Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults

Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.682-690
Hauptverfasser: Incognito, Anthony V., Nardone, Massimo, Teixeira, André L., Lee, Jordan B., Kathia, Muhammad M., Millar, Philip J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 690
container_issue 3
container_start_page 682
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 124
creator Incognito, Anthony V.
Nardone, Massimo
Teixeira, André L.
Lee, Jordan B.
Kathia, Muhammad M.
Millar, Philip J.
description Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds. Muscle sympathetic single units can respond differentially to stress, but whether these responses are linked to the degree of sympathoexcitation is unclear. Fifty-three muscle sympathetic single units (microneurography) were recorded in 17 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yr). Five 40-s bouts of 10% static handgrip were performed during a 10-min forearm ischemia to progressively increase metabolite accumulation. Each static handgrip was separated by a 75-s ischemic rest [postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO)] to assess the isolated action of the muscle metaboreflex. During each set of PECO, individual single units were classified as activated, nonresponsive, or inhibited if the spike frequency was above, within, or below the baseline variability, respectively. From sets 1–5 of PECO, the proportion of single units with activated (34, 45, 68, 87, and 89%), nonresponsive (43, 44, 23, 7, and 9%), or inhibited (23, 11, 9, 6, and 2%) responses changed ( P < 0.001) as total muscle sympathoexcitation increased. A total of 51/53 (96%) single units were activated in at least one set of PECO, 16 (31%) initially inhibited before activation. This response pattern delayed the activation onset compared with noninhibited units ( set 3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, P < 0.001). Once activated, the spike-frequency rate of rise was similar (8.5 ± 6.5 vs. 7.1 ± 6.0 spikes/min per set, P = 0.48). Muscle sympathetic single-unit firing demonstrated differential control during muscle metaboreflex activation. Single units that were initially inhibited during progressive metaboreflex activation were capable of being activated in later sets. These findings reveal that single-unit activity is influenced by convergent neural inputs (i.e., both inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous single-unit activation thresholds. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single unit
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00305.2020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7509305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429054813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-b8c902af6cc07bbbb148a4067f3fca8cf8cf08137b5c5790c96aa0bf0c51d8f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaLo-nH0nqOXrtP0I-1FEPELFC96Dml2upslTWqSLq6_3uiK4MxAhryZl_AeIec5zPO8YpdrOwcooJozYLBHZumOZXnVNvtkBpD6Ajg_IschrAGAV8AOyVHBeMq6npHP5ykogzRsh1HGFUataNB2aTCbrI7UYxidDUgTGtHbQBeTTzgdvVsmMOgN0mHHMWCUnfPYG_ygUkW9kVE7S7WlWzelnRVKE1dbKheTieGUHPTSBDz7PU_I293t681D9vRy_3hz_ZSpoi5j1jWqBSb7WingXYq8bGQJNe-LXslG9amgyQveVariLai2lhK6HlSVL5qeFyfkasc7Tt2AC4U2emnE6PUg_VY4qcV_xOqVWLqNSGK1SdlEcPFL4N37hCGKQQeFxkiLbgqClayFqkx_SKPZblR5F0KS4u-ZHMS3X2JtxY9f4tuv4gvmXoyy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429054813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults</title><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Incognito, Anthony V. ; Nardone, Massimo ; Teixeira, André L. ; Lee, Jordan B. ; Kathia, Muhammad M. ; Millar, Philip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Incognito, Anthony V. ; Nardone, Massimo ; Teixeira, André L. ; Lee, Jordan B. ; Kathia, Muhammad M. ; Millar, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><description>Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds. Muscle sympathetic single units can respond differentially to stress, but whether these responses are linked to the degree of sympathoexcitation is unclear. Fifty-three muscle sympathetic single units (microneurography) were recorded in 17 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yr). Five 40-s bouts of 10% static handgrip were performed during a 10-min forearm ischemia to progressively increase metabolite accumulation. Each static handgrip was separated by a 75-s ischemic rest [postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO)] to assess the isolated action of the muscle metaboreflex. During each set of PECO, individual single units were classified as activated, nonresponsive, or inhibited if the spike frequency was above, within, or below the baseline variability, respectively. From sets 1–5 of PECO, the proportion of single units with activated (34, 45, 68, 87, and 89%), nonresponsive (43, 44, 23, 7, and 9%), or inhibited (23, 11, 9, 6, and 2%) responses changed ( P &lt; 0.001) as total muscle sympathoexcitation increased. A total of 51/53 (96%) single units were activated in at least one set of PECO, 16 (31%) initially inhibited before activation. This response pattern delayed the activation onset compared with noninhibited units ( set 3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, P &lt; 0.001). Once activated, the spike-frequency rate of rise was similar (8.5 ± 6.5 vs. 7.1 ± 6.0 spikes/min per set, P = 0.48). Muscle sympathetic single-unit firing demonstrated differential control during muscle metaboreflex activation. Single units that were initially inhibited during progressive metaboreflex activation were capable of being activated in later sets. These findings reveal that single-unit activity is influenced by convergent neural inputs (i.e., both inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous single-unit activation thresholds. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00305.2020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32727266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.682-690</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 the American Physiological Society 2020 American Physiological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-b8c902af6cc07bbbb148a4067f3fca8cf8cf08137b5c5790c96aa0bf0c51d8f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-b8c902af6cc07bbbb148a4067f3fca8cf8cf08137b5c5790c96aa0bf0c51d8f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1651-2513 ; 0000-0002-1990-6481 ; 0000-0002-2177-1061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Incognito, Anthony V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, André L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jordan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kathia, Muhammad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><description>Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds. Muscle sympathetic single units can respond differentially to stress, but whether these responses are linked to the degree of sympathoexcitation is unclear. Fifty-three muscle sympathetic single units (microneurography) were recorded in 17 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yr). Five 40-s bouts of 10% static handgrip were performed during a 10-min forearm ischemia to progressively increase metabolite accumulation. Each static handgrip was separated by a 75-s ischemic rest [postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO)] to assess the isolated action of the muscle metaboreflex. During each set of PECO, individual single units were classified as activated, nonresponsive, or inhibited if the spike frequency was above, within, or below the baseline variability, respectively. From sets 1–5 of PECO, the proportion of single units with activated (34, 45, 68, 87, and 89%), nonresponsive (43, 44, 23, 7, and 9%), or inhibited (23, 11, 9, 6, and 2%) responses changed ( P &lt; 0.001) as total muscle sympathoexcitation increased. A total of 51/53 (96%) single units were activated in at least one set of PECO, 16 (31%) initially inhibited before activation. This response pattern delayed the activation onset compared with noninhibited units ( set 3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, P &lt; 0.001). Once activated, the spike-frequency rate of rise was similar (8.5 ± 6.5 vs. 7.1 ± 6.0 spikes/min per set, P = 0.48). Muscle sympathetic single-unit firing demonstrated differential control during muscle metaboreflex activation. Single units that were initially inhibited during progressive metaboreflex activation were capable of being activated in later sets. These findings reveal that single-unit activity is influenced by convergent neural inputs (i.e., both inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous single-unit activation thresholds. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds.</description><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LxDAQDaLo-nH0nqOXrtP0I-1FEPELFC96Dml2upslTWqSLq6_3uiK4MxAhryZl_AeIec5zPO8YpdrOwcooJozYLBHZumOZXnVNvtkBpD6Ajg_IschrAGAV8AOyVHBeMq6npHP5ykogzRsh1HGFUataNB2aTCbrI7UYxidDUgTGtHbQBeTTzgdvVsmMOgN0mHHMWCUnfPYG_ygUkW9kVE7S7WlWzelnRVKE1dbKheTieGUHPTSBDz7PU_I293t681D9vRy_3hz_ZSpoi5j1jWqBSb7WingXYq8bGQJNe-LXslG9amgyQveVariLai2lhK6HlSVL5qeFyfkasc7Tt2AC4U2emnE6PUg_VY4qcV_xOqVWLqNSGK1SdlEcPFL4N37hCGKQQeFxkiLbgqClayFqkx_SKPZblR5F0KS4u-ZHMS3X2JtxY9f4tuv4gvmXoyy</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Incognito, Anthony V.</creator><creator>Nardone, Massimo</creator><creator>Teixeira, André L.</creator><creator>Lee, Jordan B.</creator><creator>Kathia, Muhammad M.</creator><creator>Millar, Philip J.</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-2513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-6481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-1061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults</title><author>Incognito, Anthony V. ; Nardone, Massimo ; Teixeira, André L. ; Lee, Jordan B. ; Kathia, Muhammad M. ; Millar, Philip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-b8c902af6cc07bbbb148a4067f3fca8cf8cf08137b5c5790c96aa0bf0c51d8f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Incognito, Anthony V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, André L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jordan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kathia, Muhammad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Incognito, Anthony V.</au><au>Nardone, Massimo</au><au>Teixeira, André L.</au><au>Lee, Jordan B.</au><au>Kathia, Muhammad M.</au><au>Millar, Philip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>682-690</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds. Muscle sympathetic single units can respond differentially to stress, but whether these responses are linked to the degree of sympathoexcitation is unclear. Fifty-three muscle sympathetic single units (microneurography) were recorded in 17 participants (8 women; 24 ± 3 yr). Five 40-s bouts of 10% static handgrip were performed during a 10-min forearm ischemia to progressively increase metabolite accumulation. Each static handgrip was separated by a 75-s ischemic rest [postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO)] to assess the isolated action of the muscle metaboreflex. During each set of PECO, individual single units were classified as activated, nonresponsive, or inhibited if the spike frequency was above, within, or below the baseline variability, respectively. From sets 1–5 of PECO, the proportion of single units with activated (34, 45, 68, 87, and 89%), nonresponsive (43, 44, 23, 7, and 9%), or inhibited (23, 11, 9, 6, and 2%) responses changed ( P &lt; 0.001) as total muscle sympathoexcitation increased. A total of 51/53 (96%) single units were activated in at least one set of PECO, 16 (31%) initially inhibited before activation. This response pattern delayed the activation onset compared with noninhibited units ( set 3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, P &lt; 0.001). Once activated, the spike-frequency rate of rise was similar (8.5 ± 6.5 vs. 7.1 ± 6.0 spikes/min per set, P = 0.48). Muscle sympathetic single-unit firing demonstrated differential control during muscle metaboreflex activation. Single units that were initially inhibited during progressive metaboreflex activation were capable of being activated in later sets. These findings reveal that single-unit activity is influenced by convergent neural inputs (i.e., both inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous single-unit activation thresholds. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Muscle sympathetic single units respond differentially to sympathoexcitatory stress such that single units can increase firing to contribute to the sympathoexcitatory response or can be nonresponsive or even inhibited. We observed a subgroup of single units that can respond bidirectionally, being first inhibited before activated by progressive increases in forearm muscle metaboreflex activation. These results suggest convergent neural inputs (i.e., inhibitory and excitatory), which yield heterogenous muscle sympathetic single-unit activation thresholds.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>32727266</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00305.2020</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-2513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-6481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-1061</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.682-690
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7509305
source American Physiological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Muscle sympathetic single-unit response patterns during progressive muscle metaboreflex activation in young healthy adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20sympathetic%20single-unit%20response%20patterns%20during%20progressive%20muscle%20metaboreflex%20activation%20in%20young%20healthy%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Incognito,%20Anthony%20V.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=682-690&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00305.2020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2429054813%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429054813&rft_id=info:pmid/32727266&rfr_iscdi=true