Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review
Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has emerged in Implant Dentistry with a series of short-time applications and as a promising material to substitute definitive dental implants. Several strategies have been investigated to diminish biofilm formation on the PEEK surface aiming to decrease the possibility...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antibiotics (Basel) 2020-09, Vol.9 (9), p.609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 609 |
container_title | Antibiotics (Basel) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Brum, Renata Scheeren Labes, Luiza Gomes Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães Pimenta, Andrea de Lima |
description | Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has emerged in Implant Dentistry with a series of short-time applications and as a promising material to substitute definitive dental implants. Several strategies have been investigated to diminish biofilm formation on the PEEK surface aiming to decrease the possibility of related infections. Therefore, a comprehensive review was carried out in order to compare PEEK with materials widely used nowadays in Implant Dentistry, such as titanium and zirconia, placing emphasis on studies investigating its ability to grant or prevent biofilm formation. Most studies failed to reveal significant antimicrobial activity in pure PEEK, while several studies described new strategies to reduce biofilm formation and bacterial colonization on this material. Those include the PEEK sulfonation process, incorporation of therapeutic and bioactive agents in PEEK matrix or on PEEK surface, PEEK coatings and incorporation of reinforcement agents, in order to produce nanocomposites or blends. The two most analyzed surface properties were contact angle and roughness, while the most studied bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Despite PEEK’s susceptibility to biofilm formation, a great number of strategies discussed in this study were able to improve its antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/antibiotics9090609 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7559429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A638486011</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a0181cff07304bb490c27a708d597979</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A638486011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3b54232b8c7954ed452fb8bc3f839b24c2e4b87e443a923bfcca7a626c5daf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplksFuGyEQhlHVqomcvEBPSL304oYFdoFLJddxUqupUrW5I2AHh2h32cLaVW59iD5hn6S4jqJGgQMj-OfTP8Mg9KYi7xlT5MwMU7AhTsFlRRRpiHqBjikRat4wSV_-Fx-h05zvSFmqYpLI1-iIUcUlqeQxGr5PyUywCZDxFPE3aLcO8McQfeh6fBFTb6YQBxwG_HW1-oy_FHEKpst4MY5dgHafte7HrvjB51BM5Snd__n1e4GXsR8T3MKQww4KeRfg5wl65UsynD6cM3RzsbpZfppfXV-ul4uruauZmubM1pwyaqUTqubQ8pp6K61jXjJlKXcUuJUCOGdGUWa9c0aYhjaubo3nbIbWB2wbzZ0eU-hNutfRBP3vIqaNNqm0rgNtShsq5z0RjHBruSKOCiOIbGslyi6sDwfWuLU9tK7UmEz3BPr0ZQi3ehN3WtS14nQPePcASPHHFvKk-5AddKVlELdZU17KkEIWBzP09iDdmGItDD4WotvL9aJ8JZcNqaqiogeVSzHnBP7RTEX0fjj08-FgfwF1F6_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444387807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Brum, Renata Scheeren ; Labes, Luiza Gomes ; Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero ; Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães ; Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</creator><creatorcontrib>Brum, Renata Scheeren ; Labes, Luiza Gomes ; Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero ; Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães ; Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</creatorcontrib><description>Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has emerged in Implant Dentistry with a series of short-time applications and as a promising material to substitute definitive dental implants. Several strategies have been investigated to diminish biofilm formation on the PEEK surface aiming to decrease the possibility of related infections. Therefore, a comprehensive review was carried out in order to compare PEEK with materials widely used nowadays in Implant Dentistry, such as titanium and zirconia, placing emphasis on studies investigating its ability to grant or prevent biofilm formation. Most studies failed to reveal significant antimicrobial activity in pure PEEK, while several studies described new strategies to reduce biofilm formation and bacterial colonization on this material. Those include the PEEK sulfonation process, incorporation of therapeutic and bioactive agents in PEEK matrix or on PEEK surface, PEEK coatings and incorporation of reinforcement agents, in order to produce nanocomposites or blends. The two most analyzed surface properties were contact angle and roughness, while the most studied bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Despite PEEK’s susceptibility to biofilm formation, a great number of strategies discussed in this study were able to improve its antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-6382</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-6382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9090609</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32948018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Anti-infective agents ; bacteria ; biofilm inhibition ; biofilms ; Control ; Dental implants ; Evaluation ; Microbial mats ; peri-implantitis ; Physiological aspects ; polyether-ether-ketone ; Polyetheretherketone ; Review</subject><ispartof>Antibiotics (Basel), 2020-09, Vol.9 (9), p.609</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3b54232b8c7954ed452fb8bc3f839b24c2e4b87e443a923bfcca7a626c5daf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3b54232b8c7954ed452fb8bc3f839b24c2e4b87e443a923bfcca7a626c5daf43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6006-2452 ; 0000-0001-6345-5035 ; 0000-0003-0918-3678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559429/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559429/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brum, Renata Scheeren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labes, Luiza Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</creatorcontrib><title>Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review</title><title>Antibiotics (Basel)</title><description>Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has emerged in Implant Dentistry with a series of short-time applications and as a promising material to substitute definitive dental implants. Several strategies have been investigated to diminish biofilm formation on the PEEK surface aiming to decrease the possibility of related infections. Therefore, a comprehensive review was carried out in order to compare PEEK with materials widely used nowadays in Implant Dentistry, such as titanium and zirconia, placing emphasis on studies investigating its ability to grant or prevent biofilm formation. Most studies failed to reveal significant antimicrobial activity in pure PEEK, while several studies described new strategies to reduce biofilm formation and bacterial colonization on this material. Those include the PEEK sulfonation process, incorporation of therapeutic and bioactive agents in PEEK matrix or on PEEK surface, PEEK coatings and incorporation of reinforcement agents, in order to produce nanocomposites or blends. The two most analyzed surface properties were contact angle and roughness, while the most studied bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Despite PEEK’s susceptibility to biofilm formation, a great number of strategies discussed in this study were able to improve its antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties.</description><subject>Anti-infective agents</subject><subject>bacteria</subject><subject>biofilm inhibition</subject><subject>biofilms</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Microbial mats</subject><subject>peri-implantitis</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>polyether-ether-ketone</subject><subject>Polyetheretherketone</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2079-6382</issn><issn>2079-6382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplksFuGyEQhlHVqomcvEBPSL304oYFdoFLJddxUqupUrW5I2AHh2h32cLaVW59iD5hn6S4jqJGgQMj-OfTP8Mg9KYi7xlT5MwMU7AhTsFlRRRpiHqBjikRat4wSV_-Fx-h05zvSFmqYpLI1-iIUcUlqeQxGr5PyUywCZDxFPE3aLcO8McQfeh6fBFTb6YQBxwG_HW1-oy_FHEKpst4MY5dgHafte7HrvjB51BM5Snd__n1e4GXsR8T3MKQww4KeRfg5wl65UsynD6cM3RzsbpZfppfXV-ul4uruauZmubM1pwyaqUTqubQ8pp6K61jXjJlKXcUuJUCOGdGUWa9c0aYhjaubo3nbIbWB2wbzZ0eU-hNutfRBP3vIqaNNqm0rgNtShsq5z0RjHBruSKOCiOIbGslyi6sDwfWuLU9tK7UmEz3BPr0ZQi3ehN3WtS14nQPePcASPHHFvKk-5AddKVlELdZU17KkEIWBzP09iDdmGItDD4WotvL9aJ8JZcNqaqiogeVSzHnBP7RTEX0fjj08-FgfwF1F6_8</recordid><startdate>20200916</startdate><enddate>20200916</enddate><creator>Brum, Renata Scheeren</creator><creator>Labes, Luiza Gomes</creator><creator>Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero</creator><creator>Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães</creator><creator>Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-2452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6345-5035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200916</creationdate><title>Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review</title><author>Brum, Renata Scheeren ; Labes, Luiza Gomes ; Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero ; Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães ; Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3b54232b8c7954ed452fb8bc3f839b24c2e4b87e443a923bfcca7a626c5daf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anti-infective agents</topic><topic>bacteria</topic><topic>biofilm inhibition</topic><topic>biofilms</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Microbial mats</topic><topic>peri-implantitis</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>polyether-ether-ketone</topic><topic>Polyetheretherketone</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brum, Renata Scheeren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labes, Luiza Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brum, Renata Scheeren</au><au>Labes, Luiza Gomes</au><au>Volpato, Cláudia Ângela Maziero</au><au>Benfatti, César Augusto Magalhães</au><au>Pimenta, Andrea de Lima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review</atitle><jtitle>Antibiotics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-09-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>609</spage><pages>609-</pages><issn>2079-6382</issn><eissn>2079-6382</eissn><abstract>Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) has emerged in Implant Dentistry with a series of short-time applications and as a promising material to substitute definitive dental implants. Several strategies have been investigated to diminish biofilm formation on the PEEK surface aiming to decrease the possibility of related infections. Therefore, a comprehensive review was carried out in order to compare PEEK with materials widely used nowadays in Implant Dentistry, such as titanium and zirconia, placing emphasis on studies investigating its ability to grant or prevent biofilm formation. Most studies failed to reveal significant antimicrobial activity in pure PEEK, while several studies described new strategies to reduce biofilm formation and bacterial colonization on this material. Those include the PEEK sulfonation process, incorporation of therapeutic and bioactive agents in PEEK matrix or on PEEK surface, PEEK coatings and incorporation of reinforcement agents, in order to produce nanocomposites or blends. The two most analyzed surface properties were contact angle and roughness, while the most studied bacteria were Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Despite PEEK’s susceptibility to biofilm formation, a great number of strategies discussed in this study were able to improve its antibiofilm and antimicrobial properties.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32948018</pmid><doi>10.3390/antibiotics9090609</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6006-2452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6345-5035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3678</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2079-6382 |
ispartof | Antibiotics (Basel), 2020-09, Vol.9 (9), p.609 |
issn | 2079-6382 2079-6382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7559429 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Anti-infective agents bacteria biofilm inhibition biofilms Control Dental implants Evaluation Microbial mats peri-implantitis Physiological aspects polyether-ether-ketone Polyetheretherketone Review |
title | Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry—A Comprehensive Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategies%20to%20Reduce%20Biofilm%20Formation%20in%20PEEK%20Materials%20Applied%20to%20Implant%20Dentistry%E2%80%94A%20Comprehensive%20Review&rft.jtitle=Antibiotics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Brum,%20Renata%20Scheeren&rft.date=2020-09-16&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=609&rft.pages=609-&rft.issn=2079-6382&rft.eissn=2079-6382&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/antibiotics9090609&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA638486011%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444387807&rft_id=info:pmid/32948018&rft_galeid=A638486011&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a0181cff07304bb490c27a708d597979&rfr_iscdi=true |