Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine

Background: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2020-07, Vol.8 (7), p.2325967120933696-2325967120933696
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Weilong, Anastasio, Albert, Guisse, Ndeye F., Faraj, Razan, Fakunle, Omolola P., Easley, Kirk, Hammond, Kyle E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2325967120933696
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2325967120933696
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 8
creator Shi, Weilong
Anastasio, Albert
Guisse, Ndeye F.
Faraj, Razan
Fakunle, Omolola P.
Easley, Kirk
Hammond, Kyle E.
description Background: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. Hypothesis: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. Results: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P < .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2325967120933696
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7401157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967120933696</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2484695322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-5d5393ae08c3b25f91992c0a3a7d37b1474238bee530f0a28401cf14b1107cf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnROGZ078qQuHFTBW4pZWNijI9JfCXqmlBKx5oZqNCazL-XyYzPRDZwD989cHMQ2qfkmFIhThgwLgtBGZEAhSw20M5Sypba5o_zCO3F-ErSKjmVILbRCJgomSRkB91N5p02PfYNnrg4BO2MxdrV-CEkuU3F06Kz2Dt8ZoyNEfce34f-xXfa1q3Bj50PfcS3y6J1dhdtNXoW7d56H6Pny4un8-vs5v5qcn52k5m8YH3Gaw4StCWlgYrxRlIpmSEatKhBVDQXOYOyspYDaYhmZU6oaWheUUqEaUoYo9OVbzdUc1sb6_qgZ6oL7VyHhfK6Vb9vXPuipv5dieREuUgGR2uD4N8GG3s1b6Oxs5l21g9RsRyAgeSMJ_TwD_rqh-DSeIkq80JyYCxRZEWZ4GMMtvn6DCVqmZf6m1dqOfg5xFfDZzoJyFZA1FP7_eq_hh-ofZt3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484695322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shi, Weilong ; Anastasio, Albert ; Guisse, Ndeye F. ; Faraj, Razan ; Fakunle, Omolola P. ; Easley, Kirk ; Hammond, Kyle E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Weilong ; Anastasio, Albert ; Guisse, Ndeye F. ; Faraj, Razan ; Fakunle, Omolola P. ; Easley, Kirk ; Hammond, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. Hypothesis: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. Results: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P &lt; .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P &lt; .001). Conclusions: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967120933696</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32782900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Joint and ligament injuries ; Knee ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Orthopedics ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-07, Vol.8 (7), p.2325967120933696-2325967120933696</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-5d5393ae08c3b25f91992c0a3a7d37b1474238bee530f0a28401cf14b1107cf83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-5d5393ae08c3b25f91992c0a3a7d37b1474238bee530f0a28401cf14b1107cf83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401157/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7401157/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Weilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasio, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guisse, Ndeye F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraj, Razan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakunle, Omolola P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Kirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. Hypothesis: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. Results: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P &lt; .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P &lt; .001). Conclusions: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance.</description><subject>Joint and ligament injuries</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtPxCAUhYnROGZ078qQuHFTBW4pZWNijI9JfCXqmlBKx5oZqNCazL-XyYzPRDZwD989cHMQ2qfkmFIhThgwLgtBGZEAhSw20M5Sypba5o_zCO3F-ErSKjmVILbRCJgomSRkB91N5p02PfYNnrg4BO2MxdrV-CEkuU3F06Kz2Dt8ZoyNEfce34f-xXfa1q3Bj50PfcS3y6J1dhdtNXoW7d56H6Pny4un8-vs5v5qcn52k5m8YH3Gaw4StCWlgYrxRlIpmSEatKhBVDQXOYOyspYDaYhmZU6oaWheUUqEaUoYo9OVbzdUc1sb6_qgZ6oL7VyHhfK6Vb9vXPuipv5dieREuUgGR2uD4N8GG3s1b6Oxs5l21g9RsRyAgeSMJ_TwD_rqh-DSeIkq80JyYCxRZEWZ4GMMtvn6DCVqmZf6m1dqOfg5xFfDZzoJyFZA1FP7_eq_hh-ofZt3</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Shi, Weilong</creator><creator>Anastasio, Albert</creator><creator>Guisse, Ndeye F.</creator><creator>Faraj, Razan</creator><creator>Fakunle, Omolola P.</creator><creator>Easley, Kirk</creator><creator>Hammond, Kyle E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine</title><author>Shi, Weilong ; Anastasio, Albert ; Guisse, Ndeye F. ; Faraj, Razan ; Fakunle, Omolola P. ; Easley, Kirk ; Hammond, Kyle E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-5d5393ae08c3b25f91992c0a3a7d37b1474238bee530f0a28401cf14b1107cf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Joint and ligament injuries</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Weilong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasio, Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guisse, Ndeye F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faraj, Razan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakunle, Omolola P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Kirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kyle E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Weilong</au><au>Anastasio, Albert</au><au>Guisse, Ndeye F.</au><au>Faraj, Razan</au><au>Fakunle, Omolola P.</au><au>Easley, Kirk</au><au>Hammond, Kyle E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2325967120933696</spage><epage>2325967120933696</epage><pages>2325967120933696-2325967120933696</pages><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract>Background: The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility in recent years. However, the provisions of the act have not translated to improved Medicaid payments for specialists such as orthopaedic surgeons. The number of health care practitioners who accept Medicaid is already decreasing, with low reimbursement rates being cited as the primary reason for the trend. Hypothesis: Private practice orthopaedic groups will see patients with Medicaid or Medicare at lower rates than academic orthopaedic practices, and business days until appointment availability will be higher for patients with Medicaid and Medicare than those with private insurance. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Researchers made calls to 2 regular-sized orthopaedic practices, 1 small orthopaedic practice, and 1 academic orthopaedic practice in each of the 50 states in the United States. Callers described a scenario of a recent injury resulting in a bucket-handle meniscal tear and an anterior cruciate ligament tear seen on magnetic resonance imaging at an outside emergency department. For a total of 194 practices, 3 separate telephone calls were made, each with a different insurance type. Data regarding insurance acceptance and business days until appointment were tabulated. Student t tests or analysis of variance for continuous data and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical data were utilized. Results: After completing 582 telephone calls, it was determined that 31.4% (n = 59) did not accept Medicaid, compared with 2.2% (n = 4) not accepting Medicare and 1% (n = 1) not accepting private insurance (P &lt; .001). There was no significant association between type of practice and Medicaid refusal (P = 0.12). Mean business days until appointment for Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance were 5.3, 4.1, and 2.9, respectively (P &lt; .001). Conclusions: Access to care remains a significant burden for the Medicaid population, given a rate of Medicaid refusal of 32.2% across regular-sized orthopaedic practices. If Medicaid is accepted, time until appointment was significantly longer when compared with private insurance.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32782900</pmid><doi>10.1177/2325967120933696</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-07, Vol.8 (7), p.2325967120933696-2325967120933696
issn 2325-9671
2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7401157
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Joint and ligament injuries
Knee
Medicaid
Medicare
Orthopedics
Sports medicine
title Impact of Insurance and Practice Type on Access to Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Insurance%20and%20Practice%20Type%20on%20Access%20to%20Orthopaedic%20Sports%20Medicine&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Shi,%20Weilong&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2325967120933696&rft.epage=2325967120933696&rft.pages=2325967120933696-2325967120933696&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967120933696&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2484695322%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484695322&rft_id=info:pmid/32782900&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967120933696&rfr_iscdi=true