Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category
Objective To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation. Study design 2010–2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35–42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of perinatology 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.468-477 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 477 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 468 |
container_title | Journal of perinatology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Haidari, Eman S. Lee, Henry C. Illuzzi, Jessica L. Phibbs, Ciaran S. Lin, Haiqun Xu, Xiao |
description | Objective
To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation.
Study design
2010–2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35–42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weight were used. Hospital variation in NICU admission rates was assessed by coefficient of variation. Patient/hospital characteristics associated with NICU admissions were identified by multivariable regression.
Results
Among 276,489 newborns, 6.3% were admitted to NICU with 34.5% of them having mild diagnoses. There was high interhospital variation in overall risk-adjusted rate of NICU admission (coefficient of variation = 26.2) and NICU admission rates for mild diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 46.4–74.0), but lower variation for moderate/severe diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 8.8–14.1). Births at hospitals with more NICU beds had a higher likelihood of NICU admission.
Conclusion
Interhospital variation in NICU admissions is mostly driven by admissions for mild diagnoses, suggesting potential overuse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7427695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A655716326</galeid><sourcerecordid>A655716326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3b627484ee0c90ec111e2b997bc7ed92c64aee53a494d42e6141a8fe205e37893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQdR7Fr9Aj5IQJC-TM3_zLwIpVgrFHzR55DJ3JlNmU3WJLOw_fRm3Np2RSQPIbm_c8K9OVX1luBzglnzMXHCFK0xxTXGSon67lm1IlzJWgjOnlcrrDirG8blSfUqpVuMl6J6WZ0w2mDCBFlV_XVIW5fNhHYmOpNd8Mh5ZPqNS6kcEsoBeQjeLIzzGXxyO0DWRECzdzmhbo96Z0YfkksowQ6iy3tkfF-gDGOI-9fVi8FMCd7c76fVj6vP3y-v65tvX75eXtzUViiaa9ZJqnjDAbBtMVhCCNCubVVnFfQttZIbAMEMb3nPKUjCiWkGoFgAU03LTqtPB9_t3G2gt-BzNJPeRrcxca-Dcfq44t1aj2GnFadKtqIYnN0bxPBzhpR1GYOFaTJlBHPSlDOuhJBYFfT9X-htmKMv7RWqbTnGDaGP1Ggm0M4PobxrF1N9IYVQRDIqC3X-D6qsHjbOBg-DK_dHgg9PBGswU16nMM3L96VjkB5AG0NKEYaHYRCslxDpQ4h0CZH-HSJ9V0Tvno7xQfInNQVgByCVkh8hPvb-H9tf5urSlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499400812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Haidari, Eman S. ; Lee, Henry C. ; Illuzzi, Jessica L. ; Phibbs, Ciaran S. ; Lin, Haiqun ; Xu, Xiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Haidari, Eman S. ; Lee, Henry C. ; Illuzzi, Jessica L. ; Phibbs, Ciaran S. ; Lin, Haiqun ; Xu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation.
Study design
2010–2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35–42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weight were used. Hospital variation in NICU admission rates was assessed by coefficient of variation. Patient/hospital characteristics associated with NICU admissions were identified by multivariable regression.
Results
Among 276,489 newborns, 6.3% were admitted to NICU with 34.5% of them having mild diagnoses. There was high interhospital variation in overall risk-adjusted rate of NICU admission (coefficient of variation = 26.2) and NICU admission rates for mild diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 46.4–74.0), but lower variation for moderate/severe diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 8.8–14.1). Births at hospitals with more NICU beds had a higher likelihood of NICU admission.
Conclusion
Interhospital variation in NICU admissions is mostly driven by admissions for mild diagnoses, suggesting potential overuse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-8346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32801351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/700/1538 ; 692/700/1720 ; Admission and discharge ; Birth Weight ; Births ; Coefficient of variation ; Gestation ; Gestational Age ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neonatal care ; Neonatal intensive care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Pediatric research ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Statistics ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatology, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.468-477</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3b627484ee0c90ec111e2b997bc7ed92c64aee53a494d42e6141a8fe205e37893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3b627484ee0c90ec111e2b997bc7ed92c64aee53a494d42e6141a8fe205e37893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1905-8539 ; 0000-0001-8383-1720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haidari, Eman S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Henry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illuzzi, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phibbs, Ciaran S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Haiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category</title><title>Journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><description>Objective
To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation.
Study design
2010–2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35–42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weight were used. Hospital variation in NICU admission rates was assessed by coefficient of variation. Patient/hospital characteristics associated with NICU admissions were identified by multivariable regression.
Results
Among 276,489 newborns, 6.3% were admitted to NICU with 34.5% of them having mild diagnoses. There was high interhospital variation in overall risk-adjusted rate of NICU admission (coefficient of variation = 26.2) and NICU admission rates for mild diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 46.4–74.0), but lower variation for moderate/severe diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 8.8–14.1). Births at hospitals with more NICU beds had a higher likelihood of NICU admission.
Conclusion
Interhospital variation in NICU admissions is mostly driven by admissions for mild diagnoses, suggesting potential overuse.</description><subject>692/700/1538</subject><subject>692/700/1720</subject><subject>Admission and discharge</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonatal intensive care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0743-8346</issn><issn>1476-5543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl9rFDEUxQdR7Fr9Aj5IQJC-TM3_zLwIpVgrFHzR55DJ3JlNmU3WJLOw_fRm3Np2RSQPIbm_c8K9OVX1luBzglnzMXHCFK0xxTXGSon67lm1IlzJWgjOnlcrrDirG8blSfUqpVuMl6J6WZ0w2mDCBFlV_XVIW5fNhHYmOpNd8Mh5ZPqNS6kcEsoBeQjeLIzzGXxyO0DWRECzdzmhbo96Z0YfkksowQ6iy3tkfF-gDGOI-9fVi8FMCd7c76fVj6vP3y-v65tvX75eXtzUViiaa9ZJqnjDAbBtMVhCCNCubVVnFfQttZIbAMEMb3nPKUjCiWkGoFgAU03LTqtPB9_t3G2gt-BzNJPeRrcxca-Dcfq44t1aj2GnFadKtqIYnN0bxPBzhpR1GYOFaTJlBHPSlDOuhJBYFfT9X-htmKMv7RWqbTnGDaGP1Ggm0M4PobxrF1N9IYVQRDIqC3X-D6qsHjbOBg-DK_dHgg9PBGswU16nMM3L96VjkB5AG0NKEYaHYRCslxDpQ4h0CZH-HSJ9V0Tvno7xQfInNQVgByCVkh8hPvb-H9tf5urSlA</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Haidari, Eman S.</creator><creator>Lee, Henry C.</creator><creator>Illuzzi, Jessica L.</creator><creator>Phibbs, Ciaran S.</creator><creator>Lin, Haiqun</creator><creator>Xu, Xiao</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-8539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-1720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category</title><author>Haidari, Eman S. ; Lee, Henry C. ; Illuzzi, Jessica L. ; Phibbs, Ciaran S. ; Lin, Haiqun ; Xu, Xiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3b627484ee0c90ec111e2b997bc7ed92c64aee53a494d42e6141a8fe205e37893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>692/700/1538</topic><topic>692/700/1720</topic><topic>Admission and discharge</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonatal intensive care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haidari, Eman S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Henry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illuzzi, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phibbs, Ciaran S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Haiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haidari, Eman S.</au><au>Lee, Henry C.</au><au>Illuzzi, Jessica L.</au><au>Phibbs, Ciaran S.</au><au>Lin, Haiqun</au><au>Xu, Xiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle><stitle>J Perinatol</stitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>468</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>468-477</pages><issn>0743-8346</issn><eissn>1476-5543</eissn><abstract>Objective
To examine interhospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and reasons for the variation.
Study design
2010–2012 linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 35 hospitals in California on live births at 35–42 weeks gestation and ≥1500 g birth weight were used. Hospital variation in NICU admission rates was assessed by coefficient of variation. Patient/hospital characteristics associated with NICU admissions were identified by multivariable regression.
Results
Among 276,489 newborns, 6.3% were admitted to NICU with 34.5% of them having mild diagnoses. There was high interhospital variation in overall risk-adjusted rate of NICU admission (coefficient of variation = 26.2) and NICU admission rates for mild diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 46.4–74.0), but lower variation for moderate/severe diagnoses (coefficient of variation: 8.8–14.1). Births at hospitals with more NICU beds had a higher likelihood of NICU admission.
Conclusion
Interhospital variation in NICU admissions is mostly driven by admissions for mild diagnoses, suggesting potential overuse.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>32801351</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-8539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-1720</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0743-8346 |
ispartof | Journal of perinatology, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.468-477 |
issn | 0743-8346 1476-5543 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7427695 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | 692/700/1538 692/700/1720 Admission and discharge Birth Weight Births Coefficient of variation Gestation Gestational Age Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Infant, Newborn Intensive care Intensive care units Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Medical diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neonatal care Neonatal intensive care Neonates Newborn babies Pediatric research Pediatric Surgery Pediatrics Statistics Variation |
title | Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20variation%20in%20admissions%20to%20neonatal%20intensive%20care%20units%20by%20diagnosis%20severity%20and%20category&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Haidari,%20Eman%20S.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=468&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=468-477&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.eissn=1476-5543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41372-020-00775-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA655716326%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499400812&rft_id=info:pmid/32801351&rft_galeid=A655716326&rfr_iscdi=true |