Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty
Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferabl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2746 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Fuchs, Michael Pumberger, Matthias Hommel, Hagen Perka, Carsten von Roth, Philipp Thiele, Kathi |
description | Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm9092746 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7565972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438677251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-cca1fd79dc0c91264da79f2e9157efcd64913c1d747260815c8d77f89b0f77a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtLw0AQhRdRbKl98RcEfBEhupckk30RarFaLAhSn5ft7qbdkmbjblKov96UFm_zMjOcj8MZBqFLgm8Z4_hurTYccwpJdoL6FAPEmOXs9NfcQ8MQ1rirPE8ogXPUYzRPE5alfTR_kKox3soyGrvSVfZTNtZVkSuiqfd2edgmZWt1pFtvq2U0CqZurIrezNaGvfpSGRONfLPyri5laHYX6KyQZTDDYx-g98njfPwcz16fpuPRLFaMsCZWSpJCA9cKK05olmgJvKCGkxRMoXSWcMIU0ZAAzXBOUpVrgCLnC1wASM4G6P7gW7eLjdHKVI2Xpai93Ui_E05a8Vep7Eos3VZAmqUcaGdwfTTw7qM1oREbG5QpS1kZ1wZBE5ZnADQlHXr1D1271lfdeaJLTnCGOaQddXOglHcheFN8hyFY7P8lfv7FvgBswYd8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641060975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Fuchs, Michael ; Pumberger, Matthias ; Hommel, Hagen ; Perka, Carsten ; von Roth, Philipp ; Thiele, Kathi</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Michael ; Pumberger, Matthias ; Hommel, Hagen ; Perka, Carsten ; von Roth, Philipp ; Thiele, Kathi</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092746</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32854365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Clinical medicine ; Disease prevention ; Gram-positive bacteria ; Granulocytes ; Infections ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Skin ; Suctioning ; Surgeons ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2746</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-cca1fd79dc0c91264da79f2e9157efcd64913c1d747260815c8d77f89b0f77a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-cca1fd79dc0c91264da79f2e9157efcd64913c1d747260815c8d77f89b0f77a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0885-7370 ; 0000-0002-5400-482X ; 0000-0002-5557-682X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565972/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7565972/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pumberger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommel, Hagen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perka, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roth, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Kathi</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Gram-positive bacteria</subject><subject>Granulocytes</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Suctioning</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtLw0AQhRdRbKl98RcEfBEhupckk30RarFaLAhSn5ft7qbdkmbjblKov96UFm_zMjOcj8MZBqFLgm8Z4_hurTYccwpJdoL6FAPEmOXs9NfcQ8MQ1rirPE8ogXPUYzRPE5alfTR_kKox3soyGrvSVfZTNtZVkSuiqfd2edgmZWt1pFtvq2U0CqZurIrezNaGvfpSGRONfLPyri5laHYX6KyQZTDDYx-g98njfPwcz16fpuPRLFaMsCZWSpJCA9cKK05olmgJvKCGkxRMoXSWcMIU0ZAAzXBOUpVrgCLnC1wASM4G6P7gW7eLjdHKVI2Xpai93Ui_E05a8Vep7Eos3VZAmqUcaGdwfTTw7qM1oREbG5QpS1kZ1wZBE5ZnADQlHXr1D1271lfdeaJLTnCGOaQddXOglHcheFN8hyFY7P8lfv7FvgBswYd8</recordid><startdate>20200825</startdate><enddate>20200825</enddate><creator>Fuchs, Michael</creator><creator>Pumberger, Matthias</creator><creator>Hommel, Hagen</creator><creator>Perka, Carsten</creator><creator>von Roth, Philipp</creator><creator>Thiele, Kathi</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-7370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-482X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-682X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200825</creationdate><title>Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty</title><author>Fuchs, Michael ; Pumberger, Matthias ; Hommel, Hagen ; Perka, Carsten ; von Roth, Philipp ; Thiele, Kathi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-cca1fd79dc0c91264da79f2e9157efcd64913c1d747260815c8d77f89b0f77a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Gram-positive bacteria</topic><topic>Granulocytes</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Suctioning</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pumberger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommel, Hagen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perka, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Roth, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Kathi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuchs, Michael</au><au>Pumberger, Matthias</au><au>Hommel, Hagen</au><au>Perka, Carsten</au><au>von Roth, Philipp</au><au>Thiele, Kathi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2020-08-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2746</spage><pages>2746-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Surgical risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the subjects of ongoing research. It is unclear if there are specific locations of the surgical area that might act as a pathogen source. Due to the fact that bacterial replication occurs preferably under humid conditions, it was our aim to investigate if irrigation fluid reservoirs on the surgical covers are subject to bacterial colonization. We prospectively observed 40 patients with scheduled aseptic 1-stage TKA revision. At time intervals of 30 min, irrigation samples were tested for microbiological colonization. Additionally, the suction tip was investigated at the end of surgery. Overall, a bacterial detection rate of 25% was found (57/232 samples). Analysis for any positive microbial detection revealed pathogen findings of irrigation fluid in 41.7% of samples after 30 min with a constant increase up to 77.8% after 90 min. Twenty-three percent of suction tips showed bacterial colonization. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, accounting for the majority of PJI, were the predominant pathogens. After an average follow-up of 17 months, no PJI was confirmed. Despite the substantial bacterial load of irrigation fluid, PJI rates were not elevated. Nevertheless, we recommend that irrigation fluid reservoirs should be prevented and not withdrawn by suction.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32854365</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm9092746</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-7370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-482X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-682X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2746 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7565972 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Antibiotics Bacteria Clinical medicine Disease prevention Gram-positive bacteria Granulocytes Infections Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Pathogens Patients Skin Suctioning Surgeons Virulence |
title | Bacterial Colonization of Irrigation Fluid during Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20Colonization%20of%20Irrigation%20Fluid%20during%20Aseptic%20Revision%20Knee%20Arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Fuchs,%20Michael&rft.date=2020-08-25&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2746&rft.pages=2746-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm9092746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2438677251%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641060975&rft_id=info:pmid/32854365&rfr_iscdi=true |