Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017

Background: Botulinum toxin has been effectively used cosmetically and therapeutically for the last decades in a wide range of medical conditions. Although bibliometrics has been a popular and growing study area in recent years, medical literature lacks studies evaluating published botulinum toxin l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery 2020-04, Vol.13 (2), p.95-102
Hauptverfasser: Senel, Engin, Muslu, Ümran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
container_volume 13
creator Senel, Engin
Muslu, Ümran
description Background: Botulinum toxin has been effectively used cosmetically and therapeutically for the last decades in a wide range of medical conditions. Although bibliometrics has been a popular and growing study area in recent years, medical literature lacks studies evaluating published botulinum toxin literature. Objective: The goal of our study was to evaluate bibliometric features and to perform a detailed trend analysis in the medical literature related to botulinum toxin. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all the published documents including the keywords "botulinum toxin" and "botulinum neurotoxin" and commercial brand names of botulinum toxin products between 1975 and 2017. We performed a detailed bibliometric and scientometric assessment in this field. Results: A total of 24,948 articles were retrieved from four databases provided by Web of Science, and most of which were original articles (76.19%). The United States ranked first and dominated literature with 8,729 documents (34.29%) followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy (14.61%, 11.18%, and 5.5%, respectively). The United Kingdom was detected to be the most productive country with the highest productivity (55.09) followed Switzerland, Denmark, and Germany (47.7, 34.01, and 33.98, respectively). The most studied area was neurology (56.1%) and University of California System was the most productive institution. We noted no correlation between publication number and citations by year. Conclusion: We found that all top 10 authors and institutions were from developed countries. Physician from developing and the least-developed countries should be supported to carry out novel studies on botulinum toxin.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_111_19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7394113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A627759773</galeid><sourcerecordid>A627759773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470u-97c531326722c090b94669b044644ed01ec4bd9f86ccf5b5091ccd1e49060a1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1vFCEUhidGY5vae68MiYl3uwIDQ_HCZLPRqmli4sc1YZgzXVoGKjBd66-X7Ww3u0kVEiDwvOfA4a2qlwTPGcH12y_Lxff5ZlCEEEXkk-oYS8FmnHDxdLumWIij6jSlK1xaTc-YZM-ro5oKSYXAx9Wfcxda7VCO4LuEQo_akEdn_TigHH5bj5zNEHUeI7xDC9Ta1tkwQI7WIO21u0v2UdnNWECjsw0-oRbyGsAjIgUvqg5RTMSL6lmvXYLT7XxS_fz44cfy0-zi6_nn5eJiZpjA40wKw2tS00ZQarDErWRNI1vMWMMYdJiAYW0n-7PGmJ63HEtiTEeASdxgTfr6pHo_xS1XGqAz4HPUTt1EO-h4p4K26vDE25W6DLdK1JIRUpcAr7cBYvg1QsrqKoyxvD0pysvFGso4_S_FiJANkeXXdtSldqCs70NJaQabjFo05Uu4FGKTcf4IVXoHgzXBQ2_L_oHgzZ5gBdrlVQpuvC__IYgn0MSQUoR-VweC1cZW6t5Re7Yqklf79dsJHkxUgG8TsA6ueCVdu3ENURX22of1PwMrydXkPjW5T4VePdio_gtsEeQj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417961910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Senel, Engin ; Muslu, Ümran</creator><creatorcontrib>Senel, Engin ; Muslu, Ümran</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Botulinum toxin has been effectively used cosmetically and therapeutically for the last decades in a wide range of medical conditions. Although bibliometrics has been a popular and growing study area in recent years, medical literature lacks studies evaluating published botulinum toxin literature. Objective: The goal of our study was to evaluate bibliometric features and to perform a detailed trend analysis in the medical literature related to botulinum toxin. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all the published documents including the keywords "botulinum toxin" and "botulinum neurotoxin" and commercial brand names of botulinum toxin products between 1975 and 2017. We performed a detailed bibliometric and scientometric assessment in this field. Results: A total of 24,948 articles were retrieved from four databases provided by Web of Science, and most of which were original articles (76.19%). The United States ranked first and dominated literature with 8,729 documents (34.29%) followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy (14.61%, 11.18%, and 5.5%, respectively). The United Kingdom was detected to be the most productive country with the highest productivity (55.09) followed Switzerland, Denmark, and Germany (47.7, 34.01, and 33.98, respectively). The most studied area was neurology (56.1%) and University of California System was the most productive institution. We noted no correlation between publication number and citations by year. Conclusion: We found that all top 10 authors and institutions were from developed countries. Physician from developing and the least-developed countries should be supported to carry out novel studies on botulinum toxin.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-2077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_111_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32792770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Botulinum toxin ; Botulinum toxins ; Citation indexes ; Cosmetics ; Defense research ; Hirsch index ; Indian literature ; Industrialized nations ; Keywords ; Neurology ; Original ; Productivity ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Scientometrics ; Self citation ; Site planning ; Studies ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, 2020-04, Vol.13 (2), p.95-102</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470u-97c531326722c090b94669b044644ed01ec4bd9f86ccf5b5091ccd1e49060a1f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394113/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394113/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27441,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senel, Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muslu, Ümran</creatorcontrib><title>Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017</title><title>Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Cutan Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Botulinum toxin has been effectively used cosmetically and therapeutically for the last decades in a wide range of medical conditions. Although bibliometrics has been a popular and growing study area in recent years, medical literature lacks studies evaluating published botulinum toxin literature. Objective: The goal of our study was to evaluate bibliometric features and to perform a detailed trend analysis in the medical literature related to botulinum toxin. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all the published documents including the keywords "botulinum toxin" and "botulinum neurotoxin" and commercial brand names of botulinum toxin products between 1975 and 2017. We performed a detailed bibliometric and scientometric assessment in this field. Results: A total of 24,948 articles were retrieved from four databases provided by Web of Science, and most of which were original articles (76.19%). The United States ranked first and dominated literature with 8,729 documents (34.29%) followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy (14.61%, 11.18%, and 5.5%, respectively). The United Kingdom was detected to be the most productive country with the highest productivity (55.09) followed Switzerland, Denmark, and Germany (47.7, 34.01, and 33.98, respectively). The most studied area was neurology (56.1%) and University of California System was the most productive institution. We noted no correlation between publication number and citations by year. Conclusion: We found that all top 10 authors and institutions were from developed countries. Physician from developing and the least-developed countries should be supported to carry out novel studies on botulinum toxin.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Botulinum toxin</subject><subject>Botulinum toxins</subject><subject>Citation indexes</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Defense research</subject><subject>Hirsch index</subject><subject>Indian literature</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Scientometrics</subject><subject>Self citation</subject><subject>Site planning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0974-2077</issn><issn>0974-5157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1vFCEUhidGY5vae68MiYl3uwIDQ_HCZLPRqmli4sc1YZgzXVoGKjBd66-X7Ww3u0kVEiDwvOfA4a2qlwTPGcH12y_Lxff5ZlCEEEXkk-oYS8FmnHDxdLumWIij6jSlK1xaTc-YZM-ro5oKSYXAx9Wfcxda7VCO4LuEQo_akEdn_TigHH5bj5zNEHUeI7xDC9Ta1tkwQI7WIO21u0v2UdnNWECjsw0-oRbyGsAjIgUvqg5RTMSL6lmvXYLT7XxS_fz44cfy0-zi6_nn5eJiZpjA40wKw2tS00ZQarDErWRNI1vMWMMYdJiAYW0n-7PGmJ63HEtiTEeASdxgTfr6pHo_xS1XGqAz4HPUTt1EO-h4p4K26vDE25W6DLdK1JIRUpcAr7cBYvg1QsrqKoyxvD0pysvFGso4_S_FiJANkeXXdtSldqCs70NJaQabjFo05Uu4FGKTcf4IVXoHgzXBQ2_L_oHgzZ5gBdrlVQpuvC__IYgn0MSQUoR-VweC1cZW6t5Re7Yqklf79dsJHkxUgG8TsA6ueCVdu3ENURX22of1PwMrydXkPjW5T4VePdio_gtsEeQj</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Senel, Engin</creator><creator>Muslu, Ümran</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017</title><author>Senel, Engin ; Muslu, Ümran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470u-97c531326722c090b94669b044644ed01ec4bd9f86ccf5b5091ccd1e49060a1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Botulinum toxin</topic><topic>Botulinum toxins</topic><topic>Citation indexes</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Defense research</topic><topic>Hirsch index</topic><topic>Indian literature</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Scientometrics</topic><topic>Self citation</topic><topic>Site planning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senel, Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muslu, Ümran</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senel, Engin</au><au>Muslu, Ümran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cutan Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>95-102</pages><issn>0974-2077</issn><eissn>0974-5157</eissn><abstract>Background: Botulinum toxin has been effectively used cosmetically and therapeutically for the last decades in a wide range of medical conditions. Although bibliometrics has been a popular and growing study area in recent years, medical literature lacks studies evaluating published botulinum toxin literature. Objective: The goal of our study was to evaluate bibliometric features and to perform a detailed trend analysis in the medical literature related to botulinum toxin. Materials and Methods: We analyzed all the published documents including the keywords "botulinum toxin" and "botulinum neurotoxin" and commercial brand names of botulinum toxin products between 1975 and 2017. We performed a detailed bibliometric and scientometric assessment in this field. Results: A total of 24,948 articles were retrieved from four databases provided by Web of Science, and most of which were original articles (76.19%). The United States ranked first and dominated literature with 8,729 documents (34.29%) followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy (14.61%, 11.18%, and 5.5%, respectively). The United Kingdom was detected to be the most productive country with the highest productivity (55.09) followed Switzerland, Denmark, and Germany (47.7, 34.01, and 33.98, respectively). The most studied area was neurology (56.1%) and University of California System was the most productive institution. We noted no correlation between publication number and citations by year. Conclusion: We found that all top 10 authors and institutions were from developed countries. Physician from developing and the least-developed countries should be supported to carry out novel studies on botulinum toxin.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>32792770</pmid><doi>10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_111_19</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-2077
ispartof Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, 2020-04, Vol.13 (2), p.95-102
issn 0974-2077
0974-5157
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7394113
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Bibliometrics
Botulinum toxin
Botulinum toxins
Citation indexes
Cosmetics
Defense research
Hirsch index
Indian literature
Industrialized nations
Keywords
Neurology
Original
Productivity
R&D
Research & development
Scientometrics
Self citation
Site planning
Studies
Trends
title Global trends of botulinum toxin literature: A bibliometric analysis of botulinum toxin publications between 1975 and 2017
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20trends%20of%20botulinum%20toxin%20literature:%20A%20bibliometric%20analysis%20of%20botulinum%20toxin%20publications%20between%201975%20and%202017&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cutaneous%20and%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Senel,%20Engin&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=95-102&rft.issn=0974-2077&rft.eissn=0974-5157&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_111_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA627759773%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417961910&rft_id=info:pmid/32792770&rft_galeid=A627759773&rfr_iscdi=true