Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest

Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a “good person.” While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2020-08, Vol.117 (32), p.19080-19091
Hauptverfasser: Speer, Sebastian P. H., Smidts, Ale, Boksem, Maarten A. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19091
container_issue 32
container_start_page 19080
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 117
creator Speer, Sebastian P. H.
Smidts, Ale
Boksem, Maarten A. S.
description Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a “good person.” While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exact role of cognitive control in (dis)honesty remains elusive. Here we identify this role, by investigating the neural mechanism underlying cheating. We developed a task which allows for inconspicuously measuring spontaneous cheating on a trial-by-trial basis in the MRI scanner. We found that activity in the nucleus accumbens promotes cheating, particularly for individuals who cheat a lot, while a network consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex promotes honesty, particularly in individuals who are generally honest. Finally, activity in areas associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to be honest, whereas it enabled cheating for honest participants. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive control is not needed to be honest or dishonest per se but that it depends on an individual’s moral default.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.2003480117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7430999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26968682</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26968682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-3e0ce03ebb24321da781375fa77a73714b0d46b3ce7264b5698ebb680f33ce053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpaJy0554KC73kss7oYyXtpVBMPgqGXNKz0Mpj75q15Eq7Dv7vq8XGpTkJzfze4w2PkK8U5hQUv997m-YMgAsNlKoPZEahpqUUNXwkMwCmSi2YuCY3KW0BoK40fCLXnCmhKsVm5HURNr4bugMWLvghhr7ovItoE6aiDR7TcMyTwrVoB4ypaMbh9On8ZloMbUhYvLWhsBHPis_kam37hF_O7y35_fjwunguly9PvxY_l6UTWg4lR3AIHJuGCc7oyipNuarWVimruKKigZWQDXeomBRNJWudWalhzfMMKn5Lfpx892Ozw5XDfIDtzT52OxuPJtjO_L_xXWs24WCU4FDXdTa4OxvE8GfMyc2uSw773noMYzI5F0xBuM7o93foNozR5_MmimldAZ0M70-UiyGliOtLGApmasxMjZl_jWXFt5Nim4YQLziTtdRSM_4Xl2ySog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432885019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Speer, Sebastian P. H. ; Smidts, Ale ; Boksem, Maarten A. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Speer, Sebastian P. H. ; Smidts, Ale ; Boksem, Maarten A. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a “good person.” While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exact role of cognitive control in (dis)honesty remains elusive. Here we identify this role, by investigating the neural mechanism underlying cheating. We developed a task which allows for inconspicuously measuring spontaneous cheating on a trial-by-trial basis in the MRI scanner. We found that activity in the nucleus accumbens promotes cheating, particularly for individuals who cheat a lot, while a network consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex promotes honesty, particularly in individuals who are generally honest. Finally, activity in areas associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to be honest, whereas it enabled cheating for honest participants. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive control is not needed to be honest or dishonest per se but that it depends on an individual’s moral default.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003480117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32747572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Cheating ; Cognitive ability ; Cortex (cingulate) ; Cortex (frontal) ; Frontal gyrus ; Honesty ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Nucleus accumbens ; Prefrontal cortex ; Reinforcement ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2020-08, Vol.117 (32), p.19080-19091</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Aug 11, 2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-3e0ce03ebb24321da781375fa77a73714b0d46b3ce7264b5698ebb680f33ce053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-3e0ce03ebb24321da781375fa77a73714b0d46b3ce7264b5698ebb680f33ce053</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3803-7661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26968682$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26968682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,800,882,27905,27906,53772,53774,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speer, Sebastian P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidts, Ale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boksem, Maarten A. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><description>Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a “good person.” While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exact role of cognitive control in (dis)honesty remains elusive. Here we identify this role, by investigating the neural mechanism underlying cheating. We developed a task which allows for inconspicuously measuring spontaneous cheating on a trial-by-trial basis in the MRI scanner. We found that activity in the nucleus accumbens promotes cheating, particularly for individuals who cheat a lot, while a network consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex promotes honesty, particularly in individuals who are generally honest. Finally, activity in areas associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to be honest, whereas it enabled cheating for honest participants. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive control is not needed to be honest or dishonest per se but that it depends on an individual’s moral default.</description><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cortex (cingulate)</subject><subject>Cortex (frontal)</subject><subject>Frontal gyrus</subject><subject>Honesty</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Nucleus accumbens</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpaJy0554KC73kss7oYyXtpVBMPgqGXNKz0Mpj75q15Eq7Dv7vq8XGpTkJzfze4w2PkK8U5hQUv997m-YMgAsNlKoPZEahpqUUNXwkMwCmSi2YuCY3KW0BoK40fCLXnCmhKsVm5HURNr4bugMWLvghhr7ovItoE6aiDR7TcMyTwrVoB4ypaMbh9On8ZloMbUhYvLWhsBHPis_kam37hF_O7y35_fjwunguly9PvxY_l6UTWg4lR3AIHJuGCc7oyipNuarWVimruKKigZWQDXeomBRNJWudWalhzfMMKn5Lfpx892Ozw5XDfIDtzT52OxuPJtjO_L_xXWs24WCU4FDXdTa4OxvE8GfMyc2uSw773noMYzI5F0xBuM7o93foNozR5_MmimldAZ0M70-UiyGliOtLGApmasxMjZl_jWXFt5Nim4YQLziTtdRSM_4Xl2ySog</recordid><startdate>20200811</startdate><enddate>20200811</enddate><creator>Speer, Sebastian P. H.</creator><creator>Smidts, Ale</creator><creator>Boksem, Maarten A. S.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-7661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200811</creationdate><title>Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest</title><author>Speer, Sebastian P. H. ; Smidts, Ale ; Boksem, Maarten A. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-3e0ce03ebb24321da781375fa77a73714b0d46b3ce7264b5698ebb680f33ce053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cortex (cingulate)</topic><topic>Cortex (frontal)</topic><topic>Frontal gyrus</topic><topic>Honesty</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Nucleus accumbens</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speer, Sebastian P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smidts, Ale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boksem, Maarten A. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speer, Sebastian P. H.</au><au>Smidts, Ale</au><au>Boksem, Maarten A. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><date>2020-08-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>19080</spage><epage>19091</epage><pages>19080-19091</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Every day, we are faced with the conflict between the temptation to cheat for financial gains and maintaining a positive image of ourselves as being a “good person.” While it has been proposed that cognitive control is needed to mediate this conflict between reward and our moral self-image, the exact role of cognitive control in (dis)honesty remains elusive. Here we identify this role, by investigating the neural mechanism underlying cheating. We developed a task which allows for inconspicuously measuring spontaneous cheating on a trial-by-trial basis in the MRI scanner. We found that activity in the nucleus accumbens promotes cheating, particularly for individuals who cheat a lot, while a network consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex promotes honesty, particularly in individuals who are generally honest. Finally, activity in areas associated with cognitive control (anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus) helped dishonest participants to be honest, whereas it enabled cheating for honest participants. Thus, our results suggest that cognitive control is not needed to be honest or dishonest per se but that it depends on an individual’s moral default.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>32747572</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.2003480117</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-7661</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2020-08, Vol.117 (32), p.19080-19091
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7430999
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Cheating
Cognitive ability
Cortex (cingulate)
Cortex (frontal)
Frontal gyrus
Honesty
Magnetic resonance imaging
Nucleus accumbens
Prefrontal cortex
Reinforcement
Social Sciences
title Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A17%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20control%20increases%20honesty%20in%20cheaters%20but%20cheating%20in%20those%20who%20are%20honest&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Speer,%20Sebastian%20P.%20H.&rft.date=2020-08-11&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=19080&rft.epage=19091&rft.pages=19080-19091&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.2003480117&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E26968682%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432885019&rft_id=info:pmid/32747572&rft_jstor_id=26968682&rfr_iscdi=true