Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography
Introduction The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imagi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Osteoporosis international 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1627 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1607 |
container_title | Osteoporosis international |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Whittier, D.E. Boyd, S.K. Burghardt, A.J. Paccou, J. Ghasem-Zadeh, A. Chapurlat, R. Engelke, K. Bouxsein, M.L. |
description | Introduction
The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems.
Methods
A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document.
Results
An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems.
Conclusion
This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7429313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433032648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUtRCIDgM_wAJZYgOLgB9xHG-QqgpapJHYgMTO8iTXE1eJndrOSPMR_DMuKQW6wBtL955z7usg9JKSd5QQ-T4RQlVbEUYqImreVuIR2tCa84qpRjxGG6K4rFRNv5-hZyldk0JSSj5FZ5zVoiVMbdCPy8X1MDoPCdsQcR4Am5QgpQl8xsHiffCAe_DJ5RM2vseT62IwsRtchi4vEbDz-OiOAS_J-QMe3GGoIqQwLtkFj2eIbh4gmhHfLMZnl012R8BdmOYlQ49zmMIhmnk4PUdPrBkTvLj7t-jbp49fL66q3ZfLzxfnu6oTQuZq31sJsrH93tZSECa5bYTqCFetapnYS2vAdr00TdOLEjItbbkFSW0jW04Z36IPq-687CfouzJqaU_P0U0mnnQwTv-b8W7Qh3DUsmaKU14E3q4CwwPa1flO38ZIXV4rmyMt2Dd3xWK4WSBlPbnUwTgaD2FJmtVEciqacrktev0Aeh2W6MsqCopzwllTtwXFVlS5Q0oR7H0HlOhbZ-jVGbo4Q_9yhhaF9Orvke8pv61QAHwFpJLyB4h_av9H9ie0_8gG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433032648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems.
Methods
A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document.
Results
An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems.
Conclusion
This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32458029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Bone Density ; Computed tomography ; Endocrinology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Measurement techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging ; Position Paper ; Quality control ; Radius ; Radius - diagnostic imaging ; Rheumatology ; Standardization ; Tibia ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627</ispartof><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2020.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7027-7414 ; 0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04444876$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paccou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapurlat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Introduction
The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems.
Methods
A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document.
Results
An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems.
Conclusion
This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</description><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Position Paper</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Radius - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ustu1DAUtRCIDgM_wAJZYgOLgB9xHG-QqgpapJHYgMTO8iTXE1eJndrOSPMR_DMuKQW6wBtL955z7usg9JKSd5QQ-T4RQlVbEUYqImreVuIR2tCa84qpRjxGG6K4rFRNv5-hZyldk0JSSj5FZ5zVoiVMbdCPy8X1MDoPCdsQcR4Am5QgpQl8xsHiffCAe_DJ5RM2vseT62IwsRtchi4vEbDz-OiOAS_J-QMe3GGoIqQwLtkFj2eIbh4gmhHfLMZnl012R8BdmOYlQ49zmMIhmnk4PUdPrBkTvLj7t-jbp49fL66q3ZfLzxfnu6oTQuZq31sJsrH93tZSECa5bYTqCFetapnYS2vAdr00TdOLEjItbbkFSW0jW04Z36IPq-687CfouzJqaU_P0U0mnnQwTv-b8W7Qh3DUsmaKU14E3q4CwwPa1flO38ZIXV4rmyMt2Dd3xWK4WSBlPbnUwTgaD2FJmtVEciqacrktev0Aeh2W6MsqCopzwllTtwXFVlS5Q0oR7H0HlOhbZ-jVGbo4Q_9yhhaF9Orvke8pv61QAHwFpJLyB4h_av9H9ie0_8gG</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Whittier, D.E.</creator><creator>Boyd, S.K.</creator><creator>Burghardt, A.J.</creator><creator>Paccou, J.</creator><creator>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creator><creator>Chapurlat, R.</creator><creator>Engelke, K.</creator><creator>Bouxsein, M.L.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-7414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</title><author>Whittier, D.E. ; Boyd, S.K. ; Burghardt, A.J. ; Paccou, J. ; Ghasem-Zadeh, A. ; Chapurlat, R. ; Engelke, K. ; Bouxsein, M.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-bdf7e76fdbf4750273f659c03989825b7faefcd7a66d5898a8183fe71f6783123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Position Paper</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Radius - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittier, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paccou, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapurlat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouxsein, M.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittier, D.E.</au><au>Boyd, S.K.</au><au>Burghardt, A.J.</au><au>Paccou, J.</au><au>Ghasem-Zadeh, A.</au><au>Chapurlat, R.</au><au>Engelke, K.</au><au>Bouxsein, M.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1627</epage><pages>1607-1627</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The application of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to assess bone microarchitecture has grown rapidly since its introduction in 2005. As the use of HR-pQCT for clinical research continues to grow, there is an urgent need to form a consensus on imaging and analysis methodologies so that studies can be appropriately compared. In addition, with the recent introduction of the second-generation HrpQCT, which differs from the first-generation HR-pQCT in scan region, resolution, and morphological measurement techniques, there is a need for guidelines on appropriate reporting of results and considerations as the field adopts newer systems.
Methods
A joint working group between the International Osteoporosis Foundation, American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, and European Calcified Tissue Society convened in person and by teleconference over several years to produce the guidelines and recommendations presented in this document.
Results
An overview and discussion is provided for (1) standardized protocol for imaging distal radius and tibia sites using HR-pQCT, with the importance of quality control and operator training discussed; (2) standardized terminology and recommendations on reporting results; (3) factors influencing accuracy and precision error, with considerations for longitudinal and multi-center study designs; and finally (4) comparison between scanner generations and other high-resolution CT systems.
Conclusion
This article addresses the need for standardization of HR-pQCT imaging techniques and terminology, provides guidance on interpretation and reporting of results, and discusses unresolved issues in the field.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>32458029</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-7414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8214-6385</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-941X |
ispartof | Osteoporosis international, 2020-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1607-1627 |
issn | 0937-941X 1433-2965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7429313 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Bone Density Computed tomography Endocrinology Humans Life Sciences Measurement techniques Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopedics Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging Position Paper Quality control Radius Radius - diagnostic imaging Rheumatology Standardization Tibia Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20bone%20density%20and%20microarchitecture%20in%20vivo%20using%20high-resolution%20peripheral%20quantitative%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Whittier,%20D.E.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1627&rft.pages=1607-1627&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-020-05438-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2433032648%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433032648&rft_id=info:pmid/32458029&rfr_iscdi=true |