Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning

Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype‐to‐phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular ecology 2020-06, Vol.29 (12), p.2234-2253
Hauptverfasser: Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel, Carleton, Karen L., Narain, Devika W., Pierotti, Michele E. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2253
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2234
container_title Molecular ecology
container_volume 29
creator Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel
Carleton, Karen L.
Narain, Devika W.
Pierotti, Michele E. R.
description Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype‐to‐phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution. In particular, some speciose but understudied lineages can provide a unique opportunity to better understand aspects of visual system evolution such as opsin gene duplication and neofunctionalization. In this study, we showcase the visual system evolution of neotropical Characiformes and the spectral tuning mechanisms they exhibit to modulate their visual sensitivities. Such mechanisms include gene duplications and losses, gene conversion, opsin amino acid sequence and expression variation, and A1/A2‐chromophore shifts. The Characiforms we studied utilize three cone opsin classes (SWS2, RH2, LWS) and a rod opsin (RH1). However, the characiform's entire opsin gene repertoire is a product of dynamic evolution by opsin gene loss (SWS1, RH2) and duplication (LWS, RH1). The LWS‐ and RH1‐duplicates originated from a teleost specific whole‐genome duplication as well as characiform‐specific duplication events. Both LWS‐opsins exhibit gene conversion and, through substitutions in key tuning sites, one of the LWS‐paralogues has acquired spectral sensitivity to green light. These sequence changes suggest reversion and parallel evolution of key tuning sites. Furthermore, characiforms' colour vision is based on the expression of both LWS‐paralogues and SWS2. Finally, we found interspecific and intraspecific variation in A1/A2‐chromophores proportions, correlating with the light environment. These multiple mechanisms may be a result of the diverse visual environments where Characiformes have evolved.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mec.15474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7451407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2404639740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-7b7e6d3f23acac4987cd2f4c21c49453ee8234a7cfbc5db1064ecd4e4dcca36e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTs_owheQgBsHrJlcTt1cCNKMFxhxM4q7kE6d6s6QSmqSqh565wO48Bl9EjP2OKhgNiH8H1_O4SfkCWcnPJ_TAc0JL6GGe2TBZVUWooUv98mCtZUoOGvkATlM6ZIxLkVZPiQHUoDgLW8W5Ntnm2bt6GjXA_qJ4ja4ebLBU-vpcqOjNrYPccD0kl5skHY7rwdrcjphHJ3e0dDTCR2GNNHrTXD44-v3NfowZHYenTX6xvaCpjlu7db6NQ1jsj5R7TuaRjRTzN9Ps8_RI_Kg1y7h49v7iHx6c3axfFecf3z7fvn6vDAAEop6VWPVyV5IbbSBtqlNJ3owgucHlBKxERJ0bfqVKbsVZxWg6QChM0bLCuURebX3jvNqwM7kxfMQaox20HGngrbq78TbjVqHraqh5MDqLHh-K4jhasY0qcEmg85pj2FOSgCDSrY1sIw--we9DHP0eb1M8baRTV3JTB3vKRNDShH7u2E4Uzcdq9yx-tVxZp_-Of0d-bvUDJzugWvrcPd_k_pwttwrfwIq_bax</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419838763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel ; Carleton, Karen L. ; Narain, Devika W. ; Pierotti, Michele E. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel ; Carleton, Karen L. ; Narain, Devika W. ; Pierotti, Michele E. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype‐to‐phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution. In particular, some speciose but understudied lineages can provide a unique opportunity to better understand aspects of visual system evolution such as opsin gene duplication and neofunctionalization. In this study, we showcase the visual system evolution of neotropical Characiformes and the spectral tuning mechanisms they exhibit to modulate their visual sensitivities. Such mechanisms include gene duplications and losses, gene conversion, opsin amino acid sequence and expression variation, and A1/A2‐chromophore shifts. The Characiforms we studied utilize three cone opsin classes (SWS2, RH2, LWS) and a rod opsin (RH1). However, the characiform's entire opsin gene repertoire is a product of dynamic evolution by opsin gene loss (SWS1, RH2) and duplication (LWS, RH1). The LWS‐ and RH1‐duplicates originated from a teleost specific whole‐genome duplication as well as characiform‐specific duplication events. Both LWS‐opsins exhibit gene conversion and, through substitutions in key tuning sites, one of the LWS‐paralogues has acquired spectral sensitivity to green light. These sequence changes suggest reversion and parallel evolution of key tuning sites. Furthermore, characiforms' colour vision is based on the expression of both LWS‐paralogues and SWS2. Finally, we found interspecific and intraspecific variation in A1/A2‐chromophores proportions, correlating with the light environment. These multiple mechanisms may be a result of the diverse visual environments where Characiformes have evolved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1083</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-294X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mec.15474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32421918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Amino acid sequence ; Amino acids ; Characiformes ; chromophore ; Chromophores ; Color vision ; Conversion ; Evolution ; Gene conversion ; Gene duplication ; genome duplication ; Genomes ; Genotypes ; Information processing ; Interspecific ; opsin ; Opsins ; Phenotypes ; Photopigments ; Reproduction (copying) ; Reversion ; Spectra ; Spectral sensitivity ; spectral tuning ; Tuning ; Visual aspects ; visual pigment ; Visual pigments ; Visual system</subject><ispartof>Molecular ecology, 2020-06, Vol.29 (12), p.2234-2253</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-7b7e6d3f23acac4987cd2f4c21c49453ee8234a7cfbc5db1064ecd4e4dcca36e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-7b7e6d3f23acac4987cd2f4c21c49453ee8234a7cfbc5db1064ecd4e4dcca36e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2837-6192 ; 0000-0001-6660-4331 ; 0000-0001-6306-5643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmec.15474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmec.15474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carleton, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narain, Devika W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierotti, Michele E. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning</title><title>Molecular ecology</title><addtitle>Mol Ecol</addtitle><description>Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype‐to‐phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution. In particular, some speciose but understudied lineages can provide a unique opportunity to better understand aspects of visual system evolution such as opsin gene duplication and neofunctionalization. In this study, we showcase the visual system evolution of neotropical Characiformes and the spectral tuning mechanisms they exhibit to modulate their visual sensitivities. Such mechanisms include gene duplications and losses, gene conversion, opsin amino acid sequence and expression variation, and A1/A2‐chromophore shifts. The Characiforms we studied utilize three cone opsin classes (SWS2, RH2, LWS) and a rod opsin (RH1). However, the characiform's entire opsin gene repertoire is a product of dynamic evolution by opsin gene loss (SWS1, RH2) and duplication (LWS, RH1). The LWS‐ and RH1‐duplicates originated from a teleost specific whole‐genome duplication as well as characiform‐specific duplication events. Both LWS‐opsins exhibit gene conversion and, through substitutions in key tuning sites, one of the LWS‐paralogues has acquired spectral sensitivity to green light. These sequence changes suggest reversion and parallel evolution of key tuning sites. Furthermore, characiforms' colour vision is based on the expression of both LWS‐paralogues and SWS2. Finally, we found interspecific and intraspecific variation in A1/A2‐chromophores proportions, correlating with the light environment. These multiple mechanisms may be a result of the diverse visual environments where Characiformes have evolved.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Amino acid sequence</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Characiformes</subject><subject>chromophore</subject><subject>Chromophores</subject><subject>Color vision</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gene conversion</subject><subject>Gene duplication</subject><subject>genome duplication</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>opsin</subject><subject>Opsins</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Photopigments</subject><subject>Reproduction (copying)</subject><subject>Reversion</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Spectral sensitivity</subject><subject>spectral tuning</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><subject>Visual aspects</subject><subject>visual pigment</subject><subject>Visual pigments</subject><subject>Visual system</subject><issn>0962-1083</issn><issn>1365-294X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTs_owheQgBsHrJlcTt1cCNKMFxhxM4q7kE6d6s6QSmqSqh565wO48Bl9EjP2OKhgNiH8H1_O4SfkCWcnPJ_TAc0JL6GGe2TBZVUWooUv98mCtZUoOGvkATlM6ZIxLkVZPiQHUoDgLW8W5Ntnm2bt6GjXA_qJ4ja4ebLBU-vpcqOjNrYPccD0kl5skHY7rwdrcjphHJ3e0dDTCR2GNNHrTXD44-v3NfowZHYenTX6xvaCpjlu7db6NQ1jsj5R7TuaRjRTzN9Ps8_RI_Kg1y7h49v7iHx6c3axfFecf3z7fvn6vDAAEop6VWPVyV5IbbSBtqlNJ3owgucHlBKxERJ0bfqVKbsVZxWg6QChM0bLCuURebX3jvNqwM7kxfMQaox20HGngrbq78TbjVqHraqh5MDqLHh-K4jhasY0qcEmg85pj2FOSgCDSrY1sIw--we9DHP0eb1M8baRTV3JTB3vKRNDShH7u2E4Uzcdq9yx-tVxZp_-Of0d-bvUDJzugWvrcPd_k_pwttwrfwIq_bax</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel</creator><creator>Carleton, Karen L.</creator><creator>Narain, Devika W.</creator><creator>Pierotti, Michele E. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-6192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-4331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6306-5643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning</title><author>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel ; Carleton, Karen L. ; Narain, Devika W. ; Pierotti, Michele E. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4434-7b7e6d3f23acac4987cd2f4c21c49453ee8234a7cfbc5db1064ecd4e4dcca36e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Amino acid sequence</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Characiformes</topic><topic>chromophore</topic><topic>Chromophores</topic><topic>Color vision</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gene conversion</topic><topic>Gene duplication</topic><topic>genome duplication</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>opsin</topic><topic>Opsins</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Photopigments</topic><topic>Reproduction (copying)</topic><topic>Reversion</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Spectral sensitivity</topic><topic>spectral tuning</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><topic>Visual aspects</topic><topic>visual pigment</topic><topic>Visual pigments</topic><topic>Visual system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carleton, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narain, Devika W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierotti, Michele E. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Molecular ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Escobar‐Camacho, Daniel</au><au>Carleton, Karen L.</au><au>Narain, Devika W.</au><au>Pierotti, Michele E. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning</atitle><jtitle>Molecular ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Ecol</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2234</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2234-2253</pages><issn>0962-1083</issn><eissn>1365-294X</eissn><abstract>Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype‐to‐phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution. In particular, some speciose but understudied lineages can provide a unique opportunity to better understand aspects of visual system evolution such as opsin gene duplication and neofunctionalization. In this study, we showcase the visual system evolution of neotropical Characiformes and the spectral tuning mechanisms they exhibit to modulate their visual sensitivities. Such mechanisms include gene duplications and losses, gene conversion, opsin amino acid sequence and expression variation, and A1/A2‐chromophore shifts. The Characiforms we studied utilize three cone opsin classes (SWS2, RH2, LWS) and a rod opsin (RH1). However, the characiform's entire opsin gene repertoire is a product of dynamic evolution by opsin gene loss (SWS1, RH2) and duplication (LWS, RH1). The LWS‐ and RH1‐duplicates originated from a teleost specific whole‐genome duplication as well as characiform‐specific duplication events. Both LWS‐opsins exhibit gene conversion and, through substitutions in key tuning sites, one of the LWS‐paralogues has acquired spectral sensitivity to green light. These sequence changes suggest reversion and parallel evolution of key tuning sites. Furthermore, characiforms' colour vision is based on the expression of both LWS‐paralogues and SWS2. Finally, we found interspecific and intraspecific variation in A1/A2‐chromophores proportions, correlating with the light environment. These multiple mechanisms may be a result of the diverse visual environments where Characiformes have evolved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32421918</pmid><doi>10.1111/mec.15474</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2837-6192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-4331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6306-5643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1083
ispartof Molecular ecology, 2020-06, Vol.29 (12), p.2234-2253
issn 0962-1083
1365-294X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7451407
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adaptation
Amino acid sequence
Amino acids
Characiformes
chromophore
Chromophores
Color vision
Conversion
Evolution
Gene conversion
Gene duplication
genome duplication
Genomes
Genotypes
Information processing
Interspecific
opsin
Opsins
Phenotypes
Photopigments
Reproduction (copying)
Reversion
Spectra
Spectral sensitivity
spectral tuning
Tuning
Visual aspects
visual pigment
Visual pigments
Visual system
title Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole‐genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20pigment%20evolution%20in%20Characiformes:%20The%20dynamic%20interplay%20of%20teleost%20whole%E2%80%90genome%20duplication,%20surviving%20opsins%20and%20spectral%20tuning&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20ecology&rft.au=Escobar%E2%80%90Camacho,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2234&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2234-2253&rft.issn=0962-1083&rft.eissn=1365-294X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mec.15474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2404639740%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419838763&rft_id=info:pmid/32421918&rfr_iscdi=true