Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810
Hauptverfasser: Sokal, Paweł, Malukiewicz, Agnieszka, Kierońska, Sara, Murawska, Joanna, Guzowski, Cezary, Rudaś, Marcin, Paczkowski, Dariusz, Rusinek, Marcin, Krakowiak, Mateusz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2810
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 9
creator Sokal, Paweł
Malukiewicz, Agnieszka
Kierońska, Sara
Murawska, Joanna
Guzowski, Cezary
Rudaś, Marcin
Paczkowski, Dariusz
Rusinek, Marcin
Krakowiak, Mateusz
description The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group ( < 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm9092810
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7563558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641059892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9r1jAYxYsobszd-AEk4I3IqkmTNokXwuz8BwNf7LwOSfrU5SVNatoO5kfx0y6vm_PV3CQ5z4_D4TlF8ZTgV5RK_HprR4llJQh-UBxWmPMSU0Ef7r0PiuN53uJ8hGAV4Y-LA1oJLnBDDotf3WrKDSQL0-JiQDr0qFunpPfFbnJBe9TGlIeLG1evf-suoPYyxeAs2uj86a5Dn-IIb9Ap-pqd4uh-Qn-COhhdeRZX46F8513IUpviPMcrSCdo47UFE8s2hiVF76FHF8lp_6R4NGg_w_HdfVR8-_D-ov1Unn_5-Lk9PS8tw81SVjUfmoqZXkpsGR94LWqqMTMMKqx7QhkISYbB1pYTg6XROwBTasRgNAA9Kt7e-k6rGaG3kGNor6bkRp2uVdRO_TsJ7lJ9j1eK1w2ta5ENXtwZpPhjhXlRo5steK8DxHVWFaNSCkJIndHn_6HbuKa83Ew1jOBaClll6uUtZXdbSjDchyFY7VpXf1vP8LP9-Pfon47pDfIDqXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641059892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group ( &lt; 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32878061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chronic pain ; Clinical medicine ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Double-blind studies ; Electrodes ; Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543) ; Pain ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; Spinal cord ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1226-1983 ; 0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierońska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaś, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusinek, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group ( &lt; 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</description><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543)</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9r1jAYxYsobszd-AEk4I3IqkmTNokXwuz8BwNf7LwOSfrU5SVNatoO5kfx0y6vm_PV3CQ5z4_D4TlF8ZTgV5RK_HprR4llJQh-UBxWmPMSU0Ef7r0PiuN53uJ8hGAV4Y-LA1oJLnBDDotf3WrKDSQL0-JiQDr0qFunpPfFbnJBe9TGlIeLG1evf-suoPYyxeAs2uj86a5Dn-IIb9Ap-pqd4uh-Qn-COhhdeRZX46F8513IUpviPMcrSCdo47UFE8s2hiVF76FHF8lp_6R4NGg_w_HdfVR8-_D-ov1Unn_5-Lk9PS8tw81SVjUfmoqZXkpsGR94LWqqMTMMKqx7QhkISYbB1pYTg6XROwBTasRgNAA9Kt7e-k6rGaG3kGNor6bkRp2uVdRO_TsJ7lJ9j1eK1w2ta5ENXtwZpPhjhXlRo5steK8DxHVWFaNSCkJIndHn_6HbuKa83Ew1jOBaClll6uUtZXdbSjDchyFY7VpXf1vP8LP9-Pfon47pDfIDqXo</recordid><startdate>20200831</startdate><enddate>20200831</enddate><creator>Sokal, Paweł</creator><creator>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Kierońska, Sara</creator><creator>Murawska, Joanna</creator><creator>Guzowski, Cezary</creator><creator>Rudaś, Marcin</creator><creator>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creator><creator>Rusinek, Marcin</creator><creator>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-1983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200831</creationdate><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><author>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543)</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierońska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaś, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusinek, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sokal, Paweł</au><au>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</au><au>Kierońska, Sara</au><au>Murawska, Joanna</au><au>Guzowski, Cezary</au><au>Rudaś, Marcin</au><au>Paczkowski, Dariusz</au><au>Rusinek, Marcin</au><au>Krakowiak, Mateusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2020-08-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2810</spage><pages>2810-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms. Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group ( &lt; 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients). The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32878061</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm9092810</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-1983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7563558
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Chronic pain
Clinical medicine
Diabetic neuropathy
Double-blind studies
Electrodes
Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543)
Pain
Patients
Performance evaluation
Spinal cord
Surgery
title Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sub-Perception%20and%20Supra-Perception%20Spinal%20Cord%20Stimulation%20in%20Chronic%20Pain%20Syndrome:%20A%20Randomized,%20Semi-Double-Blind,%20Crossover,%20Placebo-Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Sokal,%20Pawe%C5%82&rft.date=2020-08-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2810&rft.pages=2810-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm9092810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2641059892%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641059892&rft_id=info:pmid/32878061&rfr_iscdi=true