Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial
The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain. A r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2810 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Sokal, Paweł Malukiewicz, Agnieszka Kierońska, Sara Murawska, Joanna Guzowski, Cezary Rudaś, Marcin Paczkowski, Dariusz Rusinek, Marcin Krakowiak, Mateusz |
description | The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain.
A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms.
Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (
< 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients).
The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm9092810 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7563558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641059892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9r1jAYxYsobszd-AEk4I3IqkmTNokXwuz8BwNf7LwOSfrU5SVNatoO5kfx0y6vm_PV3CQ5z4_D4TlF8ZTgV5RK_HprR4llJQh-UBxWmPMSU0Ef7r0PiuN53uJ8hGAV4Y-LA1oJLnBDDotf3WrKDSQL0-JiQDr0qFunpPfFbnJBe9TGlIeLG1evf-suoPYyxeAs2uj86a5Dn-IIb9Ap-pqd4uh-Qn-COhhdeRZX46F8513IUpviPMcrSCdo47UFE8s2hiVF76FHF8lp_6R4NGg_w_HdfVR8-_D-ov1Unn_5-Lk9PS8tw81SVjUfmoqZXkpsGR94LWqqMTMMKqx7QhkISYbB1pYTg6XROwBTasRgNAA9Kt7e-k6rGaG3kGNor6bkRp2uVdRO_TsJ7lJ9j1eK1w2ta5ENXtwZpPhjhXlRo5steK8DxHVWFaNSCkJIndHn_6HbuKa83Ew1jOBaClll6uUtZXdbSjDchyFY7VpXf1vP8LP9-Pfon47pDfIDqXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641059892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain.
A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms.
Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (
< 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients).
The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092810</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32878061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chronic pain ; Clinical medicine ; Diabetic neuropathy ; Double-blind studies ; Electrodes ; Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543) ; Pain ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; Spinal cord ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1226-1983 ; 0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7563558/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierońska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaś, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusinek, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain.
A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms.
Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (
< 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients).
The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</description><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Diabetic neuropathy</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543)</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9r1jAYxYsobszd-AEk4I3IqkmTNokXwuz8BwNf7LwOSfrU5SVNatoO5kfx0y6vm_PV3CQ5z4_D4TlF8ZTgV5RK_HprR4llJQh-UBxWmPMSU0Ef7r0PiuN53uJ8hGAV4Y-LA1oJLnBDDotf3WrKDSQL0-JiQDr0qFunpPfFbnJBe9TGlIeLG1evf-suoPYyxeAs2uj86a5Dn-IIb9Ap-pqd4uh-Qn-COhhdeRZX46F8513IUpviPMcrSCdo47UFE8s2hiVF76FHF8lp_6R4NGg_w_HdfVR8-_D-ov1Unn_5-Lk9PS8tw81SVjUfmoqZXkpsGR94LWqqMTMMKqx7QhkISYbB1pYTg6XROwBTasRgNAA9Kt7e-k6rGaG3kGNor6bkRp2uVdRO_TsJ7lJ9j1eK1w2ta5ENXtwZpPhjhXlRo5steK8DxHVWFaNSCkJIndHn_6HbuKa83Ew1jOBaClll6uUtZXdbSjDchyFY7VpXf1vP8LP9-Pfon47pDfIDqXo</recordid><startdate>20200831</startdate><enddate>20200831</enddate><creator>Sokal, Paweł</creator><creator>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Kierońska, Sara</creator><creator>Murawska, Joanna</creator><creator>Guzowski, Cezary</creator><creator>Rudaś, Marcin</creator><creator>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creator><creator>Rusinek, Marcin</creator><creator>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-1983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200831</creationdate><title>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><author>Sokal, Paweł ; Malukiewicz, Agnieszka ; Kierońska, Sara ; Murawska, Joanna ; Guzowski, Cezary ; Rudaś, Marcin ; Paczkowski, Dariusz ; Rusinek, Marcin ; Krakowiak, Mateusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-257f624bd990c47f75853a04b4e20ad134e891ffc5c71b09ba5853033b8fbaee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Diabetic neuropathy</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543)</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sokal, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kierońska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murawska, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzowski, Cezary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudaś, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paczkowski, Dariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rusinek, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowiak, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sokal, Paweł</au><au>Malukiewicz, Agnieszka</au><au>Kierońska, Sara</au><au>Murawska, Joanna</au><au>Guzowski, Cezary</au><au>Rudaś, Marcin</au><au>Paczkowski, Dariusz</au><au>Rusinek, Marcin</au><au>Krakowiak, Mateusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2020-08-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2810</spage><pages>2810-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The introduction of modern sub-perception modalities has improved the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in refractory pain syndromes of the trunk and lower limbs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low and high frequency SCS among patients with chronic pain.
A randomised, semi-double-blind, placebo controlled, four period (4 × 2 weeks) crossover trial was conducted from August 2018 to January 2020. Eighteen patients with SCS due to failed back surgery syndrome and/or complex regional pain syndrome were randomised to four treatment arms without washout periods: (1) low frequency (40-60 Hz), (2) 1 kHz, (3) clustered tonic, and (4) sham SCS (i.e., placebo). The primary outcome was pain scores measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and during subsequent treatment arms.
Pain scores (VAS) reported during the preoperative period was M (SD) = 8.13 (0.99). There was a 50% reduction in pain reported in the low frequency tonic treatment group (M (SD) = 4.18 (1.76)), a 37% reduction in the 1 kHz treatment group (M (SD) = 5.17 (1.4)), a 34% reduction in the clustered tonic settings group (M (SD) = 5.27 (1.33)), and a 34% reduction in the sham stimulation group (M (SD) = 5.42 (1.22)). The reduction in pain from the preoperative period to the treatment period was significant in each treatment group (
< 0.001). Overall, these reductions were of comparable magnitude between treatments. However, the modality most preferred by patients was low frequency (55% or 10 patients).
The pain-relieving effects of SCS reached significance and were comparable across all modes of stimulation including sham. Sub-perception stimulation was not superior to supra-perception. SCS was characterised by a high degree of placebo effect. No evidence of carryover effect was observed between subsequent treatments. Contemporary neuromodulation procedures should be tailored to the individual preferences of patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32878061</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm9092810</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-1983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-9943</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-08, Vol.9 (9), p.2810 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7563558 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Chronic pain Clinical medicine Diabetic neuropathy Double-blind studies Electrodes Kopernik, Mikolaj (Nicolaus Copernicus) (1473-1543) Pain Patients Performance evaluation Spinal cord Surgery |
title | Sub-Perception and Supra-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Semi-Double-Blind, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A16%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sub-Perception%20and%20Supra-Perception%20Spinal%20Cord%20Stimulation%20in%20Chronic%20Pain%20Syndrome:%20A%20Randomized,%20Semi-Double-Blind,%20Crossover,%20Placebo-Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Sokal,%20Pawe%C5%82&rft.date=2020-08-31&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2810&rft.pages=2810-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm9092810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2641059892%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641059892&rft_id=info:pmid/32878061&rfr_iscdi=true |