Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Urological Association journal 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.E387-E393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | E387 |
container_title | Canadian Urological Association journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Cheung, Douglas C Wallis, Christopher J.D Possee, Simon Camilla, Tajzler Anidjar, Maurice Barrett, Keith Deklaj, Tom Drachenberg, Darrel E Evans, Howard French, Christopher Gotto, Geoffrey Izard, Jason Jain, Umesh Kawakami, Jun Kulkarni, Girish S Lee, Jason McCracken, Jeffrey McGregor, Thomas Richard, Patrick O Rowe, Neal E Sabbagh, Robert Martin, Blair St Tatzel, Stephanie Touma, Naji Widmer, Hugues Wiesenthal, Joshua Yang, Brian Zorn, Kevin C Kapoor, Anil Finelli, Antonio Satkunasivam, Raj |
description | Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes.
Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
Results: An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles).
Conclusions: Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5489/cuaj.6579 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7492033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A637638990</galeid><sourcerecordid>A637638990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d0afc9757d85f4f5300ed0e0ba2279de994786f5d02e18f23b3111d3945990583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks9q3DAQxk1padK0h76BaC_JwVv9sSzrUghLmxYCDaR7FlpptKtgS45kL-xj9I0rs6E0EHSQmPnpm2-kqaqPBK9408kvZtYPq5YL-ao6J5LimlDSvF7OhNRtI_BZ9S7nB4zbEhFvqzNGeSu5IOfVn7UO2nod0Ga0egIUA7qf084b3aO7FA3YOUFGl-vN_d0V2qTYx90R3aQ4j8jEkCHkOSMXE_JhSjqOkPTkD4D2MMQ86ewzKhI-7NDggx903x8LeiiJAo06Tb5UCjDuE5gpDsf31Run-wwfnvaLavP92-_1j_r2183P9fVtbVhDptpi7YwUXNiOu8ZxhjFYDHirKRXSgpSN6FrHLaZAOkfZlhFCLJMNlxLzjl1UX0-647wdwBpY7PdqTMVjOqqovXqeCX6vdvGgRFOemLEicPkkkOLjDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWtCEtFZx2S63PJ3Sne1A-uFgUzYKr65aJlnXFU6E-vUCZ0T-q_6HVC1BZFgZfPgScL_FnqlenCybFnBO4fy0SrJbxUcv4qGV82F-FZLh3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416275288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cheung, Douglas C ; Wallis, Christopher J.D ; Possee, Simon ; Camilla, Tajzler ; Anidjar, Maurice ; Barrett, Keith ; Deklaj, Tom ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Evans, Howard ; French, Christopher ; Gotto, Geoffrey ; Izard, Jason ; Jain, Umesh ; Kawakami, Jun ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Lee, Jason ; McCracken, Jeffrey ; McGregor, Thomas ; Richard, Patrick O ; Rowe, Neal E ; Sabbagh, Robert ; Martin, Blair St ; Tatzel, Stephanie ; Touma, Naji ; Widmer, Hugues ; Wiesenthal, Joshua ; Yang, Brian ; Zorn, Kevin C ; Kapoor, Anil ; Finelli, Antonio ; Satkunasivam, Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Douglas C ; Wallis, Christopher J.D ; Possee, Simon ; Camilla, Tajzler ; Anidjar, Maurice ; Barrett, Keith ; Deklaj, Tom ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Evans, Howard ; French, Christopher ; Gotto, Geoffrey ; Izard, Jason ; Jain, Umesh ; Kawakami, Jun ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Lee, Jason ; McCracken, Jeffrey ; McGregor, Thomas ; Richard, Patrick O ; Rowe, Neal E ; Sabbagh, Robert ; Martin, Blair St ; Tatzel, Stephanie ; Touma, Naji ; Widmer, Hugues ; Wiesenthal, Joshua ; Yang, Brian ; Zorn, Kevin C ; Kapoor, Anil ; Finelli, Antonio ; Satkunasivam, Raj</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes.
Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
Results: An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles).
Conclusions: Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-6470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-1214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32569571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Urological Association</publisher><subject>Ischemia ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Tumor removal</subject><ispartof>Canadian Urological Association journal, 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.E387-E393</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Canadian Urological Association</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Canadian Urological Association or its licensors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d0afc9757d85f4f5300ed0e0ba2279de994786f5d02e18f23b3111d3945990583</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492033/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492033/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Christopher J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possee, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camilla, Tajzler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anidjar, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deklaj, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotto, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izard, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Girish S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Patrick O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Neal E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Blair St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatzel, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touma, Naji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmer, Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiesenthal, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn, Kevin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finelli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satkunasivam, Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy</title><title>Canadian Urological Association journal</title><description>Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes.
Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
Results: An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles).
Conclusions: Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference.</description><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Tumor removal</subject><issn>1911-6470</issn><issn>1920-1214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptks9q3DAQxk1padK0h76BaC_JwVv9sSzrUghLmxYCDaR7FlpptKtgS45kL-xj9I0rs6E0EHSQmPnpm2-kqaqPBK9408kvZtYPq5YL-ao6J5LimlDSvF7OhNRtI_BZ9S7nB4zbEhFvqzNGeSu5IOfVn7UO2nod0Ga0egIUA7qf084b3aO7FA3YOUFGl-vN_d0V2qTYx90R3aQ4j8jEkCHkOSMXE_JhSjqOkPTkD4D2MMQ86ewzKhI-7NDggx903x8LeiiJAo06Tb5UCjDuE5gpDsf31Run-wwfnvaLavP92-_1j_r2183P9fVtbVhDptpi7YwUXNiOu8ZxhjFYDHirKRXSgpSN6FrHLaZAOkfZlhFCLJMNlxLzjl1UX0-647wdwBpY7PdqTMVjOqqovXqeCX6vdvGgRFOemLEicPkkkOLjDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWtCEtFZx2S63PJ3Sne1A-uFgUzYKr65aJlnXFU6E-vUCZ0T-q_6HVC1BZFgZfPgScL_FnqlenCybFnBO4fy0SrJbxUcv4qGV82F-FZLh3</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Cheung, Douglas C</creator><creator>Wallis, Christopher J.D</creator><creator>Possee, Simon</creator><creator>Camilla, Tajzler</creator><creator>Anidjar, Maurice</creator><creator>Barrett, Keith</creator><creator>Deklaj, Tom</creator><creator>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creator><creator>Evans, Howard</creator><creator>French, Christopher</creator><creator>Gotto, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Izard, Jason</creator><creator>Jain, Umesh</creator><creator>Kawakami, Jun</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Girish S</creator><creator>Lee, Jason</creator><creator>McCracken, Jeffrey</creator><creator>McGregor, Thomas</creator><creator>Richard, Patrick O</creator><creator>Rowe, Neal E</creator><creator>Sabbagh, Robert</creator><creator>Martin, Blair St</creator><creator>Tatzel, Stephanie</creator><creator>Touma, Naji</creator><creator>Widmer, Hugues</creator><creator>Wiesenthal, Joshua</creator><creator>Yang, Brian</creator><creator>Zorn, Kevin C</creator><creator>Kapoor, Anil</creator><creator>Finelli, Antonio</creator><creator>Satkunasivam, Raj</creator><general>Canadian Urological Association</general><general>Canadian Medical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy</title><author>Cheung, Douglas C ; Wallis, Christopher J.D ; Possee, Simon ; Camilla, Tajzler ; Anidjar, Maurice ; Barrett, Keith ; Deklaj, Tom ; Drachenberg, Darrel E ; Evans, Howard ; French, Christopher ; Gotto, Geoffrey ; Izard, Jason ; Jain, Umesh ; Kawakami, Jun ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Lee, Jason ; McCracken, Jeffrey ; McGregor, Thomas ; Richard, Patrick O ; Rowe, Neal E ; Sabbagh, Robert ; Martin, Blair St ; Tatzel, Stephanie ; Touma, Naji ; Widmer, Hugues ; Wiesenthal, Joshua ; Yang, Brian ; Zorn, Kevin C ; Kapoor, Anil ; Finelli, Antonio ; Satkunasivam, Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-d0afc9757d85f4f5300ed0e0ba2279de994786f5d02e18f23b3111d3945990583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Tumor removal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Christopher J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possee, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camilla, Tajzler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anidjar, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deklaj, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drachenberg, Darrel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotto, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izard, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Girish S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCracken, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Patrick O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Neal E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Blair St</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatzel, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Touma, Naji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmer, Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiesenthal, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn, Kevin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finelli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satkunasivam, Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheung, Douglas C</au><au>Wallis, Christopher J.D</au><au>Possee, Simon</au><au>Camilla, Tajzler</au><au>Anidjar, Maurice</au><au>Barrett, Keith</au><au>Deklaj, Tom</au><au>Drachenberg, Darrel E</au><au>Evans, Howard</au><au>French, Christopher</au><au>Gotto, Geoffrey</au><au>Izard, Jason</au><au>Jain, Umesh</au><au>Kawakami, Jun</au><au>Kulkarni, Girish S</au><au>Lee, Jason</au><au>McCracken, Jeffrey</au><au>McGregor, Thomas</au><au>Richard, Patrick O</au><au>Rowe, Neal E</au><au>Sabbagh, Robert</au><au>Martin, Blair St</au><au>Tatzel, Stephanie</au><au>Touma, Naji</au><au>Widmer, Hugues</au><au>Wiesenthal, Joshua</au><au>Yang, Brian</au><au>Zorn, Kevin C</au><au>Kapoor, Anil</au><au>Finelli, Antonio</au><au>Satkunasivam, Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Urological Association journal</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>E387</spage><epage>E393</epage><pages>E387-E393</pages><issn>1911-6470</issn><eissn>1920-1214</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard in the management of small renal masses. However, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) is associated with a steep learning curve, and optimal, standardized techniques for time-efficient hemostasis are poorly described. Given the relative lack of evidence, the goal was to describe a set of actionable guiding principles, through an expert working panel, for urologists to approach hemostasis without compromising warm ischemia or oncological outcomes.
Methods: A three-step modified Delphi method was used to achieve expert agreement on the best practices for hemostasis in MIPN. Panelists were recruited from the Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group, which represent all provinces, academic and community practices, and fellowship- and non-fellowship-trained surgeons. Thirty-two (round 1) and 46 (round 2) panellists participated in survey questionnaires, and 22 attended the in-person consensus meeting.
Results: An initial literature search of 945 articles (230 abstracts) underwent screening and yielded 24 preliminary techniques. Through sequential survey assessment and in-person discussion, a total of 11 strategies were approved. These are temporally distributed prior to tumor resection (five principles), during tumor resection (two principles), and during renorrhaphy (four principles).
Conclusions: Given the variability in tumor size, depth, location, and vascularity, coupled with limitations of laparoscopic equipment, achieving consistent hemostasis in MIPN may be challenging. Despite over two decades of MIPN experience, limited evidence exists to guide clinicians. Through a three-step Delphi method and rigorous iterative review with a panel of experts, we ascertained a guiding checklist of principles for newly beginning and practicing urologists to reference.</abstract><pub>Canadian Urological Association</pub><pmid>32569571</pmid><doi>10.5489/cuaj.6579</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-6470 |
ispartof | Canadian Urological Association journal, 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.E387-E393 |
issn | 1911-6470 1920-1214 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7492033 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ischemia Pharmaceutical industry Tumor removal |
title | Canadian Update on Surgical Procedures (CUSP) Urology Group consensus for intraoperative hemostasis during minimally invasive partial nephrectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canadian%20Update%20on%20Surgical%20Procedures%20(CUSP)%20Urology%20Group%20consensus%20for%20intraoperative%20hemostasis%20during%20minimally%20invasive%20partial%20nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Urological%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Cheung,%20Douglas%20C&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=E387&rft.epage=E393&rft.pages=E387-E393&rft.issn=1911-6470&rft.eissn=1920-1214&rft_id=info:doi/10.5489/cuaj.6579&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA637638990%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416275288&rft_id=info:pmid/32569571&rft_galeid=A637638990&rfr_iscdi=true |