Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community
•Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are built on a network philosophy.•We gathered 10 waves of monthly data from a Pennsylvania men’s TC.•Network structure and resident integration were consistent with TC principles.•Network contacts and treatment engagement drove individual integration into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social networks 2021-01, Vol.64, p.16-28 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Social networks |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Schaefer, David R. Davidson, Kimberly M. Haynie, Dana L. Bouchard, Martin |
description | •Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are built on a network philosophy.•We gathered 10 waves of monthly data from a Pennsylvania men’s TC.•Network structure and resident integration were consistent with TC principles.•Network contacts and treatment engagement drove individual integration into the TC.
Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are a widespread, effective way to help incarcerated individuals address substance abuse problems. The TC philosophy is grounded in an explicitly relational paradigm that entails building community and conditioning residents to increasingly take responsibility for leadership therein. Although TCs are based on cultivating a network that continuously integrates new residents, many common structural features can jeopardize TC goals and are hence discouraged (e.g., clustering, homophily). In light of this tension, analyzing the TC from a network perspective can offer new insights to its functioning, as well as to broader questions surrounding how networks integrate new members. In this study we examine a men’s TC unit in a Pennsylvania prison over a 10-month span. Using data on residents’ informal networks, we examine: (1) how well individuals integrate into the TC network across time, (2) what predicts how well residents integrate into the TC, and (3) how well the TC network structure adheres to theoretical ideals. Results suggest that individual integration is driven by a range of hypothesized factors and, with limited exceptions, the observed TC is able to foster a network structure and integrate residents consistent with TC principles. We discuss the implications of these results for evaluating TCs and for understanding the process of network integration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7485928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378873320300514</els_id><sourcerecordid>2493861319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-a05da87935013f909355273c346cad016e3d5df0fd033e6a273ebcef65f05d8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoV_gFAkLlwSnu0kti-gquJLquilnC2v_dL1srEX22nVf19XWwrlwOlZejPzZjyEvKbQUaDj-22Xow1YOgYMOhAdgHhCVlQK1TJK6VOyAi5kKwXnR-RFzlsAGAWVz8kRZ4pRqcSKfPyO5Tqmn40PBS-TKT6G5tqXjQ-NafbJ5xjatcnomrLBZPa4FG8bG-d5Cb7cvCTPJrPL-Op-HpMfnz9dnH5tz86_fDs9OWttr2hpDQzOVGd8AMonBfUxMMEt70drXI2D3A1ugskB5ziausO1xWkcpsqUEz8mHw66-2U9o7MYSjI7XQ3OJt3oaLx-vAl-oy_jlRa9HBSTVeDdvUCKvxbMRc8-W9ztTMC4ZM36ng1KKS4q9O0_0G1cUqjxKkpxOVJOVUX1B5RNMeeE04MZCvquIb3Vh4b0XUMahK4NVdqbv4M8kH5X8icp1u-88ph0th6DRecT2qJd9P-_cAu7jKUG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493861319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Schaefer, David R. ; Davidson, Kimberly M. ; Haynie, Dana L. ; Bouchard, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, David R. ; Davidson, Kimberly M. ; Haynie, Dana L. ; Bouchard, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>•Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are built on a network philosophy.•We gathered 10 waves of monthly data from a Pennsylvania men’s TC.•Network structure and resident integration were consistent with TC principles.•Network contacts and treatment engagement drove individual integration into the TC.
Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are a widespread, effective way to help incarcerated individuals address substance abuse problems. The TC philosophy is grounded in an explicitly relational paradigm that entails building community and conditioning residents to increasingly take responsibility for leadership therein. Although TCs are based on cultivating a network that continuously integrates new residents, many common structural features can jeopardize TC goals and are hence discouraged (e.g., clustering, homophily). In light of this tension, analyzing the TC from a network perspective can offer new insights to its functioning, as well as to broader questions surrounding how networks integrate new members. In this study we examine a men’s TC unit in a Pennsylvania prison over a 10-month span. Using data on residents’ informal networks, we examine: (1) how well individuals integrate into the TC network across time, (2) what predicts how well residents integrate into the TC, and (3) how well the TC network structure adheres to theoretical ideals. Results suggest that individual integration is driven by a range of hypothesized factors and, with limited exceptions, the observed TC is able to foster a network structure and integrate residents consistent with TC principles. We discuss the implications of these results for evaluating TCs and for understanding the process of network integration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-8733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32921897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Clustering ; Community ; Conditioning ; Exceptions ; Leadership ; Men ; Network autocorrelation model ; Network integration ; Prison ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Substance abuse ; Therapeutic communities ; Therapeutic community</subject><ispartof>Social networks, 2021-01, Vol.64, p.16-28</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-a05da87935013f909355273c346cad016e3d5df0fd033e6a273ebcef65f05d8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-a05da87935013f909355273c346cad016e3d5df0fd033e6a273ebcef65f05d8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873320300514$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community</title><title>Social networks</title><addtitle>Soc Networks</addtitle><description>•Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are built on a network philosophy.•We gathered 10 waves of monthly data from a Pennsylvania men’s TC.•Network structure and resident integration were consistent with TC principles.•Network contacts and treatment engagement drove individual integration into the TC.
Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are a widespread, effective way to help incarcerated individuals address substance abuse problems. The TC philosophy is grounded in an explicitly relational paradigm that entails building community and conditioning residents to increasingly take responsibility for leadership therein. Although TCs are based on cultivating a network that continuously integrates new residents, many common structural features can jeopardize TC goals and are hence discouraged (e.g., clustering, homophily). In light of this tension, analyzing the TC from a network perspective can offer new insights to its functioning, as well as to broader questions surrounding how networks integrate new members. In this study we examine a men’s TC unit in a Pennsylvania prison over a 10-month span. Using data on residents’ informal networks, we examine: (1) how well individuals integrate into the TC network across time, (2) what predicts how well residents integrate into the TC, and (3) how well the TC network structure adheres to theoretical ideals. Results suggest that individual integration is driven by a range of hypothesized factors and, with limited exceptions, the observed TC is able to foster a network structure and integrate residents consistent with TC principles. We discuss the implications of these results for evaluating TCs and for understanding the process of network integration.</description><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Exceptions</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Network autocorrelation model</subject><subject>Network integration</subject><subject>Prison</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Therapeutic communities</subject><subject>Therapeutic community</subject><issn>0378-8733</issn><issn>1879-2111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoV_gFAkLlwSnu0kti-gquJLquilnC2v_dL1srEX22nVf19XWwrlwOlZejPzZjyEvKbQUaDj-22Xow1YOgYMOhAdgHhCVlQK1TJK6VOyAi5kKwXnR-RFzlsAGAWVz8kRZ4pRqcSKfPyO5Tqmn40PBS-TKT6G5tqXjQ-NafbJ5xjatcnomrLBZPa4FG8bG-d5Cb7cvCTPJrPL-Op-HpMfnz9dnH5tz86_fDs9OWttr2hpDQzOVGd8AMonBfUxMMEt70drXI2D3A1ugskB5ziausO1xWkcpsqUEz8mHw66-2U9o7MYSjI7XQ3OJt3oaLx-vAl-oy_jlRa9HBSTVeDdvUCKvxbMRc8-W9ztTMC4ZM36ng1KKS4q9O0_0G1cUqjxKkpxOVJOVUX1B5RNMeeE04MZCvquIb3Vh4b0XUMahK4NVdqbv4M8kH5X8icp1u-88ph0th6DRecT2qJd9P-_cAu7jKUG</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Schaefer, David R.</creator><creator>Davidson, Kimberly M.</creator><creator>Haynie, Dana L.</creator><creator>Bouchard, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community</title><author>Schaefer, David R. ; Davidson, Kimberly M. ; Haynie, Dana L. ; Bouchard, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-a05da87935013f909355273c346cad016e3d5df0fd033e6a273ebcef65f05d8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Exceptions</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Network autocorrelation model</topic><topic>Network integration</topic><topic>Prison</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Therapeutic communities</topic><topic>Therapeutic community</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Kimberly M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynie, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaefer, David R.</au><au>Davidson, Kimberly M.</au><au>Haynie, Dana L.</au><au>Bouchard, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community</atitle><jtitle>Social networks</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Networks</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>16</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>16-28</pages><issn>0378-8733</issn><eissn>1879-2111</eissn><abstract>•Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are built on a network philosophy.•We gathered 10 waves of monthly data from a Pennsylvania men’s TC.•Network structure and resident integration were consistent with TC principles.•Network contacts and treatment engagement drove individual integration into the TC.
Prison-based therapeutic communities (TCs) are a widespread, effective way to help incarcerated individuals address substance abuse problems. The TC philosophy is grounded in an explicitly relational paradigm that entails building community and conditioning residents to increasingly take responsibility for leadership therein. Although TCs are based on cultivating a network that continuously integrates new residents, many common structural features can jeopardize TC goals and are hence discouraged (e.g., clustering, homophily). In light of this tension, analyzing the TC from a network perspective can offer new insights to its functioning, as well as to broader questions surrounding how networks integrate new members. In this study we examine a men’s TC unit in a Pennsylvania prison over a 10-month span. Using data on residents’ informal networks, we examine: (1) how well individuals integrate into the TC network across time, (2) what predicts how well residents integrate into the TC, and (3) how well the TC network structure adheres to theoretical ideals. Results suggest that individual integration is driven by a range of hypothesized factors and, with limited exceptions, the observed TC is able to foster a network structure and integrate residents consistent with TC principles. We discuss the implications of these results for evaluating TCs and for understanding the process of network integration.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32921897</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-8733 |
ispartof | Social networks, 2021-01, Vol.64, p.16-28 |
issn | 0378-8733 1879-2111 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7485928 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Clustering Community Conditioning Exceptions Leadership Men Network autocorrelation model Network integration Prison Prisoners Prisons Substance abuse Therapeutic communities Therapeutic community |
title | Network integration within a prison-based therapeutic community |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Network%20integration%20within%20a%20prison-based%20therapeutic%20community&rft.jtitle=Social%20networks&rft.au=Schaefer,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=16-28&rft.issn=0378-8733&rft.eissn=1879-2111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2493861319%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493861319&rft_id=info:pmid/32921897&rft_els_id=S0378873320300514&rfr_iscdi=true |