The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be a decision-making tool for function preservation surgery, including radical trachelectomy and ovary preservation in the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. The intraoperative diagnosis is important for guiding treatment decisions for patients with these co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pathology oncology research 2020-10, Vol.26 (4), p.2273-2279 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2279 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2273 |
container_title | Pathology oncology research |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Tanaka, Tomohito Miyamoto, Shunsuke Terada, Shinichi Kogata, Yuhei Fujiwara, Satoe Tanaka, Yoshimichi Taniguchi, Kohei Komura, Kazumasa Yamamoto, Kazuhiro Yamada, Takashi Ohmichi, Masahide |
description | Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be a decision-making tool for function preservation surgery, including radical trachelectomy and ovary preservation in the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. The intraoperative diagnosis is important for guiding treatment decisions for patients with these conditions. Three hundred seventy-one patients with cervical and endometrial cancer received SNB with an intraoperative frozen section analysis and imprint cytology. The sentinel node was cut in half, parallel to the longest axis, to obtain the maximum section area. After performing imprint cytology, one half was used to create a frozen section. The specimen was cut at 2-mm intervals into 5-μm-thick sections, which were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analyses and imprint cytology was compared to the final pathological diagnosis. Among 951 detected sentinel nodes, 51 nodes were found to be positive in the final pathological diagnosis. The sensitivity of a frozen section analysis, imprint cytology and the combination of the two modalities was 76.5%, 72.6%, and 92.2%, respectively. The specificity of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 100%. The negative predictive value of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 98.7% and 98.5%, respectively. In these settings, the accuracy of the frozen section analysis and imprint cytology in the evaluation of SNB specimens was considered acceptable; however, the sensitivity of the combined approach was higher in comparison to when a frozen section analysis or imprint cytology was performed alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7471201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440026466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c5230efa5b8336617730fee40cf2654252c1807e310b5fc7a386cf851e4816d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwVJ8sBaVlaWKmiiF3OlteZ7LpK7GA7i9K_2j-Ds1vKx4GTx_Yzr2fGb5Y9J_g1wbh8EwilBcsxxTnGFaU5fZCdkoKloMLlwxRTMsv5rBAn2ZMQrnFKEjPxODthlBcVnfHT7Ha9A_TBqK11IRqN5loPXukRuQYpi5Y2euV68CqaPaAL727AohXoaJxFc6vaMZiQyBotu94bG9FijK5124PCCmw0Flr02dWA3hvXhxGtetCmAxtQ412HviTphAX0w8Qd-hYhqQBagN8brdqD9LmtXQfRm7RfKKvBv0UKfU0nLvRTLam0q01IKWqqK1GrONTj0-xRo9oAz-7Ws2x9cb5efMovrz4uF_PLXPOSx1wXlGFoVLGpGBOClCXDDQDHuqGi4LSgmqR5AiN4UzS6VKwSuqkKArwiomZn2bujbD9sOqg1TDNrZZpGp_wonTLy7xtrdnLr9rLkJaGYJIFXdwLefR8gRNmZoKFtlQU3BEk5LhnhM1om9OU_6LUbfOp4ojjGVHAhEkWPlE4DCh6a-2IIlpN15NE6MllHHqwjaUp68Wcb9ym_vJIAdgTC9NFb8L_f_o_sT0Sd1AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440026466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Tanaka, Tomohito ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Terada, Shinichi ; Kogata, Yuhei ; Fujiwara, Satoe ; Tanaka, Yoshimichi ; Taniguchi, Kohei ; Komura, Kazumasa ; Yamamoto, Kazuhiro ; Yamada, Takashi ; Ohmichi, Masahide</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Tomohito ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Terada, Shinichi ; Kogata, Yuhei ; Fujiwara, Satoe ; Tanaka, Yoshimichi ; Taniguchi, Kohei ; Komura, Kazumasa ; Yamamoto, Kazuhiro ; Yamada, Takashi ; Ohmichi, Masahide</creatorcontrib><description>Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be a decision-making tool for function preservation surgery, including radical trachelectomy and ovary preservation in the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. The intraoperative diagnosis is important for guiding treatment decisions for patients with these conditions. Three hundred seventy-one patients with cervical and endometrial cancer received SNB with an intraoperative frozen section analysis and imprint cytology. The sentinel node was cut in half, parallel to the longest axis, to obtain the maximum section area. After performing imprint cytology, one half was used to create a frozen section. The specimen was cut at 2-mm intervals into 5-μm-thick sections, which were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analyses and imprint cytology was compared to the final pathological diagnosis. Among 951 detected sentinel nodes, 51 nodes were found to be positive in the final pathological diagnosis. The sensitivity of a frozen section analysis, imprint cytology and the combination of the two modalities was 76.5%, 72.6%, and 92.2%, respectively. The specificity of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 100%. The negative predictive value of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 98.7% and 98.5%, respectively. In these settings, the accuracy of the frozen section analysis and imprint cytology in the evaluation of SNB specimens was considered acceptable; however, the sensitivity of the combined approach was higher in comparison to when a frozen section analysis or imprint cytology was performed alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1219-4956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2807</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32458294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biopsy ; Cancer Research ; Cellular biology ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Cytology ; Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrium ; Immunology ; Lobbying ; Medical diagnosis ; Observational studies ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Pathology ; Patients ; Preservation ; Surgery ; Uterine cancer ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Pathology oncology research, 2020-10, Vol.26 (4), p.2273-2279</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c5230efa5b8336617730fee40cf2654252c1807e310b5fc7a386cf851e4816d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c5230efa5b8336617730fee40cf2654252c1807e310b5fc7a386cf851e4816d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4210-701X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41466,42535,51296</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Tomohito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Satoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yoshimichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komura, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmichi, Masahide</creatorcontrib><title>The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study</title><title>Pathology oncology research</title><addtitle>Pathol. Oncol. Res</addtitle><addtitle>Pathol Oncol Res</addtitle><description>Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be a decision-making tool for function preservation surgery, including radical trachelectomy and ovary preservation in the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. The intraoperative diagnosis is important for guiding treatment decisions for patients with these conditions. Three hundred seventy-one patients with cervical and endometrial cancer received SNB with an intraoperative frozen section analysis and imprint cytology. The sentinel node was cut in half, parallel to the longest axis, to obtain the maximum section area. After performing imprint cytology, one half was used to create a frozen section. The specimen was cut at 2-mm intervals into 5-μm-thick sections, which were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analyses and imprint cytology was compared to the final pathological diagnosis. Among 951 detected sentinel nodes, 51 nodes were found to be positive in the final pathological diagnosis. The sensitivity of a frozen section analysis, imprint cytology and the combination of the two modalities was 76.5%, 72.6%, and 92.2%, respectively. The specificity of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 100%. The negative predictive value of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 98.7% and 98.5%, respectively. In these settings, the accuracy of the frozen section analysis and imprint cytology in the evaluation of SNB specimens was considered acceptable; however, the sensitivity of the combined approach was higher in comparison to when a frozen section analysis or imprint cytology was performed alone.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Uterine cancer</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1219-4956</issn><issn>1532-2807</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwVJ8sBaVlaWKmiiF3OlteZ7LpK7GA7i9K_2j-Ds1vKx4GTx_Yzr2fGb5Y9J_g1wbh8EwilBcsxxTnGFaU5fZCdkoKloMLlwxRTMsv5rBAn2ZMQrnFKEjPxODthlBcVnfHT7Ha9A_TBqK11IRqN5loPXukRuQYpi5Y2euV68CqaPaAL727AohXoaJxFc6vaMZiQyBotu94bG9FijK5124PCCmw0Flr02dWA3hvXhxGtetCmAxtQ412HviTphAX0w8Qd-hYhqQBagN8brdqD9LmtXQfRm7RfKKvBv0UKfU0nLvRTLam0q01IKWqqK1GrONTj0-xRo9oAz-7Ws2x9cb5efMovrz4uF_PLXPOSx1wXlGFoVLGpGBOClCXDDQDHuqGi4LSgmqR5AiN4UzS6VKwSuqkKArwiomZn2bujbD9sOqg1TDNrZZpGp_wonTLy7xtrdnLr9rLkJaGYJIFXdwLefR8gRNmZoKFtlQU3BEk5LhnhM1om9OU_6LUbfOp4ojjGVHAhEkWPlE4DCh6a-2IIlpN15NE6MllHHqwjaUp68Wcb9ym_vJIAdgTC9NFb8L_f_o_sT0Sd1AQ</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Tanaka, Tomohito</creator><creator>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Terada, Shinichi</creator><creator>Kogata, Yuhei</creator><creator>Fujiwara, Satoe</creator><creator>Tanaka, Yoshimichi</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Kohei</creator><creator>Komura, Kazumasa</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Kazuhiro</creator><creator>Yamada, Takashi</creator><creator>Ohmichi, Masahide</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-701X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study</title><author>Tanaka, Tomohito ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Terada, Shinichi ; Kogata, Yuhei ; Fujiwara, Satoe ; Tanaka, Yoshimichi ; Taniguchi, Kohei ; Komura, Kazumasa ; Yamamoto, Kazuhiro ; Yamada, Takashi ; Ohmichi, Masahide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c5230efa5b8336617730fee40cf2654252c1807e310b5fc7a386cf851e4816d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Uterine cancer</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Tomohito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Satoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yoshimichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komura, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmichi, Masahide</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pathology oncology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanaka, Tomohito</au><au>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</au><au>Terada, Shinichi</au><au>Kogata, Yuhei</au><au>Fujiwara, Satoe</au><au>Tanaka, Yoshimichi</au><au>Taniguchi, Kohei</au><au>Komura, Kazumasa</au><au>Yamamoto, Kazuhiro</au><au>Yamada, Takashi</au><au>Ohmichi, Masahide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Pathology oncology research</jtitle><stitle>Pathol. Oncol. Res</stitle><addtitle>Pathol Oncol Res</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2273</spage><epage>2279</epage><pages>2273-2279</pages><issn>1219-4956</issn><eissn>1532-2807</eissn><abstract>Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may be a decision-making tool for function preservation surgery, including radical trachelectomy and ovary preservation in the treatment of cervical and endometrial cancer. The intraoperative diagnosis is important for guiding treatment decisions for patients with these conditions. Three hundred seventy-one patients with cervical and endometrial cancer received SNB with an intraoperative frozen section analysis and imprint cytology. The sentinel node was cut in half, parallel to the longest axis, to obtain the maximum section area. After performing imprint cytology, one half was used to create a frozen section. The specimen was cut at 2-mm intervals into 5-μm-thick sections, which were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analyses and imprint cytology was compared to the final pathological diagnosis. Among 951 detected sentinel nodes, 51 nodes were found to be positive in the final pathological diagnosis. The sensitivity of a frozen section analysis, imprint cytology and the combination of the two modalities was 76.5%, 72.6%, and 92.2%, respectively. The specificity of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 100%. The negative predictive value of a frozen section analysis and imprint cytology was 98.7% and 98.5%, respectively. In these settings, the accuracy of the frozen section analysis and imprint cytology in the evaluation of SNB specimens was considered acceptable; however, the sensitivity of the combined approach was higher in comparison to when a frozen section analysis or imprint cytology was performed alone.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32458294</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-701X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1219-4956 |
ispartof | Pathology oncology research, 2020-10, Vol.26 (4), p.2273-2279 |
issn | 1219-4956 1532-2807 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7471201 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Biopsy Cancer Research Cellular biology Cervical cancer Cervix Cytology Decision making Diagnosis Endometrial cancer Endometrium Immunology Lobbying Medical diagnosis Observational studies Oncology Original Original Article Pathology Patients Preservation Surgery Uterine cancer Uterus |
title | The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis and Imprint Cytology of Sentinel Node Biopsy Specimens from Patients with Uterine Cervical and Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Observational Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A34%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20an%20Intraoperative%20Frozen%20Section%20Analysis%20and%20Imprint%20Cytology%20of%20Sentinel%20Node%20Biopsy%20Specimens%20from%20Patients%20with%20Uterine%20Cervical%20and%20Endometrial%20Cancer:%20a%20Retrospective%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Pathology%20oncology%20research&rft.au=Tanaka,%20Tomohito&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2273&rft.epage=2279&rft.pages=2273-2279&rft.issn=1219-4956&rft.eissn=1532-2807&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12253-020-00822-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2440026466%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440026466&rft_id=info:pmid/32458294&rfr_iscdi=true |