Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience

Radiotherapy is a very effective tool in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The aim of this study was to compare the palliative effect of radiotherapy between the standard fractionation schedule 20 Gy over 5 fractions (20Gy/5fr) and the high biological dose schedule 27 Gy over 3 fractions (27...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.1807-1811
Hauptverfasser: Sakr, Amr, Hashem, Wedad Bassam, Ebrahim, Nadia, Mashhour, Karim Nabil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1811
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1807
container_title Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
container_volume 21
creator Sakr, Amr
Hashem, Wedad Bassam
Ebrahim, Nadia
Mashhour, Karim Nabil
description Radiotherapy is a very effective tool in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The aim of this study was to compare the palliative effect of radiotherapy between the standard fractionation schedule 20 Gy over 5 fractions (20Gy/5fr) and the high biological dose schedule 27 Gy over 3 fractions (27Gy/3fr) which is frequently used in Stereotactic body radio-surgery (SBRT). Patients were randomized to receive (20Gy/5fr)or (27Gy/3fr). The primary aim of the study was pain relief using the numeric rating scale (NRS), after three months of radiation therapy. Secondary end points include pain relief immediately after finishing radiation therapy (within one week), and narcotic relief after three months of radiation therapy. Twenty-two patients with painful bone metastases were included. 12 patients received (20Gy/5fr) and 10 patients received (27Gy/3fr). Male patients were predominant on both arms (81.8%) with a mean age of 58 years [ranging between 19-72 years]. For pain relief after three months of radiation therapy, partial pain relief was documented in 9 patients (75%) with (20Gy/5fr) and in 8 patients (80%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p- value of 0.6. Additionally, narcotic relief after three months was equal for both groups. For immediate pain relief, partial pain relief was seen in one patient (8%) with (20Gy/5fr) versus seven patients (70%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p value of 0.06. The increase in immediate pain relief in the 27Gy arm was numerically but not statistically significant. SBRT and standard fractionation radiation therapy had equal effectiveness for pain relief, when the assessment was done after three months of radiation therapy. Interestingly, SBRT had a better immediate pain relief.  .
doi_str_mv 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.6.1807
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7568878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32592381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3267-4e7f43db04f5c0af89e124722b679b7614da1f808dd1d41521dd39c0e56781f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtqGzEURUVpaS7tJ7ScH_BEl9HFfSi4JklTUmpygbwJeSQlKmPJSJpQ91_yrxknaXBBcASLvQ-HhdAnghtGOJdHs8WP-aKhmOKGkkY0RGH5Bu3TVoqJFPTm7c5_Dx2U8hvjlivJ36M9RvmUMkX20cOFiTatwl9nYRH6VOGyDnYDyQPFcLqBEIHDSTZdDSkWuHe5DAWofGFsh10YG1K9c9msN-BThqvsTA3xFhYmRD_08C1FBz9dNWV8rnyBGVyOvHdwFksNddgWwfGftcvBxc59QO-86Yv7-DIP0fXJ8dX8--T81-nZfHY-6RgVctI66Vtml7j1vMPGq6kj4-2ULoWcLqUgrTXEK6ysJbYlnBJr2bTDjgupiCfsEH197l0Py5WznYs1m16vc1iZvNHJBP0_ieFO36Z7LblQSqqxgD8XdDmVkp1_zRKsn3zpJ19660tTooXe-hpzn3cXv6b-CWKPFYeT3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Sakr, Amr ; Hashem, Wedad Bassam ; Ebrahim, Nadia ; Mashhour, Karim Nabil</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Amr ; Hashem, Wedad Bassam ; Ebrahim, Nadia ; Mashhour, Karim Nabil</creatorcontrib><description>Radiotherapy is a very effective tool in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The aim of this study was to compare the palliative effect of radiotherapy between the standard fractionation schedule 20 Gy over 5 fractions (20Gy/5fr) and the high biological dose schedule 27 Gy over 3 fractions (27Gy/3fr) which is frequently used in Stereotactic body radio-surgery (SBRT). Patients were randomized to receive (20Gy/5fr)or (27Gy/3fr). The primary aim of the study was pain relief using the numeric rating scale (NRS), after three months of radiation therapy. Secondary end points include pain relief immediately after finishing radiation therapy (within one week), and narcotic relief after three months of radiation therapy. Twenty-two patients with painful bone metastases were included. 12 patients received (20Gy/5fr) and 10 patients received (27Gy/3fr). Male patients were predominant on both arms (81.8%) with a mean age of 58 years [ranging between 19-72 years]. For pain relief after three months of radiation therapy, partial pain relief was documented in 9 patients (75%) with (20Gy/5fr) and in 8 patients (80%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p- value of 0.6. Additionally, narcotic relief after three months was equal for both groups. For immediate pain relief, partial pain relief was seen in one patient (8%) with (20Gy/5fr) versus seven patients (70%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p value of 0.06. The increase in immediate pain relief in the 27Gy arm was numerically but not statistically significant. SBRT and standard fractionation radiation therapy had equal effectiveness for pain relief, when the assessment was done after three months of radiation therapy. Interestingly, SBRT had a better immediate pain relief.  .</description><identifier>ISSN: 2476-762X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1513-7368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2476-762X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.6.1807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32592381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thailand: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bone Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer Pain - epidemiology ; Cancer Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Egypt - epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.1807-1811</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3267-4e7f43db04f5c0af89e124722b679b7614da1f808dd1d41521dd39c0e56781f13</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9980-6474</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568878/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568878/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashem, Wedad Bassam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahim, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashhour, Karim Nabil</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience</title><title>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</title><addtitle>Asian Pac J Cancer Prev</addtitle><description>Radiotherapy is a very effective tool in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The aim of this study was to compare the palliative effect of radiotherapy between the standard fractionation schedule 20 Gy over 5 fractions (20Gy/5fr) and the high biological dose schedule 27 Gy over 3 fractions (27Gy/3fr) which is frequently used in Stereotactic body radio-surgery (SBRT). Patients were randomized to receive (20Gy/5fr)or (27Gy/3fr). The primary aim of the study was pain relief using the numeric rating scale (NRS), after three months of radiation therapy. Secondary end points include pain relief immediately after finishing radiation therapy (within one week), and narcotic relief after three months of radiation therapy. Twenty-two patients with painful bone metastases were included. 12 patients received (20Gy/5fr) and 10 patients received (27Gy/3fr). Male patients were predominant on both arms (81.8%) with a mean age of 58 years [ranging between 19-72 years]. For pain relief after three months of radiation therapy, partial pain relief was documented in 9 patients (75%) with (20Gy/5fr) and in 8 patients (80%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p- value of 0.6. Additionally, narcotic relief after three months was equal for both groups. For immediate pain relief, partial pain relief was seen in one patient (8%) with (20Gy/5fr) versus seven patients (70%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p value of 0.06. The increase in immediate pain relief in the 27Gy arm was numerically but not statistically significant. SBRT and standard fractionation radiation therapy had equal effectiveness for pain relief, when the assessment was done after three months of radiation therapy. Interestingly, SBRT had a better immediate pain relief.  .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cancer Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Egypt - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2476-762X</issn><issn>1513-7368</issn><issn>2476-762X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtqGzEURUVpaS7tJ7ScH_BEl9HFfSi4JklTUmpygbwJeSQlKmPJSJpQ91_yrxknaXBBcASLvQ-HhdAnghtGOJdHs8WP-aKhmOKGkkY0RGH5Bu3TVoqJFPTm7c5_Dx2U8hvjlivJ36M9RvmUMkX20cOFiTatwl9nYRH6VOGyDnYDyQPFcLqBEIHDSTZdDSkWuHe5DAWofGFsh10YG1K9c9msN-BThqvsTA3xFhYmRD_08C1FBz9dNWV8rnyBGVyOvHdwFksNddgWwfGftcvBxc59QO-86Yv7-DIP0fXJ8dX8--T81-nZfHY-6RgVctI66Vtml7j1vMPGq6kj4-2ULoWcLqUgrTXEK6ysJbYlnBJr2bTDjgupiCfsEH197l0Py5WznYs1m16vc1iZvNHJBP0_ieFO36Z7LblQSqqxgD8XdDmVkp1_zRKsn3zpJ19660tTooXe-hpzn3cXv6b-CWKPFYeT3g</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Sakr, Amr</creator><creator>Hashem, Wedad Bassam</creator><creator>Ebrahim, Nadia</creator><creator>Mashhour, Karim Nabil</creator><general>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-6474</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience</title><author>Sakr, Amr ; Hashem, Wedad Bassam ; Ebrahim, Nadia ; Mashhour, Karim Nabil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3267-4e7f43db04f5c0af89e124722b679b7614da1f808dd1d41521dd39c0e56781f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cancer Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Egypt - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakr, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashem, Wedad Bassam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahim, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashhour, Karim Nabil</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakr, Amr</au><au>Hashem, Wedad Bassam</au><au>Ebrahim, Nadia</au><au>Mashhour, Karim Nabil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience</atitle><jtitle>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Asian Pac J Cancer Prev</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1807</spage><epage>1811</epage><pages>1807-1811</pages><issn>2476-762X</issn><issn>1513-7368</issn><eissn>2476-762X</eissn><abstract>Radiotherapy is a very effective tool in the treatment of painful bone metastases. The aim of this study was to compare the palliative effect of radiotherapy between the standard fractionation schedule 20 Gy over 5 fractions (20Gy/5fr) and the high biological dose schedule 27 Gy over 3 fractions (27Gy/3fr) which is frequently used in Stereotactic body radio-surgery (SBRT). Patients were randomized to receive (20Gy/5fr)or (27Gy/3fr). The primary aim of the study was pain relief using the numeric rating scale (NRS), after three months of radiation therapy. Secondary end points include pain relief immediately after finishing radiation therapy (within one week), and narcotic relief after three months of radiation therapy. Twenty-two patients with painful bone metastases were included. 12 patients received (20Gy/5fr) and 10 patients received (27Gy/3fr). Male patients were predominant on both arms (81.8%) with a mean age of 58 years [ranging between 19-72 years]. For pain relief after three months of radiation therapy, partial pain relief was documented in 9 patients (75%) with (20Gy/5fr) and in 8 patients (80%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p- value of 0.6. Additionally, narcotic relief after three months was equal for both groups. For immediate pain relief, partial pain relief was seen in one patient (8%) with (20Gy/5fr) versus seven patients (70%) with (27Gy/3fr) with a p value of 0.06. The increase in immediate pain relief in the 27Gy arm was numerically but not statistically significant. SBRT and standard fractionation radiation therapy had equal effectiveness for pain relief, when the assessment was done after three months of radiation therapy. Interestingly, SBRT had a better immediate pain relief.  .</abstract><cop>Thailand</cop><pub>West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention</pub><pmid>32592381</pmid><doi>10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.6.1807</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-6474</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2476-762X
ispartof Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2020-06, Vol.21 (6), p.1807-1811
issn 2476-762X
1513-7368
2476-762X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7568878
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free E- Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Bone Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Bone Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer Pain - epidemiology
Cancer Pain - prevention & control
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Egypt - epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gamma Rays
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Management
Pilot Projects
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Radiosurgery - methods
Young Adult
title Randomized Pilot Study of 20 Gy in 5 Fractions versus 27 Gy in 3 Fractions Radiotherapy for Treating Painful Bone Metastases: A Single Institution Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Pilot%20Study%20of%2020%20Gy%20in%205%20Fractions%20versus%2027%20Gy%20in%203%20Fractions%20Radiotherapy%20for%20Treating%20Painful%20Bone%20Metastases:%20A%20Single%20Institution%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Asian%20Pacific%20Journal%20of%20Cancer%20Prevention&rft.au=Sakr,%20Amr&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1807&rft.epage=1811&rft.pages=1807-1811&rft.issn=2476-762X&rft.eissn=2476-762X&rft_id=info:doi/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.6.1807&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32592381%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32592381&rfr_iscdi=true