Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system
High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2020-03, Vol.98 (2), p.146-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Bagwell, Charles Bruce Hunsberger, Benjamin Hill, Beth Herbert, Donald Bray, Christopher Selvanantham, Thirumahal Li, Stephen Villasboas, Jose C. Pavelko, Kevin Strausbauch, Michael Rahman, Adeeb Kelly, Gregory Asgharzadeh, Shahab Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena Behbehani, Gregory Chang, Hsiaochi Lyberger, Justin Montgomery, Ruth Zhao, Yujiao Inokuma, Margaret Goldberger, Ofir Stelzer, Greg |
description | High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30‐marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2‐week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay‐specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter‐site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cyto.b.21858 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7543682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2378221429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-70d5ab2024f1ea80cbbb79fd2616f38f425b145f4d4083157cf9b863219cb13a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kr2OEzEUhUcIxC4LHTWyREOxCbbHnp8GCSIWkHYVilBQWbbHk_HKYw_-IUzHI_B-dDwJDgkRUFDZuv587j32KYrHCC4RhPi5nKNbiiVGDW3uFOeIUrwgLa3vnvakPSsehHALYUlJVd8vzkpU06Ym1Xnx_SaZqH98_RZ0VMCrybsuSS200XEGrgccDGnkFuhxTNZNg7IuzpO2W8BD4DPQFuwGZxQQxrkOcNuBSXmdQc_NsTg662ySRnEPpDImgCl34p5H7WwAKezlVvNmfQWikoN1xm1nIF2ajOrATscB3PAv-QJ4z-MQVIzKX-ZWgKfoRh4z1PHIc4WbOegAwhyiGh8W93pugnp0XC-KD1evN6u3i-v1m3erl9cLSWjdLGrYUS4wxKRHijdQCiHqtu9whaq-bHqCqUCE9qQjsCkRrWXfiqYqMWqlQCUvL4oXB90piVF1UtmYvbPJ65H7mTmu2d8nVg9s6z6zmpKyanAWeHYU8O5TUiGyUYf9Q3GrXAoM5_-qIEIlzOjTf9Bbl3z2vafqBmNEcJupywMlvQvBq_40DIJsnxq2Tw0T7FdqMv7kTwMn-HdMMkAOwE4bNf9XjK0-btavDro_AXd816E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2378221429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bagwell, Charles Bruce ; Hunsberger, Benjamin ; Hill, Beth ; Herbert, Donald ; Bray, Christopher ; Selvanantham, Thirumahal ; Li, Stephen ; Villasboas, Jose C. ; Pavelko, Kevin ; Strausbauch, Michael ; Rahman, Adeeb ; Kelly, Gregory ; Asgharzadeh, Shahab ; Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena ; Behbehani, Gregory ; Chang, Hsiaochi ; Lyberger, Justin ; Montgomery, Ruth ; Zhao, Yujiao ; Inokuma, Margaret ; Goldberger, Ofir ; Stelzer, Greg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bagwell, Charles Bruce ; Hunsberger, Benjamin ; Hill, Beth ; Herbert, Donald ; Bray, Christopher ; Selvanantham, Thirumahal ; Li, Stephen ; Villasboas, Jose C. ; Pavelko, Kevin ; Strausbauch, Michael ; Rahman, Adeeb ; Kelly, Gregory ; Asgharzadeh, Shahab ; Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena ; Behbehani, Gregory ; Chang, Hsiaochi ; Lyberger, Justin ; Montgomery, Ruth ; Zhao, Yujiao ; Inokuma, Margaret ; Goldberger, Ofir ; Stelzer, Greg</creatorcontrib><description>High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30‐marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2‐week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay‐specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter‐site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21858</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31758746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Assaying ; Automation ; Beads ; Blood ; Clinical trials ; Computer programs ; Cytometry ; cytometry automation ; cytometry standardization ; Data acquisition ; Data analysis ; Dimensional analysis ; Environmental cleanup ; Immune system ; Leukocytes (mononuclear) ; Markers ; percentage precision ; Peripheral blood mononuclear cells ; Phenotyping ; Populations ; Reagents ; Reproducibility ; Software ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2020-03, Vol.98 (2), p.146-160</ispartof><rights>2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><rights>2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society.</rights><rights>2020 International Clinical Cytometry Society</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-70d5ab2024f1ea80cbbb79fd2616f38f425b145f4d4083157cf9b863219cb13a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-70d5ab2024f1ea80cbbb79fd2616f38f425b145f4d4083157cf9b863219cb13a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcyto.b.21858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcyto.b.21858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bagwell, Charles Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsberger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvanantham, Thirumahal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasboas, Jose C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelko, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strausbauch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Adeeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgharzadeh, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behbehani, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hsiaochi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyberger, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuma, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberger, Ofir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzer, Greg</creatorcontrib><title>Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system</title><title>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</title><addtitle>Cytometry B Clin Cytom</addtitle><description>High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30‐marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2‐week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay‐specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter‐site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping.</description><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Beads</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Cytometry</subject><subject>cytometry automation</subject><subject>cytometry standardization</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Environmental cleanup</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Leukocytes (mononuclear)</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>percentage precision</subject><subject>Peripheral blood mononuclear cells</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1552-4949</issn><issn>1552-4957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kr2OEzEUhUcIxC4LHTWyREOxCbbHnp8GCSIWkHYVilBQWbbHk_HKYw_-IUzHI_B-dDwJDgkRUFDZuv587j32KYrHCC4RhPi5nKNbiiVGDW3uFOeIUrwgLa3vnvakPSsehHALYUlJVd8vzkpU06Ym1Xnx_SaZqH98_RZ0VMCrybsuSS200XEGrgccDGnkFuhxTNZNg7IuzpO2W8BD4DPQFuwGZxQQxrkOcNuBSXmdQc_NsTg662ySRnEPpDImgCl34p5H7WwAKezlVvNmfQWikoN1xm1nIF2ajOrATscB3PAv-QJ4z-MQVIzKX-ZWgKfoRh4z1PHIc4WbOegAwhyiGh8W93pugnp0XC-KD1evN6u3i-v1m3erl9cLSWjdLGrYUS4wxKRHijdQCiHqtu9whaq-bHqCqUCE9qQjsCkRrWXfiqYqMWqlQCUvL4oXB90piVF1UtmYvbPJ65H7mTmu2d8nVg9s6z6zmpKyanAWeHYU8O5TUiGyUYf9Q3GrXAoM5_-qIEIlzOjTf9Bbl3z2vafqBmNEcJupywMlvQvBq_40DIJsnxq2Tw0T7FdqMv7kTwMn-HdMMkAOwE4bNf9XjK0-btavDro_AXd816E</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Bagwell, Charles Bruce</creator><creator>Hunsberger, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hill, Beth</creator><creator>Herbert, Donald</creator><creator>Bray, Christopher</creator><creator>Selvanantham, Thirumahal</creator><creator>Li, Stephen</creator><creator>Villasboas, Jose C.</creator><creator>Pavelko, Kevin</creator><creator>Strausbauch, Michael</creator><creator>Rahman, Adeeb</creator><creator>Kelly, Gregory</creator><creator>Asgharzadeh, Shahab</creator><creator>Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena</creator><creator>Behbehani, Gregory</creator><creator>Chang, Hsiaochi</creator><creator>Lyberger, Justin</creator><creator>Montgomery, Ruth</creator><creator>Zhao, Yujiao</creator><creator>Inokuma, Margaret</creator><creator>Goldberger, Ofir</creator><creator>Stelzer, Greg</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system</title><author>Bagwell, Charles Bruce ; Hunsberger, Benjamin ; Hill, Beth ; Herbert, Donald ; Bray, Christopher ; Selvanantham, Thirumahal ; Li, Stephen ; Villasboas, Jose C. ; Pavelko, Kevin ; Strausbauch, Michael ; Rahman, Adeeb ; Kelly, Gregory ; Asgharzadeh, Shahab ; Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena ; Behbehani, Gregory ; Chang, Hsiaochi ; Lyberger, Justin ; Montgomery, Ruth ; Zhao, Yujiao ; Inokuma, Margaret ; Goldberger, Ofir ; Stelzer, Greg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4578-70d5ab2024f1ea80cbbb79fd2616f38f425b145f4d4083157cf9b863219cb13a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Beads</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Cytometry</topic><topic>cytometry automation</topic><topic>cytometry standardization</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Environmental cleanup</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Leukocytes (mononuclear)</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>percentage precision</topic><topic>Peripheral blood mononuclear cells</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bagwell, Charles Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsberger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvanantham, Thirumahal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villasboas, Jose C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelko, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strausbauch, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Adeeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgharzadeh, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behbehani, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Hsiaochi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyberger, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yujiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuma, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberger, Ofir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelzer, Greg</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bagwell, Charles Bruce</au><au>Hunsberger, Benjamin</au><au>Hill, Beth</au><au>Herbert, Donald</au><au>Bray, Christopher</au><au>Selvanantham, Thirumahal</au><au>Li, Stephen</au><au>Villasboas, Jose C.</au><au>Pavelko, Kevin</au><au>Strausbauch, Michael</au><au>Rahman, Adeeb</au><au>Kelly, Gregory</au><au>Asgharzadeh, Shahab</au><au>Gomez‐Cabrero, Azucena</au><au>Behbehani, Gregory</au><au>Chang, Hsiaochi</au><au>Lyberger, Justin</au><au>Montgomery, Ruth</au><au>Zhao, Yujiao</au><au>Inokuma, Margaret</au><au>Goldberger, Ofir</au><au>Stelzer, Greg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry B Clin Cytom</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>146-160</pages><issn>1552-4949</issn><eissn>1552-4957</eissn><abstract>High‐dimensional mass cytometry data potentially enable a comprehensive characterization of immune cells. In order to positively affect clinical trials and translational clinical research, this advanced technology needs to demonstrate a high reproducibility of results across multiple sites for both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whole blood preparations. A dry 30‐marker broad immunophenotyping panel and customized automated analysis software were recently engineered and are commercially available as the Fluidigm® Maxpar® Direct™ Immune Profiling Assay™. In this study, seven sites received whole blood and six sites received PBMC samples from single donors over a 2‐week interval. Each site labeled replicate samples and acquired data on Helios™ instruments using an assay‐specific acquisition template. All acquired sample files were then automatically analyzed by Maxpar Pathsetter™ software. A cleanup step eliminated debris, dead cells, aggregates, and normalization beads. The second step automatically enumerated 37 immune cell populations and performed label intensity assessments on all 30 markers. The inter‐site reproducibility of the 37 quantified cell populations had consistent population frequencies, with an average %CV of 14.4% for whole blood and 17.7% for PBMC. The dry reagent coupled with automated data analysis is not only convenient but also provides a high degree of reproducibility within and among multiple test sites resulting in a comprehensive yet practical solution for deep immune phenotyping.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31758746</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.b.21858</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4949 |
ispartof | Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2020-03, Vol.98 (2), p.146-160 |
issn | 1552-4949 1552-4957 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7543682 |
source | Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Assaying Automation Beads Blood Clinical trials Computer programs Cytometry cytometry automation cytometry standardization Data acquisition Data analysis Dimensional analysis Environmental cleanup Immune system Leukocytes (mononuclear) Markers percentage precision Peripheral blood mononuclear cells Phenotyping Populations Reagents Reproducibility Software Technology |
title | Multi‐site reproducibility of a human immunophenotyping assay in whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells preparations using CyTOF technology coupled with Maxpar Pathsetter, an automated data analysis system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A55%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi%E2%80%90site%20reproducibility%20of%20a%20human%20immunophenotyping%20assay%20in%20whole%20blood%20and%20peripheral%20blood%20mononuclear%20cells%20preparations%20using%20CyTOF%20technology%20coupled%20with%20Maxpar%20Pathsetter,%20an%20automated%20data%20analysis%20system&rft.jtitle=Cytometry.%20Part%20B,%20Clinical%20cytometry&rft.au=Bagwell,%20Charles%20Bruce&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=146-160&rft.issn=1552-4949&rft.eissn=1552-4957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.b.21858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2378221429%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2378221429&rft_id=info:pmid/31758746&rfr_iscdi=true |