The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses

Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a critical developmental pathway, has been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. With vismodegib and sonidegib having been approved for clinical use, increasing numbers of HH inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapies are in clinical trials. Here we h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer biology & therapy 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.873-883
Hauptverfasser: Booker, Burthia E., Steg, Adam D., Kovac, Stefan, Landen, Charles N., Amm, Hope M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 883
container_issue 10
container_start_page 873
container_title Cancer biology & therapy
container_volume 21
creator Booker, Burthia E.
Steg, Adam D.
Kovac, Stefan
Landen, Charles N.
Amm, Hope M.
description Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a critical developmental pathway, has been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. With vismodegib and sonidegib having been approved for clinical use, increasing numbers of HH inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapies are in clinical trials. Here we highlight the clinical research on HH antagonists and the genetics of response to these compounds in human cancers. Selectivity of HH inhibitors, determined by decreased pathway transcriptional activity, has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Patients with advanced/metastatic basal cell carcinoma have benefited the most, whereas HH antagonists did little to improve survival rates in other cancers. Correlation between clinical response and HH gene expression vary among different cancer types. Predicting response and resistance to HH inhibitors presents a challenge and continues to remain an important area of research. New approaches combine standard of care chemotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies to increase the clinical utility of HH inhibitors.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15384047.2020.1806640
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441606545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-9195f58ca75e72962e0453b0bd60211a207775a881be8eb483d201a66b454c813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEouXCTwB5ySbFdvwKCwSqeEmV2JS1NXEmiVFip3YC3H9PontbwYbVjGbOOTPSVxQvGb1i1NA3TFZGUKGvOOXbyFClBH1UXDIpZWmkVo_3vjLlLroonuX8g1KuuaqfFhcVr5nQVF0Wd7cDkjUjiR0ZsO1xiD2BsEAfg89LJj4QB8FhIsuACebjWwLExWmG5HMMu8-NPngHI4nrsm0wbwEt6TEgwd9zwpz9JoQA4zFjfl486WDM-OJcD8X3Tx9vr7-UN98-f73-cFM6ocxS1qyWnTQOtETNa8WRClk1tGkV5YwBp1prCcawBg02wlQtpwyUaoQUzrDqULw75c5rM2HrMCwJRjsnP0E62gje_rsJfrB9_Gm1NJVmdAt4fQ5I8W7FvNjJZ4fjCAHjmi0Xgimq5PbWoZAnqUsx54TdwxlG7Y7L3uOyOy57xrX5Xv3944Prns8meH8S-NDFNMGvmMbWLnAcY-rSxsVnW_3_xh8yyqXh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441606545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Booker, Burthia E. ; Steg, Adam D. ; Kovac, Stefan ; Landen, Charles N. ; Amm, Hope M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Booker, Burthia E. ; Steg, Adam D. ; Kovac, Stefan ; Landen, Charles N. ; Amm, Hope M.</creatorcontrib><description>Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a critical developmental pathway, has been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. With vismodegib and sonidegib having been approved for clinical use, increasing numbers of HH inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapies are in clinical trials. Here we highlight the clinical research on HH antagonists and the genetics of response to these compounds in human cancers. Selectivity of HH inhibitors, determined by decreased pathway transcriptional activity, has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Patients with advanced/metastatic basal cell carcinoma have benefited the most, whereas HH antagonists did little to improve survival rates in other cancers. Correlation between clinical response and HH gene expression vary among different cancer types. Predicting response and resistance to HH inhibitors presents a challenge and continues to remain an important area of research. New approaches combine standard of care chemotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies to increase the clinical utility of HH inhibitors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-8576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1806640</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32914706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Cancer ; GLI ; hedgehog ; Review ; SMO ; smoothened ; sonidegib ; vismodegib</subject><ispartof>Cancer biology &amp; therapy, 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.873-883</ispartof><rights>2020 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2020</rights><rights>2020 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2020 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-9195f58ca75e72962e0453b0bd60211a207775a881be8eb483d201a66b454c813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-9195f58ca75e72962e0453b0bd60211a207775a881be8eb483d201a66b454c813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2416-9575</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583710/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7583710/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Booker, Burthia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steg, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landen, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amm, Hope M.</creatorcontrib><title>The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses</title><title>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</title><addtitle>Cancer Biol Ther</addtitle><description>Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a critical developmental pathway, has been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. With vismodegib and sonidegib having been approved for clinical use, increasing numbers of HH inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapies are in clinical trials. Here we highlight the clinical research on HH antagonists and the genetics of response to these compounds in human cancers. Selectivity of HH inhibitors, determined by decreased pathway transcriptional activity, has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Patients with advanced/metastatic basal cell carcinoma have benefited the most, whereas HH antagonists did little to improve survival rates in other cancers. Correlation between clinical response and HH gene expression vary among different cancer types. Predicting response and resistance to HH inhibitors presents a challenge and continues to remain an important area of research. New approaches combine standard of care chemotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies to increase the clinical utility of HH inhibitors.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>GLI</subject><subject>hedgehog</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>SMO</subject><subject>smoothened</subject><subject>sonidegib</subject><subject>vismodegib</subject><issn>1538-4047</issn><issn>1555-8576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEouXCTwB5ySbFdvwKCwSqeEmV2JS1NXEmiVFip3YC3H9PontbwYbVjGbOOTPSVxQvGb1i1NA3TFZGUKGvOOXbyFClBH1UXDIpZWmkVo_3vjLlLroonuX8g1KuuaqfFhcVr5nQVF0Wd7cDkjUjiR0ZsO1xiD2BsEAfg89LJj4QB8FhIsuACebjWwLExWmG5HMMu8-NPngHI4nrsm0wbwEt6TEgwd9zwpz9JoQA4zFjfl486WDM-OJcD8X3Tx9vr7-UN98-f73-cFM6ocxS1qyWnTQOtETNa8WRClk1tGkV5YwBp1prCcawBg02wlQtpwyUaoQUzrDqULw75c5rM2HrMCwJRjsnP0E62gje_rsJfrB9_Gm1NJVmdAt4fQ5I8W7FvNjJZ4fjCAHjmi0Xgimq5PbWoZAnqUsx54TdwxlG7Y7L3uOyOy57xrX5Xv3944Prns8meH8S-NDFNMGvmMbWLnAcY-rSxsVnW_3_xh8yyqXh</recordid><startdate>20201002</startdate><enddate>20201002</enddate><creator>Booker, Burthia E.</creator><creator>Steg, Adam D.</creator><creator>Kovac, Stefan</creator><creator>Landen, Charles N.</creator><creator>Amm, Hope M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2416-9575</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201002</creationdate><title>The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses</title><author>Booker, Burthia E. ; Steg, Adam D. ; Kovac, Stefan ; Landen, Charles N. ; Amm, Hope M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-9195f58ca75e72962e0453b0bd60211a207775a881be8eb483d201a66b454c813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>GLI</topic><topic>hedgehog</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>SMO</topic><topic>smoothened</topic><topic>sonidegib</topic><topic>vismodegib</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Booker, Burthia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steg, Adam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landen, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amm, Hope M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Booker, Burthia E.</au><au>Steg, Adam D.</au><au>Kovac, Stefan</au><au>Landen, Charles N.</au><au>Amm, Hope M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses</atitle><jtitle>Cancer biology &amp; therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Biol Ther</addtitle><date>2020-10-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>873-883</pages><issn>1538-4047</issn><eissn>1555-8576</eissn><abstract>Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a critical developmental pathway, has been implicated in cancer initiation and progression. With vismodegib and sonidegib having been approved for clinical use, increasing numbers of HH inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapies are in clinical trials. Here we highlight the clinical research on HH antagonists and the genetics of response to these compounds in human cancers. Selectivity of HH inhibitors, determined by decreased pathway transcriptional activity, has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Patients with advanced/metastatic basal cell carcinoma have benefited the most, whereas HH antagonists did little to improve survival rates in other cancers. Correlation between clinical response and HH gene expression vary among different cancer types. Predicting response and resistance to HH inhibitors presents a challenge and continues to remain an important area of research. New approaches combine standard of care chemotherapies and molecularly targeted therapies to increase the clinical utility of HH inhibitors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>32914706</pmid><doi>10.1080/15384047.2020.1806640</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2416-9575</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-4047
ispartof Cancer biology & therapy, 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.873-883
issn 1538-4047
1555-8576
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583710
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cancer
GLI
hedgehog
Review
SMO
smoothened
sonidegib
vismodegib
title The use of hedgehog antagonists in cancer therapy: a comparison of clinical outcomes and gene expression analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20hedgehog%20antagonists%20in%20cancer%20therapy:%20a%20comparison%20of%20clinical%20outcomes%20and%20gene%20expression%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20biology%20&%20therapy&rft.au=Booker,%20Burthia%20E.&rft.date=2020-10-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=873-883&rft.issn=1538-4047&rft.eissn=1555-8576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15384047.2020.1806640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2441606545%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441606545&rft_id=info:pmid/32914706&rfr_iscdi=true