Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario

Central repositories of drug‐related information have the potential to reduce adverse events and inappropriate prescribing by enabling clinicians to access relevant details at the point of care. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Health developed the Digital Health Drug Repository (DHDR) to support cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health services research 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.43-43
Hauptverfasser: Soobiah, C., Phung, M., Tadrous, M., Bhatia, S., Jamieson, T., Desveaux, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue S1
container_start_page 43
container_title Health services research
container_volume 55
creator Soobiah, C.
Phung, M.
Tadrous, M.
Bhatia, S.
Jamieson, T.
Desveaux, L.
description Central repositories of drug‐related information have the potential to reduce adverse events and inappropriate prescribing by enabling clinicians to access relevant details at the point of care. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Health developed the Digital Health Drug Repository (DHDR) to support clinicians in developing a best possible medication history (BPMH). We conducted a formative evaluation of the DHDR to understand (1) the perceived clinical value DHDR; and (2) the barriers and enablers to adoption and meaningful use. A multimethod approach including semistructured interviews and an online clinician survey. Interview data were thematically analyzed, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health providers who were eligible to use the DHDR (irrespective of use). Thirty‐three interviews were conducted. Most participants were female (60%, n = 20), worked in acute care settings (46%, n = 15), and self‐reported using the DHDR > 4 times (78%, n = 26). Participants were satisfied with the DHDR as source of secondary information, but the absence of specific data such as medication instructions and prescribed medications that were not dispensed limited its utility. Poor integration with point‐of‐care systems further limited potential, with no perceived impact on the development of a BPMH. Of the 167 survey participants, the majority were female (82%, n = 137) and worked in acute care settings (58%, n = 90). Only 24% (n = 40) were actively using DHDR. DHDR users were neutral in their perceptions of the utility of DHDR (mean scores ranged 4.11‐4.76 on a 7‐point adjectival scale). Of the 76% (n = 127) who were not using the DHDR, many found access to medication information very important (mean scores ranged 6.22‐5.97). Reasons for not using DHDR included cumbersome process to gain access to DHDR and the perception that the repository was incomplete. Findings from this evaluation suggest that there is potential untapped value if a digital centralized medication repository is operationalized to align with clinician needs. Specifically, (1) integration with point‐of‐care systems; (2) comprehensive clinical data; and (3) quick and streamlined onboarding processes would facilitate meaningful use. Digital drug repositories can be a valuable tool for clinicians when determining a BPMH for a patient. Access to comprehensive medication information across the health care system can impr
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-6773.13385
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7440428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435551403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2115-70ed84d4df2eb12f6d56eee1128551f92fed00beda8bdff61606e843e441100f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMFKw0AQXUTBWj17DXiO3dlsku1FkLbaQqFQ9bxsktl0S5qNm0Tt35s2peDJuQwz896bxyPkHugjdDUCHod-FMfBIwSBCC_I4Ly5JANKIfbHwPg1uanrLaVUBIIPyGz2UxXWmTL3mg16i12l0saz-jhNTW4aVXhzVEWz8aauzb01VrY2jXV7z5TeqmyUM_aWXGlV1Hh36kPy8TJ7n8z95ep1MXle-ikDCP2YYiZ4xjPNMAGmoyyMEBGAiTAEPWYaM0oTzJRIMq0jiGiEggfIOQClOhiSp163apMdZimWjVOFrJzZKbeXVhn591Kajcztl4w5p5yJTuDhJODsZ4t1I7e2dWXnWTIehJ0LToMONepRqbN17VCfPwCVh7DlIVp5iFYew-4YUc_4NgXu_4PL-ext3RN_ARnygek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435551403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Soobiah, C. ; Phung, M. ; Tadrous, M. ; Bhatia, S. ; Jamieson, T. ; Desveaux, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soobiah, C. ; Phung, M. ; Tadrous, M. ; Bhatia, S. ; Jamieson, T. ; Desveaux, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Central repositories of drug‐related information have the potential to reduce adverse events and inappropriate prescribing by enabling clinicians to access relevant details at the point of care. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Health developed the Digital Health Drug Repository (DHDR) to support clinicians in developing a best possible medication history (BPMH). We conducted a formative evaluation of the DHDR to understand (1) the perceived clinical value DHDR; and (2) the barriers and enablers to adoption and meaningful use. A multimethod approach including semistructured interviews and an online clinician survey. Interview data were thematically analyzed, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health providers who were eligible to use the DHDR (irrespective of use). Thirty‐three interviews were conducted. Most participants were female (60%, n = 20), worked in acute care settings (46%, n = 15), and self‐reported using the DHDR &gt; 4 times (78%, n = 26). Participants were satisfied with the DHDR as source of secondary information, but the absence of specific data such as medication instructions and prescribed medications that were not dispensed limited its utility. Poor integration with point‐of‐care systems further limited potential, with no perceived impact on the development of a BPMH. Of the 167 survey participants, the majority were female (82%, n = 137) and worked in acute care settings (58%, n = 90). Only 24% (n = 40) were actively using DHDR. DHDR users were neutral in their perceptions of the utility of DHDR (mean scores ranged 4.11‐4.76 on a 7‐point adjectival scale). Of the 76% (n = 127) who were not using the DHDR, many found access to medication information very important (mean scores ranged 6.22‐5.97). Reasons for not using DHDR included cumbersome process to gain access to DHDR and the perception that the repository was incomplete. Findings from this evaluation suggest that there is potential untapped value if a digital centralized medication repository is operationalized to align with clinician needs. Specifically, (1) integration with point‐of‐care systems; (2) comprehensive clinical data; and (3) quick and streamlined onboarding processes would facilitate meaningful use. Digital drug repositories can be a valuable tool for clinicians when determining a BPMH for a patient. Access to comprehensive medication information across the health care system can improve efficiency and reduce medical errors. These applied insights can inform the operationalization and implementation of system‐wide strategies to improve their uptake and impact. Ontario Ministry of Health Canada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Access ; Acute services ; Critical incidents ; Data analysis ; Drugs ; Health care ; Inappropriateness ; Integrated care ; Integration ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Pharmacists ; Physicians ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Prescribing ; Repositories ; Special Issue Abstract ; Special Issue Abstracts ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.43-43</ispartof><rights>Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440428/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7440428/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soobiah, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phung, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadrous, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desveaux, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario</title><title>Health services research</title><description>Central repositories of drug‐related information have the potential to reduce adverse events and inappropriate prescribing by enabling clinicians to access relevant details at the point of care. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Health developed the Digital Health Drug Repository (DHDR) to support clinicians in developing a best possible medication history (BPMH). We conducted a formative evaluation of the DHDR to understand (1) the perceived clinical value DHDR; and (2) the barriers and enablers to adoption and meaningful use. A multimethod approach including semistructured interviews and an online clinician survey. Interview data were thematically analyzed, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health providers who were eligible to use the DHDR (irrespective of use). Thirty‐three interviews were conducted. Most participants were female (60%, n = 20), worked in acute care settings (46%, n = 15), and self‐reported using the DHDR &gt; 4 times (78%, n = 26). Participants were satisfied with the DHDR as source of secondary information, but the absence of specific data such as medication instructions and prescribed medications that were not dispensed limited its utility. Poor integration with point‐of‐care systems further limited potential, with no perceived impact on the development of a BPMH. Of the 167 survey participants, the majority were female (82%, n = 137) and worked in acute care settings (58%, n = 90). Only 24% (n = 40) were actively using DHDR. DHDR users were neutral in their perceptions of the utility of DHDR (mean scores ranged 4.11‐4.76 on a 7‐point adjectival scale). Of the 76% (n = 127) who were not using the DHDR, many found access to medication information very important (mean scores ranged 6.22‐5.97). Reasons for not using DHDR included cumbersome process to gain access to DHDR and the perception that the repository was incomplete. Findings from this evaluation suggest that there is potential untapped value if a digital centralized medication repository is operationalized to align with clinician needs. Specifically, (1) integration with point‐of‐care systems; (2) comprehensive clinical data; and (3) quick and streamlined onboarding processes would facilitate meaningful use. Digital drug repositories can be a valuable tool for clinicians when determining a BPMH for a patient. Access to comprehensive medication information across the health care system can improve efficiency and reduce medical errors. These applied insights can inform the operationalization and implementation of system‐wide strategies to improve their uptake and impact. Ontario Ministry of Health Canada.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Critical incidents</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Inappropriateness</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Prescribing</subject><subject>Repositories</subject><subject>Special Issue Abstract</subject><subject>Special Issue Abstracts</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMFKw0AQXUTBWj17DXiO3dlsku1FkLbaQqFQ9bxsktl0S5qNm0Tt35s2peDJuQwz896bxyPkHugjdDUCHod-FMfBIwSBCC_I4Ly5JANKIfbHwPg1uanrLaVUBIIPyGz2UxXWmTL3mg16i12l0saz-jhNTW4aVXhzVEWz8aauzb01VrY2jXV7z5TeqmyUM_aWXGlV1Hh36kPy8TJ7n8z95ep1MXle-ikDCP2YYiZ4xjPNMAGmoyyMEBGAiTAEPWYaM0oTzJRIMq0jiGiEggfIOQClOhiSp163apMdZimWjVOFrJzZKbeXVhn591Kajcztl4w5p5yJTuDhJODsZ4t1I7e2dWXnWTIehJ0LToMONepRqbN17VCfPwCVh7DlIVp5iFYew-4YUc_4NgXu_4PL-ext3RN_ARnygek</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Soobiah, C.</creator><creator>Phung, M.</creator><creator>Tadrous, M.</creator><creator>Bhatia, S.</creator><creator>Jamieson, T.</creator><creator>Desveaux, L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario</title><author>Soobiah, C. ; Phung, M. ; Tadrous, M. ; Bhatia, S. ; Jamieson, T. ; Desveaux, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2115-70ed84d4df2eb12f6d56eee1128551f92fed00beda8bdff61606e843e441100f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Critical incidents</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Inappropriateness</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Prescribing</topic><topic>Repositories</topic><topic>Special Issue Abstract</topic><topic>Special Issue Abstracts</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soobiah, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phung, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tadrous, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desveaux, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soobiah, C.</au><au>Phung, M.</au><au>Tadrous, M.</au><au>Bhatia, S.</au><au>Jamieson, T.</au><au>Desveaux, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>43-43</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Central repositories of drug‐related information have the potential to reduce adverse events and inappropriate prescribing by enabling clinicians to access relevant details at the point of care. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Health developed the Digital Health Drug Repository (DHDR) to support clinicians in developing a best possible medication history (BPMH). We conducted a formative evaluation of the DHDR to understand (1) the perceived clinical value DHDR; and (2) the barriers and enablers to adoption and meaningful use. A multimethod approach including semistructured interviews and an online clinician survey. Interview data were thematically analyzed, and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and allied health providers who were eligible to use the DHDR (irrespective of use). Thirty‐three interviews were conducted. Most participants were female (60%, n = 20), worked in acute care settings (46%, n = 15), and self‐reported using the DHDR &gt; 4 times (78%, n = 26). Participants were satisfied with the DHDR as source of secondary information, but the absence of specific data such as medication instructions and prescribed medications that were not dispensed limited its utility. Poor integration with point‐of‐care systems further limited potential, with no perceived impact on the development of a BPMH. Of the 167 survey participants, the majority were female (82%, n = 137) and worked in acute care settings (58%, n = 90). Only 24% (n = 40) were actively using DHDR. DHDR users were neutral in their perceptions of the utility of DHDR (mean scores ranged 4.11‐4.76 on a 7‐point adjectival scale). Of the 76% (n = 127) who were not using the DHDR, many found access to medication information very important (mean scores ranged 6.22‐5.97). Reasons for not using DHDR included cumbersome process to gain access to DHDR and the perception that the repository was incomplete. Findings from this evaluation suggest that there is potential untapped value if a digital centralized medication repository is operationalized to align with clinician needs. Specifically, (1) integration with point‐of‐care systems; (2) comprehensive clinical data; and (3) quick and streamlined onboarding processes would facilitate meaningful use. Digital drug repositories can be a valuable tool for clinicians when determining a BPMH for a patient. Access to comprehensive medication information across the health care system can improve efficiency and reduce medical errors. These applied insights can inform the operationalization and implementation of system‐wide strategies to improve their uptake and impact. Ontario Ministry of Health Canada.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.13385</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9124
ispartof Health services research, 2020-08, Vol.55 (S1), p.43-43
issn 0017-9124
1475-6773
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7440428
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Access
Acute services
Critical incidents
Data analysis
Drugs
Health care
Inappropriateness
Integrated care
Integration
Interviews
Medical personnel
Nurses
Pharmacists
Physicians
Polls & surveys
Prescribing
Repositories
Special Issue Abstract
Special Issue Abstracts
Uptake
title Exploring the Impact of the Digital Health Drug Repository in Ontario
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A23%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20Impact%20of%20the%20Digital%20Health%20Drug%20Repository%20in%20Ontario&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Soobiah,%20C.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=43-43&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.13385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2435551403%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435551403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true