Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imagi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627
Hauptverfasser: Whittier, D.E., Boyd, S.K., Burghardt, A.J., Paccou, J., Ghasem-Zadeh, A., Chapurlat, R., Engelke, K., Bouxsein, M.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1627
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1607
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 31
creator Whittier, D.E.
Boyd, S.K.
Burghardt, A.J.
Paccou, J.
Ghasem-Zadeh, A.
Chapurlat, R.
Engelke, K.
Bouxsein, M.L.
description Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems. Methods A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document. Results An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems. Conclusion This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7429313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433032648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUtRCIDgM_wAJZYgOLgB9xHG-QqgpapJHYgMTO8iTXE1eJndrOSPMR_DMuKQW6wBtL955z7usg9JKSd5QQ-T4RQlVbEUYqImreVuIR2tCa84qpRjxGG6K4rFRNv5-hZyldk0JSSj5FZ5zVoiVMbdCPy8X1MDoPCdsQcR4Am5QgpQl8xsHiffCAe_DJ5RM2vseT62IwsRtchi4vEbDz-OiOAS_J-QMe3GGoIqQwLtkFj2eIbh4gmhHfLMZnl012R8BdmOYlQ49zmMIhmnk4PUdPrBkTvLj7t-jbp49fL66q3ZfLzxfnu6oTQuZq31sJsrH93tZSECa5bYTqCFetapnYS2vAdr00TdOLEjItbbkFSW0jW04Z36IPq-687CfouzJqaU_P0U0mnnQwTv-b8W7Qh3DUsmaKU14E3q4CwwPa1flO38ZIXV4rmyMt2Dd3xWK4WSBlPbnUwTgaD2FJmtVEciqacrktev0Aeh2W6MsqCopzwllTtwXFVlS5Q0oR7H0HlOhbZ-jVGbo4Q_9yhhaF9Orvke8pv61QAHwFpJLyB4h_av9H9ie0_8gG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433032648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems. Methods A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document. Results An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems. Conclusion This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32458029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Bone Density ; Computed tomography ; Endocrinology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Measurement techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging ; Position Paper ; Quality control ; Radius ; Radius - diagnostic imaging ; Rheumatology ; Standardization ; Tibia ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627</ispartof><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7027-7414 ; 0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04444876$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paccou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapurlat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems. Methods A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document. Results An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems. Conclusion This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</description><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Position Paper</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Radius - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUtRCIDgM_wAJZYgOLgB9xHG-QqgpapJHYgMTO8iTXE1eJndrOSPMR_DMuKQW6wBtL955z7usg9JKSd5QQ-T4RQlVbEUYqImreVuIR2tCa84qpRjxGG6K4rFRNv5-hZyldk0JSSj5FZ5zVoiVMbdCPy8X1MDoPCdsQcR4Am5QgpQl8xsHiffCAe_DJ5RM2vseT62IwsRtchi4vEbDz-OiOAS_J-QMe3GGoIqQwLtkFj2eIbh4gmhHfLMZnl012R8BdmOYlQ49zmMIhmnk4PUdPrBkTvLj7t-jbp49fL66q3ZfLzxfnu6oTQuZq31sJsrH93tZSECa5bYTqCFetapnYS2vAdr00TdOLEjItbbkFSW0jW04Z36IPq-687CfouzJqaU_P0U0mnnQwTv-b8W7Qh3DUsmaKU14E3q4CwwPa1flO38ZIXV4rmyMt2Dd3xWK4WSBlPbnUwTgaD2FJmtVEciqacrktev0Aeh2W6MsqCopzwllTtwXFVlS5Q0oR7H0HlOhbZ-jVGbo4Q_9yhhaF9Orvke8pv61QAHwFpJLyB4h_av9H9ie0_8gG</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Whittier, D.E.</creator><creator>Boyd, S.K.</creator><creator>Burghardt, A.J.</creator><creator>Paccou, J.</creator><creator>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creator><creator>Chapurlat, R.</creator><creator>Engelke, K.</creator><creator>Bouxsein, M.L.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-7414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><author>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Position Paper</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Radius - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paccou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapurlat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittier, D.E.</au><au>Boyd, S.K.</au><au>Burghardt, A.J.</au><au>Paccou, J.</au><au>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</au><au>Chapurlat, R.</au><au>Engelke, K.</au><au>Bouxsein, M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1627</epage><pages>1607-1627</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems. Methods A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document. Results An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems. Conclusion This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>32458029</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-7414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7429313
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Bone Density
Computed tomography
Endocrinology
Humans
Life Sciences
Measurement techniques
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging
Position Paper
Quality control
Radius
Radius - diagnostic imaging
Rheumatology
Standardization
Tibia
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20bone%20density%20and%20microarchitecture%20in%20vivo%20using%20high-resolution%20peripheral%20quantitative%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Whittier,%20D.E.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1627&rft.pages=1607-1627&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2433032648%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433032648&rft_id=info:pmid/32458029&rfr_iscdi=true