Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&D and the impact of regulation

Over the last 20 years the share of the crop protection market attributable to the leading markets (North America, EU‐15 and Japan) that are the major focus of new active ingredient research and development (R&D) has declined. Greater growth has been recorded in developing markets, questioning t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pest management science 2020-10, Vol.76 (10), p.3348-3356
1. Verfasser: Phillips, Matthew William Archer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3356
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3348
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 76
creator Phillips, Matthew William Archer
description Over the last 20 years the share of the crop protection market attributable to the leading markets (North America, EU‐15 and Japan) that are the major focus of new active ingredient research and development (R&D) has declined. Greater growth has been recorded in developing markets, questioning the focus of current R&D strategy. R&D budgets within the major companies have seen a shift toward genetically modified (GM) trait development away from agrochemicals, such that the rate of new active ingredients entering development and subsequently being introduced has declined. As a result, the industry has become more reliant on older, off‐patent chemistry, although the availability of older products has been affected by re‐registration requirements, particularly in the EU. Current criteria often preclude the registration of broad‐spectrum agrochemicals, resulting in many new active ingredients being single site active, which is perceived to increase the potential for resistance development, particularly for herbicides, although this is not always the case. © 2019 The Author. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Since 2014 the agrochemical industry has encountered a period of downturn affected by low crop prices and farm profitability. At the same time increasing regulation has made the introduction of new chemistry increasingly challenging, particularly in the EU where registration is now governed by hazard rather than risk. This has led to companies contemplating alternative technologies for crop protection, including biologicals/bio‐stimulants, GM crops, precision agriculture, manipulation of the microbiome etc. The need to address these alternative technologies and the downturn in the chemical crop protection sector have resulted in a significant degree of industry consolidation, which has considerably altered the competitive environment. This article addresses recent industry trends and the short‐term outlook, the impact that regulatory and consolidation events have had on new active ingredient development and introduction, and the availability of technologies in the EU in comparison with the USA and the rest of the world. Resistance development has sustained the need for new solutions, but rising costs and regulation/legislation have limited farmers’ access to some technologies. The key sectors driving growth in the crop protection sector are discussed as well as current trends in research and
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.5728
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7540551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441199031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4998-eaff71bb403985e15ae598b8d89ff25d319fdbc7a278bf6aa33e96441b56e7e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0hA0AvdTNqmTW6EMT9hovgB3oW0Pdk62qYm7WT_3s7NoRdenQPn4TkvL0KHlAwoId5F5QYs8vgW6lLmhf1ACL692fl7B-05NyOECCG8XdTxKWc85LyLHoYTa5IpFFmicpyVaeNqu8ApzCE3VQFlfY5rC2Xq2iN-PrnCqkxxPQWcFZVKamw0tjBpclVnptxHO1rlDg7Ws4febq5fR3f98ePt_Wg47ifLZH1QWkc0jgPiC86AMgVM8JinXGjtsdSnQqdxEikv4rEOlfJ9EGEQ0JiFEAHxe-hy5a2auIA0aWNalcvKZoWyC2lUJv9eymwqJ2YuIxYQxmgrOF4LrPlowNVyZhpbtpml1_6hQhB_SZ2uqMQa5yzozQdK5LJ3WTm57L0lj34H2nA_RbfA2Qr4zHJY_OeRTy_fui_sOYyS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441199031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&amp;D and the impact of regulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last 20 years the share of the crop protection market attributable to the leading markets (North America, EU‐15 and Japan) that are the major focus of new active ingredient research and development (R&amp;D) has declined. Greater growth has been recorded in developing markets, questioning the focus of current R&amp;D strategy. R&amp;D budgets within the major companies have seen a shift toward genetically modified (GM) trait development away from agrochemicals, such that the rate of new active ingredients entering development and subsequently being introduced has declined. As a result, the industry has become more reliant on older, off‐patent chemistry, although the availability of older products has been affected by re‐registration requirements, particularly in the EU. Current criteria often preclude the registration of broad‐spectrum agrochemicals, resulting in many new active ingredients being single site active, which is perceived to increase the potential for resistance development, particularly for herbicides, although this is not always the case. © 2019 The Author. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Since 2014 the agrochemical industry has encountered a period of downturn affected by low crop prices and farm profitability. At the same time increasing regulation has made the introduction of new chemistry increasingly challenging, particularly in the EU where registration is now governed by hazard rather than risk. This has led to companies contemplating alternative technologies for crop protection, including biologicals/bio‐stimulants, GM crops, precision agriculture, manipulation of the microbiome etc. The need to address these alternative technologies and the downturn in the chemical crop protection sector have resulted in a significant degree of industry consolidation, which has considerably altered the competitive environment. This article addresses recent industry trends and the short‐term outlook, the impact that regulatory and consolidation events have had on new active ingredient development and introduction, and the availability of technologies in the EU in comparison with the USA and the rest of the world. Resistance development has sustained the need for new solutions, but rising costs and regulation/legislation have limited farmers’ access to some technologies. The key sectors driving growth in the crop protection sector are discussed as well as current trends in research and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.5728</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>agrochemical ; Agrochemicals ; Chemical pest control ; Crop Protection ; Genetic modification ; GM traits ; hazard ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Industrial development ; Industry ; Ingredients ; Japan ; North America ; Pest control ; Plant protection ; R&amp;D ; registration ; Research &amp; development ; resistance ; Review ; risk ; strategy</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2020-10, Vol.76 (10), p.3348-3356</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2019 The Author. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4998-eaff71bb403985e15ae598b8d89ff25d319fdbc7a278bf6aa33e96441b56e7e03</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9598-3473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.5728$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.5728$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</creatorcontrib><title>Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&amp;D and the impact of regulation</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>Over the last 20 years the share of the crop protection market attributable to the leading markets (North America, EU‐15 and Japan) that are the major focus of new active ingredient research and development (R&amp;D) has declined. Greater growth has been recorded in developing markets, questioning the focus of current R&amp;D strategy. R&amp;D budgets within the major companies have seen a shift toward genetically modified (GM) trait development away from agrochemicals, such that the rate of new active ingredients entering development and subsequently being introduced has declined. As a result, the industry has become more reliant on older, off‐patent chemistry, although the availability of older products has been affected by re‐registration requirements, particularly in the EU. Current criteria often preclude the registration of broad‐spectrum agrochemicals, resulting in many new active ingredients being single site active, which is perceived to increase the potential for resistance development, particularly for herbicides, although this is not always the case. © 2019 The Author. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Since 2014 the agrochemical industry has encountered a period of downturn affected by low crop prices and farm profitability. At the same time increasing regulation has made the introduction of new chemistry increasingly challenging, particularly in the EU where registration is now governed by hazard rather than risk. This has led to companies contemplating alternative technologies for crop protection, including biologicals/bio‐stimulants, GM crops, precision agriculture, manipulation of the microbiome etc. The need to address these alternative technologies and the downturn in the chemical crop protection sector have resulted in a significant degree of industry consolidation, which has considerably altered the competitive environment. This article addresses recent industry trends and the short‐term outlook, the impact that regulatory and consolidation events have had on new active ingredient development and introduction, and the availability of technologies in the EU in comparison with the USA and the rest of the world. Resistance development has sustained the need for new solutions, but rising costs and regulation/legislation have limited farmers’ access to some technologies. The key sectors driving growth in the crop protection sector are discussed as well as current trends in research and development.</description><subject>agrochemical</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Chemical pest control</subject><subject>Crop Protection</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>GM traits</subject><subject>hazard</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Ingredients</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>registration</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>strategy</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk7xH0hA0AvdTNqmTW6EMT9hovgB3oW0Pdk62qYm7WT_3s7NoRdenQPn4TkvL0KHlAwoId5F5QYs8vgW6lLmhf1ACL692fl7B-05NyOECCG8XdTxKWc85LyLHoYTa5IpFFmicpyVaeNqu8ApzCE3VQFlfY5rC2Xq2iN-PrnCqkxxPQWcFZVKamw0tjBpclVnptxHO1rlDg7Ws4febq5fR3f98ePt_Wg47ifLZH1QWkc0jgPiC86AMgVM8JinXGjtsdSnQqdxEikv4rEOlfJ9EGEQ0JiFEAHxe-hy5a2auIA0aWNalcvKZoWyC2lUJv9eymwqJ2YuIxYQxmgrOF4LrPlowNVyZhpbtpml1_6hQhB_SZ2uqMQa5yzozQdK5LJ3WTm57L0lj34H2nA_RbfA2Qr4zHJY_OeRTy_fui_sOYyS</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-3473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&amp;D and the impact of regulation</title><author>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4998-eaff71bb403985e15ae598b8d89ff25d319fdbc7a278bf6aa33e96441b56e7e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>agrochemical</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Chemical pest control</topic><topic>Crop Protection</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>GM traits</topic><topic>hazard</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Ingredients</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>registration</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Matthew William Archer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&amp;D and the impact of regulation</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3348</spage><epage>3356</epage><pages>3348-3356</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>Over the last 20 years the share of the crop protection market attributable to the leading markets (North America, EU‐15 and Japan) that are the major focus of new active ingredient research and development (R&amp;D) has declined. Greater growth has been recorded in developing markets, questioning the focus of current R&amp;D strategy. R&amp;D budgets within the major companies have seen a shift toward genetically modified (GM) trait development away from agrochemicals, such that the rate of new active ingredients entering development and subsequently being introduced has declined. As a result, the industry has become more reliant on older, off‐patent chemistry, although the availability of older products has been affected by re‐registration requirements, particularly in the EU. Current criteria often preclude the registration of broad‐spectrum agrochemicals, resulting in many new active ingredients being single site active, which is perceived to increase the potential for resistance development, particularly for herbicides, although this is not always the case. © 2019 The Author. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. Since 2014 the agrochemical industry has encountered a period of downturn affected by low crop prices and farm profitability. At the same time increasing regulation has made the introduction of new chemistry increasingly challenging, particularly in the EU where registration is now governed by hazard rather than risk. This has led to companies contemplating alternative technologies for crop protection, including biologicals/bio‐stimulants, GM crops, precision agriculture, manipulation of the microbiome etc. The need to address these alternative technologies and the downturn in the chemical crop protection sector have resulted in a significant degree of industry consolidation, which has considerably altered the competitive environment. This article addresses recent industry trends and the short‐term outlook, the impact that regulatory and consolidation events have had on new active ingredient development and introduction, and the availability of technologies in the EU in comparison with the USA and the rest of the world. Resistance development has sustained the need for new solutions, but rising costs and regulation/legislation have limited farmers’ access to some technologies. The key sectors driving growth in the crop protection sector are discussed as well as current trends in research and development.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>31858688</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.5728</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-3473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2020-10, Vol.76 (10), p.3348-3356
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7540551
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects agrochemical
Agrochemicals
Chemical pest control
Crop Protection
Genetic modification
GM traits
hazard
Herbicide resistance
Herbicides
Industrial development
Industry
Ingredients
Japan
North America
Pest control
Plant protection
R&D
registration
Research & development
resistance
Review
risk
strategy
title Agrochemical industry development, trends in R&D and the impact of regulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agrochemical%20industry%20development,%20trends%20in%20R&D%20and%20the%20impact%20of%20regulation&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Phillips,%20Matthew%20William%20Archer&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3348&rft.epage=3356&rft.pages=3348-3356&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.5728&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2441199031%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441199031&rft_id=info:pmid/31858688&rfr_iscdi=true