A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM)
The day reconstruction method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the experience sampling method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2021-03, Vol.120 (3), p.816-835 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 835 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 816 |
| container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| container_volume | 120 |
| creator | Lucas, Richard E. Wallsworth, Carol Anusic, Ivana Donnellan, M. Brent |
| description | The day reconstruction method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the experience sampling method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM have been conducted, these typically focus on agreement between the 2 methods at very broad levels, rather than focusing on whether the 2 methods provide similar information about the exact same moments. This article reports 2 studies that use ESM and DRM to assess the same moments. Agreement between the 2 measures varied considerably depending on the focus of the analysis. For aggregate assessments of total time spent in situations and average affect in situations, agreement was high; for between-person differences in time use and experienced affect, agreement varied across situations; and for within-person differences in both situations and affect, agreement was quite low. In addition, we found preliminary evidence that the DRM may be more influenced by expectations regarding the pleasantness of situations as compared with ESM. These results suggest that for many common purposes, the DRM does not provide the same information as ESM. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pspp0000289 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7508776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382644131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-f677875417c403ca5410b69cfc48290d9071054cd1249e628a476d9f4022daee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1vFCEUxYnR2LX65Lsh8aWNjvI1MLyYNLvrR9KNSavPhDJMl2YGKDDG_e-lbt1UH-QFcu_vntzDAeAlRu8wouJ9zDGiekgnH4EFllQ2mOL2MVjUGmloi9kReJbzTWVYS8hTcEQJqThGC2DO4Molawpchinq5HLwMAywbC1c6R28sCb4XNJsiqudjS3b0MOT1cXmFGrf_-bWP6NNznpj4aWe4uj89QFcX25On4Mngx6zfXF_H4PvH9fflp-b86-fvizPzhvNBCvNwIXoRMuwMAxRo-sLXXFpBsM6IlEvkcCoZabHhEnLSVfHeC8HVl322lp6DD7sdeN8NdneWF-SHlVMbtJpp4J26u-Od1t1HX4o0aJOCF4FTu4FUridbS5qctnYcdTehjkrQjvCGau_W9HX_6A3YU6-2lOkrYsKygj_L0U7LBAnsqvUmz1lUsg52eGwMkbqLmL1IOJKv3ro8sD-ybQCb_eAjrpO7oxOxZnRZjOnVJ3fqSlMkKKqw5z-AtGurrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2381706298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM)</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lucas, Richard E. ; Wallsworth, Carol ; Anusic, Ivana ; Donnellan, M. Brent</creator><contributor>Lucas, Richard E ; Cooper, M. Lynne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Richard E. ; Wallsworth, Carol ; Anusic, Ivana ; Donnellan, M. Brent ; Lucas, Richard E ; Cooper, M. Lynne</creatorcontrib><description>The day reconstruction method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the experience sampling method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM have been conducted, these typically focus on agreement between the 2 methods at very broad levels, rather than focusing on whether the 2 methods provide similar information about the exact same moments. This article reports 2 studies that use ESM and DRM to assess the same moments. Agreement between the 2 measures varied considerably depending on the focus of the analysis. For aggregate assessments of total time spent in situations and average affect in situations, agreement was high; for between-person differences in time use and experienced affect, agreement varied across situations; and for within-person differences in both situations and affect, agreement was quite low. In addition, we found preliminary evidence that the DRM may be more influenced by expectations regarding the pleasantness of situations as compared with ESM. These results suggest that for many common purposes, the DRM does not provide the same information as ESM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32202810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Affect ; Agreements ; Ecological Momentary Assessment ; Emotions ; Female ; Human ; Human Activities - psychology ; Humans ; Life Satisfaction ; Male ; Measurement ; Mental Recall ; Methodology ; Motivation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Sampling ; Test Construction ; Time use ; Well Being ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2021-03, Vol.120 (3), p.816-835</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-f677875417c403ca5410b69cfc48290d9071054cd1249e628a476d9f4022daee3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7995-3319</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32202810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Lucas, Richard E</contributor><contributor>Cooper, M. Lynne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallsworth, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anusic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnellan, M. Brent</creatorcontrib><title>A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM)</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>The day reconstruction method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the experience sampling method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM have been conducted, these typically focus on agreement between the 2 methods at very broad levels, rather than focusing on whether the 2 methods provide similar information about the exact same moments. This article reports 2 studies that use ESM and DRM to assess the same moments. Agreement between the 2 measures varied considerably depending on the focus of the analysis. For aggregate assessments of total time spent in situations and average affect in situations, agreement was high; for between-person differences in time use and experienced affect, agreement varied across situations; and for within-person differences in both situations and affect, agreement was quite low. In addition, we found preliminary evidence that the DRM may be more influenced by expectations regarding the pleasantness of situations as compared with ESM. These results suggest that for many common purposes, the DRM does not provide the same information as ESM.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Ecological Momentary Assessment</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Activities - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Satisfaction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Time use</subject><subject>Well Being</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1vFCEUxYnR2LX65Lsh8aWNjvI1MLyYNLvrR9KNSavPhDJMl2YGKDDG_e-lbt1UH-QFcu_vntzDAeAlRu8wouJ9zDGiekgnH4EFllQ2mOL2MVjUGmloi9kReJbzTWVYS8hTcEQJqThGC2DO4Molawpchinq5HLwMAywbC1c6R28sCb4XNJsiqudjS3b0MOT1cXmFGrf_-bWP6NNznpj4aWe4uj89QFcX25On4Mngx6zfXF_H4PvH9fflp-b86-fvizPzhvNBCvNwIXoRMuwMAxRo-sLXXFpBsM6IlEvkcCoZabHhEnLSVfHeC8HVl322lp6DD7sdeN8NdneWF-SHlVMbtJpp4J26u-Od1t1HX4o0aJOCF4FTu4FUridbS5qctnYcdTehjkrQjvCGau_W9HX_6A3YU6-2lOkrYsKygj_L0U7LBAnsqvUmz1lUsg52eGwMkbqLmL1IOJKv3ro8sD-ybQCb_eAjrpO7oxOxZnRZjOnVJ3fqSlMkKKqw5z-AtGurrQ</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Lucas, Richard E.</creator><creator>Wallsworth, Carol</creator><creator>Anusic, Ivana</creator><creator>Donnellan, M. Brent</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-3319</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM)</title><author>Lucas, Richard E. ; Wallsworth, Carol ; Anusic, Ivana ; Donnellan, M. Brent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a474t-f677875417c403ca5410b69cfc48290d9071054cd1249e628a476d9f4022daee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Ecological Momentary Assessment</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Activities - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Satisfaction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Time use</topic><topic>Well Being</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallsworth, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anusic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donnellan, M. Brent</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucas, Richard E.</au><au>Wallsworth, Carol</au><au>Anusic, Ivana</au><au>Donnellan, M. Brent</au><au>Lucas, Richard E</au><au>Cooper, M. Lynne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>816</spage><epage>835</epage><pages>816-835</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>The day reconstruction method (DRM) is an approach to measuring well-being that is designed to approximate the rich data that can be obtained from intensive repeated measures designs like those used in the experience sampling method (ESM). Although some preliminary tests of the validity of the DRM have been conducted, these typically focus on agreement between the 2 methods at very broad levels, rather than focusing on whether the 2 methods provide similar information about the exact same moments. This article reports 2 studies that use ESM and DRM to assess the same moments. Agreement between the 2 measures varied considerably depending on the focus of the analysis. For aggregate assessments of total time spent in situations and average affect in situations, agreement was high; for between-person differences in time use and experienced affect, agreement varied across situations; and for within-person differences in both situations and affect, agreement was quite low. In addition, we found preliminary evidence that the DRM may be more influenced by expectations regarding the pleasantness of situations as compared with ESM. These results suggest that for many common purposes, the DRM does not provide the same information as ESM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>32202810</pmid><doi>10.1037/pspp0000289</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-3319</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2021-03, Vol.120 (3), p.816-835 |
| issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7508776 |
| source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Affect Agreements Ecological Momentary Assessment Emotions Female Human Human Activities - psychology Humans Life Satisfaction Male Measurement Mental Recall Methodology Motivation Reproducibility of Results Research Design Sampling Test Construction Time use Well Being Young Adult |
| title | A Direct Comparison of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Direct%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Day%20Reconstruction%20Method%20(DRM)%20and%20the%20Experience%20Sampling%20Method%20(ESM)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Lucas,%20Richard%20E.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=816&rft.epage=835&rft.pages=816-835&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pspp0000289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2382644131%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2381706298&rft_id=info:pmid/32202810&rfr_iscdi=true |