Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry
Emissions of C2‐C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS‐Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface, and column observations to (1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric ab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.1148-1169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1148 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A. Henderson, B. H. Keller, C. A. Travis, K. Mahieu, E. Franco, B. Estes, M. Helmig, D. Fried, A. Richter, D. Weibring, P. Walega, J. Blake, D. R. Hannigan, J. W. Ortega, I. Conway, S. Strong, K. Fischer, E. V. |
description | Emissions of C2‐C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS‐Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface, and column observations to (1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric abundances of C2‐C5 alkanes over the United States and (2) estimate the contribution of emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry to these patterns. The oil and gas sector in the updated 2011NEI contributes over 80% of the total U.S. emissions of ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), and emissions of these species are largest in the central United States. Observed mixing ratios of C2‐C5 alkanes show enhancements over the central United States below 2 km. A nested GEOS‐Chem simulation underpredicts observed C3H8 mixing ratios in the boundary layer over several U.S. regions, and the relative underprediction is not consistent, suggesting C3H8 emissions should receive more attention moving forward. Our decision to consider only C4‐C5 alkane emissions as a single lumped species produces a geographic distribution similar to observations. Due to the increasing importance of oil and gas emissions in the United States, we recommend continued support of existing long‐term measurements of C2‐C5 alkanes. We suggest additional monitoring of C2‐C5 alkanes downwind of northeastern Colorado, Wyoming, and western North Dakota to capture changes in these regions. The atmospheric chemistry modeling community should also evaluate whether chemical mechanisms that lump larger alkanes are sufficient to understand air quality issues in regions with large emissions of these species.
Key Points
Oil and gas development is the largest source of ethane and propane in the United States; this sector is the third largest source of C4‐C5 alkanes
Propane is underpredicted over several U.S. regions
Boundary layer enhancements of C2‐C5 alkanes mixing ratios are largest over the central United States |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JD028955 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7433792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2181014128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-l2892-27b024f795e989c7f435dc403e4cfd054b99720060e58e67bcd9d320cc8d6e473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUcFqGzEQFaUhCUlu-QBBz3akkbQrXQrGSVwHQ6BJoJcitFqtrVS7cqXdFN_6Cf3Gfkm3TjDtXGZg5r15Mw-hS0qmlIC6AkLl3TUBqYR4h06BFmoilSreH-ryywm6yPmZjCEJ44IfoxMGkgGjcIq-zvo25u3GJW_xst0Gb03vY5dxbPDKpLXDc_j989dc4Fn4ZjqHb1qf837iNsUW9xuHn6YPU3zvAzZdjRcm42VXD7lPu3N01JiQ3cVbPkNPtzeP80-T1f1iOZ-tJmFUDhMoKwK8KZVwSipbNpyJ2nLCHLdNTQSvlCqBkII4IV1RVrZWNQNirawLx0t2hj6-8m6HqnW1dV2fTNDb5FuTdjoar__vdH6j1_FFl5yxUsFIwF4Jgndrp2OqvH6BPXBfD2GtjdWV0wCF1MAIl2xEfXhbm-L3weVeP8chdeOlGqikhHI6PvrA_cMHtzuIokT_tVD_a6G-W3y-FoIWwP4AbgmNlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2181014128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A. ; Henderson, B. H. ; Keller, C. A. ; Travis, K. ; Mahieu, E. ; Franco, B. ; Estes, M. ; Helmig, D. ; Fried, A. ; Richter, D. ; Weibring, P. ; Walega, J. ; Blake, D. R. ; Hannigan, J. W. ; Ortega, I. ; Conway, S. ; Strong, K. ; Fischer, E. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A. ; Henderson, B. H. ; Keller, C. A. ; Travis, K. ; Mahieu, E. ; Franco, B. ; Estes, M. ; Helmig, D. ; Fried, A. ; Richter, D. ; Weibring, P. ; Walega, J. ; Blake, D. R. ; Hannigan, J. W. ; Ortega, I. ; Conway, S. ; Strong, K. ; Fischer, E. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Emissions of C2‐C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS‐Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface, and column observations to (1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric abundances of C2‐C5 alkanes over the United States and (2) estimate the contribution of emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry to these patterns. The oil and gas sector in the updated 2011NEI contributes over 80% of the total U.S. emissions of ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), and emissions of these species are largest in the central United States. Observed mixing ratios of C2‐C5 alkanes show enhancements over the central United States below 2 km. A nested GEOS‐Chem simulation underpredicts observed C3H8 mixing ratios in the boundary layer over several U.S. regions, and the relative underprediction is not consistent, suggesting C3H8 emissions should receive more attention moving forward. Our decision to consider only C4‐C5 alkane emissions as a single lumped species produces a geographic distribution similar to observations. Due to the increasing importance of oil and gas emissions in the United States, we recommend continued support of existing long‐term measurements of C2‐C5 alkanes. We suggest additional monitoring of C2‐C5 alkanes downwind of northeastern Colorado, Wyoming, and western North Dakota to capture changes in these regions. The atmospheric chemistry modeling community should also evaluate whether chemical mechanisms that lump larger alkanes are sufficient to understand air quality issues in regions with large emissions of these species.
Key Points
Oil and gas development is the largest source of ethane and propane in the United States; this sector is the third largest source of C4‐C5 alkanes
Propane is underpredicted over several U.S. regions
Boundary layer enhancements of C2‐C5 alkanes mixing ratios are largest over the central United States</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028955</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32832312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>2011NEI ; Air quality ; Airborne observation ; Aircraft industry ; Alkanes ; Atmospheric chemistry ; atmospheric composition and trends ; Atmospheric models ; atmospheric monitoring ; Boundary layers ; butanes and pentanes ; Computer simulation ; Earth sciences & physical geography ; Emissions ; Ethane ; Gas industry ; Geographical distribution ; Geophysics ; GEOS-Chem ; light alkanes ; Mixing ratio ; Modelling ; oil and gas ; oil and gas emissions ; Oil and gas industries ; Oil and gas industry ; Organic chemistry ; Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences ; Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre ; propane ; Regions ; Sciences de la terre & géographie physique ; Simulation ; Spatial distribution ; Species</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.1148-1169</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8298-3669 ; 0000-0003-0736-458X ; 0000-0002-5230-3527 ; 0000-0001-6205-9698 ; 0000-0001-9947-1053 ; 0000-0003-3420-0783 ; 0000-0002-8283-5014 ; 0000-0002-2156-031X ; 0000-0003-1612-1651 ; 0000-0002-6755-3051 ; 0000-0002-5251-0286 ; 0000-0003-1628-0353 ; 0000-0002-4269-1677 ; 0000-0002-0552-4298 ; 0000-0002-0067-617X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JD028955$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JD028955$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahieu, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmig, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weibring, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walega, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannigan, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, E. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Emissions of C2‐C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS‐Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface, and column observations to (1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric abundances of C2‐C5 alkanes over the United States and (2) estimate the contribution of emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry to these patterns. The oil and gas sector in the updated 2011NEI contributes over 80% of the total U.S. emissions of ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), and emissions of these species are largest in the central United States. Observed mixing ratios of C2‐C5 alkanes show enhancements over the central United States below 2 km. A nested GEOS‐Chem simulation underpredicts observed C3H8 mixing ratios in the boundary layer over several U.S. regions, and the relative underprediction is not consistent, suggesting C3H8 emissions should receive more attention moving forward. Our decision to consider only C4‐C5 alkane emissions as a single lumped species produces a geographic distribution similar to observations. Due to the increasing importance of oil and gas emissions in the United States, we recommend continued support of existing long‐term measurements of C2‐C5 alkanes. We suggest additional monitoring of C2‐C5 alkanes downwind of northeastern Colorado, Wyoming, and western North Dakota to capture changes in these regions. The atmospheric chemistry modeling community should also evaluate whether chemical mechanisms that lump larger alkanes are sufficient to understand air quality issues in regions with large emissions of these species.
Key Points
Oil and gas development is the largest source of ethane and propane in the United States; this sector is the third largest source of C4‐C5 alkanes
Propane is underpredicted over several U.S. regions
Boundary layer enhancements of C2‐C5 alkanes mixing ratios are largest over the central United States</description><subject>2011NEI</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Airborne observation</subject><subject>Aircraft industry</subject><subject>Alkanes</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>atmospheric composition and trends</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>atmospheric monitoring</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>butanes and pentanes</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Earth sciences & physical geography</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Ethane</subject><subject>Gas industry</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>GEOS-Chem</subject><subject>light alkanes</subject><subject>Mixing ratio</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>oil and gas</subject><subject>oil and gas emissions</subject><subject>Oil and gas industries</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences</subject><subject>Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre</subject><subject>propane</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Sciences de la terre & géographie physique</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUcFqGzEQFaUhCUlu-QBBz3akkbQrXQrGSVwHQ6BJoJcitFqtrVS7cqXdFN_6Cf3Gfkm3TjDtXGZg5r15Mw-hS0qmlIC6AkLl3TUBqYR4h06BFmoilSreH-ryywm6yPmZjCEJ44IfoxMGkgGjcIq-zvo25u3GJW_xst0Gb03vY5dxbPDKpLXDc_j989dc4Fn4ZjqHb1qf837iNsUW9xuHn6YPU3zvAzZdjRcm42VXD7lPu3N01JiQ3cVbPkNPtzeP80-T1f1iOZ-tJmFUDhMoKwK8KZVwSipbNpyJ2nLCHLdNTQSvlCqBkII4IV1RVrZWNQNirawLx0t2hj6-8m6HqnW1dV2fTNDb5FuTdjoar__vdH6j1_FFl5yxUsFIwF4Jgndrp2OqvH6BPXBfD2GtjdWV0wCF1MAIl2xEfXhbm-L3weVeP8chdeOlGqikhHI6PvrA_cMHtzuIokT_tVD_a6G-W3y-FoIWwP4AbgmNlQ</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A.</creator><creator>Henderson, B. H.</creator><creator>Keller, C. A.</creator><creator>Travis, K.</creator><creator>Mahieu, E.</creator><creator>Franco, B.</creator><creator>Estes, M.</creator><creator>Helmig, D.</creator><creator>Fried, A.</creator><creator>Richter, D.</creator><creator>Weibring, P.</creator><creator>Walega, J.</creator><creator>Blake, D. R.</creator><creator>Hannigan, J. W.</creator><creator>Ortega, I.</creator><creator>Conway, S.</creator><creator>Strong, K.</creator><creator>Fischer, E. V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>Q33</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-3669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-458X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-3527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-9698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-1053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-0783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-5014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-031X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-1651</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6755-3051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-0286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-0353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4269-1677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-4298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-617X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry</title><author>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A. ; Henderson, B. H. ; Keller, C. A. ; Travis, K. ; Mahieu, E. ; Franco, B. ; Estes, M. ; Helmig, D. ; Fried, A. ; Richter, D. ; Weibring, P. ; Walega, J. ; Blake, D. R. ; Hannigan, J. W. ; Ortega, I. ; Conway, S. ; Strong, K. ; Fischer, E. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-l2892-27b024f795e989c7f435dc403e4cfd054b99720060e58e67bcd9d320cc8d6e473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>2011NEI</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Airborne observation</topic><topic>Aircraft industry</topic><topic>Alkanes</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>atmospheric composition and trends</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>atmospheric monitoring</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>butanes and pentanes</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Earth sciences & physical geography</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Ethane</topic><topic>Gas industry</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>GEOS-Chem</topic><topic>light alkanes</topic><topic>Mixing ratio</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>oil and gas</topic><topic>oil and gas emissions</topic><topic>Oil and gas industries</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences</topic><topic>Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre</topic><topic>propane</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Sciences de la terre & géographie physique</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, B. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travis, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahieu, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helmig, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weibring, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walega, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannigan, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strong, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, E. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Université de Liège - Open Repository and Bibliography (ORBI)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tzompa‐Sosa, Z. A.</au><au>Henderson, B. H.</au><au>Keller, C. A.</au><au>Travis, K.</au><au>Mahieu, E.</au><au>Franco, B.</au><au>Estes, M.</au><au>Helmig, D.</au><au>Fried, A.</au><au>Richter, D.</au><au>Weibring, P.</au><au>Walega, J.</au><au>Blake, D. R.</au><au>Hannigan, J. W.</au><au>Ortega, I.</au><au>Conway, S.</au><au>Strong, K.</au><au>Fischer, E. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1148</spage><epage>1169</epage><pages>1148-1169</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Emissions of C2‐C5 alkanes from the U.S. oil and gas sector have changed rapidly over the last decade. We use a nested GEOS‐Chem simulation driven by updated 2011NEI emissions with aircraft, surface, and column observations to (1) examine spatial patterns in the emissions and observed atmospheric abundances of C2‐C5 alkanes over the United States and (2) estimate the contribution of emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry to these patterns. The oil and gas sector in the updated 2011NEI contributes over 80% of the total U.S. emissions of ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), and emissions of these species are largest in the central United States. Observed mixing ratios of C2‐C5 alkanes show enhancements over the central United States below 2 km. A nested GEOS‐Chem simulation underpredicts observed C3H8 mixing ratios in the boundary layer over several U.S. regions, and the relative underprediction is not consistent, suggesting C3H8 emissions should receive more attention moving forward. Our decision to consider only C4‐C5 alkane emissions as a single lumped species produces a geographic distribution similar to observations. Due to the increasing importance of oil and gas emissions in the United States, we recommend continued support of existing long‐term measurements of C2‐C5 alkanes. We suggest additional monitoring of C2‐C5 alkanes downwind of northeastern Colorado, Wyoming, and western North Dakota to capture changes in these regions. The atmospheric chemistry modeling community should also evaluate whether chemical mechanisms that lump larger alkanes are sufficient to understand air quality issues in regions with large emissions of these species.
Key Points
Oil and gas development is the largest source of ethane and propane in the United States; this sector is the third largest source of C4‐C5 alkanes
Propane is underpredicted over several U.S. regions
Boundary layer enhancements of C2‐C5 alkanes mixing ratios are largest over the central United States</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32832312</pmid><doi>10.1029/2018JD028955</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-3669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-458X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-3527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-9698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-1053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-0783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8283-5014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-031X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-1651</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6755-3051</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-0286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-0353</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4269-1677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-4298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-617X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-01, Vol.124 (2), p.1148-1169 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7433792 |
source | Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Wiley Blackwell Journals |
subjects | 2011NEI Air quality Airborne observation Aircraft industry Alkanes Atmospheric chemistry atmospheric composition and trends Atmospheric models atmospheric monitoring Boundary layers butanes and pentanes Computer simulation Earth sciences & physical geography Emissions Ethane Gas industry Geographical distribution Geophysics GEOS-Chem light alkanes Mixing ratio Modelling oil and gas oil and gas emissions Oil and gas industries Oil and gas industry Organic chemistry Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre propane Regions Sciences de la terre & géographie physique Simulation Spatial distribution Species |
title | Atmospheric Implications of Large C2‐C5 Alkane Emissions From the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20Implications%20of%20Large%20C2%E2%80%90C5%20Alkane%20Emissions%20From%20the%20U.S.%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Tzompa%E2%80%90Sosa,%20Z.%20A.&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1148&rft.epage=1169&rft.pages=1148-1169&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JD028955&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2181014128%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2181014128&rft_id=info:pmid/32832312&rfr_iscdi=true |