Review of Type III Endoleaks
Abstract Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleak...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in interventional radiology 2020-10, Vol.37 (4), p.371-376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Seminars in interventional radiology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Stoecker, Jordan B. Glaser, Julia D. |
description | Abstract
Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleaks due to their risk of rupture, and endovascular techniques are the favored modality with placement of a bridging endograft over the endoleak defect. Conversion to open surgical repair remains the definitive option in cases where less invasive methods have failed or are precluded. In this article, the authors review evidence on the etiology, incidence, diagnosis, and current techniques for type III endoleak management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0040-1715874 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7540642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2449992127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-5391717582a18d9e84531488e51405beb0a8ca2a1626d5c3c45d578ced854c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMobk6vnkR29JKZn21yEWRMLQiCzHPI0m-us21m007235uxOfTg6fvgffJ-4UHokpIRJVLeBkyIIJimVKpUHKE-JVphpRN-jPok5RpryXQPnYWwJISKmJyiHudExJ310dUrrAv4Gvr5cLpZwTDLsuGkzn0J9iOco5O5LQNc7OcAvT1MpuMn_PzymI3vn7ETTLVYch3vp1IxS1WuQQnJY7sCSQWRM5gRq5yNYcKSXDruhMxlqhzkSgrHLR-gu13vqptVkDuo28aWZtUUlW02xtvC_E3qYmHe_dqkUpBEsFhwsy9o_GcHoTVVERyUpa3Bd8EwIbTWjLI0oqMd6hofQgPzwxlKzFapCWar1OyVxgfXvz93wH8cRgDvgHZRQAVm6bumjrr-K_wG0nR9Jw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449992127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of Type III Endoleaks</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stoecker, Jordan B. ; Glaser, Julia D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Jordan B. ; Glaser, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleaks due to their risk of rupture, and endovascular techniques are the favored modality with placement of a bridging endograft over the endoleak defect. Conversion to open surgical repair remains the definitive option in cases where less invasive methods have failed or are precluded. In this article, the authors review evidence on the etiology, incidence, diagnosis, and current techniques for type III endoleak management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0739-9529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715874</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33041482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA: Thieme Medical Publishers</publisher><subject>Review ; Review Article</subject><ispartof>Seminars in interventional radiology, 2020-10, Vol.37 (4), p.371-376</ispartof><rights>Thieme. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Thieme. All rights reserved. 2020 Thieme Medical Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-5391717582a18d9e84531488e51405beb0a8ca2a1626d5c3c45d578ced854c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-5391717582a18d9e84531488e51405beb0a8ca2a1626d5c3c45d578ced854c3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540642/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7540642/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33041482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Jordan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of Type III Endoleaks</title><title>Seminars in interventional radiology</title><addtitle>Semin intervent Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleaks due to their risk of rupture, and endovascular techniques are the favored modality with placement of a bridging endograft over the endoleak defect. Conversion to open surgical repair remains the definitive option in cases where less invasive methods have failed or are precluded. In this article, the authors review evidence on the etiology, incidence, diagnosis, and current techniques for type III endoleak management.</description><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><issn>0739-9529</issn><issn>1098-8963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMobk6vnkR29JKZn21yEWRMLQiCzHPI0m-us21m007235uxOfTg6fvgffJ-4UHokpIRJVLeBkyIIJimVKpUHKE-JVphpRN-jPok5RpryXQPnYWwJISKmJyiHudExJ310dUrrAv4Gvr5cLpZwTDLsuGkzn0J9iOco5O5LQNc7OcAvT1MpuMn_PzymI3vn7ETTLVYch3vp1IxS1WuQQnJY7sCSQWRM5gRq5yNYcKSXDruhMxlqhzkSgrHLR-gu13vqptVkDuo28aWZtUUlW02xtvC_E3qYmHe_dqkUpBEsFhwsy9o_GcHoTVVERyUpa3Bd8EwIbTWjLI0oqMd6hofQgPzwxlKzFapCWar1OyVxgfXvz93wH8cRgDvgHZRQAVm6bumjrr-K_wG0nR9Jw</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Stoecker, Jordan B.</creator><creator>Glaser, Julia D.</creator><general>Thieme Medical Publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Review of Type III Endoleaks</title><author>Stoecker, Jordan B. ; Glaser, Julia D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-5391717582a18d9e84531488e51405beb0a8ca2a1626d5c3c45d578ced854c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoecker, Jordan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Julia D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Seminars in interventional radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoecker, Jordan B.</au><au>Glaser, Julia D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of Type III Endoleaks</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in interventional radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Semin intervent Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>371-376</pages><issn>0739-9529</issn><eissn>1098-8963</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleaks due to their risk of rupture, and endovascular techniques are the favored modality with placement of a bridging endograft over the endoleak defect. Conversion to open surgical repair remains the definitive option in cases where less invasive methods have failed or are precluded. In this article, the authors review evidence on the etiology, incidence, diagnosis, and current techniques for type III endoleak management.</abstract><cop>333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA</cop><pub>Thieme Medical Publishers</pub><pmid>33041482</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0040-1715874</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0739-9529 |
ispartof | Seminars in interventional radiology, 2020-10, Vol.37 (4), p.371-376 |
issn | 0739-9529 1098-8963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7540642 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Review Review Article |
title | Review of Type III Endoleaks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20Type%20III%20Endoleaks&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20interventional%20radiology&rft.au=Stoecker,%20Jordan%20B.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=371-376&rft.issn=0739-9529&rft.eissn=1098-8963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0040-1715874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2449992127%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449992127&rft_id=info:pmid/33041482&rfr_iscdi=true |