Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority. Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2021-02, Vol.130, p.13-22 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 22 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 13 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
| container_volume | 130 |
| creator | Garritty, Chantelle Gartlehner, Gerald Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara King, Valerie J. Hamel, Candyce Kamel, Chris Affengruber, Lisa Stevens, Adrienne |
| description | To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.
Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.
Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted.
The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7557165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089543562031146X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2479031729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-ba7853d0620c4f886ae966cf51a70dd162aeceb7d53ad349e66408919a1710e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9L5DAUxYOs6Kz6FSSwL_vSMWmbP30RZXBdQRFEn0MmuXVSOk03aUf89qY7KuqLT4F7f_fk3nMQOqZkTgnlJ828Ma3roHfznORTcU6I2EEzKoXMWJXTH2hGZMWysmB8H_2MsSGECiLYHtovCsKloGyG1MKbVdAd4DvdO4vvYOPgKeIbGFbeRnwZ_NhjX9cQIk49C52BzHW1D2uw-HF0VqcKHjw2vrOjGXD4LxS2Qodot9ZthKPX9wA9_Lm4X_zNrm8vrxbn15lhnA3ZUgvJCkt4TkxZS8k1VJybmlEtiLWU5xoMLIVlhbZFWQHnZbqOVpoKSoAXB-h0q9uPy7SYgW4IulV9cGsdnpXXTn3udG6lHv1GCcYE5SwJ_H4VCP7fCHFQaxcNtG3yxo9R5SWjsmSSyYT--oI2fgxdOi9RoiIFFXmVKL6lTPAxBqjfl6FETRmqRr1lqKYMp3rKMA0efzzlfewttAScbQFIhiaXg4rGTblYF8AMynr33R8vcVyyRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479031729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Garritty, Chantelle ; Gartlehner, Gerald ; Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara ; King, Valerie J. ; Hamel, Candyce ; Kamel, Chris ; Affengruber, Lisa ; Stevens, Adrienne</creator><creatorcontrib>Garritty, Chantelle ; Gartlehner, Gerald ; Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara ; King, Valerie J. ; Hamel, Candyce ; Kamel, Chris ; Affengruber, Lisa ; Stevens, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><description>To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.
Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.
Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted.
The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33068715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Best practice ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Decision making ; Epidemiology ; Evidence synthesis ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Original ; Polls & surveys ; Rapid review ; Research Design - standards ; Research Report - standards ; Reviews ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-02, Vol.130, p.13-22</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Author(s)</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-ba7853d0620c4f886ae966cf51a70dd162aeceb7d53ad349e66408919a1710e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-ba7853d0620c4f886ae966cf51a70dd162aeceb7d53ad349e66408919a1710e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2207-9958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2479031729?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garritty, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gartlehner, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Candyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affengruber, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><title>Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.
Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.
Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted.
The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evidence synthesis</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Rapid review</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Research Report - standards</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic - standards</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9L5DAUxYOs6Kz6FSSwL_vSMWmbP30RZXBdQRFEn0MmuXVSOk03aUf89qY7KuqLT4F7f_fk3nMQOqZkTgnlJ828Ma3roHfznORTcU6I2EEzKoXMWJXTH2hGZMWysmB8H_2MsSGECiLYHtovCsKloGyG1MKbVdAd4DvdO4vvYOPgKeIbGFbeRnwZ_NhjX9cQIk49C52BzHW1D2uw-HF0VqcKHjw2vrOjGXD4LxS2Qodot9ZthKPX9wA9_Lm4X_zNrm8vrxbn15lhnA3ZUgvJCkt4TkxZS8k1VJybmlEtiLWU5xoMLIVlhbZFWQHnZbqOVpoKSoAXB-h0q9uPy7SYgW4IulV9cGsdnpXXTn3udG6lHv1GCcYE5SwJ_H4VCP7fCHFQaxcNtG3yxo9R5SWjsmSSyYT--oI2fgxdOi9RoiIFFXmVKL6lTPAxBqjfl6FETRmqRr1lqKYMp3rKMA0efzzlfewttAScbQFIhiaXg4rGTblYF8AMynr33R8vcVyyRw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Garritty, Chantelle</creator><creator>Gartlehner, Gerald</creator><creator>Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara</creator><creator>King, Valerie J.</creator><creator>Hamel, Candyce</creator><creator>Kamel, Chris</creator><creator>Affengruber, Lisa</creator><creator>Stevens, Adrienne</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-9958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews</title><author>Garritty, Chantelle ; Gartlehner, Gerald ; Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara ; King, Valerie J. ; Hamel, Candyce ; Kamel, Chris ; Affengruber, Lisa ; Stevens, Adrienne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-ba7853d0620c4f886ae966cf51a70dd162aeceb7d53ad349e66408919a1710e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evidence synthesis</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Rapid review</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Research Report - standards</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garritty, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gartlehner, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Candyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamel, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Affengruber, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garritty, Chantelle</au><au>Gartlehner, Gerald</au><au>Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara</au><au>King, Valerie J.</au><au>Hamel, Candyce</au><au>Kamel, Chris</au><au>Affengruber, Lisa</au><au>Stevens, Adrienne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>130</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>13-22</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.
Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.
Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted.
The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33068715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-9958</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-02, Vol.130, p.13-22 |
| issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 1878-5921 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7557165 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Agreements Best practice Coronaviruses COVID-19 Decision making Epidemiology Evidence synthesis Guidelines as Topic Humans Original Polls & surveys Rapid review Research Design - standards Research Report - standards Reviews Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Systematic Reviews as Topic - standards |
| title | Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A23%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cochrane%20Rapid%20Reviews%20Methods%20Group%20offers%20evidence-informed%20guidance%20to%20conduct%20rapid%20reviews&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Garritty,%20Chantelle&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=130&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=13-22&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2479031729%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479031729&rft_id=info:pmid/33068715&rft_els_id=S089543562031146X&rfr_iscdi=true |