Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care
Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1041 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1034 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Blomaard, Laura C Mooijaart, Simon P Bolt, Shanti Lucke, Jacinta A de Gelder, Jelle Booijen, Anja M Gussekloo, Jacobijn de Groot, Bas |
description | Abstract
Background
risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care.
Objective
to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation.
Design and setting
2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center.
Subjects
all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years.
Methods
feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses.
Results
we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’).
Conclusion
with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afaa078 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afaa078</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2405307414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT9v1TAUxS0Eoq-FlRFZYoEhrf8ksbMgVRUtSJXaAWbrxr55dZXEwU4qZevHgK_XT4Kr96iAhcny8c_nnqtDyBvOjjlr5Als0Y_bE-gAmNLPyIaXtS6EluVzsmGMiYIp0RyQw5Ru85VXXLwkB1KUQvOm2ZD1HCH51vd-XimMjoK1OM2wV0JH5xukD_c_Tu0yY7_S64gJxzkPpVe9w0ivYfZZeLj_SZONiGPW_EhjWDKEFAeMWxztSh1OEOchs9RCxFfkRQd9wtf784h8O__09exzcXl18eXs9LKwZSXmwgqspWAtNMLqqgLduk6hqpVz1rVla8FKmzNbYYXiuqsboZwWXDa85ULV8oh83PlOSzugs3l-hN5M0Q8QVxPAm79fRn9jtuHOqErLSlTZ4P3eIIbvC6bZDD5Z7HsYMSzJiJJVkqmSlxl99w96G5Y45vUypWrOha4fEx3vKBtDShG7pzCcmcdWza5Vs281f3j75wpP-O8aM_BhB4Rl-p_ZL5Wms0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476112866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</creator><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care.
Objective
to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation.
Design and setting
2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center.
Subjects
all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years.
Methods
feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses.
Results
we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’).
Conclusion
with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa078</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32428199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; Completion ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Feasibility ; Medical screening ; Nurses ; Patients ; Research Paper ; Stratification ; Triage ; Urgency</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooijaart, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolt, Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucke, Jacinta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gelder, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booijen, Anja M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care.
Objective
to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation.
Design and setting
2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center.
Subjects
all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years.
Methods
feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses.
Results
we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’).
Conclusion
with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Completion</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>Urgency</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT9v1TAUxS0Eoq-FlRFZYoEhrf8ksbMgVRUtSJXaAWbrxr55dZXEwU4qZevHgK_XT4Kr96iAhcny8c_nnqtDyBvOjjlr5Als0Y_bE-gAmNLPyIaXtS6EluVzsmGMiYIp0RyQw5Ru85VXXLwkB1KUQvOm2ZD1HCH51vd-XimMjoK1OM2wV0JH5xukD_c_Tu0yY7_S64gJxzkPpVe9w0ivYfZZeLj_SZONiGPW_EhjWDKEFAeMWxztSh1OEOchs9RCxFfkRQd9wtf784h8O__09exzcXl18eXs9LKwZSXmwgqspWAtNMLqqgLduk6hqpVz1rVla8FKmzNbYYXiuqsboZwWXDa85ULV8oh83PlOSzugs3l-hN5M0Q8QVxPAm79fRn9jtuHOqErLSlTZ4P3eIIbvC6bZDD5Z7HsYMSzJiJJVkqmSlxl99w96G5Y45vUypWrOha4fEx3vKBtDShG7pzCcmcdWza5Vs281f3j75wpP-O8aM_BhB4Rl-p_ZL5Wms0o</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Blomaard, Laura C</creator><creator>Mooijaart, Simon P</creator><creator>Bolt, Shanti</creator><creator>Lucke, Jacinta A</creator><creator>de Gelder, Jelle</creator><creator>Booijen, Anja M</creator><creator>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creator><creator>de Groot, Bas</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><author>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Completion</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>Urgency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooijaart, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolt, Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucke, Jacinta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gelder, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booijen, Anja M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blomaard, Laura C</au><au>Mooijaart, Simon P</au><au>Bolt, Shanti</au><au>Lucke, Jacinta A</au><au>de Gelder, Jelle</au><au>Booijen, Anja M</au><au>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</au><au>de Groot, Bas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1041</epage><pages>1034-1041</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care.
Objective
to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation.
Design and setting
2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center.
Subjects
all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years.
Methods
feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses.
Results
we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’).
Conclusion
with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32428199</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afaa078</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041 |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583525 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cohort analysis Completion Emergency medical care Emergency services Feasibility Medical screening Nurses Patients Research Paper Stratification Triage Urgency |
title | Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A51%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20acceptability%20of%20the%20%E2%80%98Acutely%20Presenting%20Older%20Patient%E2%80%99%20screener%20in%20routine%20emergency%20department%20care&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Blomaard,%20Laura%20C&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1041&rft.pages=1034-1041&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afaa078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2405307414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476112866&rft_id=info:pmid/32428199&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afaa078&rfr_iscdi=true |