Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity

The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), Article 13137
Hauptverfasser: Soldati, Gaia, Cannelli, Valentina, Piersanti, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 10
creator Soldati, Gaia
Cannelli, Valentina
Piersanti, Antonio
description The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7403152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430244697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-e922e9e2da6e78e5cfe6b4913ee37841d7782d91c2b20ee190097aab2d98f0e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtOwzAQhi0EAlR6AVaWWAfssRPHGySEeElFbGDDxnKTSesqjYudInXHHbghJ8GlFY8N3oz1z8zn8fyEHHN2ypkoz6LkuS4zBiwrdAk8gx1yCEzmGQiA3V_3AzKMccbSyUFLrvfJgQCVC8XEIXm-953rfXDdhEbvWhps7TtaL7-UfooUGC8-3t5TULTCrg-2pXe9bVc04ssSuwqp62jrJtOe-iaJLs5d5frVEdlrbBtxuI0D8nR99Xh5m40ebu4uL0aZlZL3GWoA1Ai1LVCVmFcNFmOpuUAUqpS8VqqEWvMKxsAQuWZMK2vHSSsbhkwMyPmGu1iO51hvZzSL4OY2rIy3zvzNdG5qJv7VKMkEzyEBTraA4NOPYm9mfhm6NLMBKRhIWWiVqmBTVQUfY8Dm-wXOzNoSs7HEJEvMlyVmjRabprhYLxTDD_qfrk8ACI3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430244697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity</title><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Soldati, Gaia ; Cannelli, Valentina ; Piersanti, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Soldati, Gaia ; Cannelli, Valentina ; Piersanti, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32753703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/2151/209 ; 704/2151/2809 ; 704/2151/508 ; Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Earthquakes ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Radon ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Time series ; Variation</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), Article 13137</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-e922e9e2da6e78e5cfe6b4913ee37841d7782d91c2b20ee190097aab2d98f0e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-e922e9e2da6e78e5cfe6b4913ee37841d7782d91c2b20ee190097aab2d98f0e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403152/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403152/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soldati, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannelli, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piersanti, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools.</description><subject>704/2151/209</subject><subject>704/2151/2809</subject><subject>704/2151/508</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Radon</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtOwzAQhi0EAlR6AVaWWAfssRPHGySEeElFbGDDxnKTSesqjYudInXHHbghJ8GlFY8N3oz1z8zn8fyEHHN2ypkoz6LkuS4zBiwrdAk8gx1yCEzmGQiA3V_3AzKMccbSyUFLrvfJgQCVC8XEIXm-953rfXDdhEbvWhps7TtaL7-UfooUGC8-3t5TULTCrg-2pXe9bVc04ssSuwqp62jrJtOe-iaJLs5d5frVEdlrbBtxuI0D8nR99Xh5m40ebu4uL0aZlZL3GWoA1Ai1LVCVmFcNFmOpuUAUqpS8VqqEWvMKxsAQuWZMK2vHSSsbhkwMyPmGu1iO51hvZzSL4OY2rIy3zvzNdG5qJv7VKMkEzyEBTraA4NOPYm9mfhm6NLMBKRhIWWiVqmBTVQUfY8Dm-wXOzNoSs7HEJEvMlyVmjRabprhYLxTDD_qfrk8ACI3s</recordid><startdate>20200804</startdate><enddate>20200804</enddate><creator>Soldati, Gaia</creator><creator>Cannelli, Valentina</creator><creator>Piersanti, Antonio</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200804</creationdate><title>Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity</title><author>Soldati, Gaia ; Cannelli, Valentina ; Piersanti, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a441t-e922e9e2da6e78e5cfe6b4913ee37841d7782d91c2b20ee190097aab2d98f0e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>704/2151/209</topic><topic>704/2151/2809</topic><topic>704/2151/508</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Radon</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soldati, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannelli, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piersanti, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soldati, Gaia</au><au>Cannelli, Valentina</au><au>Piersanti, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><date>2020-08-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>13137</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>The radioactive nature of radon makes it a powerful tracer for fluid movements in the crust, and a potentially effective marker to study processes connected with earthquakes preparatory phase. To explore the feasibility of using soil radon variations as earthquakes precursor, we analyse the radon concentration data recorded by two stations located close to the epicentre of the strongest mainshock (Mw 6.5 on October 30, 2016) of the seismic sequence which affected central Italy from August 2016. The two stations CTTR and NRCA operate in the framework of the permanent Italian Radon monitoring Network and recorded almost continuously since 2012 and 2016, respectively, the latter being installed just after the first mainshock of the sequence (Mw 6.0 on August 24, 2016). An increase of radon emanation is clearly visible about 2 weeks before the Mw 6.5 event on both the time series, more pronounced on NRCA, nearer to the epicentre, suggesting the possibility of a direct association with the earthquake occurrence. An independently developed detection algorithm aimed at highlighting the connections between radon emission variations and major earthquakes occurrence succeeds in forecasting the Mw 6.5 mainshock on NRCA time series. The resulting time advance of the alarm is consistent with that obtained using a Bayesian approach to compute the a posteriori probability of multiple change points on the radon time series of NRCA. Moreover, it is in agreement with the delay time which maximizes the correlation between radon and seismic anomalies. Applying the detection algorithm to CTTR time series returns alarms for both the Mw 6.0 event, with epicentre closer to this station, and the stronger Mw 6.5 event, but with a higher number of false detections. Finally, we found that a preliminary correction of the bias introduced by variations of meteorological parameters does not affect our main finding of an increase in radon concentration before the major mainshocks. Our study confirms that, although much work is still needed, a monitoring approach based on a permanent dense network is crucial for making radon time series analysis an effective complement to traditional seismological tools.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32753703</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2020-08, Vol.10 (1), Article 13137
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7403152
source Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects 704/2151/209
704/2151/2809
704/2151/508
Algorithms
Bayesian analysis
Earthquakes
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Radon
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Time series
Variation
title Monitoring soil radon during the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence in light of seismicity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A30%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20soil%20radon%20during%20the%202016%E2%80%932017%20central%20Italy%20sequence%20in%20light%20of%20seismicity&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Soldati,%20Gaia&rft.date=2020-08-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=13137&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-69821-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2430244697%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430244697&rft_id=info:pmid/32753703&rfr_iscdi=true