Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

Objectives To prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 fe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4847-4856
Hauptverfasser: Pamminger, Mathias, Klug, Gert, Kranewitter, Christof, Reindl, Martin, Reinstadler, Sebastian J., Henninger, Benjamin, Tiller, Christina, Holzknecht, Magdalena, Kremser, Christian, Bauer, Axel, Jaschke, Werner, Metzler, Bernhard, Mayr, Agnes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4856
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4847
container_title European radiology
container_volume 30
creator Pamminger, Mathias
Klug, Gert
Kranewitter, Christof
Reindl, Martin
Reinstadler, Sebastian J.
Henninger, Benjamin
Tiller, Christina
Holzknecht, Magdalena
Kremser, Christian
Bauer, Axel
Jaschke, Werner
Metzler, Bernhard
Mayr, Agnes
description Objectives To prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 female [58%]) referred for TAVI evaluation underwent QISS-MRA for aortoiliofemoral access guidance and non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) “whole heart” MRI for prosthesis sizing on a 1.5-T system. Contrast-enhanced CTA was performed as imaging gold standard for TAVI planning. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale; continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Results QISS-MRA and CTA-based measurements of aortoiliofemoral vessel diameters correlated moderately to very strong ( r  = 0.572 to 0.851, all p  ≤ 0.002) with good to excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.862 to 0.999, all p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7431439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434612118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-1f2fc0985b1285047b821e7adabf34ded083e1f4eaee1f841e02d69ba32763c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EotPCC7BAltiwMfjW2GaBVI0ojFRAQgNby3GcxFXGTm2nqCteHQ_TlsuChXUsne_85_ID8IzgVwRj8TpjzBhGmNbXSEaReABWhNcPwZI_BCusmERCKX4EjnO-xBgrwsVjcMQoI1JytQI_PsWAbAwlmVzgxy8bOKdYoo0T7GOC27NvGzgsvjPBujfwavEuWxcK8qG4dG0mmH0YJofyGAs0YfBxSGYeb6AP0MbdbJLPMcDvvozwrg1yYdzrdXC9fQIe9WbK7ultPAFfz99t1x_Qxef3m_XZBbJc8IJIT3uLlTxtCZWnmItWUuKE6UzbM965DkvmSM-dcTVIThymXaNaw6homOXsBLw96M5Lu3PdfodkJj0nvzPpRkfj9d-Z4Ec9xGstOKsnVVXg5a1AileLy0XvfD3FNJng4pI1rUxDVaNwRV_8g17GJYW6nqac8YZQQmSl6IGyKeacXH8_DMF6768--Kurv_qXv1rUoud_rnFfcmdoBdgByDUVBpd-9_6P7E8TPbNH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434612118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pamminger, Mathias ; Klug, Gert ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Kremser, Christian ; Bauer, Axel ; Jaschke, Werner ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</creator><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias ; Klug, Gert ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Kremser, Christian ; Bauer, Axel ; Jaschke, Werner ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 female [58%]) referred for TAVI evaluation underwent QISS-MRA for aortoiliofemoral access guidance and non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) “whole heart” MRI for prosthesis sizing on a 1.5-T system. Contrast-enhanced CTA was performed as imaging gold standard for TAVI planning. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale; continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Results QISS-MRA and CTA-based measurements of aortoiliofemoral vessel diameters correlated moderately to very strong ( r  = 0.572 to 0.851, all p  ≤ 0.002) with good to excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.862 to 0.999, all p  &lt; 0.0001) regarding QISS assessment. Mean diameters of the infrarenal aorta and iliofemoral vessels differed significantly (bias 0.37 to 0.98 mm, p  = 0.041 to &lt; 0.0001) between the two modalities. However, inter-method decision for transfemoral access route was comparable ( κ  = 0.866, p  &lt; 0.0001). Aortic root parameters assessed by 3D whole heart MRI strongly correlated ( r  = 0.679 to 0.887, all p  ≤ 0.0001) to CTA measurements. Conclusion QISS-MRA provides contrast-free access route evaluation in TAVI patients with moderate to strong correlations compared with CTA and substantial inter-observer agreement. Despite some significant differences in minimal vessel diameters, inter-method agreement for transfemoral accessibility is strong. Combination with 3D whole heart MRI facilitates unenhanced TAVI guidance. Key Points • QISS-MRA and CTA inter-method agreement for transfemoral approach is strong. • QISS-MRA is a very good alternative to CTA and MRA especially in patients with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiativestages 4 and 5. • Combination of QISS-MRA and 3D “whole heart” MRI facilitates fully unenhanced TAVI guidance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32318849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Access routes ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiography ; Aorta ; Aortic valve ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Blood vessels ; Cardiac ; Computed tomography ; Computed Tomography Angiography - methods ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diameters ; Evaluation ; Female ; Heart ; Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis ; Heart Valve Diseases - surgery ; Heart valves ; Humans ; Image enhancement ; Image quality ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Kidney diseases ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neuroradiology ; Prostheses ; Quality assessment ; Radiology ; Regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rheumatic heart disease ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4847-4856</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-1f2fc0985b1285047b821e7adabf34ded083e1f4eaee1f841e02d69ba32763c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-1f2fc0985b1285047b821e7adabf34ded083e1f4eaee1f841e02d69ba32763c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranewitter, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henninger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaschke, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><title>Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 female [58%]) referred for TAVI evaluation underwent QISS-MRA for aortoiliofemoral access guidance and non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) “whole heart” MRI for prosthesis sizing on a 1.5-T system. Contrast-enhanced CTA was performed as imaging gold standard for TAVI planning. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale; continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Results QISS-MRA and CTA-based measurements of aortoiliofemoral vessel diameters correlated moderately to very strong ( r  = 0.572 to 0.851, all p  ≤ 0.002) with good to excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.862 to 0.999, all p  &lt; 0.0001) regarding QISS assessment. Mean diameters of the infrarenal aorta and iliofemoral vessels differed significantly (bias 0.37 to 0.98 mm, p  = 0.041 to &lt; 0.0001) between the two modalities. However, inter-method decision for transfemoral access route was comparable ( κ  = 0.866, p  &lt; 0.0001). Aortic root parameters assessed by 3D whole heart MRI strongly correlated ( r  = 0.679 to 0.887, all p  ≤ 0.0001) to CTA measurements. Conclusion QISS-MRA provides contrast-free access route evaluation in TAVI patients with moderate to strong correlations compared with CTA and substantial inter-observer agreement. Despite some significant differences in minimal vessel diameters, inter-method agreement for transfemoral accessibility is strong. Combination with 3D whole heart MRI facilitates unenhanced TAVI guidance. Key Points • QISS-MRA and CTA inter-method agreement for transfemoral approach is strong. • QISS-MRA is a very good alternative to CTA and MRA especially in patients with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiativestages 4 and 5. • Combination of QISS-MRA and 3D “whole heart” MRI facilitates fully unenhanced TAVI guidance.</description><subject>Access routes</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic valve</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Cardiac</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Heart valves</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rheumatic heart disease</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EotPCC7BAltiwMfjW2GaBVI0ojFRAQgNby3GcxFXGTm2nqCteHQ_TlsuChXUsne_85_ID8IzgVwRj8TpjzBhGmNbXSEaReABWhNcPwZI_BCusmERCKX4EjnO-xBgrwsVjcMQoI1JytQI_PsWAbAwlmVzgxy8bOKdYoo0T7GOC27NvGzgsvjPBujfwavEuWxcK8qG4dG0mmH0YJofyGAs0YfBxSGYeb6AP0MbdbJLPMcDvvozwrg1yYdzrdXC9fQIe9WbK7ultPAFfz99t1x_Qxef3m_XZBbJc8IJIT3uLlTxtCZWnmItWUuKE6UzbM965DkvmSM-dcTVIThymXaNaw6homOXsBLw96M5Lu3PdfodkJj0nvzPpRkfj9d-Z4Ec9xGstOKsnVVXg5a1AileLy0XvfD3FNJng4pI1rUxDVaNwRV_8g17GJYW6nqac8YZQQmSl6IGyKeacXH8_DMF6768--Kurv_qXv1rUoud_rnFfcmdoBdgByDUVBpd-9_6P7E8TPbNH</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Pamminger, Mathias</creator><creator>Klug, Gert</creator><creator>Kranewitter, Christof</creator><creator>Reindl, Martin</creator><creator>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creator><creator>Henninger, Benjamin</creator><creator>Tiller, Christina</creator><creator>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creator><creator>Kremser, Christian</creator><creator>Bauer, Axel</creator><creator>Jaschke, Werner</creator><creator>Metzler, Bernhard</creator><creator>Mayr, Agnes</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT</title><author>Pamminger, Mathias ; Klug, Gert ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Kremser, Christian ; Bauer, Axel ; Jaschke, Werner ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-1f2fc0985b1285047b821e7adabf34ded083e1f4eaee1f841e02d69ba32763c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access routes</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic valve</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Cardiac</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Heart valves</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rheumatic heart disease</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranewitter, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henninger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaschke, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pamminger, Mathias</au><au>Klug, Gert</au><au>Kranewitter, Christof</au><au>Reindl, Martin</au><au>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</au><au>Henninger, Benjamin</au><au>Tiller, Christina</au><au>Holzknecht, Magdalena</au><au>Kremser, Christian</au><au>Bauer, Axel</au><au>Jaschke, Werner</au><au>Metzler, Bernhard</au><au>Mayr, Agnes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4847</spage><epage>4856</epage><pages>4847-4856</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To prospectively compare unenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography (QISS-MRA) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) for contrast-free guidance in transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age 83 ± 5 years, 15 female [58%]) referred for TAVI evaluation underwent QISS-MRA for aortoiliofemoral access guidance and non-contrast three-dimensional (3D) “whole heart” MRI for prosthesis sizing on a 1.5-T system. Contrast-enhanced CTA was performed as imaging gold standard for TAVI planning. Image quality was assessed by a 4-point Likert scale; continuous MRA and CTA measurements were compared with regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Results QISS-MRA and CTA-based measurements of aortoiliofemoral vessel diameters correlated moderately to very strong ( r  = 0.572 to 0.851, all p  ≤ 0.002) with good to excellent inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.862 to 0.999, all p  &lt; 0.0001) regarding QISS assessment. Mean diameters of the infrarenal aorta and iliofemoral vessels differed significantly (bias 0.37 to 0.98 mm, p  = 0.041 to &lt; 0.0001) between the two modalities. However, inter-method decision for transfemoral access route was comparable ( κ  = 0.866, p  &lt; 0.0001). Aortic root parameters assessed by 3D whole heart MRI strongly correlated ( r  = 0.679 to 0.887, all p  ≤ 0.0001) to CTA measurements. Conclusion QISS-MRA provides contrast-free access route evaluation in TAVI patients with moderate to strong correlations compared with CTA and substantial inter-observer agreement. Despite some significant differences in minimal vessel diameters, inter-method agreement for transfemoral accessibility is strong. Combination with 3D whole heart MRI facilitates unenhanced TAVI guidance. Key Points • QISS-MRA and CTA inter-method agreement for transfemoral approach is strong. • QISS-MRA is a very good alternative to CTA and MRA especially in patients with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiativestages 4 and 5. • Combination of QISS-MRA and 3D “whole heart” MRI facilitates fully unenhanced TAVI guidance.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32318849</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.4847-4856
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7431439
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Access routes
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography
Aorta
Aortic valve
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - surgery
Blood vessels
Cardiac
Computed tomography
Computed Tomography Angiography - methods
Contrast Media - pharmacology
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Diagnostic Radiology
Diameters
Evaluation
Female
Heart
Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis
Heart Valve Diseases - surgery
Heart valves
Humans
Image enhancement
Image quality
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Kidney diseases
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
Magnetic resonance imaging
Male
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Prostheses
Quality assessment
Radiology
Regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Rheumatic heart disease
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods
Ultrasound
title Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-contrast%20MRI%20protocol%20for%20TAVI%20guidance:%20quiescent-interval%20single-shot%20angiography%20in%20comparison%20with%20contrast-enhanced%20CT&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Pamminger,%20Mathias&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4847&rft.epage=4856&rft.pages=4847-4856&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2434612118%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434612118&rft_id=info:pmid/32318849&rfr_iscdi=true