Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care

Research ObjectiveExpanding home‐ and community‐based services (HCBS) as an alternative to nursing home care has become a priority for many state Medicaid programs. Whereas low‐income people with long‐term care needs used to have little choice but to move to a nursing home if they needed extensive a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health services research 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.22-23
Hauptverfasser: Tamara Konetzka, R., Jung, D., Gorges, R., Sanghavi, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue S1
container_start_page 22
container_title Health services research
container_volume 55
creator Tamara Konetzka, R.
Jung, D.
Gorges, R.
Sanghavi, P.
description Research ObjectiveExpanding home‐ and community‐based services (HCBS) as an alternative to nursing home care has become a priority for many state Medicaid programs. Whereas low‐income people with long‐term care needs used to have little choice but to move to a nursing home if they needed extensive assistance funded by Medicaid, now more than half of all Medicaid long‐term care funding goes to HCBS, with substantial variation by state and county. This shift in policy was motivated by widespread consumer preferences to avoid institutionalization and the hope that HCBS would save Medicaid money relative to nursing home care.However, these dramatic policy changes are being made on the basis of surprisingly little evidence about the outcomes of HCBS. HCBS inevitably involves a lower intensity of care than nursing home care and shifts some of the burden of care to untrained caregivers. Recent descriptive evidence shows higher hospitalization rates among HCBS users than nursing home residents, but descriptive correlations may suffer from selection bias. Our study provides the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and explores possible mechanisms for the effect.Study DesignWe use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data set, a national compilation of Medicaid claims, in a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. We combine the MAX data with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable, and with state and county data on the percent of individuals receiving HCBS versus nursing home care. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long‐term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.Population StudiedOlder adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare. We also examine heterogeneity of the effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.Principal FindingsHCBS users have 13 percentage‐point higher annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed, with an even larger difference among those with dementia. These differences exist within as well as across counties, ruling out differences in state policy or county‐lev
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-6773.13354
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7440521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435546229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-f959b6f3f118b37f1b7ee78678255cf65dd1c219d8445806f311e4d214a3635a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUTtPHDEQthCROAg1raXUC36udxsiOAGHdIAEpEhl-dbjw2h3DfYu0XVp0uc35pfEx6GTUsXNyPM9ZjQfQkeUHNP8TqhQsiiV4seUcyl20GTb2UUTQqgqasrEHtpP6ZkQUvFKTNCv64TPwfdLPAsd4KsQLHYh4u9hjHgGph2evuK7cWgymnBw-Aasb4y37_w_P39j01s8DV039n5Y5ca5SWDxPPTL_HmE2OGpiYDvoTWDfwM8BHw7xrQduUY_o0_OtAkOP-oB-nZ58TidFfO7q-vp2bxomFSicLWsF6XjjtJqwZWjCwWgqlJVTMrGldJa2jBa20oIWZHMpBSEZVQYXnJp-AE63fi-jIsObAP9EE2rX6LvTFzpYLz-F-n9k16GN62EIJLRbPDlwyCG1xHSoJ_zofq8s2aCSylKxurMOtmwmhhSiuC2EyjR67D0Ohq9jka_h5UV5Ubxw7ew-h9dzy4e7jfCv46CmWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435546229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tamara Konetzka, R. ; Jung, D. ; Gorges, R. ; Sanghavi, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamara Konetzka, R. ; Jung, D. ; Gorges, R. ; Sanghavi, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Research ObjectiveExpanding home‐ and community‐based services (HCBS) as an alternative to nursing home care has become a priority for many state Medicaid programs. Whereas low‐income people with long‐term care needs used to have little choice but to move to a nursing home if they needed extensive assistance funded by Medicaid, now more than half of all Medicaid long‐term care funding goes to HCBS, with substantial variation by state and county. This shift in policy was motivated by widespread consumer preferences to avoid institutionalization and the hope that HCBS would save Medicaid money relative to nursing home care.However, these dramatic policy changes are being made on the basis of surprisingly little evidence about the outcomes of HCBS. HCBS inevitably involves a lower intensity of care than nursing home care and shifts some of the burden of care to untrained caregivers. Recent descriptive evidence shows higher hospitalization rates among HCBS users than nursing home residents, but descriptive correlations may suffer from selection bias. Our study provides the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and explores possible mechanisms for the effect.Study DesignWe use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data set, a national compilation of Medicaid claims, in a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. We combine the MAX data with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable, and with state and county data on the percent of individuals receiving HCBS versus nursing home care. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long‐term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.Population StudiedOlder adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare. We also examine heterogeneity of the effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.Principal FindingsHCBS users have 13 percentage‐point higher annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed, with an even larger difference among those with dementia. These differences exist within as well as across counties, ruling out differences in state policy or county‐level health infrastructure as primary explanations. Differences are smaller for those receiving more intensive HCBS. Furthermore, we find significant disparities by race, with blacks using HCBS at higher rates than whites but experiencing higher rates of hospitalization.ConclusionsShifting long‐term care for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates and potentially exacerbates disparities by race. The intensity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients.Implications for Policy or PracticeHospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes—not just expansion—need more attention.Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adults ; Bias ; Black people ; Clinical outcomes ; Dementia ; Funding ; Government programs ; Health status ; Heterogeneity ; Home health care ; Hospitalization ; Mathematical analysis ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Nurses ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Race ; Special Issue Abstract ; Special Issue Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.22-23</ispartof><rights>Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-f959b6f3f118b37f1b7ee78678255cf65dd1c219d8445806f311e4d214a3635a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440521/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440521/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,30982,45557,45558,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamara Konetzka, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorges, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghavi, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care</title><title>Health services research</title><description>Research ObjectiveExpanding home‐ and community‐based services (HCBS) as an alternative to nursing home care has become a priority for many state Medicaid programs. Whereas low‐income people with long‐term care needs used to have little choice but to move to a nursing home if they needed extensive assistance funded by Medicaid, now more than half of all Medicaid long‐term care funding goes to HCBS, with substantial variation by state and county. This shift in policy was motivated by widespread consumer preferences to avoid institutionalization and the hope that HCBS would save Medicaid money relative to nursing home care.However, these dramatic policy changes are being made on the basis of surprisingly little evidence about the outcomes of HCBS. HCBS inevitably involves a lower intensity of care than nursing home care and shifts some of the burden of care to untrained caregivers. Recent descriptive evidence shows higher hospitalization rates among HCBS users than nursing home residents, but descriptive correlations may suffer from selection bias. Our study provides the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and explores possible mechanisms for the effect.Study DesignWe use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data set, a national compilation of Medicaid claims, in a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. We combine the MAX data with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable, and with state and county data on the percent of individuals receiving HCBS versus nursing home care. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long‐term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.Population StudiedOlder adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare. We also examine heterogeneity of the effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.Principal FindingsHCBS users have 13 percentage‐point higher annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed, with an even larger difference among those with dementia. These differences exist within as well as across counties, ruling out differences in state policy or county‐level health infrastructure as primary explanations. Differences are smaller for those receiving more intensive HCBS. Furthermore, we find significant disparities by race, with blacks using HCBS at higher rates than whites but experiencing higher rates of hospitalization.ConclusionsShifting long‐term care for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates and potentially exacerbates disparities by race. The intensity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients.Implications for Policy or PracticeHospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes—not just expansion—need more attention.Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Special Issue Abstract</subject><subject>Special Issue Abstracts</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUTtPHDEQthCROAg1raXUC36udxsiOAGHdIAEpEhl-dbjw2h3DfYu0XVp0uc35pfEx6GTUsXNyPM9ZjQfQkeUHNP8TqhQsiiV4seUcyl20GTb2UUTQqgqasrEHtpP6ZkQUvFKTNCv64TPwfdLPAsd4KsQLHYh4u9hjHgGph2evuK7cWgymnBw-Aasb4y37_w_P39j01s8DV039n5Y5ca5SWDxPPTL_HmE2OGpiYDvoTWDfwM8BHw7xrQduUY_o0_OtAkOP-oB-nZ58TidFfO7q-vp2bxomFSicLWsF6XjjtJqwZWjCwWgqlJVTMrGldJa2jBa20oIWZHMpBSEZVQYXnJp-AE63fi-jIsObAP9EE2rX6LvTFzpYLz-F-n9k16GN62EIJLRbPDlwyCG1xHSoJ_zofq8s2aCSylKxurMOtmwmhhSiuC2EyjR67D0Ohq9jka_h5UV5Ubxw7ew-h9dzy4e7jfCv46CmWA</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Tamara Konetzka, R.</creator><creator>Jung, D.</creator><creator>Gorges, R.</creator><creator>Sanghavi, P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care</title><author>Tamara Konetzka, R. ; Jung, D. ; Gorges, R. ; Sanghavi, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-f959b6f3f118b37f1b7ee78678255cf65dd1c219d8445806f311e4d214a3635a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Special Issue Abstract</topic><topic>Special Issue Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamara Konetzka, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorges, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanghavi, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamara Konetzka, R.</au><au>Jung, D.</au><au>Gorges, R.</au><au>Sanghavi, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>22-23</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Research ObjectiveExpanding home‐ and community‐based services (HCBS) as an alternative to nursing home care has become a priority for many state Medicaid programs. Whereas low‐income people with long‐term care needs used to have little choice but to move to a nursing home if they needed extensive assistance funded by Medicaid, now more than half of all Medicaid long‐term care funding goes to HCBS, with substantial variation by state and county. This shift in policy was motivated by widespread consumer preferences to avoid institutionalization and the hope that HCBS would save Medicaid money relative to nursing home care.However, these dramatic policy changes are being made on the basis of surprisingly little evidence about the outcomes of HCBS. HCBS inevitably involves a lower intensity of care than nursing home care and shifts some of the burden of care to untrained caregivers. Recent descriptive evidence shows higher hospitalization rates among HCBS users than nursing home residents, but descriptive correlations may suffer from selection bias. Our study provides the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and explores possible mechanisms for the effect.Study DesignWe use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data set, a national compilation of Medicaid claims, in a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. We combine the MAX data with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable, and with state and county data on the percent of individuals receiving HCBS versus nursing home care. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long‐term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.Population StudiedOlder adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare. We also examine heterogeneity of the effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.Principal FindingsHCBS users have 13 percentage‐point higher annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed, with an even larger difference among those with dementia. These differences exist within as well as across counties, ruling out differences in state policy or county‐level health infrastructure as primary explanations. Differences are smaller for those receiving more intensive HCBS. Furthermore, we find significant disparities by race, with blacks using HCBS at higher rates than whites but experiencing higher rates of hospitalization.ConclusionsShifting long‐term care for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates and potentially exacerbates disparities by race. The intensity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients.Implications for Policy or PracticeHospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes—not just expansion—need more attention.Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.13354</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9124
ispartof Health services research, 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.22-23
issn 0017-9124
1475-6773
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7440521
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adults
Bias
Black people
Clinical outcomes
Dementia
Funding
Government programs
Health status
Heterogeneity
Home health care
Hospitalization
Mathematical analysis
Medicaid
Medicare
Nurses
Nursing homes
Older people
Race
Special Issue Abstract
Special Issue Abstracts
title Is Being Home Good for Your Health? Outcomes of Medicaid Home‐ and Community‐Based Long‐Term Care Relative to Nursing Home Care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T15%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Being%20Home%20Good%20for%20Your%20Health?%20Outcomes%20of%20Medicaid%20Home%E2%80%90%20and%20Community%E2%80%90Based%20Long%E2%80%90Term%20Care%20Relative%20to%20Nursing%20Home%20Care&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Tamara%20Konetzka,%20R.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=22-23&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.13354&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2435546229%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435546229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true