SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors
We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of dermatology (1951) 2020-09 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | British journal of dermatology (1951) |
container_volume | |
creator | Colmenero, I Santonja, C Alonso-Riaño, M Andina, D Rodríguez Peralto, J L Requena, L Torrelo, A |
description | We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjd.19579 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7549049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447836928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2089-c615e9f12a5fc695b4f1e16092fcfc571b63afbcb4a2407b62825317d3ec4edf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIbAIHfgD5CIcJfs-aA1LYLEmkBSQCXC2Pp8068owXewZppXw8zoMo9KVKqlJ1qwuhV5Qc0zrvuqv-mGrZ6idoQbmSDaOcP0ULQkjbEK34ATos5YoQyokkz9EB51USSizQ9eXJt8tmlX42DJ_bgr-kCX8EGPEpTOAm6PFpyJXEPe72eB0rzWnEn4PLqbi02-Mw4mkLeD32qWIM84CTx6ttiF20VdxACWks73GGXU3xOQ3YztM25fICPfM2Fnh5j0fox6f199V5s_l6drE62TSOkaVunKIStKfMSu-Ulp3wFKgimnnnnWxpp7j1neuEZYK0nWJLJjltew5OQO_5Efpwl7ubuwF6B-OUbTS7HAab9ybZYP5XxrA1v9If00qhidA14M19QE6_ZyiTGUJxEKMdIc3FMCHaJVeaLav17Z315kElg39YQ4m5acvUtsxtW9X7-vFdD85_9fC_AS2RUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447836928</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><description>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33000464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Reply</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-09</ispartof><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Riaño, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andina, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</description><subject>Reply</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctuFDEQtBCIbAIHfgD5CIcJfs-aA1LYLEmkBSQCXC2Pp8068owXewZppXw8zoMo9KVKqlJ1qwuhV5Qc0zrvuqv-mGrZ6idoQbmSDaOcP0ULQkjbEK34ATos5YoQyokkz9EB51USSizQ9eXJt8tmlX42DJ_bgr-kCX8EGPEpTOAm6PFpyJXEPe72eB0rzWnEn4PLqbi02-Mw4mkLeD32qWIM84CTx6ttiF20VdxACWks73GGXU3xOQ3YztM25fICPfM2Fnh5j0fox6f199V5s_l6drE62TSOkaVunKIStKfMSu-Ulp3wFKgimnnnnWxpp7j1neuEZYK0nWJLJjltew5OQO_5Efpwl7ubuwF6B-OUbTS7HAab9ybZYP5XxrA1v9If00qhidA14M19QE6_ZyiTGUJxEKMdIc3FMCHaJVeaLav17Z315kElg39YQ4m5acvUtsxtW9X7-vFdD85_9fC_AS2RUQ</recordid><startdate>20200930</startdate><enddate>20200930</enddate><creator>Colmenero, I</creator><creator>Santonja, C</creator><creator>Alonso-Riaño, M</creator><creator>Andina, D</creator><creator>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creator><creator>Requena, L</creator><creator>Torrelo, A</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200930</creationdate><title>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</title><author>Colmenero, I ; Santonja, C ; Alonso-Riaño, M ; Andina, D ; Rodríguez Peralto, J L ; Requena, L ; Torrelo, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2089-c615e9f12a5fc695b4f1e16092fcfc571b63afbcb4a2407b62825317d3ec4edf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Reply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colmenero, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonja, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso-Riaño, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andina, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Requena, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrelo, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colmenero, I</au><au>Santonja, C</au><au>Alonso-Riaño, M</au><au>Andina, D</au><au>Rodríguez Peralto, J L</au><au>Requena, L</au><au>Torrelo, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2020-09-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>We fully agree that the interpretation of electron microscopy findings can be challenging, even for experts. Differences between viral pathogens and normal subcellular organelles may be subtle, and some cellular components can masquerade as viruses. The size and shape of the particle shown in our paper fit with other descriptions of SARS-CoV-2, but there may be a bias in interpretation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>33000464</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.19579</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0963 |
ispartof | British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-09 |
issn | 0007-0963 1365-2133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7549049 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Reply |
title | SARS-CoV-2 Has Not Been Detected Directly by Electron Microscopy in the Endothelium of Chilblain Lesions: reply from authors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SARS-CoV-2%20Has%20Not%20Been%20Detected%20Directly%20by%20Electron%20Microscopy%20in%20the%20Endothelium%20of%20Chilblain%20Lesions:%20reply%20from%20authors&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Colmenero,%20I&rft.date=2020-09-30&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.19579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2447836928%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447836928&rft_id=info:pmid/33000464&rfr_iscdi=true |