Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care

Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041
Hauptverfasser: Blomaard, Laura C, Mooijaart, Simon P, Bolt, Shanti, Lucke, Jacinta A, de Gelder, Jelle, Booijen, Anja M, Gussekloo, Jacobijn, de Groot, Bas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1041
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1034
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 49
creator Blomaard, Laura C
Mooijaart, Simon P
Bolt, Shanti
Lucke, Jacinta A
de Gelder, Jelle
Booijen, Anja M
Gussekloo, Jacobijn
de Groot, Bas
description Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation. Design and setting 2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center. Subjects all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years. Methods feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses. Results we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’). Conclusion with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afaa078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afaa078</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2405307414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT9v1TAUxS0Eoq-FlRFZYoEhrf8ksbMgVRUtSJXaAWbrxr55dZXEwU4qZevHgK_XT4Kr96iAhcny8c_nnqtDyBvOjjlr5Als0Y_bE-gAmNLPyIaXtS6EluVzsmGMiYIp0RyQw5Ru85VXXLwkB1KUQvOm2ZD1HCH51vd-XimMjoK1OM2wV0JH5xukD_c_Tu0yY7_S64gJxzkPpVe9w0ivYfZZeLj_SZONiGPW_EhjWDKEFAeMWxztSh1OEOchs9RCxFfkRQd9wtf784h8O__09exzcXl18eXs9LKwZSXmwgqspWAtNMLqqgLduk6hqpVz1rVla8FKmzNbYYXiuqsboZwWXDa85ULV8oh83PlOSzugs3l-hN5M0Q8QVxPAm79fRn9jtuHOqErLSlTZ4P3eIIbvC6bZDD5Z7HsYMSzJiJJVkqmSlxl99w96G5Y45vUypWrOha4fEx3vKBtDShG7pzCcmcdWza5Vs281f3j75wpP-O8aM_BhB4Rl-p_ZL5Wms0o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476112866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</creator><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation. Design and setting 2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center. Subjects all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years. Methods feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses. Results we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’). Conclusion with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa078</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32428199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; Completion ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Feasibility ; Medical screening ; Nurses ; Patients ; Research Paper ; Stratification ; Triage ; Urgency</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32428199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooijaart, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolt, Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucke, Jacinta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gelder, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booijen, Anja M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation. Design and setting 2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center. Subjects all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years. Methods feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses. Results we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’). Conclusion with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Completion</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>Urgency</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT9v1TAUxS0Eoq-FlRFZYoEhrf8ksbMgVRUtSJXaAWbrxr55dZXEwU4qZevHgK_XT4Kr96iAhcny8c_nnqtDyBvOjjlr5Als0Y_bE-gAmNLPyIaXtS6EluVzsmGMiYIp0RyQw5Ru85VXXLwkB1KUQvOm2ZD1HCH51vd-XimMjoK1OM2wV0JH5xukD_c_Tu0yY7_S64gJxzkPpVe9w0ivYfZZeLj_SZONiGPW_EhjWDKEFAeMWxztSh1OEOchs9RCxFfkRQd9wtf784h8O__09exzcXl18eXs9LKwZSXmwgqspWAtNMLqqgLduk6hqpVz1rVla8FKmzNbYYXiuqsboZwWXDa85ULV8oh83PlOSzugs3l-hN5M0Q8QVxPAm79fRn9jtuHOqErLSlTZ4P3eIIbvC6bZDD5Z7HsYMSzJiJJVkqmSlxl99w96G5Y45vUypWrOha4fEx3vKBtDShG7pzCcmcdWza5Vs281f3j75wpP-O8aM_BhB4Rl-p_ZL5Wms0o</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Blomaard, Laura C</creator><creator>Mooijaart, Simon P</creator><creator>Bolt, Shanti</creator><creator>Lucke, Jacinta A</creator><creator>de Gelder, Jelle</creator><creator>Booijen, Anja M</creator><creator>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creator><creator>de Groot, Bas</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</title><author>Blomaard, Laura C ; Mooijaart, Simon P ; Bolt, Shanti ; Lucke, Jacinta A ; de Gelder, Jelle ; Booijen, Anja M ; Gussekloo, Jacobijn ; de Groot, Bas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-c2e6320ba92c855a8bdf7e767ddcdb4bcac3cccec2c2718f6927d821391b12763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Completion</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>Urgency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blomaard, Laura C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooijaart, Simon P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolt, Shanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucke, Jacinta A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gelder, Jelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booijen, Anja M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Bas</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blomaard, Laura C</au><au>Mooijaart, Simon P</au><au>Bolt, Shanti</au><au>Lucke, Jacinta A</au><au>de Gelder, Jelle</au><au>Booijen, Anja M</au><au>Gussekloo, Jacobijn</au><au>de Groot, Bas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1041</epage><pages>1034-1041</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background risk stratification tools for older patients in the emergency department (ED) have rarely been implemented successfully in routine care. Objective to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ (APOP) screener, which identifies older ED patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes within 2 minutes at presentation. Design and setting 2-month prospective cohort study, after the implementation of the APOP screener in ED routine care in the Leiden University Medical Center. Subjects all consecutive ED patients aged ≥70 years. Methods feasibility of screening was assessed by measuring the screening rate and by identifying patient- and organisation-related determinants of screening completion. Acceptability was assessed by collecting experienced barriers of screening completion from triage-nurses. Results we included 953 patients with a median age of 77 (IQR 72–82) years, of which 560 (59%) patients were screened. Patients had a higher probability of being screened when they had a higher age (OR 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.06), P = 0.017). Patients had a lower probability of being screened when they were triaged very urgent (OR 0.55 (0.39–0.78), P = 0.001) or when the number of patients upon arrival was high (OR 0.63 (0.47–0.86), P = 0.003). Experienced barriers of screening completion were patient-related (‘patient was too sick’), organisation-related (‘ED was too busy’) and personnel-related (‘forgot to complete screening’). Conclusion with more than half of all older patients screened, feasibility and acceptability of screening in routine ED care is very promising. To further improve screening completion, solutions are needed for patients who present with high urgency and during ED rush hours.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32428199</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afaa078</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2020-11, Vol.49 (6), p.1034-1041
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7583525
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cohort analysis
Completion
Emergency medical care
Emergency services
Feasibility
Medical screening
Nurses
Patients
Research Paper
Stratification
Triage
Urgency
title Feasibility and acceptability of the ‘Acutely Presenting Older Patient’ screener in routine emergency department care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A51%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20acceptability%20of%20the%20%E2%80%98Acutely%20Presenting%20Older%20Patient%E2%80%99%20screener%20in%20routine%20emergency%20department%20care&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Blomaard,%20Laura%20C&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1041&rft.pages=1034-1041&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afaa078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2405307414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476112866&rft_id=info:pmid/32428199&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afaa078&rfr_iscdi=true