Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19
Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19–associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1384-1386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1384 |
container_title | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Veronese, Nicola Sbrogiò, Luca Gino Valle, Roberto Marin, Laura Boscolo Fiore, Elena Tiozzo, Andrea |
description | Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19–associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID-19, are not still available.
Retrospective.
Nursing home residents affected by COVID-19 were followed up with an LUS from April 8 to May 14, 2020, in Chioggia, Venice.
COVID-19 was diagnosed through a nasopharyngeal swab. LUS results were scored using a 12-zone method. For each of the 12 zones (2 posterior, 2 anterior, 2 lateral, for both left and right lungs), the possible score ranged from 0 to 3 (1 = presence of B lines, separated, with 50% of space from the pleural line; 3 = lung thickening with tissuelike aspect). The total score ranged from 0 to 36. Mortality was assessed using administrative data. Data regarding accuracy (and related parameters) were reported.
Among 175 nursing home residents, 48 (mean age: 84.1 years; mainly female) were affected by COVID-19. Twelve died during the follow-up period. The mean LUS score was 3. The area under the curve of LUS in predicting mortality was 0.603 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.419-0.787], and it increased to 0.725 (95% CI: 0.41-0.99) after including follow-up LUS controls. Taking an LUS score ≥4 as exposure variable and mortality as outcome, the sensitivity was 58.33% and specificity 63.89%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative of 0.65.
LUS is able to significantly predict mortality in nursing home residents affected by COVID-19, suggesting that this simple tool can be routinely used in this setting instead of more invasive techniques available only in hospital. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7388855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525861020306599</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440467298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dab616b243f876a4a1e8d76dd92aa752b836b85f52bd6374f5d5d2dd4f5299dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQhUVpaC7tLygUPfbFri7W7aGFsG2TwNItpclbEbIkb7TY1kayA_vvq-0mIX3J0xyYb84McwB4j1GNEeafNvXGDM7UBBFUI1Ej2rwCJ5hRWSkq2Ou9JqySHKNjcJrzBhUQK_4GHFMiJWWKn4A_P1NcjzFPwcIb088exg4u53ENr_spmRzHuE5me7uDYYSr3vkEf8wphwJcxsHDXz4H58cpw_Ou83byDrY7uFjdXH2tsHoLjjrTZ__uoZ6B6-_ffi8uq-Xq4mpxvqxsw9RUOdNyzFvS0E4KbhqDvXSCO6eIMYKRVlLeStYV5TgVTcccc8S5IohSztIz8OXgu53bwTtbDkqm19sUBpN2Opqg_--M4Vav470WVErJWDH4-GCQ4t3s86SHkK3vezP6OGdNmgY1XBAlC0oPqE0x5-S7pzUY6X0weqP_BaP3wWgkdAmmTH14fuHTzGMSBfh8AHz5033wSWcb_Gi9C6n8VbsYXlzwFx1yoPI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440467298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Veronese, Nicola ; Sbrogiò, Luca Gino ; Valle, Roberto ; Marin, Laura ; Boscolo Fiore, Elena ; Tiozzo, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Nicola ; Sbrogiò, Luca Gino ; Valle, Roberto ; Marin, Laura ; Boscolo Fiore, Elena ; Tiozzo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19–associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID-19, are not still available.
Retrospective.
Nursing home residents affected by COVID-19 were followed up with an LUS from April 8 to May 14, 2020, in Chioggia, Venice.
COVID-19 was diagnosed through a nasopharyngeal swab. LUS results were scored using a 12-zone method. For each of the 12 zones (2 posterior, 2 anterior, 2 lateral, for both left and right lungs), the possible score ranged from 0 to 3 (1 = presence of B lines, separated, with <50% of space from the pleural line; 2 = presence of B lines, separated, with >50% of space from the pleural line; 3 = lung thickening with tissuelike aspect). The total score ranged from 0 to 36. Mortality was assessed using administrative data. Data regarding accuracy (and related parameters) were reported.
Among 175 nursing home residents, 48 (mean age: 84.1 years; mainly female) were affected by COVID-19. Twelve died during the follow-up period. The mean LUS score was 3. The area under the curve of LUS in predicting mortality was 0.603 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.419-0.787], and it increased to 0.725 (95% CI: 0.41-0.99) after including follow-up LUS controls. Taking an LUS score ≥4 as exposure variable and mortality as outcome, the sensitivity was 58.33% and specificity 63.89%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative of 0.65.
LUS is able to significantly predict mortality in nursing home residents affected by COVID-19, suggesting that this simple tool can be routinely used in this setting instead of more invasive techniques available only in hospital.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32883596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Betacoronavirus ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Female ; Humans ; lung ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; nursing home ; Nursing Homes - organization & administration ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1384-1386</ispartof><rights>2020 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. 2020 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dab616b243f876a4a1e8d76dd92aa752b836b85f52bd6374f5d5d2dd4f5299dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dab616b243f876a4a1e8d76dd92aa752b836b85f52bd6374f5d5d2dd4f5299dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9328-289X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32883596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbrogiò, Luca Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscolo Fiore, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiozzo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description>Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19–associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID-19, are not still available.
Retrospective.
Nursing home residents affected by COVID-19 were followed up with an LUS from April 8 to May 14, 2020, in Chioggia, Venice.
COVID-19 was diagnosed through a nasopharyngeal swab. LUS results were scored using a 12-zone method. For each of the 12 zones (2 posterior, 2 anterior, 2 lateral, for both left and right lungs), the possible score ranged from 0 to 3 (1 = presence of B lines, separated, with <50% of space from the pleural line; 2 = presence of B lines, separated, with >50% of space from the pleural line; 3 = lung thickening with tissuelike aspect). The total score ranged from 0 to 36. Mortality was assessed using administrative data. Data regarding accuracy (and related parameters) were reported.
Among 175 nursing home residents, 48 (mean age: 84.1 years; mainly female) were affected by COVID-19. Twelve died during the follow-up period. The mean LUS score was 3. The area under the curve of LUS in predicting mortality was 0.603 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.419-0.787], and it increased to 0.725 (95% CI: 0.41-0.99) after including follow-up LUS controls. Taking an LUS score ≥4 as exposure variable and mortality as outcome, the sensitivity was 58.33% and specificity 63.89%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative of 0.65.
LUS is able to significantly predict mortality in nursing home residents affected by COVID-19, suggesting that this simple tool can be routinely used in this setting instead of more invasive techniques available only in hospital.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nursing home</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - organization & administration</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtr3DAQhUVpaC7tLygUPfbFri7W7aGFsG2TwNItpclbEbIkb7TY1kayA_vvq-0mIX3J0xyYb84McwB4j1GNEeafNvXGDM7UBBFUI1Ej2rwCJ5hRWSkq2Ou9JqySHKNjcJrzBhUQK_4GHFMiJWWKn4A_P1NcjzFPwcIb088exg4u53ENr_spmRzHuE5me7uDYYSr3vkEf8wphwJcxsHDXz4H58cpw_Ou83byDrY7uFjdXH2tsHoLjjrTZ__uoZ6B6-_ffi8uq-Xq4mpxvqxsw9RUOdNyzFvS0E4KbhqDvXSCO6eIMYKRVlLeStYV5TgVTcccc8S5IohSztIz8OXgu53bwTtbDkqm19sUBpN2Opqg_--M4Vav470WVErJWDH4-GCQ4t3s86SHkK3vezP6OGdNmgY1XBAlC0oPqE0x5-S7pzUY6X0weqP_BaP3wWgkdAmmTH14fuHTzGMSBfh8AHz5033wSWcb_Gi9C6n8VbsYXlzwFx1yoPI</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Veronese, Nicola</creator><creator>Sbrogiò, Luca Gino</creator><creator>Valle, Roberto</creator><creator>Marin, Laura</creator><creator>Boscolo Fiore, Elena</creator><creator>Tiozzo, Andrea</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-289X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19</title><author>Veronese, Nicola ; Sbrogiò, Luca Gino ; Valle, Roberto ; Marin, Laura ; Boscolo Fiore, Elena ; Tiozzo, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dab616b243f876a4a1e8d76dd92aa752b836b85f52bd6374f5d5d2dd4f5299dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nursing home</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - organization & administration</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbrogiò, Luca Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscolo Fiore, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiozzo, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veronese, Nicola</au><au>Sbrogiò, Luca Gino</au><au>Valle, Roberto</au><au>Marin, Laura</au><au>Boscolo Fiore, Elena</au><au>Tiozzo, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1384</spage><epage>1386</epage><pages>1384-1386</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract>Lung ultrasonographic (LUS) imaging may play an important role in the management of patients with COVID-19–associated lung injury, particularly in some special populations. However, data regarding the prognostic role of the LUS in nursing home residents, one of the populations most affected by COVID-19, are not still available.
Retrospective.
Nursing home residents affected by COVID-19 were followed up with an LUS from April 8 to May 14, 2020, in Chioggia, Venice.
COVID-19 was diagnosed through a nasopharyngeal swab. LUS results were scored using a 12-zone method. For each of the 12 zones (2 posterior, 2 anterior, 2 lateral, for both left and right lungs), the possible score ranged from 0 to 3 (1 = presence of B lines, separated, with <50% of space from the pleural line; 2 = presence of B lines, separated, with >50% of space from the pleural line; 3 = lung thickening with tissuelike aspect). The total score ranged from 0 to 36. Mortality was assessed using administrative data. Data regarding accuracy (and related parameters) were reported.
Among 175 nursing home residents, 48 (mean age: 84.1 years; mainly female) were affected by COVID-19. Twelve died during the follow-up period. The mean LUS score was 3. The area under the curve of LUS in predicting mortality was 0.603 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.419-0.787], and it increased to 0.725 (95% CI: 0.41-0.99) after including follow-up LUS controls. Taking an LUS score ≥4 as exposure variable and mortality as outcome, the sensitivity was 58.33% and specificity 63.89%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.62 and a negative of 0.65.
LUS is able to significantly predict mortality in nursing home residents affected by COVID-19, suggesting that this simple tool can be routinely used in this setting instead of more invasive techniques available only in hospital.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32883596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.034</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-289X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-8610 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1384-1386 |
issn | 1525-8610 1538-9375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7388855 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Betacoronavirus Clinical Laboratory Techniques Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging COVID-19 COVID-19 Testing Female Humans lung Lung - diagnostic imaging Male nursing home Nursing Homes - organization & administration Pandemics Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging Retrospective Studies SARS-CoV-2 Ultrasonography |
title | Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasonography in Older Nursing Home Residents Affected by COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20Value%20of%20Lung%20Ultrasonography%20in%20Older%20Nursing%20Home%20Residents%20Affected%20by%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Veronese,%20Nicola&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1384&rft.epage=1386&rft.pages=1384-1386&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2440467298%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440467298&rft_id=info:pmid/32883596&rft_els_id=S1525861020306599&rfr_iscdi=true |