Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JCO oncology practice 2020-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e868-e874 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e874 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e868 |
container_title | JCO oncology practice |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Holmes, Chris E Ades, Steven Gilchrist, Susan Douce, Daniel Libby, Karen Rogala, Britny Parenteau, Emily Cushman, Mary Holm, Allison Kaigle |
description | Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy.
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked.
A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis.
VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JOP.19.00697 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7489490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388000985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-62f2da10f29ed62bd599661f1fa3326c0047608fec1b83984e419cbe7c7bb61c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtvGyEUhVHVKonS7LKuWGbRcXmMGciikmXlVSVKpKTdIoa51FTM4MJMpPyT_tzixLbaBeIAh-9e3YPQKSUzygj58u3-YUbVjBChmnfoiAkpKzrn8_d7zZpDdJLzL0IIY6JRSh2gQ76RjZJH6M_jZC3k7KaA72IHAbuY8NXki_QD4Jt-HaCHYTSjjwMeI35I8FzOeGkGC6la5BytNyN0-GmVYt_G7PM5_gFDnPLuCsoKPve7zxuUL7QV4EXfTsGMMb1siXhZCnv7EX1wJmQ42e7H6PvlxdPyurq9v7pZLm4ry2U9VoI51hlKHFPQCdZ2c6WEoI46wzkTlpC6EUQ6sLSVXMkaaqpsC41t2lZQy4_R1zfuemp76GzpLpmg18n3Jr3oaLz-_2XwK_0zPuumlqpWpADOtoAUf0-QR937bCEEM0AZgWZcyjJ8JefF-vnNalPMOYHbl6FEb_LUJU9NlX7Ns9g__dva3rxLj_8FopKfrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388000985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Holmes, Chris E ; Ades, Steven ; Gilchrist, Susan ; Douce, Daniel ; Libby, Karen ; Rogala, Britny ; Parenteau, Emily ; Cushman, Mary ; Holm, Allison Kaigle</creator><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Chris E ; Ades, Steven ; Gilchrist, Susan ; Douce, Daniel ; Libby, Karen ; Rogala, Britny ; Parenteau, Emily ; Cushman, Mary ; Holm, Allison Kaigle</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy.
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked.
A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis.
VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2688-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2688-1535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JOP.19.00697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32267798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</subject><ispartof>JCO oncology practice, 2020-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e868-e874</ispartof><rights>2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-62f2da10f29ed62bd599661f1fa3326c0047608fec1b83984e419cbe7c7bb61c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-62f2da10f29ed62bd599661f1fa3326c0047608fec1b83984e419cbe7c7bb61c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32267798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Chris E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ades, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilchrist, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douce, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogala, Britny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parenteau, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Allison Kaigle</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic</title><title>JCO oncology practice</title><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><description>Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy.
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked.
A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis.
VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.</description><subject>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</subject><issn>2688-1527</issn><issn>2688-1535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtvGyEUhVHVKonS7LKuWGbRcXmMGciikmXlVSVKpKTdIoa51FTM4MJMpPyT_tzixLbaBeIAh-9e3YPQKSUzygj58u3-YUbVjBChmnfoiAkpKzrn8_d7zZpDdJLzL0IIY6JRSh2gQ76RjZJH6M_jZC3k7KaA72IHAbuY8NXki_QD4Jt-HaCHYTSjjwMeI35I8FzOeGkGC6la5BytNyN0-GmVYt_G7PM5_gFDnPLuCsoKPve7zxuUL7QV4EXfTsGMMb1siXhZCnv7EX1wJmQ42e7H6PvlxdPyurq9v7pZLm4ry2U9VoI51hlKHFPQCdZ2c6WEoI46wzkTlpC6EUQ6sLSVXMkaaqpsC41t2lZQy4_R1zfuemp76GzpLpmg18n3Jr3oaLz-_2XwK_0zPuumlqpWpADOtoAUf0-QR937bCEEM0AZgWZcyjJ8JefF-vnNalPMOYHbl6FEb_LUJU9NlX7Ns9g__dva3rxLj_8FopKfrw</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Holmes, Chris E</creator><creator>Ades, Steven</creator><creator>Gilchrist, Susan</creator><creator>Douce, Daniel</creator><creator>Libby, Karen</creator><creator>Rogala, Britny</creator><creator>Parenteau, Emily</creator><creator>Cushman, Mary</creator><creator>Holm, Allison Kaigle</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic</title><author>Holmes, Chris E ; Ades, Steven ; Gilchrist, Susan ; Douce, Daniel ; Libby, Karen ; Rogala, Britny ; Parenteau, Emily ; Cushman, Mary ; Holm, Allison Kaigle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-62f2da10f29ed62bd599661f1fa3326c0047608fec1b83984e419cbe7c7bb61c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Chris E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ades, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilchrist, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douce, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Libby, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogala, Britny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parenteau, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushman, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holm, Allison Kaigle</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holmes, Chris E</au><au>Ades, Steven</au><au>Gilchrist, Susan</au><au>Douce, Daniel</au><au>Libby, Karen</au><au>Rogala, Britny</au><au>Parenteau, Emily</au><au>Cushman, Mary</au><au>Holm, Allison Kaigle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic</atitle><jtitle>JCO oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>JCO Oncol Pract</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e868</spage><epage>e874</epage><pages>e868-e874</pages><issn>2688-1527</issn><eissn>2688-1535</eissn><abstract>Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy.
Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked.
A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis.
VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>32267798</pmid><doi>10.1200/JOP.19.00697</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2688-1527 |
ispartof | JCO oncology practice, 2020-09, Vol.16 (9), p.e868-e874 |
issn | 2688-1527 2688-1535 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7489490 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
title | Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Model%20for%20Guideline%20Implementation%20to%20Prevent%20Cancer-Associated%20Thrombosis:%20Venous%20Thromboembolism%20Prevention%20in%20the%20Ambulatory%20Cancer%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=JCO%20oncology%20practice&rft.au=Holmes,%20Chris%20E&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e868&rft.epage=e874&rft.pages=e868-e874&rft.issn=2688-1527&rft.eissn=2688-1535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JOP.19.00697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2388000985%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388000985&rft_id=info:pmid/32267798&rfr_iscdi=true |