Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Background: Immunotherapy has drastically changed the outlook for melanoma patients over the past decade. Specifically, the dual blockade of immune checkpoints using ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes. This immense achievement, though, is at the cos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2020-08, Vol.12 (8), p.2329
Hauptverfasser: Asher, Nethanel, Ben-Betzalel, Guy, Lev-Ari, Shaked, Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie, Steinberg-Silman, Yael, Gochman, Neta, Schachter, Jacob, Meirson, Tomer, Markel, Gal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2329
container_title Cancers
container_volume 12
creator Asher, Nethanel
Ben-Betzalel, Guy
Lev-Ari, Shaked
Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie
Steinberg-Silman, Yael
Gochman, Neta
Schachter, Jacob
Meirson, Tomer
Markel, Gal
description Background: Immunotherapy has drastically changed the outlook for melanoma patients over the past decade. Specifically, the dual blockade of immune checkpoints using ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes. This immense achievement, though, is at the cost of toxicity, with 60% of the patients experiencing high-grade adverse events (AEs). Our study aims to report the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of an out-of-trial, real-life population. Methods: Data on metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab were retrieved from our melanoma database—a single-center prospectively updated, medical-records based oncologic registry. Data included demographics, clinical and pathological information, as well as tumor responses and survival. Associations between patient or treatment characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated. Results: We identified 172 metastatic melanoma patients, of whom 64% were treatment-naïve. The median follow-up was 12 months. The response rates for treatment-naïve and previously-treated patients were 61% and 25%, respectively; median progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.2 and 2.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) were not-reached (NR) and 6.1 months, respectively. The estimated three-year OS for treatment-naïve patients was 58% (95% CI 42–65). At data cutoff, 22% were still on-treatment. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 60% of the patients, almost all of whom were exposed to steroid treatments (59%); AEs were fatal in 4 patients, and led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 31%. Factors significantly associated with outcome were cutaneous histology, low lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low number of metastatic sites, performance status, first line of treatment and number of combinations administered during the induction phase. Conclusions: Despite the profoundly different baseline patient characteristics, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is as effective in the real-world population as it was in clinical trials, including long-term outcomes. In addition to confirming the significance of baseline prognostic factors, our study reveals that the number of combinations effectively administered may also be correlated with good outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers12082329
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7464656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639969607</galeid><sourcerecordid>A639969607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-dd390e79d81b0e09070fe67a2dc4e373124826a15ef61a43661176a625fbd7e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlLBDEQhYMoKurZa8CLl9EsPUnnIoi4gRuieAw16WqNpDtj0q34740LbrmkKvl49R5FyCZnO1Iatuugd5gyF6wWUpgFsiqYFhOlTLX4q14hGzk_snKk5FrpZbIiRS0qXbNVcnONEOhdTKGhl-PgYoeZxpaezn3w3djBjELf0Av_HMNH53t6BYPHfsj0xQ8P9BwHyEN5cqUM0McO1slSCyHjxte9Rm6PDm8OTiZnl8enB_tnE1cJNUyapqRAbZqazxgywzRrUWkQjatQaslFVQsFfIqt4lBJpXjxD0pM21mjkck1svepOx9nHTaumEoQ7Dz5DtKrjeDt35_eP9j7-Gx1pSo1VUVg-0sgxacR82A7nx2GEgPjmK0oQ6WRUtUF3fqHPsYx9SXeByXM1Cj2Q91DQOv7Npa57l3U7hclowqkC7X7SbkUc07YflvmzL6v1v5brXwDGJCVSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436295960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Asher, Nethanel ; Ben-Betzalel, Guy ; Lev-Ari, Shaked ; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie ; Steinberg-Silman, Yael ; Gochman, Neta ; Schachter, Jacob ; Meirson, Tomer ; Markel, Gal</creator><creatorcontrib>Asher, Nethanel ; Ben-Betzalel, Guy ; Lev-Ari, Shaked ; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie ; Steinberg-Silman, Yael ; Gochman, Neta ; Schachter, Jacob ; Meirson, Tomer ; Markel, Gal</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Immunotherapy has drastically changed the outlook for melanoma patients over the past decade. Specifically, the dual blockade of immune checkpoints using ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes. This immense achievement, though, is at the cost of toxicity, with 60% of the patients experiencing high-grade adverse events (AEs). Our study aims to report the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of an out-of-trial, real-life population. Methods: Data on metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab were retrieved from our melanoma database—a single-center prospectively updated, medical-records based oncologic registry. Data included demographics, clinical and pathological information, as well as tumor responses and survival. Associations between patient or treatment characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated. Results: We identified 172 metastatic melanoma patients, of whom 64% were treatment-naïve. The median follow-up was 12 months. The response rates for treatment-naïve and previously-treated patients were 61% and 25%, respectively; median progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.2 and 2.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) were not-reached (NR) and 6.1 months, respectively. The estimated three-year OS for treatment-naïve patients was 58% (95% CI 42–65). At data cutoff, 22% were still on-treatment. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 60% of the patients, almost all of whom were exposed to steroid treatments (59%); AEs were fatal in 4 patients, and led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 31%. Factors significantly associated with outcome were cutaneous histology, low lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low number of metastatic sites, performance status, first line of treatment and number of combinations administered during the induction phase. Conclusions: Despite the profoundly different baseline patient characteristics, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is as effective in the real-world population as it was in clinical trials, including long-term outcomes. In addition to confirming the significance of baseline prognostic factors, our study reveals that the number of combinations effectively administered may also be correlated with good outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32824780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Asymptomatic ; Clinical trials ; Demography ; Dosage and administration ; Drug dosages ; Drug therapy ; Immune checkpoint ; Immunotherapy ; Ipilimumab ; L-Lactate dehydrogenase ; Lactic acid ; Medical prognosis ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Mutation ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Population ; Survival ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2020-08, Vol.12 (8), p.2329</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-dd390e79d81b0e09070fe67a2dc4e373124826a15ef61a43661176a625fbd7e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-dd390e79d81b0e09070fe67a2dc4e373124826a15ef61a43661176a625fbd7e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5011-5477</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464656/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7464656/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asher, Nethanel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Betzalel, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lev-Ari, Shaked</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg-Silman, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochman, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meirson, Tomer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markel, Gal</creatorcontrib><title>Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma</title><title>Cancers</title><description>Background: Immunotherapy has drastically changed the outlook for melanoma patients over the past decade. Specifically, the dual blockade of immune checkpoints using ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes. This immense achievement, though, is at the cost of toxicity, with 60% of the patients experiencing high-grade adverse events (AEs). Our study aims to report the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of an out-of-trial, real-life population. Methods: Data on metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab were retrieved from our melanoma database—a single-center prospectively updated, medical-records based oncologic registry. Data included demographics, clinical and pathological information, as well as tumor responses and survival. Associations between patient or treatment characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated. Results: We identified 172 metastatic melanoma patients, of whom 64% were treatment-naïve. The median follow-up was 12 months. The response rates for treatment-naïve and previously-treated patients were 61% and 25%, respectively; median progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.2 and 2.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) were not-reached (NR) and 6.1 months, respectively. The estimated three-year OS for treatment-naïve patients was 58% (95% CI 42–65). At data cutoff, 22% were still on-treatment. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 60% of the patients, almost all of whom were exposed to steroid treatments (59%); AEs were fatal in 4 patients, and led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 31%. Factors significantly associated with outcome were cutaneous histology, low lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low number of metastatic sites, performance status, first line of treatment and number of combinations administered during the induction phase. Conclusions: Despite the profoundly different baseline patient characteristics, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is as effective in the real-world population as it was in clinical trials, including long-term outcomes. In addition to confirming the significance of baseline prognostic factors, our study reveals that the number of combinations effectively administered may also be correlated with good outcome.</description><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Ipilimumab</subject><subject>L-Lactate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUlLBDEQhYMoKurZa8CLl9EsPUnnIoi4gRuieAw16WqNpDtj0q34740LbrmkKvl49R5FyCZnO1Iatuugd5gyF6wWUpgFsiqYFhOlTLX4q14hGzk_snKk5FrpZbIiRS0qXbNVcnONEOhdTKGhl-PgYoeZxpaezn3w3djBjELf0Av_HMNH53t6BYPHfsj0xQ8P9BwHyEN5cqUM0McO1slSCyHjxte9Rm6PDm8OTiZnl8enB_tnE1cJNUyapqRAbZqazxgywzRrUWkQjatQaslFVQsFfIqt4lBJpXjxD0pM21mjkck1svepOx9nHTaumEoQ7Dz5DtKrjeDt35_eP9j7-Gx1pSo1VUVg-0sgxacR82A7nx2GEgPjmK0oQ6WRUtUF3fqHPsYx9SXeByXM1Cj2Q91DQOv7Npa57l3U7hclowqkC7X7SbkUc07YflvmzL6v1v5brXwDGJCVSA</recordid><startdate>20200818</startdate><enddate>20200818</enddate><creator>Asher, Nethanel</creator><creator>Ben-Betzalel, Guy</creator><creator>Lev-Ari, Shaked</creator><creator>Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie</creator><creator>Steinberg-Silman, Yael</creator><creator>Gochman, Neta</creator><creator>Schachter, Jacob</creator><creator>Meirson, Tomer</creator><creator>Markel, Gal</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-5477</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200818</creationdate><title>Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma</title><author>Asher, Nethanel ; Ben-Betzalel, Guy ; Lev-Ari, Shaked ; Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie ; Steinberg-Silman, Yael ; Gochman, Neta ; Schachter, Jacob ; Meirson, Tomer ; Markel, Gal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-dd390e79d81b0e09070fe67a2dc4e373124826a15ef61a43661176a625fbd7e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Ipilimumab</topic><topic>L-Lactate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asher, Nethanel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Betzalel, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lev-Ari, Shaked</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg-Silman, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochman, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meirson, Tomer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markel, Gal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asher, Nethanel</au><au>Ben-Betzalel, Guy</au><au>Lev-Ari, Shaked</au><au>Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie</au><au>Steinberg-Silman, Yael</au><au>Gochman, Neta</au><au>Schachter, Jacob</au><au>Meirson, Tomer</au><au>Markel, Gal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><date>2020-08-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2329</spage><pages>2329-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Background: Immunotherapy has drastically changed the outlook for melanoma patients over the past decade. Specifically, the dual blockade of immune checkpoints using ipilimumab and nivolumab has shown unprecedented response rates and survival outcomes. This immense achievement, though, is at the cost of toxicity, with 60% of the patients experiencing high-grade adverse events (AEs). Our study aims to report the efficacy and toxicity outcomes of an out-of-trial, real-life population. Methods: Data on metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab were retrieved from our melanoma database—a single-center prospectively updated, medical-records based oncologic registry. Data included demographics, clinical and pathological information, as well as tumor responses and survival. Associations between patient or treatment characteristics and outcomes were also evaluated. Results: We identified 172 metastatic melanoma patients, of whom 64% were treatment-naïve. The median follow-up was 12 months. The response rates for treatment-naïve and previously-treated patients were 61% and 25%, respectively; median progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.2 and 2.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) were not-reached (NR) and 6.1 months, respectively. The estimated three-year OS for treatment-naïve patients was 58% (95% CI 42–65). At data cutoff, 22% were still on-treatment. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 60% of the patients, almost all of whom were exposed to steroid treatments (59%); AEs were fatal in 4 patients, and led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 31%. Factors significantly associated with outcome were cutaneous histology, low lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low number of metastatic sites, performance status, first line of treatment and number of combinations administered during the induction phase. Conclusions: Despite the profoundly different baseline patient characteristics, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is as effective in the real-world population as it was in clinical trials, including long-term outcomes. In addition to confirming the significance of baseline prognostic factors, our study reveals that the number of combinations effectively administered may also be correlated with good outcome.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32824780</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers12082329</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-5477</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2020-08, Vol.12 (8), p.2329
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7464656
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Asymptomatic
Clinical trials
Demography
Dosage and administration
Drug dosages
Drug therapy
Immune checkpoint
Immunotherapy
Ipilimumab
L-Lactate dehydrogenase
Lactic acid
Medical prognosis
Melanoma
Metastases
Metastasis
Monoclonal antibodies
Mutation
Patient outcomes
Patients
Population
Survival
Toxicity
title Real World Outcomes of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real%20World%20Outcomes%20of%20Ipilimumab%20and%20Nivolumab%20in%20Patients%20with%20Metastatic%20Melanoma&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Asher,%20Nethanel&rft.date=2020-08-18&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2329&rft.pages=2329-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers12082329&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA639969607%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436295960&rft_id=info:pmid/32824780&rft_galeid=A639969607&rfr_iscdi=true