Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications

Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol (18F‐FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand–binding function of breast cancer lesions....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2020-10, Vol.25 (10), p.835-844
Hauptverfasser: Kurland, Brenda F., Wiggins, Jay R., Coche, Amandine, Fontan, Charlotte, Bouvet, Yann, Webner, Peter, Divgi, Chaitanya, Linden, Hannah M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 844
container_issue 10
container_start_page 835
container_title The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)
container_volume 25
creator Kurland, Brenda F.
Wiggins, Jay R.
Coche, Amandine
Fontan, Charlotte
Bouvet, Yann
Webner, Peter
Divgi, Chaitanya
Linden, Hannah M.
description Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol (18F‐FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand–binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for 18F‐FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta‐analysis of published results comparing 18F‐FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English‐language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve models for the meta‐analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65–0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65–1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non‐IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68–0.94). These results suggest that 18F‐FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER‐positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. Implications for Practice 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol positron emission tomography (18F‐FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FES PET in a meta‐analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. 18F‐FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that 18F‐FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future. Positron emission t
doi_str_mv 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0967
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7543360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2399252832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3870-e328d38ba66bbae7b25031ddc6128868eef31d9e6cf459a54c110174404e30483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUktuFDEQbSEQCQNXAC_ZdLDb7h8LpElrBiIFBkEQ7CyPu3rayG03todoWHEErgIHySE4AGfAPQmB7Ni4quSq917ZL0keEXxECsqehB6skVbbjfLhKMOkTnFdlLeSQ5KzOmU1_nA75riiaUny-iC55_1HjGNKs7vJAc1oyXBOD5Nf73ur4efXb8e23aGmF07IAE59EUFZg2yHFj44uwGD3oCEMViH3gYRth4pg15CED5WSqJjBzFFjTASHDpXoUekuPgekUm1jOdSb62zU1le_IhhghWtshq9tl5FCoMWg_J-Yj2zg904Mfa7p3uK2D43Qu-88kiYdlJihwFMuxfpURdFnZgAcWavWplgUaOVUVJoNB9HHZN96_3kTie0hwdXcZa8Wy7Omhfp6er5STM_TSWtSpwCzaqWVmtRFOu1gHKd5ZiStpUFyaqqqAC6WNZQyI7ltciZJASTkjHMgGJW0Vny7BJ33K4HaCWYuK3mo1ODcDtuheI3b4zq-cZ-5mXOKC1wBHh8BeDspy34wOPjSNBaGLBbzzNa11meVfEnZ0l52Sqd9d5Bd01DMJ_cwm-4hU9u4ZNb4uTDf1Vez_2xx981zpWG3f_i8tWrZkUojW_2G5el4ro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2399252832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kurland, Brenda F. ; Wiggins, Jay R. ; Coche, Amandine ; Fontan, Charlotte ; Bouvet, Yann ; Webner, Peter ; Divgi, Chaitanya ; Linden, Hannah M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Brenda F. ; Wiggins, Jay R. ; Coche, Amandine ; Fontan, Charlotte ; Bouvet, Yann ; Webner, Peter ; Divgi, Chaitanya ; Linden, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><description>Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol (18F‐FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand–binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for 18F‐FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta‐analysis of published results comparing 18F‐FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English‐language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve models for the meta‐analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65–0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65–1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non‐IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68–0.94). These results suggest that 18F‐FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER‐positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. Implications for Practice 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol positron emission tomography (18F‐FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FES PET in a meta‐analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. 18F‐FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that 18F‐FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐FES is being developed for the characterization of estrogen receptor (ER) status of known or suspected metastatic lesions in patients with a history of ER‐positive breast cancer. This study was conducted to assess concordance of ER by 18F‐FES PET and immunohistochemistry in non‐breast lesions and to incorporate new published data, as part of a new drug application. This report presents the results of the meta‐analysis and reviews current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-7159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-490X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0967</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32374053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol ; Biopsy ; Breast Cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Estradiol ; Estrogen receptor ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Metastatic breast cancer ; Meta‐analysis ; Positron emission tomography ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Receptors, Estrogen ; Tissue biopsy</subject><ispartof>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio), 2020-10, Vol.25 (10), p.835-844</ispartof><rights>AlphaMed Press 2020</rights><rights>AlphaMed Press 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3870-e328d38ba66bbae7b25031ddc6128868eef31d9e6cf459a54c110174404e30483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3870-e328d38ba66bbae7b25031ddc6128868eef31d9e6cf459a54c110174404e30483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5669-0595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543360/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543360/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32374053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Brenda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggins, Jay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coche, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontan, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouvet, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divgi, Chaitanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><title>Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications</title><title>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</title><addtitle>Oncologist</addtitle><description>Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol (18F‐FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand–binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for 18F‐FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta‐analysis of published results comparing 18F‐FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English‐language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve models for the meta‐analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65–0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65–1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non‐IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68–0.94). These results suggest that 18F‐FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER‐positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. Implications for Practice 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol positron emission tomography (18F‐FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FES PET in a meta‐analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. 18F‐FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that 18F‐FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐FES is being developed for the characterization of estrogen receptor (ER) status of known or suspected metastatic lesions in patients with a history of ER‐positive breast cancer. This study was conducted to assess concordance of ER by 18F‐FES PET and immunohistochemistry in non‐breast lesions and to incorporate new published data, as part of a new drug application. This report presents the results of the meta‐analysis and reviews current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans.</description><subject>16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Estradiol</subject><subject>Estrogen receptor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Metastatic breast cancer</subject><subject>Meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen</subject><subject>Tissue biopsy</subject><issn>1083-7159</issn><issn>1549-490X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUktuFDEQbSEQCQNXAC_ZdLDb7h8LpElrBiIFBkEQ7CyPu3rayG03todoWHEErgIHySE4AGfAPQmB7Ni4quSq917ZL0keEXxECsqehB6skVbbjfLhKMOkTnFdlLeSQ5KzOmU1_nA75riiaUny-iC55_1HjGNKs7vJAc1oyXBOD5Nf73ur4efXb8e23aGmF07IAE59EUFZg2yHFj44uwGD3oCEMViH3gYRth4pg15CED5WSqJjBzFFjTASHDpXoUekuPgekUm1jOdSb62zU1le_IhhghWtshq9tl5FCoMWg_J-Yj2zg904Mfa7p3uK2D43Qu-88kiYdlJihwFMuxfpURdFnZgAcWavWplgUaOVUVJoNB9HHZN96_3kTie0hwdXcZa8Wy7Omhfp6er5STM_TSWtSpwCzaqWVmtRFOu1gHKd5ZiStpUFyaqqqAC6WNZQyI7ltciZJASTkjHMgGJW0Vny7BJ33K4HaCWYuK3mo1ODcDtuheI3b4zq-cZ-5mXOKC1wBHh8BeDspy34wOPjSNBaGLBbzzNa11meVfEnZ0l52Sqd9d5Bd01DMJ_cwm-4hU9u4ZNb4uTDf1Vez_2xx981zpWG3f_i8tWrZkUojW_2G5el4ro</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Kurland, Brenda F.</creator><creator>Wiggins, Jay R.</creator><creator>Coche, Amandine</creator><creator>Fontan, Charlotte</creator><creator>Bouvet, Yann</creator><creator>Webner, Peter</creator><creator>Divgi, Chaitanya</creator><creator>Linden, Hannah M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-0595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications</title><author>Kurland, Brenda F. ; Wiggins, Jay R. ; Coche, Amandine ; Fontan, Charlotte ; Bouvet, Yann ; Webner, Peter ; Divgi, Chaitanya ; Linden, Hannah M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3870-e328d38ba66bbae7b25031ddc6128868eef31d9e6cf459a54c110174404e30483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Estradiol</topic><topic>Estrogen receptor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Metastatic breast cancer</topic><topic>Meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen</topic><topic>Tissue biopsy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurland, Brenda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggins, Jay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coche, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontan, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouvet, Yann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divgi, Chaitanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Hannah M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurland, Brenda F.</au><au>Wiggins, Jay R.</au><au>Coche, Amandine</au><au>Fontan, Charlotte</au><au>Bouvet, Yann</au><au>Webner, Peter</au><au>Divgi, Chaitanya</au><au>Linden, Hannah M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications</atitle><jtitle>The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio)</jtitle><addtitle>Oncologist</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>835-844</pages><issn>1083-7159</issn><eissn>1549-490X</eissn><abstract>Estrogen receptor (ER) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cancer tissue is currently used to direct endocrine therapy in breast cancer. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol (18F‐FES) noninvasively characterizes ER ligand–binding function of breast cancer lesions. Concordance of imaging and tissue assays should be established for 18F‐FES PET to be an alternative or complement to tissue biopsy for metastatic lesions. We conducted a meta‐analysis of published results comparing 18F‐FES PET and tissue assays of ER status in patients with breast cancer. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for English‐language manuscripts with at least 10 patients and low overall risk of bias. Thresholds for imaging and tissue classification could differ between studies but had to be clearly stated. We used hierarchical summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve models for the meta‐analysis. The primary analysis included 113 nonbreast lesions from 4 studies; an expanded analysis included 327 total lesions from 11 studies. Treating IHC results as the reference standard, sensitivity was 0.78 (95% confidence region 0.65–0.88) and specificity 0.98 (0.65–1.00) for the primary analysis of nonbreast lesions. In the expanded analysis including non‐IHC tissue assays and all lesion sites, sensitivity was 0.81 (0.73–0.87) and specificity 0.86 (0.68–0.94). These results suggest that 18F‐FES PET is useful for characterization of ER status of metastatic breast cancer lesions. We also review current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans. This imaging assay has potential to improve clinically relevant outcomes for patients with (historically) ER‐positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain metastases and/or lobular histology. Implications for Practice 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol positron emission tomography (18F‐FES PET) imaging assesses estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in vivo. This work reviews the sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FES PET in a meta‐analysis with reference tissue assays and discusses best practices for use of the tracer as an imaging biomarker. 18F‐FES PET could enhance breast cancer diagnosis and staging as well as aid in therapy selection for patients with metastatic disease. Tissue sampling limitations, intrapatient heterogeneity, and temporal changes in molecular markers make it likely that 18F‐FES PET will complement existing assays when clinically available in the near future. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐FES is being developed for the characterization of estrogen receptor (ER) status of known or suspected metastatic lesions in patients with a history of ER‐positive breast cancer. This study was conducted to assess concordance of ER by 18F‐FES PET and immunohistochemistry in non‐breast lesions and to incorporate new published data, as part of a new drug application. This report presents the results of the meta‐analysis and reviews current best practices for conducting 18F‐FES PET scans.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32374053</pmid><doi>10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0967</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-0595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-7159
ispartof The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio), 2020-10, Vol.25 (10), p.835-844
issn 1083-7159
1549-490X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7543360
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects 16α‐18F‐fluoro‐17β‐estradiol
Biopsy
Breast Cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Estradiol
Estrogen receptor
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Metastatic breast cancer
Meta‐analysis
Positron emission tomography
Radiopharmaceuticals
Receptors, Estrogen
Tissue biopsy
title Whole‐Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α‐18F‐Fluoro‐17β‐Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta‐Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T12%3A29%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole%E2%80%90Body%20Characterization%20of%20Estrogen%20Receptor%20Status%20in%20Metastatic%20Breast%20Cancer%20with%2016%CE%B1%E2%80%9018F%E2%80%90Fluoro%E2%80%9017%CE%B2%E2%80%90Estradiol%20Positron%20Emission%20Tomography:%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Integration%20into%20Clinical%20Applications&rft.jtitle=The%20oncologist%20(Dayton,%20Ohio)&rft.au=Kurland,%20Brenda%20F.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=835-844&rft.issn=1083-7159&rft.eissn=1549-490X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0967&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2399252832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2399252832&rft_id=info:pmid/32374053&rfr_iscdi=true