Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery

Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of maxillofacial surgery 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.3-9
Hauptverfasser: Rahimov, Chingiz R, Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G, Rahimli, Masuma Ch, Farzaliyev, Ismayil M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Annals of maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 10
creator Rahimov, Chingiz R
Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G
Rahimli, Masuma Ch
Farzaliyev, Ismayil M
description Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A - 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B - 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ams.ams_183_19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7433943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2438679337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-88e3cc464da8a70aa2da4839441cd3a8876fbcc770ec8e032d5553c904ad5cde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUE1LAzEQDaLYUnv1KHv0sjXZyW6yBwWxfkGhoPUc0uy0jexHTXYL_femtFYdGGaYefPe8Ai5ZHTEGYUbXflRSMUkKJafkH6S8DwGybLTXQ8spoJnPTL0_pOGCAsJyTnpQSLTNKeiT25nK4cYj22FtbdNrctobPWybrz1ka2jqZvbNgzf0DS1b11nWrvB6L1zS3TbC3K20KXH4aEOyMfT4-zhJZ5Mn18f7iexAZrmsZQIxvCMF1pqQbVOCs0l5JwzU4CWUmSLuTFCUDQSKSRFmqZgcsp1kZoCYUDu9rzrbl5hYbBunS7V2tlKu61qtFX_N7VdqWWzUYJDkIFAcH0gcM1Xh75VlfUGy1LX2HReJRxkJnIAEaCjPdS4xnuHi6MMo2pnu9pZ_mt7OLj6-9wR_mMyfAOFFoEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438679337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Rahimov, Chingiz R ; Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G ; Rahimli, Masuma Ch ; Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahimov, Chingiz R ; Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G ; Rahimli, Masuma Ch ; Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</creatorcontrib><description>Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A - 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B - 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-3816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_183_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32855907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</publisher><subject>Original - Comparative Study</subject><ispartof>Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.3-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-88e3cc464da8a70aa2da4839441cd3a8876fbcc770ec8e032d5553c904ad5cde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-88e3cc464da8a70aa2da4839441cd3a8876fbcc770ec8e032d5553c904ad5cde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433943/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7433943/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahimov, Chingiz R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimli, Masuma Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</creatorcontrib><title>Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery</title><title>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A - 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B - 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually.</description><subject>Original - Comparative Study</subject><issn>2231-0746</issn><issn>2249-3816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUE1LAzEQDaLYUnv1KHv0sjXZyW6yBwWxfkGhoPUc0uy0jexHTXYL_femtFYdGGaYefPe8Ai5ZHTEGYUbXflRSMUkKJafkH6S8DwGybLTXQ8spoJnPTL0_pOGCAsJyTnpQSLTNKeiT25nK4cYj22FtbdNrctobPWybrz1ka2jqZvbNgzf0DS1b11nWrvB6L1zS3TbC3K20KXH4aEOyMfT4-zhJZ5Mn18f7iexAZrmsZQIxvCMF1pqQbVOCs0l5JwzU4CWUmSLuTFCUDQSKSRFmqZgcsp1kZoCYUDu9rzrbl5hYbBunS7V2tlKu61qtFX_N7VdqWWzUYJDkIFAcH0gcM1Xh75VlfUGy1LX2HReJRxkJnIAEaCjPdS4xnuHi6MMo2pnu9pZ_mt7OLj6-9wR_mMyfAOFFoEU</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Rahimov, Chingiz R</creator><creator>Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G</creator><creator>Rahimli, Masuma Ch</creator><creator>Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery</title><author>Rahimov, Chingiz R ; Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G ; Rahimli, Masuma Ch ; Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3059-88e3cc464da8a70aa2da4839441cd3a8876fbcc770ec8e032d5553c904ad5cde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original - Comparative Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahimov, Chingiz R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimli, Masuma Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahimov, Chingiz R</au><au>Ahmadov, Sirajaddin G</au><au>Rahimli, Masuma Ch</au><au>Farzaliyev, Ismayil M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Annals of maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>3-9</pages><issn>2231-0746</issn><eissn>2249-3816</eissn><abstract>Orbital floor fractures are common among mid-face fractures. The general aim of treatment is to restore orbital volume and anatomy with grafts or reconstructive materials. Malpositioning of the implants and inadequate volume restorations are common complications of these procedures. The aim of our study is to present the surgical outcomes of orbital reconstruction aided by our algorithm of patient-specific virtual planning. The current study was performed on 77 patients with orbital wall fractures who were categorized into two groups: Group A - 42 patients (virtual planning) and Group B - 35 patients (traditional approach). Criteria of analysis included the presence of diplopia postoperatively and duration of surgical procedures. Diplopia was recorded right after surgery in 16 cases (38.1%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. However, 6 months postreconstruction, residual diplopia was recorded in 4 cases (9.5%) of Group A and in 12 cases (34.3%) of Group B. Mean operation time in Group A for the patients with isolated zygoma fracture was 2.23 h; for isolated orbital wall fracture was 1.98 h; and for combined zygoma, orbital wall, and facial bone fracture was 3.07 h. In Group B, these indexes were 3.47, 2.05, and 3.31 h, respectively. Application of virtual planning could significantly improve postoperative outcomes in orbital reconstruction. However, application of this technology could be limited by complicated defects of the orbital walls, which would require complex shape of the implant that might be difficult to be prevent virtually.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</pub><pmid>32855907</pmid><doi>10.4103/ams.ams_183_19</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2231-0746
ispartof Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.3-9
issn 2231-0746
2249-3816
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7433943
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Original - Comparative Study
title Three-Dimensional Diagnosis in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-Dimensional%20Diagnosis%20in%20Orbital%20Reconstructive%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Rahimov,%20Chingiz%20R&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=3-9&rft.issn=2231-0746&rft.eissn=2249-3816&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ams.ams_183_19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2438679337%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438679337&rft_id=info:pmid/32855907&rfr_iscdi=true