The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms

The aim of the present study was to explore the relation between both farm performance and antimicrobial use (AMU) of broiler farms. Farm performance was expressed as technical efficiency, obtained by using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis. AMU was expressed as treatment incidence. Cluster anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1349-1356
Hauptverfasser: Roskam, J L, Oude Lansink, A G J M, Saatkamp, H W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1349
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 99
creator Roskam, J L
Oude Lansink, A G J M
Saatkamp, H W
description The aim of the present study was to explore the relation between both farm performance and antimicrobial use (AMU) of broiler farms. Farm performance was expressed as technical efficiency, obtained by using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis. AMU was expressed as treatment incidence. Cluster analysis is used to obtain groups of farms with similar characteristics regarding technical farm performance and AMU. Results indicate that the farms within the different clusters combine different technical farm performance and different levels of AMU. Between the clusters, significant differences were found in technical farm performance, AMU, the resource intensity of the number of animals at set-up, the number of antimicrobial treatments, the number of antimicrobial treatments related to either gut health or combined problems, and the number of antimicrobial treatments with either yellow or orange active substances. Farmers who combine high levels of AMU with high technical farm performance are likely to overestimate the real economic value of AMU. Proper coordination between the farmer and the veterinarian can be crucial in that case for reducing AMU. Farms with low performance are likely to have poor farm conditions. Improving those farm conditions can help reducing the need for AMU on this kind of farms. The farm-specific conditions have to be considered in future policies aimed at reducing AMU in livestock production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7587671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369875177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-600dd941305bc07c5860cf5c6300edd44295a578ee5c1cb4ea41d76297d54cd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFP3DAQha2qqCy0P4ALyrGXLDN2bG8ulSpEAQmJC3C1HHvS9SqJt3a2iH9fb9michhZM37vja2PsTOEJQKqi81ymzdLDtiWfgmy-cAWKLmsBWr8yBYAgtdSt3jMTnLeAHBUSn9ix4IjSuDNgj09rKlKNNg5xKnqaH4mmqqZ3HoKzg5Vb9NYbSn1MY12clTZyZeawxhcil0okl2mKvZVl2IYKP115M_sqLdDpi-H85Q9_rh6uLyp7-6vby-_39VOtO1cKwDv2wYFyM6BdnKlwPXSKQFA3jcNb6WVekUkHbquIdug14q32svGeSFO2bfX3O2uG8k7muZkB7NNYbTpxUQbzPubKazNz_jbaLnSSmMJ-HoISPHXjvJsxpAdDYOdKO6y4UK1Ky1R6yLFV2n5eM6J-rc1CGbPw2xM4WH2PPajwqN4zv9_35vjHwDxB9R4iR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369875177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Roskam, J L ; Oude Lansink, A G J M ; Saatkamp, H W</creator><creatorcontrib>Roskam, J L ; Oude Lansink, A G J M ; Saatkamp, H W</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present study was to explore the relation between both farm performance and antimicrobial use (AMU) of broiler farms. Farm performance was expressed as technical efficiency, obtained by using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis. AMU was expressed as treatment incidence. Cluster analysis is used to obtain groups of farms with similar characteristics regarding technical farm performance and AMU. Results indicate that the farms within the different clusters combine different technical farm performance and different levels of AMU. Between the clusters, significant differences were found in technical farm performance, AMU, the resource intensity of the number of animals at set-up, the number of antimicrobial treatments, the number of antimicrobial treatments related to either gut health or combined problems, and the number of antimicrobial treatments with either yellow or orange active substances. Farmers who combine high levels of AMU with high technical farm performance are likely to overestimate the real economic value of AMU. Proper coordination between the farmer and the veterinarian can be crucial in that case for reducing AMU. Farms with low performance are likely to have poor farm conditions. Improving those farm conditions can help reducing the need for AMU on this kind of farms. The farm-specific conditions have to be considered in future policies aimed at reducing AMU in livestock production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32115024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Management and Production</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1349-1356</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-600dd941305bc07c5860cf5c6300edd44295a578ee5c1cb4ea41d76297d54cd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-600dd941305bc07c5860cf5c6300edd44295a578ee5c1cb4ea41d76297d54cd33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587671/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7587671/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32115024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roskam, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oude Lansink, A G J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H W</creatorcontrib><title>The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of the present study was to explore the relation between both farm performance and antimicrobial use (AMU) of broiler farms. Farm performance was expressed as technical efficiency, obtained by using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis. AMU was expressed as treatment incidence. Cluster analysis is used to obtain groups of farms with similar characteristics regarding technical farm performance and AMU. Results indicate that the farms within the different clusters combine different technical farm performance and different levels of AMU. Between the clusters, significant differences were found in technical farm performance, AMU, the resource intensity of the number of animals at set-up, the number of antimicrobial treatments, the number of antimicrobial treatments related to either gut health or combined problems, and the number of antimicrobial treatments with either yellow or orange active substances. Farmers who combine high levels of AMU with high technical farm performance are likely to overestimate the real economic value of AMU. Proper coordination between the farmer and the veterinarian can be crucial in that case for reducing AMU. Farms with low performance are likely to have poor farm conditions. Improving those farm conditions can help reducing the need for AMU on this kind of farms. The farm-specific conditions have to be considered in future policies aimed at reducing AMU in livestock production.</description><subject>Management and Production</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFP3DAQha2qqCy0P4ALyrGXLDN2bG8ulSpEAQmJC3C1HHvS9SqJt3a2iH9fb9michhZM37vja2PsTOEJQKqi81ymzdLDtiWfgmy-cAWKLmsBWr8yBYAgtdSt3jMTnLeAHBUSn9ix4IjSuDNgj09rKlKNNg5xKnqaH4mmqqZ3HoKzg5Vb9NYbSn1MY12clTZyZeawxhcil0okl2mKvZVl2IYKP115M_sqLdDpi-H85Q9_rh6uLyp7-6vby-_39VOtO1cKwDv2wYFyM6BdnKlwPXSKQFA3jcNb6WVekUkHbquIdug14q32svGeSFO2bfX3O2uG8k7muZkB7NNYbTpxUQbzPubKazNz_jbaLnSSmMJ-HoISPHXjvJsxpAdDYOdKO6y4UK1Ky1R6yLFV2n5eM6J-rc1CGbPw2xM4WH2PPajwqN4zv9_35vjHwDxB9R4iR8</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Roskam, J L</creator><creator>Oude Lansink, A G J M</creator><creator>Saatkamp, H W</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms</title><author>Roskam, J L ; Oude Lansink, A G J M ; Saatkamp, H W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-600dd941305bc07c5860cf5c6300edd44295a578ee5c1cb4ea41d76297d54cd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Management and Production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roskam, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oude Lansink, A G J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roskam, J L</au><au>Oude Lansink, A G J M</au><au>Saatkamp, H W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1349</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1349-1356</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present study was to explore the relation between both farm performance and antimicrobial use (AMU) of broiler farms. Farm performance was expressed as technical efficiency, obtained by using a bootstrap data envelopment analysis. AMU was expressed as treatment incidence. Cluster analysis is used to obtain groups of farms with similar characteristics regarding technical farm performance and AMU. Results indicate that the farms within the different clusters combine different technical farm performance and different levels of AMU. Between the clusters, significant differences were found in technical farm performance, AMU, the resource intensity of the number of animals at set-up, the number of antimicrobial treatments, the number of antimicrobial treatments related to either gut health or combined problems, and the number of antimicrobial treatments with either yellow or orange active substances. Farmers who combine high levels of AMU with high technical farm performance are likely to overestimate the real economic value of AMU. Proper coordination between the farmer and the veterinarian can be crucial in that case for reducing AMU. Farms with low performance are likely to have poor farm conditions. Improving those farm conditions can help reducing the need for AMU on this kind of farms. The farm-specific conditions have to be considered in future policies aimed at reducing AMU in livestock production.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>32115024</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.054</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2020-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1349-1356
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7587671
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Management and Production
title The relation between technical farm performance and antimicrobial use of broiler farms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T19%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relation%20between%20technical%20farm%20performance%20and%20antimicrobial%20use%20of%20broiler%20farms&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Roskam,%20J%20L&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1349&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1349-1356&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2369875177%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369875177&rft_id=info:pmid/32115024&rfr_iscdi=true