The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks
To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 331 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Yigit, Seyhmus Yıldırım, Azad |
description | To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation.
We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2).
The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases.
In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7569624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32420969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMtKAzEUDaLYUrt2J_mBGZOb12QjSPEFBTd1JwyZmaQNdh4kM4X-vSk-0NXlnheHg9A1JTkwJcitqdr8oKmHvFBEn6E5CEYzqbg4R3PCNGQcCJuhZYy-IpxAQSUjl2jGIBFa6jl63-wsjlPY2nDE_TTWfWsj7h0ebOPNGHyNnW37YPY47owbsQumHqeQRKZrcJIPJvjo--5kCuZkOj0J-4hX6MKZfbTL77tAb48Pm9Vztn59elndr7MaQI2ZNKoQTHIBTlJoKNDaVRa0po41WunUNsGNlhV1jREF4RyMsE0tKq6lkmyB7r5yh6lqE267MRUuh-BbE45lb3z5n-n8rtz2h1IJqSXwFHDzN-DX-bMT-wQWoW43</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</creator><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><description>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation.
We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2).
The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases.
In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-4203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2531-6745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32420969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Mattioli 1885</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fluoroscopy - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation - methods ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Male ; Original ; Radiation Exposure - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569624/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569624/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><title>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</title><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><description>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation.
We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2).
The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases.
In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0392-4203</issn><issn>2531-6745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMtKAzEUDaLYUrt2J_mBGZOb12QjSPEFBTd1JwyZmaQNdh4kM4X-vSk-0NXlnheHg9A1JTkwJcitqdr8oKmHvFBEn6E5CEYzqbg4R3PCNGQcCJuhZYy-IpxAQSUjl2jGIBFa6jl63-wsjlPY2nDE_TTWfWsj7h0ebOPNGHyNnW37YPY47owbsQumHqeQRKZrcJIPJvjo--5kCuZkOj0J-4hX6MKZfbTL77tAb48Pm9Vztn59elndr7MaQI2ZNKoQTHIBTlJoKNDaVRa0po41WunUNsGNlhV1jREF4RyMsE0tKq6lkmyB7r5yh6lqE267MRUuh-BbE45lb3z5n-n8rtz2h1IJqSXwFHDzN-DX-bMT-wQWoW43</recordid><startdate>20200511</startdate><enddate>20200511</enddate><creator>Yigit, Seyhmus</creator><creator>Yıldırım, Azad</creator><general>Mattioli 1885</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200511</creationdate><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><author>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yigit, Seyhmus</au><au>Yıldırım, Azad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</atitle><jtitle>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><date>2020-05-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>326-331</pages><issn>0392-4203</issn><eissn>2531-6745</eissn><abstract>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation.
We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2).
The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases.
In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Mattioli 1885</pub><pmid>32420969</pmid><doi>10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0392-4203 |
ispartof | Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331 |
issn | 0392-4203 2531-6745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7569624 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Child Female Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging Femoral Fractures - surgery Fluoroscopy - adverse effects Fracture Fixation - methods Humans Intraoperative Period Male Original Radiation Exposure - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Treatment Outcome |
title | The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20surgery%20outcomes%20of%20pediatric%20femoral%20shaft%20fractures%20and%20comparision%20of%20radiation%20risks&rft.jtitle=Acta%20bio-medica%20:%20Atenei%20Parmensis&rft.au=Yigit,%20Seyhmus&rft.date=2020-05-11&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=326-331&rft.issn=0392-4203&rft.eissn=2531-6745&rft_id=info:doi/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E32420969%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32420969&rfr_iscdi=true |