Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death
Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP syn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cell death and differentiation 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3003 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2989 |
container_title | Cell death and differentiation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Murthy, Ambika M. V. Robinson, Nirmal Kumar, Sharad |
description | Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7560597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2444379564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0E4v0DFCgSDU3Aj0lsN0hoBQsSgmKhthxnshvIJkucBdHxD_whX4L3wbOgmpHmzB1fX0L2GD1iVKhjDwyYiimnMaUph1itkE0GMo0ToGI19CKhsaYgN8iW9_c0UFKn62RDcA1KiXSTyF7beN_Z6iHKsHtGrCPXPx28v74Nbi-v-5Evh7WtynoY2TqPHFZVlKPtRjtkrbCVx91l3SZ352e3vYv46qZ_2Tu9ih1I6GKUWCDaTFEHoFPNNbOaUctEgTkvXK5AOonAZeKynGaaKpch50yJTLEUxDY5WehOptkYc4d119rKTNpybNsX09jS_J7U5cgMmycjk5QmWgaBw6VA2zxO0XdmXPqZD1tjM_WGA4CQOpnfOviD3jfTNtifURK0kinXgeILys1-rsXi6zGMmlkuZpGLCbmYeS5GhaX9nza-Vj6DCIBYAD6M6iG237f_kf0A6NeYqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474987629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</creator><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><description>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-9047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32948836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/250/1933 ; 692/308/1426 ; AMP ; Apoptosis ; Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Biology ; Cell Cycle Analysis ; Cell death ; Cyclic GMP ; Drug development ; Immune response ; Inflammatory diseases ; Innate immunity ; Interferon ; Life Sciences ; Molecular modelling ; Review ; Review Article ; Signal transduction ; Stem Cells</subject><ispartof>Cell death and differentiation, 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7126-9814 ; 0000-0002-7361-9491 ; 0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560597/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560597/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><title>Cell death and differentiation</title><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><description>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</description><subject>631/250/1933</subject><subject>692/308/1426</subject><subject>AMP</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Cycle Analysis</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Cyclic GMP</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Inflammatory diseases</subject><subject>Innate immunity</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Molecular modelling</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Signal transduction</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><issn>1350-9047</issn><issn>1476-5403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtOxDAQRS0E4v0DFCgSDU3Aj0lsN0hoBQsSgmKhthxnshvIJkucBdHxD_whX4L3wbOgmpHmzB1fX0L2GD1iVKhjDwyYiimnMaUph1itkE0GMo0ToGI19CKhsaYgN8iW9_c0UFKn62RDcA1KiXSTyF7beN_Z6iHKsHtGrCPXPx28v74Nbi-v-5Evh7WtynoY2TqPHFZVlKPtRjtkrbCVx91l3SZ352e3vYv46qZ_2Tu9ih1I6GKUWCDaTFEHoFPNNbOaUctEgTkvXK5AOonAZeKynGaaKpch50yJTLEUxDY5WehOptkYc4d119rKTNpybNsX09jS_J7U5cgMmycjk5QmWgaBw6VA2zxO0XdmXPqZD1tjM_WGA4CQOpnfOviD3jfTNtifURK0kinXgeILys1-rsXi6zGMmlkuZpGLCbmYeS5GhaX9nza-Vj6DCIBYAD6M6iG237f_kf0A6NeYqw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creator><creator>Robinson, Nirmal</creator><creator>Kumar, Sharad</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</title><author>Murthy, Ambika M. V. ; Robinson, Nirmal ; Kumar, Sharad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e7efeeab80c44969291a910a13fed2fcd847c7e4275cbd0b908cbe22183b81643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>631/250/1933</topic><topic>692/308/1426</topic><topic>AMP</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Cycle Analysis</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Cyclic GMP</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Inflammatory diseases</topic><topic>Innate immunity</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Molecular modelling</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Signal transduction</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Nirmal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sharad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cell death and differentiation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murthy, Ambika M. V.</au><au>Robinson, Nirmal</au><au>Kumar, Sharad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death</atitle><jtitle>Cell death and differentiation</jtitle><stitle>Cell Death Differ</stitle><addtitle>Cell Death Differ</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2989</spage><epage>3003</epage><pages>2989-3003</pages><issn>1350-9047</issn><eissn>1476-5403</eissn><abstract>Cytosolic nucleic acid sensors have a critical role in detecting endogenous nucleic acids to initiate innate immune responses during microbial infections and/or cell death. Several seminal studies over the past decade have delineated the conserved mechanism of cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) and the downstream signaling adapter stimulator of interferon genes (STING) in mediating innate immune signaling pathways as a host defense mechanism. Besides the predominant role in microbial infections and inflammatory diseases, there is an increased attention on alternative functional responses of cGAS–STING-mediated signaling. Here we review the complexity of interactions between the cGAS–STING signaling and cell death pathways. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms of this interplay is important with regard to the development of new therapeutics targeting cGAS–STING signaling in cancer, infectious, and chronic inflammatory diseases.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32948836</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-9814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7361-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9767-1999</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-9047 |
ispartof | Cell death and differentiation, 2020-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2989-3003 |
issn | 1350-9047 1476-5403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7560597 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | 631/250/1933 692/308/1426 AMP Apoptosis Biochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Cell Biology Cell Cycle Analysis Cell death Cyclic GMP Drug development Immune response Inflammatory diseases Innate immunity Interferon Life Sciences Molecular modelling Review Review Article Signal transduction Stem Cells |
title | Crosstalk between cGAS–STING signaling and cell death |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crosstalk%20between%20cGAS%E2%80%93STING%20signaling%20and%20cell%20death&rft.jtitle=Cell%20death%20and%20differentiation&rft.au=Murthy,%20Ambika%20M.%20V.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2989&rft.epage=3003&rft.pages=2989-3003&rft.issn=1350-9047&rft.eissn=1476-5403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41418-020-00624-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2444379564%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474987629&rft_id=info:pmid/32948836&rfr_iscdi=true |