Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?
Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Disaster medicine and public health preparedness 2022-02, Vol.16 (1), p.36-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Disaster medicine and public health preparedness |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Barten, Dennis G. Latten, Gideon H.P. van Osch, Frits H.M. |
description | Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well-developed primary care system.
A retrospective analysis of ED utilization was performed in 3 Dutch hospitals during a 60-day period, starting on February 15, 2020. The identical period in 2019 was used as a reference. ED visits were labeled as COVID-related (defined as COVID-19 suspected) or non-COVID-related. Admission rates were compared using chi-square tests, and the reduction in ED visits was assessed descriptively.
During the study period, daily ED volume was 18% lower compared to that of 2019. ED utilization further declined (-29%) during lockdown. Combined admission rates were higher in 2020 compared to those in 2019 (P < 0.001), and they were higher for COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ED visits (P < 0.001).
ED utilization was markedly reduced during the local rise of COVID-19 in a region with a well-developed primary care system and relatively low ED self-referral rates. Although it cannot directly be concluded from the findings of our study, this observation likely reflects a complex interaction between pure lockdown effects and viral fear, which warrants further research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/dmp.2020.303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7503047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_dmp_2020_303</cupid><sourcerecordid>2667943102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4863-fb46bf92593c130a340ee0aca6b80d628e35367dfc8e7de8234b1302e88e8d6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9vFCEYhidGY2v15tmQePHgrAwwwHioMbtbbbJJG2Mbb4SBb3apM7DCjLr-9dJ2rT_iCcL35OV78xTF0wrPKlyJV3bYzggmeEYxvVccVg2VpWDs0_2be10K2dCD4lFKVxjXXNTNw-KAEiEJ5vSw-P4B7GTAouUAcQ3e7NACtjqOA_gRXYyudz_06IJHiyk6v0bjBtBSx36Hzjc6AQrdzdP87PJ0UVYNOtfewuDMa3Tpou7RCeiIQkSrYD7b8M2jZdeBGd88Lh50uk_wZH8eFRcny4_z9-Xq7N3p_O2qNExyWnYt423XkLqhpqJYU4YBsDaatxJbTiTQmnJhOyNBWJCEsjZzBKQEabmlR8Xxbe52agewJtfKa6ltdIOOOxW0U39PvNuodfiqRI0pZiIHvNgHxPBlgjSqwSUDfa89hCkpwiglrBKSZfT5P-hVmKLP9RThXDSMVphk6uUtZWJIKUJ3t0yF1bVSlZWqa6UqK834sz8L3MG_HGZgts_TQxudXcPvb_-b-BNuuatt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667943102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Barten, Dennis G. ; Latten, Gideon H.P. ; van Osch, Frits H.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barten, Dennis G. ; Latten, Gideon H.P. ; van Osch, Frits H.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well-developed primary care system.
A retrospective analysis of ED utilization was performed in 3 Dutch hospitals during a 60-day period, starting on February 15, 2020. The identical period in 2019 was used as a reference. ED visits were labeled as COVID-related (defined as COVID-19 suspected) or non-COVID-related. Admission rates were compared using chi-square tests, and the reduction in ED visits was assessed descriptively.
During the study period, daily ED volume was 18% lower compared to that of 2019. ED utilization further declined (-29%) during lockdown. Combined admission rates were higher in 2020 compared to those in 2019 (P < 0.001), and they were higher for COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ED visits (P < 0.001).
ED utilization was markedly reduced during the local rise of COVID-19 in a region with a well-developed primary care system and relatively low ED self-referral rates. Although it cannot directly be concluded from the findings of our study, this observation likely reflects a complex interaction between pure lockdown effects and viral fear, which warrants further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-7893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-744X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32782063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Brief Report ; Communicable Disease Control ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Fear ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Primary care ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2</subject><ispartof>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2022-02, Vol.16 (1), p.36-39</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><rights>Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4863-fb46bf92593c130a340ee0aca6b80d628e35367dfc8e7de8234b1302e88e8d6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4863-fb46bf92593c130a340ee0aca6b80d628e35367dfc8e7de8234b1302e88e8d6d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7185-9491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1935789320003031/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barten, Dennis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latten, Gideon H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Frits H.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?</title><title>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</title><addtitle>Disaster med. public health prep</addtitle><description>Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well-developed primary care system.
A retrospective analysis of ED utilization was performed in 3 Dutch hospitals during a 60-day period, starting on February 15, 2020. The identical period in 2019 was used as a reference. ED visits were labeled as COVID-related (defined as COVID-19 suspected) or non-COVID-related. Admission rates were compared using chi-square tests, and the reduction in ED visits was assessed descriptively.
During the study period, daily ED volume was 18% lower compared to that of 2019. ED utilization further declined (-29%) during lockdown. Combined admission rates were higher in 2020 compared to those in 2019 (P < 0.001), and they were higher for COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ED visits (P < 0.001).
ED utilization was markedly reduced during the local rise of COVID-19 in a region with a well-developed primary care system and relatively low ED self-referral rates. Although it cannot directly be concluded from the findings of our study, this observation likely reflects a complex interaction between pure lockdown effects and viral fear, which warrants further research.</description><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><issn>1935-7893</issn><issn>1938-744X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9vFCEYhidGY2v15tmQePHgrAwwwHioMbtbbbJJG2Mbb4SBb3apM7DCjLr-9dJ2rT_iCcL35OV78xTF0wrPKlyJV3bYzggmeEYxvVccVg2VpWDs0_2be10K2dCD4lFKVxjXXNTNw-KAEiEJ5vSw-P4B7GTAouUAcQ3e7NACtjqOA_gRXYyudz_06IJHiyk6v0bjBtBSx36Hzjc6AQrdzdP87PJ0UVYNOtfewuDMa3Tpou7RCeiIQkSrYD7b8M2jZdeBGd88Lh50uk_wZH8eFRcny4_z9-Xq7N3p_O2qNExyWnYt423XkLqhpqJYU4YBsDaatxJbTiTQmnJhOyNBWJCEsjZzBKQEabmlR8Xxbe52agewJtfKa6ltdIOOOxW0U39PvNuodfiqRI0pZiIHvNgHxPBlgjSqwSUDfa89hCkpwiglrBKSZfT5P-hVmKLP9RThXDSMVphk6uUtZWJIKUJ3t0yF1bVSlZWqa6UqK834sz8L3MG_HGZgts_TQxudXcPvb_-b-BNuuatt</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Barten, Dennis G.</creator><creator>Latten, Gideon H.P.</creator><creator>van Osch, Frits H.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-9491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?</title><author>Barten, Dennis G. ; Latten, Gideon H.P. ; van Osch, Frits H.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4863-fb46bf92593c130a340ee0aca6b80d628e35367dfc8e7de8234b1302e88e8d6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barten, Dennis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latten, Gideon H.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Frits H.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barten, Dennis G.</au><au>Latten, Gideon H.P.</au><au>van Osch, Frits H.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?</atitle><jtitle>Disaster medicine and public health preparedness</jtitle><addtitle>Disaster med. public health prep</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>36-39</pages><issn>1935-7893</issn><eissn>1938-744X</eissn><abstract>Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well-developed primary care system.
A retrospective analysis of ED utilization was performed in 3 Dutch hospitals during a 60-day period, starting on February 15, 2020. The identical period in 2019 was used as a reference. ED visits were labeled as COVID-related (defined as COVID-19 suspected) or non-COVID-related. Admission rates were compared using chi-square tests, and the reduction in ED visits was assessed descriptively.
During the study period, daily ED volume was 18% lower compared to that of 2019. ED utilization further declined (-29%) during lockdown. Combined admission rates were higher in 2020 compared to those in 2019 (P < 0.001), and they were higher for COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ED visits (P < 0.001).
ED utilization was markedly reduced during the local rise of COVID-19 in a region with a well-developed primary care system and relatively low ED self-referral rates. Although it cannot directly be concluded from the findings of our study, this observation likely reflects a complex interaction between pure lockdown effects and viral fear, which warrants further research.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32782063</pmid><doi>10.1017/dmp.2020.303</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-9491</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-7893 |
ispartof | Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2022-02, Vol.16 (1), p.36-39 |
issn | 1935-7893 1938-744X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7503047 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Brief Report Communicable Disease Control Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Emergency Service, Hospital Fear Humans Pandemics Primary care Retrospective Studies SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20Emergency%20Department%20Utilization%20During%20the%20Early%20Phase%20of%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic:%20Viral%20Fear%20or%20Lockdown%20Effect?&rft.jtitle=Disaster%20medicine%20and%20public%20health%20preparedness&rft.au=Barten,%20Dennis%20G.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=36-39&rft.issn=1935-7893&rft.eissn=1938-744X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/dmp.2020.303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2667943102%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667943102&rft_id=info:pmid/32782063&rft_cupid=10_1017_dmp_2020_303&rfr_iscdi=true |