Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
Background: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. Purpose: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2020-08, Vol.8 (8), p.2325967120945654-2325967120945654 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2325967120945654 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2325967120945654 |
container_title | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Shultz, Christopher L. Schrader, Samuel N. Packard, Benjamin D. Wascher, Daniel C. Treme, Gehron P. Richter, Dustin L. |
description | Background:
Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined.
Purpose:
To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded.
Results:
Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy.
Conclusion:
Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clea |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2325967120945654 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7466890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967120945654</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2444382792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-be203aae21961bff1bc63bac2dcc0a8cf0dc5af801c66030e8c68d3eced4a1993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qVUGUOydkqZde0vorTnyhQkBbpO2HEJytiTPZNdrEW9tB4t_XqwVKkeqL7fEz77zjIeSIs4-cN80nIUVtdMMFM6rWtXpF9rehaht7_ey8Rw5TumVltTU3snlL9qQwStWt3idwmei5h-UUUvaOnsa8iiG5sLmnkGleIb32I9Iw0O_Ye1jTX5BxvQ4DjiGW68IvYcQp0yt0YUo5zi77MNEf6DAliPef35E3A6wTHj7sB-Tmy8X12bdq8fPr5dnponJKi1x1KJgEQMGN5t0w8M5p2YETvXMMWjew3tUwtIw7rZlk2Drd9rKU6RVwY-QBOdnpbuZuxN4VU8Wg3UQ_Fhs2gLf_vkx-ZZfhzjZK69awIvDhQSCG3zOmbEefXGkWJgxzskIpJVvRGFHQ9y_Q2zDHqbS3pbhQzHBeKLajXPnSFHF4MsOZ3Y7QvhxhSTl-3sRTwuPAClDtgARL_Fv1v4J_AJMcpXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441240911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SAGE Journals Open Access</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Freely accessible e-journals</source><creator>Shultz, Christopher L. ; Schrader, Samuel N. ; Packard, Benjamin D. ; Wascher, Daniel C. ; Treme, Gehron P. ; Richter, Dustin L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Christopher L. ; Schrader, Samuel N. ; Packard, Benjamin D. ; Wascher, Daniel C. ; Treme, Gehron P. ; Richter, Dustin L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined.
Purpose:
To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded.
Results:
Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy.
Conclusion:
Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967120945654</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32944586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Knee ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical diagnosis ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Patients ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-08, Vol.8 (8), p.2325967120945654-2325967120945654</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-be203aae21961bff1bc63bac2dcc0a8cf0dc5af801c66030e8c68d3eced4a1993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-be203aae21961bff1bc63bac2dcc0a8cf0dc5af801c66030e8c68d3eced4a1993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466890/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466890/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,21945,27830,27901,27902,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Samuel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packard, Benjamin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wascher, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treme, Gehron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Dustin L.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background:
Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined.
Purpose:
To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded.
Results:
Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy.
Conclusion:
Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.</description><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2qVUGUOydkqZde0vorTnyhQkBbpO2HEJytiTPZNdrEW9tB4t_XqwVKkeqL7fEz77zjIeSIs4-cN80nIUVtdMMFM6rWtXpF9rehaht7_ey8Rw5TumVltTU3snlL9qQwStWt3idwmei5h-UUUvaOnsa8iiG5sLmnkGleIb32I9Iw0O_Ye1jTX5BxvQ4DjiGW68IvYcQp0yt0YUo5zi77MNEf6DAliPef35E3A6wTHj7sB-Tmy8X12bdq8fPr5dnponJKi1x1KJgEQMGN5t0w8M5p2YETvXMMWjew3tUwtIw7rZlk2Drd9rKU6RVwY-QBOdnpbuZuxN4VU8Wg3UQ_Fhs2gLf_vkx-ZZfhzjZK69awIvDhQSCG3zOmbEefXGkWJgxzskIpJVvRGFHQ9y_Q2zDHqbS3pbhQzHBeKLajXPnSFHF4MsOZ3Y7QvhxhSTl-3sRTwuPAClDtgARL_Fv1v4J_AJMcpXI</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Shultz, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Schrader, Samuel N.</creator><creator>Packard, Benjamin D.</creator><creator>Wascher, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Treme, Gehron P.</creator><creator>Richter, Dustin L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?</title><author>Shultz, Christopher L. ; Schrader, Samuel N. ; Packard, Benjamin D. ; Wascher, Daniel C. ; Treme, Gehron P. ; Richter, Dustin L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-be203aae21961bff1bc63bac2dcc0a8cf0dc5af801c66030e8c68d3eced4a1993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Samuel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packard, Benjamin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wascher, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treme, Gehron P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Dustin L.</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shultz, Christopher L.</au><au>Schrader, Samuel N.</au><au>Packard, Benjamin D.</au><au>Wascher, Daniel C.</au><au>Treme, Gehron P.</au><au>Richter, Dustin L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2325967120945654</spage><epage>2325967120945654</epage><pages>2325967120945654-2325967120945654</pages><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Background:
Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined.
Purpose:
To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded.
Results:
Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy.
Conclusion:
Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32944586</pmid><doi>10.1177/2325967120945654</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2325-9671 |
ispartof | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-08, Vol.8 (8), p.2325967120945654-2325967120945654 |
issn | 2325-9671 2325-9671 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7466890 |
source | NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SAGE Journals Open Access; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Freely accessible e-journals |
subjects | Knee Magnetic resonance imaging Medical diagnosis Orthopedics Pain Patients Sports medicine |
title | Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A18%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Diagnostic%20Arthroscopy%20at%20the%20Time%20of%20Medial%20Patellofemoral%20Ligament%20Reconstruction%20Necessary?&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Shultz,%20Christopher%20L.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2325967120945654&rft.epage=2325967120945654&rft.pages=2325967120945654-2325967120945654&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967120945654&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2444382792%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441240911&rft_id=info:pmid/32944586&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967120945654&rfr_iscdi=true |