The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks

To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331
Hauptverfasser: Yigit, Seyhmus, Yıldırım, Azad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 2
container_start_page 326
container_title Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
container_volume 91
creator Yigit, Seyhmus
Yıldırım, Azad
description To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases. In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.
doi_str_mv 10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7569624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32420969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMtKAzEUDaLYUrt2J_mBGZOb12QjSPEFBTd1JwyZmaQNdh4kM4X-vSk-0NXlnheHg9A1JTkwJcitqdr8oKmHvFBEn6E5CEYzqbg4R3PCNGQcCJuhZYy-IpxAQSUjl2jGIBFa6jl63-wsjlPY2nDE_TTWfWsj7h0ebOPNGHyNnW37YPY47owbsQumHqeQRKZrcJIPJvjo--5kCuZkOj0J-4hX6MKZfbTL77tAb48Pm9Vztn59elndr7MaQI2ZNKoQTHIBTlJoKNDaVRa0po41WunUNsGNlhV1jREF4RyMsE0tKq6lkmyB7r5yh6lqE267MRUuh-BbE45lb3z5n-n8rtz2h1IJqSXwFHDzN-DX-bMT-wQWoW43</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</creator><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><description>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases. In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-4203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2531-6745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32420969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Mattioli 1885</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fluoroscopy - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation - methods ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Male ; Original ; Radiation Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569624/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7569624/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32420969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><title>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</title><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><description>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases. In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0392-4203</issn><issn>2531-6745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMtKAzEUDaLYUrt2J_mBGZOb12QjSPEFBTd1JwyZmaQNdh4kM4X-vSk-0NXlnheHg9A1JTkwJcitqdr8oKmHvFBEn6E5CEYzqbg4R3PCNGQcCJuhZYy-IpxAQSUjl2jGIBFa6jl63-wsjlPY2nDE_TTWfWsj7h0ebOPNGHyNnW37YPY47owbsQumHqeQRKZrcJIPJvjo--5kCuZkOj0J-4hX6MKZfbTL77tAb48Pm9Vztn59elndr7MaQI2ZNKoQTHIBTlJoKNDaVRa0po41WunUNsGNlhV1jREF4RyMsE0tKq6lkmyB7r5yh6lqE267MRUuh-BbE45lb3z5n-n8rtz2h1IJqSXwFHDzN-DX-bMT-wQWoW43</recordid><startdate>20200511</startdate><enddate>20200511</enddate><creator>Yigit, Seyhmus</creator><creator>Yıldırım, Azad</creator><general>Mattioli 1885</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200511</creationdate><title>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</title><author>Yigit, Seyhmus ; Yıldırım, Azad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c227t-6a78536452f612d121cfbe2991f3d97932412dd96b1fda580442a5edc5b496763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yigit, Seyhmus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım, Azad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yigit, Seyhmus</au><au>Yıldırım, Azad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks</atitle><jtitle>Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><date>2020-05-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>326-331</pages><issn>0392-4203</issn><eissn>2531-6745</eissn><abstract>To show midterm results and compare the two methods utilized in pediatric femoral diaphysis fractures fixation and the risks of radiation. We conducted retrospective studies of 60 children and adolescent between the age of 6 to 16 years who were exposed to traumatic femoral shaft fractures and treated with methods of fixation titanyum elastic nail (EN), submuscular bridge plating (SBP) Twenty eight (18 males and 10 females) were treated with SBP (group 1), and 32 patients (18 males and 14 females) were treated with EN (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 10,3 years. Duration of follow-up was 29.8 months. Mean union time was 7,4 weeks (range, 6-10 weeks). Operative time was on average 60.6 minutes. Considering Flynn's criteria, the results of treatment was excellent in 50, good in 4 and poor in 6 cases. In the surgical treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, fixation techniques such as submuscular bridge platingand elastic nails were found to have similar fracture healing and complication rates. An orthopaedic surgeon must protect himself, his personnel and the patient from radiation exposure. Open reduction internal plate fixation can be chosen as an alternative treatment for children who do not cause radiation exposure to the femoral fracture.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Mattioli 1885</pub><pmid>32420969</pmid><doi>10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0392-4203
ispartof Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2020-05, Vol.91 (2), p.326-331
issn 0392-4203
2531-6745
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7569624
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Child
Female
Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Fluoroscopy - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation - methods
Humans
Intraoperative Period
Male
Original
Radiation Exposure - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Treatment Outcome
title The surgery outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures and comparision of radiation risks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20surgery%20outcomes%20of%20pediatric%20femoral%20shaft%20fractures%20and%20comparision%20of%20radiation%20risks&rft.jtitle=Acta%20bio-medica%20:%20Atenei%20Parmensis&rft.au=Yigit,%20Seyhmus&rft.date=2020-05-11&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=326-331&rft.issn=0392-4203&rft.eissn=2531-6745&rft_id=info:doi/10.23750/abm.v91i2.8709&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E32420969%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32420969&rfr_iscdi=true