The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a marker of nutrition and is associated with poor survival in various kinds of cancers. However, no reports have yet compared risk factors for colorectal cancer recurrence using a nutritional index. We assessed the predictive value of the CONUT sco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), p.13239, Article 13239
Hauptverfasser: Hayama, Tamuro, Ozawa, Tsuyoshi, Okada, Yuka, Tsukamoto, Mitsuo, Fukushima, Yoshihisa, Shimada, Ryu, Nozawa, Keijiro, Matsuda, Keiji, Fujii, Shoichi, Hashiguchi, Yojiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13239
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 10
creator Hayama, Tamuro
Ozawa, Tsuyoshi
Okada, Yuka
Tsukamoto, Mitsuo
Fukushima, Yoshihisa
Shimada, Ryu
Nozawa, Keijiro
Matsuda, Keiji
Fujii, Shoichi
Hashiguchi, Yojiro
description The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a marker of nutrition and is associated with poor survival in various kinds of cancers. However, no reports have yet compared risk factors for colorectal cancer recurrence using a nutritional index. We assessed the predictive value of the CONUT score compared with the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the medical records of 336 consecutive patients with stage I-I I I CRC who underwent curative resection at a single institution in 2012–2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The low CONUT score group exhibited higher RFS and longer OS compared to the high CONUT score group (82.2% vs. 63.3%, p  = 0.002 and 95.5% and 86.2%, p  = 0.005, respectively). The Akaike’s information criterion values of each index for RFS and OS were superior in CONUT score (723.71 and 315.46, respectively) compared to those of PNI (726.95 and 316.52) and mGPS (728.15 and 318.07, respectively). The CONUT score was found to be a good predictor of RFS and OS in patients with resectable CRC.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-020-70252-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7413386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430817711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-baa3137e12d4a49be7594f2d96171cc668c3e6a310363e6de932a1fc26444ae13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXbF2CBLLEpi1D_xU42SGjEn1S1i07Xlse5SV1l7GA7lXgTHpc7nVIKi3phWzrfPffap6reMPqBUdGeZcmarq0pp7WmvOE1f1EdciqbmgvOXz65H1QnOd9SXA3vJOteVweCayWVZofVr_UNkDlBSWDLFkIhqxhKitPkw0gulpJ88THYiVwVW5ZMTleXF9fr9yS7mID4TGwgPvQwA25YPqc4hpiLd2SwrsSEKplt8ShmsiCUxrjzTpDB7bzJgJCLE_q5go2cDQ7ScfVqsFOGk4fzqLr-8nm9-lafX379vvp0XrtG0lJvrBVMaGC8l1Z2G9BNJwfed4pp5pxSrROgkKFC4aWHTnDLBseVlNICE0fVx73vvGy20DscM9nJzMlvbfppovXmXyX4GzPGO6MlE6JVaHD6YJDijwVyMVufHUyTDRCXbLgUrGWibTWi7_5Db-OS8HPvKdoyrdluIr6nXIo5Jxgeh2HU7LI3--wNZm_uszcci94-fcZjyZ-kERB7IKMURkh_ez9j-xucmb1S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430817711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hayama, Tamuro ; Ozawa, Tsuyoshi ; Okada, Yuka ; Tsukamoto, Mitsuo ; Fukushima, Yoshihisa ; Shimada, Ryu ; Nozawa, Keijiro ; Matsuda, Keiji ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Hashiguchi, Yojiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayama, Tamuro ; Ozawa, Tsuyoshi ; Okada, Yuka ; Tsukamoto, Mitsuo ; Fukushima, Yoshihisa ; Shimada, Ryu ; Nozawa, Keijiro ; Matsuda, Keiji ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Hashiguchi, Yojiro</creatorcontrib><description>The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a marker of nutrition and is associated with poor survival in various kinds of cancers. However, no reports have yet compared risk factors for colorectal cancer recurrence using a nutritional index. We assessed the predictive value of the CONUT score compared with the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the medical records of 336 consecutive patients with stage I-I I I CRC who underwent curative resection at a single institution in 2012–2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The low CONUT score group exhibited higher RFS and longer OS compared to the high CONUT score group (82.2% vs. 63.3%, p  = 0.002 and 95.5% and 86.2%, p  = 0.005, respectively). The Akaike’s information criterion values of each index for RFS and OS were superior in CONUT score (723.71 and 315.46, respectively) compared to those of PNI (726.95 and 316.52) and mGPS (728.15 and 318.07, respectively). The CONUT score was found to be a good predictor of RFS and OS in patients with resectable CRC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70252-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32764671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/4028/546 ; 692/4028/67 ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical records ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Status ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), p.13239, Article 13239</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-baa3137e12d4a49be7594f2d96171cc668c3e6a310363e6de932a1fc26444ae13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-baa3137e12d4a49be7594f2d96171cc668c3e6a310363e6de932a1fc26444ae13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413386/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413386/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27911,27912,41107,42176,51563,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayama, Tamuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukamoto, Mitsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozawa, Keijiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashiguchi, Yojiro</creatorcontrib><title>The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a marker of nutrition and is associated with poor survival in various kinds of cancers. However, no reports have yet compared risk factors for colorectal cancer recurrence using a nutritional index. We assessed the predictive value of the CONUT score compared with the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the medical records of 336 consecutive patients with stage I-I I I CRC who underwent curative resection at a single institution in 2012–2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The low CONUT score group exhibited higher RFS and longer OS compared to the high CONUT score group (82.2% vs. 63.3%, p  = 0.002 and 95.5% and 86.2%, p  = 0.005, respectively). The Akaike’s information criterion values of each index for RFS and OS were superior in CONUT score (723.71 and 315.46, respectively) compared to those of PNI (726.95 and 316.52) and mGPS (728.15 and 318.07, respectively). The CONUT score was found to be a good predictor of RFS and OS in patients with resectable CRC.</description><subject>692/4028/546</subject><subject>692/4028/67</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXbF2CBLLEpi1D_xU42SGjEn1S1i07Xlse5SV1l7GA7lXgTHpc7nVIKi3phWzrfPffap6reMPqBUdGeZcmarq0pp7WmvOE1f1EdciqbmgvOXz65H1QnOd9SXA3vJOteVweCayWVZofVr_UNkDlBSWDLFkIhqxhKitPkw0gulpJ88THYiVwVW5ZMTleXF9fr9yS7mID4TGwgPvQwA25YPqc4hpiLd2SwrsSEKplt8ShmsiCUxrjzTpDB7bzJgJCLE_q5go2cDQ7ScfVqsFOGk4fzqLr-8nm9-lafX379vvp0XrtG0lJvrBVMaGC8l1Z2G9BNJwfed4pp5pxSrROgkKFC4aWHTnDLBseVlNICE0fVx73vvGy20DscM9nJzMlvbfppovXmXyX4GzPGO6MlE6JVaHD6YJDijwVyMVufHUyTDRCXbLgUrGWibTWi7_5Db-OS8HPvKdoyrdluIr6nXIo5Jxgeh2HU7LI3--wNZm_uszcci94-fcZjyZ-kERB7IKMURkh_ez9j-xucmb1S</recordid><startdate>20200806</startdate><enddate>20200806</enddate><creator>Hayama, Tamuro</creator><creator>Ozawa, Tsuyoshi</creator><creator>Okada, Yuka</creator><creator>Tsukamoto, Mitsuo</creator><creator>Fukushima, Yoshihisa</creator><creator>Shimada, Ryu</creator><creator>Nozawa, Keijiro</creator><creator>Matsuda, Keiji</creator><creator>Fujii, Shoichi</creator><creator>Hashiguchi, Yojiro</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200806</creationdate><title>The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer</title><author>Hayama, Tamuro ; Ozawa, Tsuyoshi ; Okada, Yuka ; Tsukamoto, Mitsuo ; Fukushima, Yoshihisa ; Shimada, Ryu ; Nozawa, Keijiro ; Matsuda, Keiji ; Fujii, Shoichi ; Hashiguchi, Yojiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-baa3137e12d4a49be7594f2d96171cc668c3e6a310363e6de932a1fc26444ae13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>692/4028/546</topic><topic>692/4028/67</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayama, Tamuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Yuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsukamoto, Mitsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukushima, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Ryu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozawa, Keijiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashiguchi, Yojiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayama, Tamuro</au><au>Ozawa, Tsuyoshi</au><au>Okada, Yuka</au><au>Tsukamoto, Mitsuo</au><au>Fukushima, Yoshihisa</au><au>Shimada, Ryu</au><au>Nozawa, Keijiro</au><au>Matsuda, Keiji</au><au>Fujii, Shoichi</au><au>Hashiguchi, Yojiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-08-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13239</spage><pages>13239-</pages><artnum>13239</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a marker of nutrition and is associated with poor survival in various kinds of cancers. However, no reports have yet compared risk factors for colorectal cancer recurrence using a nutritional index. We assessed the predictive value of the CONUT score compared with the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the medical records of 336 consecutive patients with stage I-I I I CRC who underwent curative resection at a single institution in 2012–2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The low CONUT score group exhibited higher RFS and longer OS compared to the high CONUT score group (82.2% vs. 63.3%, p  = 0.002 and 95.5% and 86.2%, p  = 0.005, respectively). The Akaike’s information criterion values of each index for RFS and OS were superior in CONUT score (723.71 and 315.46, respectively) compared to those of PNI (726.95 and 316.52) and mGPS (728.15 and 318.07, respectively). The CONUT score was found to be a good predictor of RFS and OS in patients with resectable CRC.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32764671</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-70252-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), p.13239, Article 13239
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7413386
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 692/4028/546
692/4028/67
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Male
Medical prognosis
Medical records
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Neoplasm Staging
Nutrition Assessment
Nutritional Status
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk factors
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Survival
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title The pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A44%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20pretreatment%20Controlling%20Nutritional%20Status%20(CONUT)%20score%20is%20an%20independent%20prognostic%20factor%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20resection%20for%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Hayama,%20Tamuro&rft.date=2020-08-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13239&rft.pages=13239-&rft.artnum=13239&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-70252-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2430817711%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430817711&rft_id=info:pmid/32764671&rfr_iscdi=true