SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors

We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2020-09
Hauptverfasser: Colmenero, I, Santonja, C, Alonso-Riaño, M, Andina, D, Rodríguez Peralto, J L, Requena, L, Torrelo, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title British journal of dermatology (1951)
container_volume
creator Colmenero, I
Santonja, C
Alonso-Riaño, M
Andina, D
Rodríguez Peralto, J L
Requena, L
Torrelo, A
description We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjd.19579
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7549049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447836928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2089-c615e9f12a5fc695b4f1e16092fcfc571b63afbcb4a2407b62825317d3ec4edf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIbAIHfgD5CIcJfs-aA1LYLEmkBSQCXC2Pp8068owXewZppXw8zoMo9KVKqlJ1qwuhV5Qc0zrvuqv-mGrZ6idoQbmSDaOcP0ULQkjbEK34ATos5YoQyokkz9EB51USSizQ9eXJt8tmlX42DJ_bgr-kCX8EGPEpTOAm6PFpyJXEPe72eB0rzWnEn4PLqbi02-Mw4mkLeD32qWIM84CTx6ttiF20VdxACWks73GGXU3xOQ3YztM25fICPfM2Fnh5j0fox6f199V5s_l6drE62TSOkaVunKIStKfMSu-Ulp3wFKgimnnnnWxpp7j1neuEZYK0nWJLJjltew5OQO_5Efpwl7ubuwF6B-OUbTS7HAab9ybZYP5XxrA1v9If00qhidA14M19QE6_ZyiTGUJxEKMdIc3FMCHaJVeaLav17Z315kElg39YQ4m5acvUtsxtW9X7-vFdD85_9fC_AS2RUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447836928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><description>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33000464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Reply</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-09</ispartof><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Riaño, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andina, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</description><subject>Reply</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIbAIHfgD5CIcJfs-aA1LYLEmkBSQCXC2Pp8068owXewZppXw8zoMo9KVKqlJ1qwuhV5Qc0zrvuqv-mGrZ6idoQbmSDaOcP0ULQkjbEK34ATos5YoQyokkz9EB51USSizQ9eXJt8tmlX42DJ_bgr-kCX8EGPEpTOAm6PFpyJXEPe72eB0rzWnEn4PLqbi02-Mw4mkLeD32qWIM84CTx6ttiF20VdxACWks73GGXU3xOQ3YztM25fICPfM2Fnh5j0fox6f199V5s_l6drE62TSOkaVunKIStKfMSu-Ulp3wFKgimnnnnWxpp7j1neuEZYK0nWJLJjltew5OQO_5Efpwl7ubuwF6B-OUbTS7HAab9ybZYP5XxrA1v9If00qhidA14M19QE6_ZyiTGUJxEKMdIc3FMCHaJVeaLav17Z315kElg39YQ4m5acvUtsxtW9X7-vFdD85_9fC_AS2RUQ</recordid><startdate>20200930</startdate><enddate>20200930</enddate><creator>Colmenero, I</creator><creator>Santonja, C</creator><creator>Alonso-Riaño, M</creator><creator>Andina, D</creator><creator>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creator><creator>Requena, L</creator><creator>Torrelo, A</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200930</creationdate><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><author>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2089-c615e9f12a5fc695b4f1e16092fcfc571b63afbcb4a2407b62825317d3ec4edf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Reply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Riaño, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andina, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colmenero, I</au><au>Santonja, C</au><au>Alonso-Riaño, M</au><au>Andina, D</au><au>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</au><au>Requena, L</au><au>Torrelo, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2020-09-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>33000464</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.19579</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0963
ispartof British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-09
issn 0007-0963
1365-2133
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7549049
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Reply
title SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SARS-CoV-2%20Has%20Not%20Been%20Detected%20Directly%20by%20Electron%20Microscopy%20in%20the%20Endothelium%20of%20Chilblain%20Lesions:%20reply%20from%20authors&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Colmenero,%20I&rft.date=2020-09-30&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.19579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2447836928%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447836928&rft_id=info:pmid/33000464&rfr_iscdi=true