kevin ; Bröske, Ann‐Marie ; Rüttinger, Dominik ; Mueller, Claudia ; Phipps, Alex ; Walz, Antje‐Christine ; Ries, Carola ; Baehner, Monika ; Cannarile, Michael ; Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</creator><creatorcontrib>Smart, Kevin ; Bröske, Ann‐Marie ; Rüttinger, Dominik ; Mueller, Claudia ; Phipps, Alex ; Walz, Antje‐Christine ; Ries, Carola ; Baehner, Monika ; Cannarile, Michael ; Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</creatorcontrib><description>Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activation of the cell surface colony‐stimulating factor‐1 receptor. Here, we show how modeling target‐mediated drug disposition coupled with pharmacodynamic end points was used to optimize the dose of emactuzumab without defining an MTD. The model could be used to recommend doses across different disease indications. The approach recommended an optimal biological dose of emactuzumab for dosing every 2 weeks (q2w) ≥ 900 mg, approximately three‐fold lower than the highest dose tested clinically. The model predicted that emactuzumab doses ≥ 900 mg q2w would achieve target saturation in excess of 90% over the entire dosing cycle. Subsequently, a dose of 1,000 mg q2w was used in the extension phase of a phase I study of emactuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumors or diffuse‐type tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Clinical data from this study were consistent with model predictions. The model was also used to predict the optimum dose of emactuzumab for use with dosing every 3 weeks, enabling dosing flexibility with respect to comedications. In summary, this work demonstrates the value of quantitative clinical pharmacology approaches to dose selection in oncology as opposed to traditional MTD methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32575160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><ispartof>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2020-09, Vol.108 (3), p.616-624</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-9d935f293b7f55525e466e1c44e0327b64954ad03423bbb083ec11b6beb5dcfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-9d935f293b7f55525e466e1c44e0327b64954ad03423bbb083ec11b6beb5dcfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcpt.1964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcpt.1964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32575160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smart, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bröske, Ann‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüttinger, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phipps, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Antje‐Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baehner, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarile, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</creatorcontrib><title>PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor</title><title>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activation of the cell surface colony‐stimulating factor‐1 receptor. Here, we show how modeling target‐mediated drug disposition coupled with pharmacodynamic end points was used to optimize the dose of emactuzumab without defining an MTD. The model could be used to recommend doses across different disease indications. The approach recommended an optimal biological dose of emactuzumab for dosing every 2 weeks (q2w) ≥ 900 mg, approximately three‐fold lower than the highest dose tested clinically. The model predicted that emactuzumab doses ≥ 900 mg q2w would achieve target saturation in excess of 90% over the entire dosing cycle. Subsequently, a dose of 1,000 mg q2w was used in the extension phase of a phase I study of emactuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumors or diffuse‐type tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Clinical data from this study were consistent with model predictions. The model was also used to predict the optimum dose of emactuzumab for use with dosing every 3 weeks, enabling dosing flexibility with respect to comedications. In summary, this work demonstrates the value of quantitative clinical pharmacology approaches to dose selection in oncology as opposed to traditional MTD methods.</description><issn>0009-9236</issn><issn>1532-6535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAYRSMEokNB4gmQlyya1v8Tb5Cq9IeKoo5oEEvLdhzGKLFD7AyarngE9rwdT4LLlAILVp-s7_jYV7coniN4iCDER2ZMh0hw-qBYIEZwyRlhD4sFhFCUAhO-VzyJ8VM-UlFVj4s9gtmSIQ4XxffVm6PVCXhrW6eSbcFJiBZcjckN7kYlFzwIHTgdlEnzzTwofQAUqK_P0Dtw4ddOuxSmA-A8WGXY-hTBB5fW4LjdKG-y7jr0rgXNPIQpAuWz33XdHO2Pr9-a7WhBY32IWx82TvXg3CmfQG37fnfjafGoU320z-7mfvH-7LSpX5eXV-cX9fFlaWgFaSlaQViHBdHLjjGGmaWcW2QotZDgpeZUMKpaSCgmWmtYEWsQ0lxbzVrTKbJfvNp5x1kPtjU5x6R6OU5uUNNWBuXkvxvv1vJj2MglqwTmVRa8vBNM4fNsY5KDiybnUN6GOUpMEReUCCT-oGYKMU62u38GQXnbpcxdytsuM_ri72_dg7_Ly0C5A7643m7_K5L1qvkl_AnpKar7</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Smart, Kevin</creator><creator>Bröske, Ann‐Marie</creator><creator>Rüttinger, Dominik</creator><creator>Mueller, Claudia</creator><creator>Phipps, Alex</creator><creator>Walz, Antje‐Christine</creator><creator>Ries, Carola</creator><creator>Baehner, Monika</creator><creator>Cannarile, Michael</creator><creator>Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor</title><author>Smart, Kevin ; Bröske, Ann‐Marie ; Rüttinger, Dominik ; Mueller, Claudia ; Phipps, Alex ; Walz, Antje‐Christine ; Ries, Carola ; Baehner, Monika ; Cannarile, Michael ; Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-9d935f293b7f55525e466e1c44e0327b64954ad03423bbb083ec11b6beb5dcfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smart, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bröske, Ann‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüttinger, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phipps, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walz, Antje‐Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baehner, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarile, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smart, Kevin</au><au>Bröske, Ann‐Marie</au><au>Rüttinger, Dominik</au><au>Mueller, Claudia</au><au>Phipps, Alex</au><au>Walz, Antje‐Christine</au><au>Ries, Carola</au><au>Baehner, Monika</au><au>Cannarile, Michael</au><au>Meneses‐Lorente, Georgina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor</atitle><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>616</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>616-624</pages><issn>0009-9236</issn><eissn>1532-6535</eissn><abstract>Targeted biological therapies may achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy at doses below the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); therefore, the search for the MTD in clinical studies may not be ideal for these agents. Emactuzumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits the activation of the cell surface colony‐stimulating factor‐1 receptor. Here, we show how modeling target‐mediated drug disposition coupled with pharmacodynamic end points was used to optimize the dose of emactuzumab without defining an MTD. The model could be used to recommend doses across different disease indications. The approach recommended an optimal biological dose of emactuzumab for dosing every 2 weeks (q2w) ≥ 900 mg, approximately three‐fold lower than the highest dose tested clinically. The model predicted that emactuzumab doses ≥ 900 mg q2w would achieve target saturation in excess of 90% over the entire dosing cycle. Subsequently, a dose of 1,000 mg q2w was used in the extension phase of a phase I study of emactuzumab in patients with advanced solid tumors or diffuse‐type tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Clinical data from this study were consistent with model predictions. The model was also used to predict the optimum dose of emactuzumab for use with dosing every 3 weeks, enabling dosing flexibility with respect to comedications. In summary, this work demonstrates the value of quantitative clinical pharmacology approaches to dose selection in oncology as opposed to traditional MTD methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>32575160</pmid><doi>10.1002/cpt.1964</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9236
ispartof Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2020-09, Vol.108 (3), p.616-624
issn 0009-9236
1532-6535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7589268
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title PK/PD Mediated Dose Optimization of Emactuzumab, a CSF1R Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Diffuse‐Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PK/PD%20Mediated%20Dose%20Optimization%20of%20Emactuzumab,%20a%20CSF1R%20Inhibitor,%20in%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20Solid%20Tumors%20and%20Diffuse%E2%80%90Type%20Tenosynovial%20Giant%20Cell%20Tumor&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20pharmacology%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Smart,%20Kevin&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=616&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=616-624&rft.issn=0009-9236&rft.eissn=1532-6535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cpt.1964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2416943919%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416943919&rft_id=info:pmid/32575160&rfr_iscdi=true