Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death

Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP syn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cell death and differentiation 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003
Hauptverfasser: Murthy, Ambika M. V., Robinson, Nirmal, Kumar, Sharad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3003
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2989
container_title Cell death and differentiation
container_volume 27
creator Murthy, Ambika M. V.
Robinson, Nirmal
Kumar, Sharad
description Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7560597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444379564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0E4v0DFCgSDU3Aj0lsN0hoBQsSgmKhthxnshvIJkucBdHxD_whX4L3wbOgmpHmzB1fX0L2GD1iVKhjDwyYiimnMaUph1itkE0GMo0ToGI19CKhsaYgN8iW9_c0UFKn62RDcA1KiXSTyF7beN_Z6iHKsHtGrCPXPx28v74Nbi-v-5Evh7WtynoY2TqPHFZVlKPtRjtkrbCVx91l3SZ352e3vYv46qZ_2Tu9ih1I6GKUWCDaTFEHoFPNNbOaUctEgTkvXK5AOonAZeKynGaaKpch50yJTLEUxDY5WehOptkYc4d119rKTNpybNsX09jS_J7U5cgMmycjk5QmWgaBw6VA2zxO0XdmXPqZD1tjM_WGA4CQOpnfOviD3jfTNtifURK0kinXgeILys1-rsXi6zGMmlkuZpGLCbmYeS5GhaX9nza-Vj6DCIBYAD6M6iG237f_kf0A6NeYqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474987629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</creator><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><description>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-9047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32948836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/250/1933 ; 692/308/1426 ; AMP ; Apoptosis ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Biology ; Cell Cycle Analysis ; Cell death ; Cyclic GMP ; Drug development ; Immune response ; Inflammatory diseases ; Innate immunity ; Interferon ; Life Sciences ; Molecular modelling ; Review ; Review Article ; Signal transduction ; Stem Cells</subject><ispartof>Cell death and differentiation, 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7126-9814 ; 0000-0002-7361-9491 ; 0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560597/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560597/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><title>Cell death and differentiation</title><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><description>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</description><subject>631/250/1933</subject><subject>692/308/1426</subject><subject>AMP</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Cycle Analysis</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Cyclic GMP</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Inflammatory diseases</subject><subject>Innate immunity</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Molecular modelling</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><issn>1350-9047</issn><issn>1476-5403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0E4v0DFCgSDU3Aj0lsN0hoBQsSgmKhthxnshvIJkucBdHxD_whX4L3wbOgmpHmzB1fX0L2GD1iVKhjDwyYiimnMaUph1itkE0GMo0ToGI19CKhsaYgN8iW9_c0UFKn62RDcA1KiXSTyF7beN_Z6iHKsHtGrCPXPx28v74Nbi-v-5Evh7WtynoY2TqPHFZVlKPtRjtkrbCVx91l3SZ352e3vYv46qZ_2Tu9ih1I6GKUWCDaTFEHoFPNNbOaUctEgTkvXK5AOonAZeKynGaaKpch50yJTLEUxDY5WehOptkYc4d119rKTNpybNsX09jS_J7U5cgMmycjk5QmWgaBw6VA2zxO0XdmXPqZD1tjM_WGA4CQOpnfOviD3jfTNtifURK0kinXgeILys1-rsXi6zGMmlkuZpGLCbmYeS5GhaX9nza-Vj6DCIBYAD6M6iG237f_kf0A6NeYqw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creator><creator>Robinson, Nirmal</creator><creator>Kumar, Sharad</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><author>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>631/250/1933</topic><topic>692/308/1426</topic><topic>AMP</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Cycle Analysis</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Cyclic GMP</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Inflammatory diseases</topic><topic>Innate immunity</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Molecular modelling</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cell death and differentiation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</au><au>Robinson, Nirmal</au><au>Kumar, Sharad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</atitle><jtitle>Cell death and differentiation</jtitle><stitle>Cell Death Differ</stitle><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2989</spage><epage>3003</epage><pages>2989-3003</pages><issn>1350-9047</issn><eissn>1476-5403</eissn><abstract>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32948836</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-9047
ispartof Cell death and differentiation, 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003
issn 1350-9047
1476-5403
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7560597
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central
subjects 631/250/1933
692/308/1426
AMP
Apoptosis
Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cell Biology
Cell Cycle Analysis
Cell death
Cyclic GMP
Drug development
Immune response
Inflammatory diseases
Innate immunity
Interferon
Life Sciences
Molecular modelling
Review
Review Article
Signal transduction
Stem Cells
title Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crosstalk%20between%20cGAS%E2%80%93STING%20signaling%20and%20cell%20death&rft.jtitle=Cell%20death%20and%20differentiation&rft.au=Murthy,%20Ambika%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2989&rft.epage=3003&rft.pages=2989-3003&rft.issn=1350-9047&rft.eissn=1476-5403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2444379564%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474987629&rft_id=info:pmid/32948836&rfr_iscdi=true